Skip to content

Open Versus Robotic Retromuscular Ventral Hernia Repair

Prospective Randomized Control Trial of Open Versus Robotic REtrOmuscular Ventral Hernia Repair (ORREO Trial)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03007758
Acronym
ORREO
Enrollment
101
Registered
2017-01-02
Start date
2016-12-31
Completion date
2024-11-26
Last updated
2025-08-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ventral Hernia

Keywords

Hernia repair, Robotic hernia repair, Open hernia repair, Incisional hernia

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine how the robotic retromuscular hernia repair compares to the open retromuscular hernia repair for large hernia defects in patients at higher risk of wound complications.

Detailed description

All patients presenting to the Greenville Health System Hernia Center who meet the inclusion criteria will be considered for enrollment. Patients who qualify and agree to participate will be randomized 1:1 to robotic retromuscular ventral hernia repair or open retromuscular ventral hernia repair. Data to be collected includes the following: demographic information, medical characteristics, medications, medical and surgical history, operative details, hospital stay data, and patient-reported outcomes via a quality of life questionnaire. Post-operative follow-up will occur at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years.

Interventions

An open retromuscular ventral hernia repair involves an incision through your abdominal wall, most often through a prior surgery scar. The contents of the hernia, which may include intestine or fatty tissue, are returned into the abdominal cavity. The posterior (inner-most) layer of the abdominal wall is separated from the muscle and closed, which closes the abdominal cavity. Mesh is then placed over that closed layer, which is outside of the abdominal cavity, but below the abdominal muscles. The anterior (outer-most) layer of the abdominal wall is then closed over the mesh, which closes the hernia.

A robotic retromuscular ventral hernia repair involves a similar separation of the layers of the abdominal wall, similar mesh placement, and similar closure of the hernia defect. The surgical robot is a tool that allows your surgeon to place long, narrow instruments through small incisions in order to perform surgery from the inside of your abdomen. Rather than one longer incision in the middle of your abdomen, four to six small incisions, about 1 inch, are made along the outer part of your abdomen between the rib cage and hip.

Sponsors

Prisma Health-Upstate
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Ventral or incisional hernia measuring ≥ 7 cm and ≤ 15 cm. * At least one of the following risk factors: Body Mass Index \> 30, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Diabetes Mellitus, current smoker (within 1 month)

Exclusion criteria

* Current abdominal wall infection * Presence of ileostomy, colostomy, or ileal conduit * Center for Disease Control wound class 3 or 4 * Hernia defect \< 7 cm or \>15 cm * Pregnant women

