Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Conditions
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, obesity, DXA, MRI
Brief summary
This study assessed the safety, pharmacokinetics and efficacy of bimagrumab when administered in overweight and obese patients with type 2 diabetes
Detailed description
A non-confirmatory, randomized, subject and investigator blinded, placebo controlled, parallel-arm study, investigating a 48-week treatment period with i.v. bimagrumab 10 mg/kg in overweight and obese subjects with type 2 diabetes. Participants were randomized and assigned to one of the following 2 treatment arms in a ratio of 1:1: Arm 1: Bimagrumab 10 mg/kg up to maximum 1200 mg, every 4 weeks (12 doses) until week 44. Arm 2: Placebo, every 4 weeks (12 doses) until week 44. The study consisted of a screening baseline period of 3 weeks, treatment period of 48 weeks and then a follow-up period of 8 weeks. Treatment period visits were scheduled every 4 weeks until week 44. Administration of bimagrumab or placebo was done via an i.v. infusion over 30 minutes followed by flushing for 15 minutes. Subjects were asked to return to the Investigator site for dosing approximately every 4 weeks during the treatment period. During those visits, subjects were evaluated for safety, tolerability, PK and efficacy. The treatment period ended approximately 4 weeks after the last dose administration.
Interventions
DRUGBYM338 10 mg/kg
intravenous infusion every four weeks
OTHERPlacebo
intravenous infusion every four weeks
Sponsors
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Type 2 diabetes with HbA1c between 6.5% and 10% at screening with stable treatment for 3 months prior to randomization * On one of the following anti-diabetes regimens with stable treatment for approximately 3 months prior to randomization: 1) metformin monotherapy; 2) DPP4 inhibitor agent monotherapy; 3) combination therapy of metformin and DPP4 inhibitor agent; 4) no anti-diabetes therapy. * Body Mass Index of 28 to 40 kg/m2 at screening * Body weight between 65 and 140 kg at screening
Exclusion criteria
* Women of child-bearing potential unless they are using highly effective methods of contraception * Diabetes other than Type 2 such as Type 1 diabetes, surgically induced diabetes, brittle type 2 diabetes as per investigator judgement, history of severe hypoglycemic episodes in the year preceding screening or hypoglycemic unawareness * History of clinically significant arrythmias, heart failure, unstable angina, myocardial infarction or stroke, coronary artery bypass graft surgery, or percutaneous coronary intervention, deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism, valve disorders or defects, pulmonary hypertension within 6 months of screening or 1 year for drug-eluting stents * Tachycardia * Use of anti-obesity medications, nutritional supplements or over the counter products for weight loss within 3 months of screening * Use of medications known to induce weight gain such as some anti-convulsant and psychotropic medications within 3 months of screening * Any chronic active infection (e.g., HIV, Hepatitis B or C, tuberculosis, etc) or has received anti-HCV treatments within the previous 6 months. * Uncontrolled thyroid disease. Stable euthyroid patients on stable thyroid replacement therapy for at least 3 months of screening are allowed. * Abnormal liver function tests such as SGOT, SGPT, alkaline phosphatase, or serum bilirubin, or abnormal lipase and/or amylase. * Known history or presence of severe active acute or chronic liver disease (e.g., cirrhosis). * Uncontrolled depression * Use of skeletal muscle anabolic agents in any form for 3 months prior to screening * Chronic kidney disease \[estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) \< 30 mL/min\];
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Total Body Fat Mass by Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) at Week 48 | Baseline, Week 48 | Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was used to assess changes in body composition, including total fat and lean body mass (FM and LBM) and appendicular skeletal fat and muscle mass (aFM and aLBM). DXA instruments had a source that generated x-rays split into two energies which measured bone mineral mass and soft tissue from which fat and fat-free mass (or lean body mass) were estimated. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Week 24 and 48 | Baseline, Week 24, Week 48 | HbA1c reflects average glucose concentrations over the past 3 months and therefore provides a useful index of the glycemic control of bimagrumab over that time period. It is a standard endpoint used to assess the glycemic efficacy of any anti-diabetic medication. HbA1c is a key glycemic parameter which correlates with reduction of risk of diabetic complications. |
