Skip to content

Clinical Evaluation of the Cochlear Nucleus CI532 Cochlear Implant in Adults

Clinical Evaluation of the Cochlear Nucleus(R) CI532 Cochlear Implant in Adults

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03007472
Acronym
SME
Enrollment
96
Registered
2017-01-02
Start date
2017-02-15
Completion date
2020-03-06
Last updated
2020-12-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hearing Loss, Sensorineural

Keywords

cochlear implant, sound processor

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to gather long-term data on the FDA approved CI532 cochlear implant, and CP1000 (Nucleus 7) sound processor

Detailed description

Appropriate candidates will receive a CI532 cochlear implant and be fit with the CP1000 sound processor. Imaging will be completed pre-op, intra-op, and post-op to assess implant location. Speech perception testing as well as subjective questionnaires will be administered over 12 months.

Interventions

DEVICECI532

Cochlear implant

DEVICENucleus 7

Sound processor

Sponsors

Cochlear
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Adults 18 years or older who have a bilateral postlinguistic sensorineural hearing loss. 2. Limited benefit from amplification as defined by test scores of 40% correct or less in the ear to be implanted and 50% or less in the contralateral ear on a recorded monosyllabic word test I. Consistent with the Minimum Speech Test Battery (2011), it is required that all subjects be evaluated at 60 dBA presentation level. 3. Bilateral moderate sloping to profound hearing loss 4. Minimum of 30 days experience with appropriately fit bilateral amplification, fit using the standardized National Acoustics Laboratory (NAL) fitting method 5. Proficient in English 6. Ability to complete testing -

Exclusion criteria

1. Previous cochlear implantation 2. Pre-linguistically deafened (onset of hearing loss at less than two years of age) 3. Ossification or any other cochlear anomaly that might prevent complete insertion of the electrode array 4. Duration of severe to profound hearing loss greater than 20 years 5. Diagnosis of retro-cochlear pathology 6. Diagnosis of auditory neuropathy 7. Unrealistic expectations on the part of the subject regarding the possible benefits, risks, and limitations that are inherent to the surgical procedure and use of the prosthetic device 8. Unwillingness or inability to comply with all investigational requirements 9. Additional cognitive, medical or social handicaps that would prevent completion of all study requirements-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Pre- to 6 Months Post-implantation Speech Recognition in Quiet in the Implanted Ear AlonePreoperatively and 6 months post sound processor activationGroup mean Consonant Nucleus Consonant (CNC) word recognition in quiet measured pre-operatively and again at 6 month post sound processor activation compared to the group mean score in the preoperative, best unilateral condition. The CNC word test has a score range of 0-100% with higher values indicating better scores.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evaluation of Change in Pre and Post Implantation Speech Recognition in Noise Scores in the Implanted Ear AlonePreoperatively and 6 months post sound processor activationGroup mean AzBio sentence in noise score in the best unilateral condition compared to the group mean score in the preoperative, unilateral aided condition. The AzBio sentence test has a score range of 0-100% with higher values indicating better scores.
Change in Pre and Post Implantation Score on the Health Utility Index-3 (HUI3)Preoperatively and 6 months post sound processor activatonGroup mean HUI3 score post sound processor activation compared to the scores measured preoperatively. The HUI3 consists of eight attributes of general health (vision, hearing, speech, mobility, dexterity, emotion, cognition, and pain) with five or six levels per attribute. For each respondent, health status is described as a vector that combines the levels of each attribute. This information is then converted into a utility score of HRQL on a scale from perfect health (1.0) to death (0).