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Composite Outcome of Diagnosis of Surgical Site Occurrence or Infection, Hospital Readmission, or Hernia RecurrenceThrough study completion, an average of 2 yearsA composite outcome of events which are clinically significant including but not limited to seroma requiring procedural intervention, skin dehiscence, cellulitis, hematoma, skin necrosis, and surgical site infections which may require interventions such as wound care or antibiotic therapy.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Surgical Site Occurrences Requiring Procedural InterventionPost-operatively: 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 yearsSurgical site occurrence (SSO) is defined as all wound complications that occur after a surgical procedure but are not surgical site infections
All Surgical Site InfectionsPost-operatively: 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 yearsSurgical site occurrence is defined as all wound complications that occur after a surgical procedure but are not surgical site infections.
Surgical Site Infections Requiring Procedural InterventionPost-operatively: 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years
Length of Stay at Hospital Measured in DaysTime from procedure until discharge, an expected range of 2 to10 days
Operative Time (Procedure Start to Procedure Finish Measured in Minutes)Day of surgery
Cost for Hospital Charges From Billing OfficeThrough study completion, an average of 2 years
BMIMeasured at study enrollmentBody Mass Index
Hernia Widthmeasured at surgeryWidth of Hernia
Hernia Lengthmeasured at surgeryLength of Hernia
All Surgical Site OccurrencesPost-operatively: 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 yearsSurgical site occurrence (SSO) is defined as all wound complications that occur after a surgical procedure but are not surgical site infections.
Quality of Life Via Questionnaire - 6 Through 12 Monthsassessed at Baseline and Post-operatively at 6 through 12 months. Data for the 6 and 12-month patient reported outcomes were combined for analysis.Patient reported outcomes via the Hernia related quality of life score. The survey contains 12 statements about the patients abdominal wall and asks the patient to rate how strongly the disagree (1) or agree (6) with the statements on a scale 1-6.The score is calculated with the following formula: (120-\[(20/12)\*(sum of response on all 12 questions)\]).The highest possible number, meaning the abdominal wall does not affect the patient, is 100, and the lowest, meaning the abdominal wall greatly affects the patient's quality of life, is a 0.
Quality of Life Via Questionnaire - 24 Monthsassessed at Baseline and Post-operatively at 24 monthsPatient reported outcomes via the Hernia related quality of life score. The survey contains 12 statements about the patients abdominal wall and asks the patient to rate how strongly the disagree (1) or agree (6) with the statements on a scale 1-6. The score is calculated with the following formula: (120-\[(20/12)\*(sum of responses on all 12 questions)\]).The highest possible number, meaning the abdominal wall does not affect the patient, is 100, and the lowest, meaning the abdominal wall greatly affects the patient's quality of life, is a 0.
Pain Score - 30 Day Patient Reported Outcomesassessed at Baseline and Post-operatively at 30 days.Patient is asked 3 different questions all in relation to their pain in the past 7 days: how intense was it as its worst, on average, and right now. They then rank their pain for each question on a scale of 1 - 5. 1 meaning no pain and 5 very severe pain. The pain scores were then averaged and used for this analysis.
Pain Score - 6 or 12 Month Patient Reported Outcomesassessed at Baseline and Post-operatively at 6-12 months; data for 6 and 12-month pain scores were combined for analysis.Patient is asked 3 different questions all in relation to their pain in the past 7 days: how intense was it as its worst, on average, and right now. They then rank their pain for each question on a scale of 1 - 5. 1 meaning no pain and 5 very severe pain. The pain scores were then averaged and used for this analysis.
Pain Score - 24 Month Patient Reported Outcomesassessed at Baseline and Post-operatively at 24 monthsPatient is asked 3 different questions all in relation to their pain in the past 7 days: how intense was it as its worst, on average, and right now. They then rank their pain for each question on a scale of 1 - 5. 1 meaning no pain and 5 very severe pain. The pain scores were then averaged and used for this analysis.
Ventral Hernia Recurrence Inventory 1 Yearassessed at Baseline and Post-operatively at 12 months.Patients are asked 3 yes or no questions about their hernia operation: do you feel your hernia has come back, do you feel or see a bulge, and do you have physical pain or symptoms at the site.
Ventral Hernia Recurrence Inventory 2 Yearsassessed at Baseline and Post-operatively at 24 monthsPatients are asked 3 yes or no questions about their hernia operation: do you feel your hernia has come back, do you feel or see a bulge, and do you have physical pain or symptoms at the site.
Hernia Recurrenceassessed Post-operatively as 24 monthsThe ventral hernia recurrence inventory asked patients if they have had any additional surgery since the hernia operation. If they answer yes, they choose if the surgery was for a hernia or another reason. The answers from 1 year follow up and 2 year follow up to the last question were combined for this analysis. Composite recurrence was then determined by excluding patients with negative CT scan or physical exam but had answered the ventral hernia recurrence inventory indication the hernia recurrence.
Conversion to OpenAssessed at index surgery.Robotic surgeries converted to open surgeries.
Quality of Life Via Questionnaire - 30 Daysassessed at Baseline and Post-operatively at 30 daysPatient reported outcomes via the Hernia related quality of life score. The survey contains 12 statements about the patients abdominal wall and asks the patient to rate how strongly the disagree (1) or agree (6) with the statements on a scale 1-6. The score is calculated with the following formula: (120-\[(20/12)\*(sum of response on all 12 questions)\]).The highest possible number, meaning the abdominal wall does not affect the patient, is 100, and the lowest, meaning the abdominal wall greatly affects the patient's quality of life, is a 0.

Participant flow

Recruitment details

After screening, 101 patients were consented.