| The Trough Observed Analyte Concentration (Ctrough) of Repeat Doses of BYM338 10 mg/kg on Day 84, 168, 252, 308 and 336 | Day 84, 252, 336 at pre-dose only. Day 168, 308 at pre-dose and 45 mins post-dose | The trough observed analyte concentration (Ctrough) is the concentration that is just prior to the beginning of, or at the end of, a dosing interval (μg/mL). |
| Maximum Observed Serum Concentration(Cmax) Derived on Day 1, 168 and 308 | Day 1, 168, 308 at pre-dose and 45 mins post-dose | Cmax is the observed maximum plasma concentration following administration (μg/mL). |
| Time to Reach the Maximum Concentration After Drug Administration (Tmax) Derived on Day 168 and 308 | Day 1, 168, 308 at pre-dose and 45 mins post-dose | Tmax is the time to reach peak or maximum concentration (h) after the drug administration. |
| Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) | Baseline, Week 24, Week 48 | Body Mass Index (BMI) was determined by height and weight measurements at week 24 and 48. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. BMI was calculated as (Body weight (kg)/ \[Height (m)\]\^2) |
| Change From Baseline in Total Body Fat Mass by Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) at Week 24 | Baseline, Week 24 | Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was used to assess changes in body composition, including total fat and lean body mass (FM and LBM) and appendicular skeletal fat and muscle mass (aFM and aLBM). DXA instruments had a source that generated x-rays split into two energies which measured bone mineral mass and soft tissue from which fat and fat-free mass (or lean body mass) were estimated. |
| Change From Baseline in Lean Body Mass (LBM) Measured by DXA | Baseline, Week 24, Week 48 | Lean body mass (LBM) is a part of body composition defined as the difference between total body weight and body fat weight. This means that it counts the mass of all organs except body fat, including bones, muscles, blood, skin, and everything else. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was used to assess changes in body composition, including total fat and lean body mass (FM and LBM) and appendicular skeletal fat and muscle mass (aFM and aLBM). DXA instruments had a source that generated x-rays split into two energies which measured bone mineral mass and soft tissue from which fat and fat-free mass (or lean body mass) were estimated. |
| Change From Baseline in Waist Circumference | Baseline, Week 24, Week 52 | Waist circumference is the length in cm of the circumference to the nearest 0.1 cm at the level of the umbilicus with the subject in the upright position. A negative change indicates improvement. |
| Change From Baseline in Waist to Hip Ratio | Baseline, Week 24, Week 52 | Hip circumference was measured at the greatest protrusion of the buttocks. Combined with waist circumference, the waist-to-hip ratio was derived during data analysis. |
| Change From Baseline in Insulin Resistance (HOMA2-IR) | Baseline. Week 12, Week 36 | Blood samples were collected to analyze insulin resistance. The homeostasis model assessment computational method was used to estimate insulin resistance (HOMA2-IR) from fasting plasma glucose and insulin. The HOMA2-IR is the reciprocal of insulin sensitivity (%S), as a percentage of a normal reference population (normal young adult). Higher numbers indicate higher insulin resistance. No established cutoffs are indicating impaired resistance. HOMA2-IR was calculated using an online calculator \[https://www.dtu.ox.ac.uk/homacalculator/\]. |
| Immunogenicity Assessed by the Number of Participants Developing Anti-BYM338 Antibodies During the Trial | 392 days | Describes the number of participants tested positive for anti-BYM338 antibodies after the start of bimagrumab (BYM338) treatment. A validated bridging enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used for the confirmation of the presence of anti-BYM338 antibodies in human serum. |
| Change From Baseline in Weight | Baseline, Week 24, Week 48 | Body weight was measured to the nearest 0.1 kilogram (kg) in indoor clothing without shoes. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. |
Countries
United Kingdom, United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
The study was completed as planned.
