Skip to content

Early Speech With One-Way Speaking Valve in Tracheostomy Patients

Early Speech With One-Way Speaking Valve in Tracheostomy Patients - Pilot Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03008174
Enrollment
20
Registered
2017-01-02
Start date
2016-02-05
Completion date
2019-12-05
Last updated
2020-01-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aphonia, Respiratory Failure, Speech

Keywords

tracheostomy, quality of life, speaking valve, speech, mechanically ventilated patients

Brief summary

Patients with tracheostomy who are on and off of mechanical ventilation initially lose the ability to speak, and the use of one-way speaking valves (OWSV) is one method of restoring speech in these patients. Patients with tracheostomy who experience loss of speech report frustration and feelings of confinement from patients' communication impairment, therefore investigators would like to restore speech in these patients as soon as it is safe to do so. However, there is currently little known in the literature about the timing of the use of OWSV in patients with tracheostomy. Therefore, the investigators propose a pre-test post-test clinical trial pilot study to investigate the safety of early use of OWSV in patients undergoing a percutaneous tracheostomy. Study aims are to identify patients who would benefit from the early use of OWSV and to determine the effects of early use of OWSV on speech and clinical outcomes. To achieve these aims, patients who undergo percutaneous tracheostomy will be screened, and patients meeting screening criteria will be randomized into intervention and control groups. The intervention group will receive early speech-language pathology (SLP) evaluation and OWSV trial at 12-24 hours following tracheostomy procedure, and the control group will receive standard SLP evaluation and OWSV trial at 48-60 hours following tracheostomy procedure. Intervention and control groups will been compared on speech and clinical outcomes measures from pre-test at 12-24 hours following tracheostomy and post-test at 48-60 hours following tracheostomy and characteristics of patients who successfully tolerate early OWSV use will be identified.

Interventions

OTHEREarly one-way speaking valve (OWSV) assessment

The OWSV assessment by speech language pathologists will be completed at 12-24 hours following percutaneous tracheostomy procedure, which is earlier than the current standard of care of 48 hours or later.

Sponsors

Johns Hopkins University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient who received a percutaneous tracheostomy * Glasgow Coma Scale score ≥9 * Confusion Assessment Method -ICU (CAM-ICU): negative * Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS): -1 to +1 * Able to understand English

Exclusion criteria

* Open tracheostomy * Laryngectomy * Presently using OWSV or capped trach * Foam-filled cuffed tracheostomy tube * Presence of known severe airway obstruction * Presence of post-operative bleeding requiring transfusion or packing * Presence of air-leak around the cuff resulting in respiratory decompensation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Speech Intelligibility as Assessed by Speech Intelligibility Test ScoreUp to 24 hours after percutaneous tracheostomy procedure (assessed once within the period)Speech intelligibility test scores will be reported in percentages (Percentage of words that were intelligible).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of Life as Assessed by Quality of Life in Mechanically Ventilated Patients ScoresUp to 24 hours after percutaneous tracheostomy procedure (assessed once within the period)Quality of life as assessed by Quality of Life in Mechanically Ventilated Patients Scores. QOL scores will be reported on a scale of 0 - 100. The lower the score, the poorer the quality of life is, and the higher the score, the better the quality of life.
Number of Participants With BleedingAt the time of use of speaking valve up to 24hours after percutaneous tracheostomy procedureBleeding will be reported as present or absent.
Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Length of StayAt the time of discharge, up to 4 monthsICU length of stay will be reported in days.
Hospital Length of StayAt the time of discharge, up to 4 monthsHospital length of stay will be reported in days.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Intervention
1. Early one-way speaking valve (OWSV) assessment by speech language pathologist (SLP) following 12-24 hours after percutaneous tracheostomy procedure. 2. Second OWSV evaluation with SLP following 48-60 hours from initial percutaneous tracheostomy procedure. 3. Third OWSV evaluation with SLP following first tracheostomy tube change. Participants may receive additional SLP sessions between second and third sessions per standard of care. Early one-way speaking valve (OWSV) assessment: The OWSV assessment by speech language pathologists will be completed at 12-24 hours following percutaneous tracheostomy procedure, which is earlier than the current standard of care of 48 hours or later.
10
Control
1. Standard OWSV evaluation with SLP following 48-60 hours from initial percutaneous tracheostomy procedure. 2. Second OWSV evaluation with SLP following first tracheostomy tube change. Participants may receive additional SLP sessions between first and second sessions per standard of care.
10
Total20

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicControlTotalIntervention
Age, Continuous50.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.1
50.35 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.48
50.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.7
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African American
6 Participants9 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
3 Participants9 Participants6 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Middle Eastern
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score6.0 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.63
5.8 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.88
5.6 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.17
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants11 Participants6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants9 Participants4 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 100 / 10
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 100 / 10
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 100 / 10

Outcome results

Primary

Speech Intelligibility as Assessed by Speech Intelligibility Test Score

Speech intelligibility test scores will be reported in percentages (Percentage of words that were intelligible).