Pre-assignment details

One patient withdrew from the study prior to surgery, leaving 100 patients randomized for inclusion. A total of 7 patients were randomized but never went through with surgery (5 randomized to open, 2 randomized to robotic repair).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)
Robotic VHR
46
Open Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)
Open VHR
44
Total90

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOpen Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Total
Active Smoker14 Participants16 Participants30 Participants
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
12 Participants14 Participants26 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
32 Participants32 Participants64 Participants
ASA
2
12 Participants13 Participants25 Participants
ASA
3
32 Participants32 Participants64 Participants
ASA
4
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Bowel Injury (full-thickness)2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Bowel Injury (serosa)2 Participants6 Participants8 Participants
Comorbidities
COPD
6 Participants7 Participants13 Participants
Comorbidities
DM
16 Participants13 Participants29 Participants
Comorbidities
HTN
28 Participants26 Participants54 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
43 Participants42 Participants85 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants3 Participants4 Participants
Hernia Type
Incisional
41 Participants44 Participants85 Participants
Hernia Type
Parastomal
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Hernia Type
Primary Ventral
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Hernia Type
Recurrent Hernia
23 Participants16 Participants39 Participants
Intraoperative Complications4 Participants6 Participants10 Participants
Myofascial release
Posterior rectus sheath only
34 Participants32 Participants66 Participants
Myofascial release
Transversus Abdominis Release
10 Participants14 Participants24 Participants
Number of Prior Repairs
1
20 Participants10 Participants30 Participants
Number of Prior Repairs
2
2 Participants5 Participants7 Participants
Number of Prior Repairs
3 or more
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Number of Prior Repairs
None
21 Participants30 Participants51 Participants
Prior Mesh Present16 Participants7 Participants23 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
3 Participants5 Participants8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants4 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
40 Participants37 Participants77 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
30 Participants28 Participants58 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
14 Participants18 Participants32 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
2 / 502 / 51
other
Total, other adverse events
15 / 507 / 51
serious
Total, serious adverse events
9 / 506 / 51

Outcome results

Primary

Composite Outcome of Diagnosis of Surgical Site Occurrence or Infection, Hospital Readmission, or Hernia Recurrence

A composite outcome of events which are clinically significant including but not limited to seroma requiring procedural intervention, skin dehiscence, cellulitis, hematoma, skin necrosis, and surgical site infections which may require interventions such as wound care or antibiotic therapy.

Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years

Population: After screening, 101 patients were consented. One patient withdrew from the study prior to surgery, leaving 100 patients randomized for inclusion. A total of 7 patients were randomized but never went through with surgery (5 randomized to open, 2 randomized to robotic repair). Two patients in the robotic arm and one in the open arm did not complete 30-day follow-up and were excluded, leaving 46 robotic RMVHR and 44 open RMVHR patients for analysis of the primary outcome.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Composite Outcome of Diagnosis of Surgical Site Occurrence or Infection, Hospital Readmission, or Hernia Recurrence9 Participants
Open Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Composite Outcome of Diagnosis of Surgical Site Occurrence or Infection, Hospital Readmission, or Hernia Recurrence9 Participants
Secondary

All Surgical Site Infections

Surgical site occurrence is defined as all wound complications that occur after a surgical procedure but are not surgical site infections.

Time frame: Post-operatively: 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years

Population: After screening, 101 patients were consented. One patient withdrew from the study prior to surgery, leaving 100 patients randomized for inclusion. A total of 7 patients were randomized but never went through with surgery (5 randomized to open, 2 randomized to robotic repair). Two patients in the robotic arm and one in the open arm did not complete 30-day follow-up and were excluded, leaving 46 rRMVHR and 44 RMVHR patients for analysis of the primary outcome.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)All Surgical Site Infections2 Participants
Open Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)All Surgical Site Infections3 Participants
Secondary

All Surgical Site Occurrences

Surgical site occurrence (SSO) is defined as all wound complications that occur after a surgical procedure but are not surgical site infections.