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Frequency Specific Thresholds and Speech Recognition in Noise or Quiet12 months post-activationFrequency-specific thresholds at standard audiometric frequencies for each ear, and speech recognition in quiet (CNC words) or noise (AzBio sentences) in best unilateral and/or electric alone.
Speech Perception in Quiet and Noise With Change in Cochlear Implant ProgrammingFollowing 12-month study visit but prior to 36-month interval.Two optional study visits to evaluate whether a change in cochlear implant programming, specifically an increase in the number of channels will improve subject speech perception in quiet and noise.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
CI532/N7 Study Group
All subjects will receive a CI532 cochlear implant (intervention) and be fit with the CP1000 sound processor CI532: Cochlear implant Nucleus 7: Sound processor
96
Total96

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyDeath2
Overall StudyDid not have aidable contralateral thresholds at the time2
Overall StudyLoss to Follow Up1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCI532/N7 Study Group
Age, Continuous67.39 years
Contralateral Ear Mean - Duration of Hearing Loss26.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
Ipsilateral Ear Mean - Duration of Hearing Loss21.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
96 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
34 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
62 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
2 / 96
other
Total, other adverse events
26 / 96
serious
Total, serious adverse events
16 / 96

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Pre- to 6 Months Post-implantation Speech Recognition in Quiet in the Implanted Ear Alone

Group mean Consonant Nucleus Consonant (CNC) word recognition in quiet measured pre-operatively and again at 6 month post sound processor activation compared to the group mean score in the preoperative, best unilateral condition. The CNC word test has a score range of 0-100% with higher values indicating better scores.

Time frame: Preoperatively and 6 months post sound processor activation

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CI532/N7 Study GroupChange From Pre- to 6 Months Post-implantation Speech Recognition in Quiet in the Implanted Ear AloneBaseline Ipsilateral Aided14.6 percentage of correct wordsStandard Deviation 11.6
CI532/N7 Study GroupChange From Pre- to 6 Months Post-implantation Speech Recognition in Quiet in the Implanted Ear Alone6 Month CI/Best Unilateral60.9 percentage of correct wordsStandard Deviation 21.09
Secondary

Change in Pre and Post Implantation Score on the Health Utility Index-3 (HUI3)

Group mean HUI3 score post sound processor activation compared to the scores measured preoperatively. The HUI3 consists of eight attributes of general health (vision, hearing, speech, mobility, dexterity, emotion, cognition, and pain) with five or six levels per attribute. For each respondent, health status is described as a vector that combines the levels of each attribute. This information is then converted into a utility score of HRQL on a scale from perfect health (1.0) to death (0).

Time frame: Preoperatively and 6 months post sound processor activaton

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CI532/N7 Study GroupChange in Pre and Post Implantation Score on the Health Utility Index-3 (HUI3)Baseline0.46 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2
CI532/N7 Study GroupChange in Pre and Post Implantation Score on the Health Utility Index-3 (HUI3)6 Month0.64 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.197
Secondary

Evaluation of Change in Pre and Post Implantation Speech Recognition in Noise Scores in the Implanted Ear Alone

Group mean AzBio sentence in noise score in the best unilateral condition compared to the group mean score in the preoperative, unilateral aided condition. The AzBio sentence test has a score range of 0-100% with higher values indicating better scores.

Time frame: Preoperatively and 6 months post sound processor activation

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CI532/N7 Study GroupEvaluation of Change in Pre and Post Implantation Speech Recognition in Noise Scores in the Implanted Ear AloneBaseline Ipsilateral Aided +10 SNR14.8 percentage of correct AzBio sentencesStandard Deviation 17.24
CI532/N7 Study GroupEvaluation of Change in Pre and Post Implantation Speech Recognition in Noise Scores in the Implanted Ear Alone6 Month CI/Best Unilateral +10 SNR42.7 percentage of correct AzBio sentencesStandard Deviation 26.21
Other Pre-specified

Frequency Specific Thresholds and Speech Recognition in Noise or Quiet

Frequency-specific thresholds at standard audiometric frequencies for each ear, and speech recognition in quiet (CNC words) or noise (AzBio sentences) in best unilateral and/or electric alone.

Time frame: 12 months post-activation

Other Pre-specified

Speech Perception in Quiet and Noise With Change in Cochlear Implant Programming

Two optional study visits to evaluate whether a change in cochlear implant programming, specifically an increase in the number of channels will improve subject speech perception in quiet and noise.

Time frame: Following 12-month study visit but prior to 36-month interval.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 25, 2026