Time frame: Up to 24 hours after percutaneous tracheostomy procedure (assessed once within the period)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionSpeech Intelligibility as Assessed by Speech Intelligibility Test Score25.71 Percentage of intelligible wordsStandard Deviation 33.35
ControlSpeech Intelligibility as Assessed by Speech Intelligibility Test Score0 Percentage of intelligible wordsStandard Deviation 0
Primary

Speech Intelligibility as Assessed by Speech Intelligibility Test Score

Speech intelligibility test scores will be reported in percentages (Percentage of words that were intelligible).

Time frame: Between 25 and 60 hours after percutaneous tracheostomy procedure (assessed once within the period)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionSpeech Intelligibility as Assessed by Speech Intelligibility Test Score13 Percentage of intelligible wordsStandard Deviation 26.46
ControlSpeech Intelligibility as Assessed by Speech Intelligibility Test Score33.63 Percentage of intelligible wordsStandard Deviation 33.12
Primary

Speech Intelligibility as Assessed by Speech Intelligibility Test Score

Speech intelligibility test scores will be reported in percentages (Percentage of words that were intelligible).

Time frame: Between 61 hours and 21 days after percutaneous tracheostomy procedure (assessed once within the period)

Population: Data for this outcome measure was only obtained from participants that completed the study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionSpeech Intelligibility as Assessed by Speech Intelligibility Test Score74.54 Percentage of intelligible wordsStandard Deviation 21.03
ControlSpeech Intelligibility as Assessed by Speech Intelligibility Test Score35.97 Percentage of intelligible wordsStandard Deviation 39.5
Secondary

Hospital Length of Stay

Hospital length of stay will be reported in days.

Time frame: At the time of discharge, up to 4 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionHospital Length of Stay69.7 DaysStandard Deviation 33.86
ControlHospital Length of Stay75.6 DaysStandard Deviation 101.12
Secondary

Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Length of Stay

ICU length of stay will be reported in days.

Time frame: At the time of discharge, up to 4 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionIntensive Care Unit (ICU) Length of Stay51 DaysStandard Deviation 30.37
ControlIntensive Care Unit (ICU) Length of Stay53.9 DaysStandard Deviation 51.46
Secondary

Number of Participants With Bleeding

Bleeding will be reported as present or absent.

Time frame: At the time of use of speaking valve up to 24hours after percutaneous tracheostomy procedure

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
InterventionNumber of Participants With Bleeding0 Participants
ControlNumber of Participants With Bleeding0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Bleeding

Bleeding will be reported as present or absent.

Time frame: At the time of use of speaking valve between 25 and 60 hours after percutaneous tracheostomy procedure

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
InterventionNumber of Participants With Bleeding0 Participants
ControlNumber of Participants With Bleeding0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Bleeding

Bleeding will be reported as present or absent.

Time frame: At the time of use of speaking valve between 61 hours and 21 days after percutaneous tracheostomy procedure

Population: Data for this outcome measure was only obtained from participants that completed the study.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
InterventionNumber of Participants With Bleeding0 Participants
ControlNumber of Participants With Bleeding0 Participants
Secondary

Quality of Life as Assessed by Quality of Life in Mechanically Ventilated Patients Scores

Quality of life as assessed by Quality of Life in Mechanically Ventilated Patients Scores. QOL scores will be reported on a scale of 0 - 100. The lower the score, the poorer the quality of life is, and the higher the score, the better the quality of life.

Time frame: Up to 24 hours after percutaneous tracheostomy procedure (assessed once within the period)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionQuality of Life as Assessed by Quality of Life in Mechanically Ventilated Patients Scores42.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18
ControlQuality of Life as Assessed by Quality of Life in Mechanically Ventilated Patients Scores41.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.4
Secondary

Quality of Life as Assessed by Quality of Life in Mechanically Ventilated Patients Scores

Quality of life as assessed by Quality of Life in Mechanically Ventilated Patients Scores. QOL scores will be reported on a scale of 0 - 100. The lower the score, the poorer the quality of life is, and the higher the score, the better the quality of life.

Time frame: Between 61 hours and 21 days after percutaneous tracheostomy procedure (assessed once within the period)

Population: Data for this outcome measure was only obtained from participants that completed the study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionQuality of Life as Assessed by Quality of Life in Mechanically Ventilated Patients Scores55.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22
ControlQuality of Life as Assessed by Quality of Life in Mechanically Ventilated Patients Scores47.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.2
Secondary

Quality of Life as Assessed by Quality of Life in Mechanically Ventilated Patients Scores

Quality of life as assessed by Quality of Life in Mechanically Ventilated Patients Scores. QOL scores will be reported on a scale of 0 - 100. The lower the score, the poorer the quality of life is, and the higher the score, the better the quality of life.

Time frame: Between 25 and 60 hours after percutaneous tracheostomy procedure (assessed once within the period)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionQuality of Life as Assessed by Quality of Life in Mechanically Ventilated Patients Scores53.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.8
ControlQuality of Life as Assessed by Quality of Life in Mechanically Ventilated Patients Scores47.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.8

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 15, 2026