Time frame: Post-operatively: 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years

Population: After screening, 101 patients were consented. One patient withdrew from the study prior to surgery, leaving 100 patients randomized for inclusion. A total of 7 patients were randomized but never went through with surgery (5 randomized to open, 2 randomized to robotic repair). Two patients in the robotic arm and one in the open arm did not complete 30-day follow-up and were excluded, leaving 46 rRMVHR and 44 RMVHR patients for analysis of the primary outcome.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)All Surgical Site Occurrences8 Participants
Open Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)All Surgical Site Occurrences7 Participants
Secondary

BMI

Body Mass Index

Time frame: Measured at study enrollment

Population: After screening, 101 patients were consented. One patient withdrew from the study prior to surgery, leaving 100 patients randomized for inclusion. A total of 7 patients were randomized but never went through with surgery (5 randomized to open, 2 randomized to robotic repair). Two patients in the robotic arm and one in the open arm did not complete 30-day follow-up and were excluded, leaving 46 rRMVHR and 44 RMVHR patients for analysis of the primary outcome.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)BMI36.7 kg/m^2
Open Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)BMI36.7 kg/m^2
Secondary

Conversion to Open

Robotic surgeries converted to open surgeries.

Time frame: Assessed at index surgery.

Population: Patient who are randomized to receive an open ventral hernia repair were not assessed for Conversion to Open

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Conversion to Open5 Participants
Open Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Conversion to Open0 Participants
Secondary

Cost for Hospital Charges From Billing Office

Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years

Population: After screening, 101 patients were consented. One patient withdrew from the study prior to surgery, leaving 100 patients randomized for inclusion. A total of 7 patients were randomized but never went through with surgery (5 randomized to open, 2 randomized to robotic repair). Two patients in the robotic arm and one in the open arm did not complete 30-day follow-up and were excluded, leaving 46 rRMVHR and 44 RMVHR patients for analysis of the primary outcome.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Cost for Hospital Charges From Billing Office11747 U.S. Dollars
Open Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Cost for Hospital Charges From Billing Office9267 U.S. Dollars
Secondary

Hernia Length

Length of Hernia

Time frame: measured at surgery

Population: After screening, 101 patients were consented. One patient withdrew from the study prior to surgery, leaving 100 patients randomized for inclusion. A total of 7 patients were randomized but never went through with surgery (5 randomized to open, 2 randomized to robotic repair). Two patients in the robotic arm and one in the open arm did not complete 30-day follow-up and were excluded, leaving 46 rRMVHR and 44 RMVHR patients for analysis of the primary outcome.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Hernia Length15 cm
Open Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Hernia Length15 cm
Secondary

Hernia Recurrence

The ventral hernia recurrence inventory asked patients if they have had any additional surgery since the hernia operation. If they answer yes, they choose if the surgery was for a hernia or another reason. The answers from 1 year follow up and 2 year follow up to the last question were combined for this analysis. Composite recurrence was then determined by excluding patients with negative CT scan or physical exam but had answered the ventral hernia recurrence inventory indication the hernia recurrence.

Time frame: assessed Post-operatively as 24 months

Population: 32 patients in the robotic arm completed the 24 month patient reported outcomes and 30 patients in the open arm completed the 24 month patient reported outcomes.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Hernia RecurrenceVentral Hernia Recurrence Inventory - Recurrence at 2 years11 Participants
Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Hernia RecurrenceComposite Recurrence4 Participants
Open Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Hernia RecurrenceVentral Hernia Recurrence Inventory - Recurrence at 2 years4 Participants
Open Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Hernia RecurrenceComposite Recurrence1 Participants
Secondary

Hernia Width

Width of Hernia

Time frame: measured at surgery

Population: After screening, 101 patients were consented. One patient withdrew from the study prior to surgery, leaving 100 patients randomized for inclusion. A total of 7 patients were randomized but never went through with surgery (5 randomized to open, 2 randomized to robotic repair). Two patients in the robotic arm and one in the open arm did not complete 30-day follow-up and were excluded, leaving 46 rRMVHR and 44 RMVHR patients for analysis of the primary outcome.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Hernia Width8 cm
Open Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Hernia Width10 cm
Secondary

Length of Stay at Hospital Measured in Days

Time frame: Time from procedure until discharge, an expected range of 2 to10 days

Population: After screening, 101 patients were consented. One patient withdrew from the study prior to surgery, leaving 100 patients randomized for inclusion. A total of 7 patients were randomized but never went through with surgery (5 randomized to open, 2 randomized to robotic repair). Two patients in the robotic arm and one in the open arm did not complete 30-day follow-up and were excluded, leaving 46 rRMVHR and 44 RMVHR patients for analysis of the primary outcome.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Length of Stay at Hospital Measured in Days1 days
Open Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Length of Stay at Hospital Measured in Days2 days
Secondary

Operative Time (Procedure Start to Procedure Finish Measured in Minutes)

Time frame: Day of surgery

Population: After screening, 101 patients were consented. One patient withdrew from the study prior to surgery, leaving 100 patients randomized for inclusion. A total of 7 patients were randomized but never went through with surgery (5 randomized to open, 2 randomized to robotic repair). Two patients in the robotic arm and one in the open arm did not complete 30-day follow-up and were excluded, leaving 46 rRMVHR and 44 RMVHR patients for analysis of the primary outcome.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Operative Time (Procedure Start to Procedure Finish Measured in Minutes)206 minutes
Open Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Operative Time (Procedure Start to Procedure Finish Measured in Minutes)156 minutes
Secondary

Pain Score - 24 Month Patient Reported Outcomes

Patient is asked 3 different questions all in relation to their pain in the past 7 days: how intense was it as its worst, on average, and right now. They then rank their pain for each question on a scale of 1 - 5. 1 meaning no pain and 5 very severe pain. The pain scores were then averaged and used for this analysis.

Time frame: assessed at Baseline and Post-operatively at 24 months

Population: 32 patients in the robotic arm completed the 24 month patient reported outcomes and 30 patients in the open arm completed the 24 month patient reported outcomes.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Pain Score - 24 Month Patient Reported Outcomes24 month Patient reported outcomes1 units on a scale
Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Pain Score - 24 Month Patient Reported OutcomesDifference-1 units on a scale
Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Pain Score - 24 Month Patient Reported OutcomesBaseline Patient Reported outcomes2 units on a scale
Open Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Pain Score - 24 Month Patient Reported Outcomes24 month Patient reported outcomes1 units on a scale
Open Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Pain Score - 24 Month Patient Reported OutcomesDifference-1 units on a scale
Open Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Pain Score - 24 Month Patient Reported OutcomesBaseline Patient Reported outcomes2 units on a scale
Secondary

Pain Score - 30 Day Patient Reported Outcomes

Patient is asked 3 different questions all in relation to their pain in the past 7 days: how intense was it as its worst, on average, and right now. They then rank their pain for each question on a scale of 1 - 5. 1 meaning no pain and 5 very severe pain. The pain scores were then averaged and used for this analysis.

Time frame: assessed at Baseline and Post-operatively at 30 days.

Population: 41 patients in the robotic arm completed the 24 month patient reported outcomes and 41 patients in the open arm completed the 24 month patient reported outcomes.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Pain Score - 30 Day Patient Reported OutcomesBaseline Patient Reported outcomes2 units on a scale
Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Pain Score - 30 Day Patient Reported Outcomes30 Day Patient reported outcomes3 units on a scale
Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Pain Score - 30 Day Patient Reported OutcomesDifference1 units on a scale
Open Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Pain Score - 30 Day Patient Reported OutcomesBaseline Patient Reported outcomes3 units on a scale
Open Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Pain Score - 30 Day Patient Reported Outcomes30 Day Patient reported outcomes2 units on a scale
Open Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Pain Score - 30 Day Patient Reported OutcomesDifference0 units on a scale
Secondary

Pain Score - 6 or 12 Month Patient Reported Outcomes

Patient is asked 3 different questions all in relation to their pain in the past 7 days: how intense was it as its worst, on average, and right now. They then rank their pain for each question on a scale of 1 - 5. 1 meaning no pain and 5 very severe pain. The pain scores were then averaged and used for this analysis.

Time frame: assessed at Baseline and Post-operatively at 6-12 months; data for 6 and 12-month pain scores were combined for analysis.

Population: 39 patients in the robotic arm completed the 6 or 12 month patient reported outcomes and 33 patients in the open arm completed the 6 or 12 month patient reported outcomes. Data collected at both 6 month and 12 month time points but they were combined for analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Pain Score - 6 or 12 Month Patient Reported OutcomesBaseline Patient Reported outcomes2 units on a scale
Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Pain Score - 6 or 12 Month Patient Reported Outcomes6 or 12 month Patient reported outcomes1 units on a scale
Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Pain Score - 6 or 12 Month Patient Reported OutcomesDifference-1 units on a scale
Open Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Pain Score - 6 or 12 Month Patient Reported OutcomesBaseline Patient Reported outcomes2 units on a scale
Open Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Pain Score - 6 or 12 Month Patient Reported Outcomes6 or 12 month Patient reported outcomes1 units on a scale
Open Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Pain Score - 6 or 12 Month Patient Reported OutcomesDifference-1 units on a scale
Secondary

Quality of Life Via Questionnaire - 24 Months

Patient reported outcomes via the Hernia related quality of life score. The survey contains 12 statements about the patients abdominal wall and asks the patient to rate how strongly the disagree (1) or agree (6) with the statements on a scale 1-6. The score is calculated with the following formula: (120-\[(20/12)\*(sum of responses on all 12 questions)\]).The highest possible number, meaning the abdominal wall does not affect the patient, is 100, and the lowest, meaning the abdominal wall greatly affects the patient's quality of life, is a 0.

Time frame: assessed at Baseline and Post-operatively at 24 months

Population: 32 patients in the robotic arm completed the 24 month patient reported outcomes and 30 patients in the open arm completed the 24 month patient reported outcomes.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Quality of Life Via Questionnaire - 24 Months24 month Patient Reported Outcomes80 units on a scale
Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Quality of Life Via Questionnaire - 24 MonthsDifference28 units on a scale
Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Quality of Life Via Questionnaire - 24 MonthsBaseline Patient Reported Outcomes36 units on a scale
Open Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Quality of Life Via Questionnaire - 24 MonthsBaseline Patient Reported Outcomes32 units on a scale
Open Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Quality of Life Via Questionnaire - 24 Months24 month Patient Reported Outcomes91 units on a scale
Open Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Quality of Life Via Questionnaire - 24 MonthsDifference59 units on a scale
Secondary

Quality of Life Via Questionnaire - 30 Days

Patient reported outcomes via the Hernia related quality of life score. The survey contains 12 statements about the patients abdominal wall and asks the patient to rate how strongly the disagree (1) or agree (6) with the statements on a scale 1-6. The score is calculated with the following formula: (120-\[(20/12)\*(sum of response on all 12 questions)\]).The highest possible number, meaning the abdominal wall does not affect the patient, is 100, and the lowest, meaning the abdominal wall greatly affects the patient's quality of life, is a 0.

Time frame: assessed at Baseline and Post-operatively at 30 days

Population: 41 patients in the robotic arm completed the 30 day PROs and 41 patients in the open arm completed the 30 day PROs.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Quality of Life Via Questionnaire - 30 Days30 Day Patient Reported Outcomes38 units on a scale
Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Quality of Life Via Questionnaire - 30 DaysDifference0 units on a scale
Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Quality of Life Via Questionnaire - 30 DaysBaseline Patient Reported Outcomes34 units on a scale
Open Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Quality of Life Via Questionnaire - 30 Days30 Day Patient Reported Outcomes50 units on a scale
Open Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Quality of Life Via Questionnaire - 30 DaysDifference16 units on a scale
Open Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Quality of Life Via Questionnaire - 30 DaysBaseline Patient Reported Outcomes28 units on a scale
Secondary

Quality of Life Via Questionnaire - 6 Through 12 Months

Patient reported outcomes via the Hernia related quality of life score. The survey contains 12 statements about the patients abdominal wall and asks the patient to rate how strongly the disagree (1) or agree (6) with the statements on a scale 1-6.The score is calculated with the following formula: (120-\[(20/12)\*(sum of response on all 12 questions)\]).The highest possible number, meaning the abdominal wall does not affect the patient, is 100, and the lowest, meaning the abdominal wall greatly affects the patient's quality of life, is a 0.

Time frame: assessed at Baseline and Post-operatively at 6 through 12 months. Data for the 6 and 12-month patient reported outcomes were combined for analysis.

Population: 39 patients in the robotic arm completed the 6 or 12 month PROs and 33 patients in the open arm completed the 6 or 12 month PROs. Data collected at both 6 month and 12 month time points but they were combined for analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Quality of Life Via Questionnaire - 6 Through 12 MonthsBaseline Patient Reported Outcomes26 units on a scale
Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Quality of Life Via Questionnaire - 6 Through 12 Months6-12 month Patient Reported Outcomes86 units on a scale
Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Quality of Life Via Questionnaire - 6 Through 12 MonthsDifference60 units on a scale
Open Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Quality of Life Via Questionnaire - 6 Through 12 MonthsBaseline Patient Reported Outcomes46 units on a scale
Open Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Quality of Life Via Questionnaire - 6 Through 12 Months6-12 month Patient Reported Outcomes90 units on a scale
Open Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Quality of Life Via Questionnaire - 6 Through 12 MonthsDifference20 units on a scale
Secondary

Surgical Site Infections Requiring Procedural Intervention

Time frame: Post-operatively: 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years

Population: After screening, 101 patients were consented. One patient withdrew from the study prior to surgery, leaving 100 patients randomized for inclusion. A total of 7 patients were randomized but never went through with surgery (5 randomized to open, 2 randomized to robotic repair). Two patients in the robotic arm and one in the open arm did not complete 30-day follow-up and were excluded, leaving 46 rRMVHR and 44 RMVHR patients for analysis of the primary outcome.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Surgical Site Infections Requiring Procedural Intervention6 Participants
Open Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Surgical Site Infections Requiring Procedural Intervention3 Participants
Secondary

Surgical Site Occurrences Requiring Procedural Intervention

Surgical site occurrence (SSO) is defined as all wound complications that occur after a surgical procedure but are not surgical site infections

Time frame: Post-operatively: 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years

Population: After screening, 101 patients were consented. One patient withdrew from the study prior to surgery, leaving 100 patients randomized for inclusion. A total of 7 patients were randomized but never went through with surgery (5 randomized to open, 2 randomized to robotic repair). Two patients in the robotic arm and one in the open arm did not complete 30-day follow-up and were excluded, leaving 46 rRMVHR and 44 RMVHR patients for analysis of the primary outcome.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Surgical Site Occurrences Requiring Procedural Intervention6 Participants
Open Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Surgical Site Occurrences Requiring Procedural Intervention3 Participants
Secondary

Ventral Hernia Recurrence Inventory 1 Year

Patients are asked 3 yes or no questions about their hernia operation: do you feel your hernia has come back, do you feel or see a bulge, and do you have physical pain or symptoms at the site.

Time frame: assessed at Baseline and Post-operatively at 12 months.

Population: 39 patients in the robotic arm completed the 12 month patient reported outcomes and 33 patients in the open arm completed the 12 month patient reported outcomes.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Ventral Hernia Recurrence Inventory 1 YearPain at hernia site9 count of yes answers
Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Ventral Hernia Recurrence Inventory 1 YearBulging at hernia site16 count of yes answers
Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Ventral Hernia Recurrence Inventory 1 YearDo you feel your hernia has come back?2 count of yes answers
Open Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Ventral Hernia Recurrence Inventory 1 YearPain at hernia site5 count of yes answers
Open Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Ventral Hernia Recurrence Inventory 1 YearBulging at hernia site7 count of yes answers
Open Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Ventral Hernia Recurrence Inventory 1 YearDo you feel your hernia has come back?2 count of yes answers
Secondary

Ventral Hernia Recurrence Inventory 2 Years

Patients are asked 3 yes or no questions about their hernia operation: do you feel your hernia has come back, do you feel or see a bulge, and do you have physical pain or symptoms at the site.

Time frame: assessed at Baseline and Post-operatively at 24 months

Population: 32 patients in the robotic arm completed the 24 month patient reported outcomes and 30 patients in the open arm completed the 24 month patient reported outcomes.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Ventral Hernia Recurrence Inventory 2 YearsPain at hernia site8 count of yes answers
Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Ventral Hernia Recurrence Inventory 2 YearsBulging at hernia site11 count of yes answers
Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Ventral Hernia Recurrence Inventory 2 YearsDo you feel your hernia has come back?7 count of yes answers
Open Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Ventral Hernia Recurrence Inventory 2 YearsPain at hernia site4 count of yes answers
Open Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Ventral Hernia Recurrence Inventory 2 YearsBulging at hernia site3 count of yes answers
Open Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR)Ventral Hernia Recurrence Inventory 2 YearsDo you feel your hernia has come back?1 count of yes answers

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026