Pre-assignment details
Participants were randomized to the study at 1:1 ratio to receive BYM338 10 mg/kg or placebo.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| BYM338 10 mg/kg intravenous infusion every four weeks | 37 |
| Placebo intravenous infusion every four weeks | 38 |
| Total | 75 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 5 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Physician Decision | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Protocol deviation | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 7 | 5 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | BYM338 10 mg/kg | Placebo | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 60.7 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.5 | 60.2 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.02 | 60.4 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.72 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Ethnicity Hispanic Or Latino | 27 Participants | 25 Participants | 52 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Ethnicity Not Hispanic Or Latino | 9 Participants | 12 Participants | 21 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Ethnicity Not Reported | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race Asian | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race Black Or African American | 6 Participants | 9 Participants | 15 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race Other | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race Unknown | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race White | 30 Participants | 27 Participants | 57 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 23 Participants | 12 Participants | 35 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 14 Participants | 26 Participants | 40 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 37 | 0 / 38 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 31 / 37 | 31 / 38 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 3 / 37 | 3 / 38 |
Outcome results
Primary
Change From Baseline in Total Body Fat Mass by Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) at Week 48
Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was used to assess changes in body composition, including total fat and lean body mass (FM and LBM) and appendicular skeletal fat and muscle mass (aFM and aLBM). DXA instruments had a source that generated x-rays split into two energies which measured bone mineral mass and soft tissue from which fat and fat-free mass (or lean body mass) were estimated.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 48
Population: Pharmacodynamic (PD) analysis set
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| BYM338 10 mg/kg | Change From Baseline in Total Body Fat Mass by Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) at Week 48 | -7.49 kg |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Total Body Fat Mass by Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) at Week 48 | -0.18 kg |
p-value: <0.00180% CI: [-8.48, -6.14]Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
Secondary
Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI)
Body Mass Index (BMI) was determined by height and weight measurements at week 24 and 48. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. BMI was calculated as (Body weight (kg)/ \[Height (m)\]\^2)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 48
Population: Pharmacodynamic analysis set
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| BYM338 10 mg/kg | Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) | week 24 | -1.50 Kg/m^2 |
| BYM338 10 mg/kg | Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) | week 48 | -2.19 Kg/m^2 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) | week 24 | -0.17 Kg/m^2 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) | week 48 | -0.28 Kg/m^2 |
Comparison: week 24p-value: <0.00180% CI: [-1.71, -0.95]Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
Comparison: week 48p-value: <0.00180% CI: [-2.48, -1.34]Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
Secondary
Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Week 24 and 48
HbA1c reflects average glucose concentrations over the past 3 months and therefore provides a useful index of the glycemic control of bimagrumab over that time period. It is a standard endpoint used to assess the glycemic efficacy of any anti-diabetic medication. HbA1c is a key glycemic parameter which correlates with reduction of risk of diabetic complications.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 48
Population: Pharmacodynamic analysis set
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| BYM338 10 mg/kg | Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Week 24 and 48 | week 24 | -0.85 percentage change |
| BYM338 10 mg/kg | Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Week 24 and 48 | week 48 | -0.76 percentage change |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Week 24 and 48 | week 24 | 0.28 percentage change |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Week 24 and 48 | week 48 | 0.04 percentage change |
Comparison: week 24p-value: <0.00180% CI: [-1.42, -0.83]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: week 48p-value: 0.00580% CI: [-1.2, -0.41]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary
Change From Baseline in Insulin Resistance (HOMA2-IR)
Blood samples were collected to analyze insulin resistance. The homeostasis model assessment computational method was used to estimate insulin resistance (HOMA2-IR) from fasting plasma glucose and insulin. The HOMA2-IR is the reciprocal of insulin sensitivity (%S), as a percentage of a normal reference population (normal young adult). Higher numbers indicate higher insulin resistance. No established cutoffs are indicating impaired resistance. HOMA2-IR was calculated using an online calculator \[https://www.dtu.ox.ac.uk/homacalculator/\].
Time frame: Baseline. Week 12, Week 36
Population: Pharmacodynamic analysis set
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| BYM338 10 mg/kg | Change From Baseline in Insulin Resistance (HOMA2-IR) | week 12 | 0.10 Insulin Resistance (IR) Score |
| BYM338 10 mg/kg | Change From Baseline in Insulin Resistance (HOMA2-IR) | week 36 | -0.09 Insulin Resistance (IR) Score |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Insulin Resistance (HOMA2-IR) | week 12 | 0.76 Insulin Resistance (IR) Score |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Insulin Resistance (HOMA2-IR) | week 36 | 0.57 Insulin Resistance (IR) Score |
Comparison: week 12p-value: 0.02880% CI: [-1.03, -0.28]Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
Comparison: week 36p-value: 0.08180% CI: [-1.14, -0.18]Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
Secondary
Change From Baseline in Lean Body Mass (LBM) Measured by DXA
Lean body mass (LBM) is a part of body composition defined as the difference between total body weight and body fat weight. This means that it counts the mass of all organs except body fat, including bones, muscles, blood, skin, and everything else. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was used to assess changes in body composition, including total fat and lean body mass (FM and LBM) and appendicular skeletal fat and muscle mass (aFM and aLBM). DXA instruments had a source that generated x-rays split into two energies which measured bone mineral mass and soft tissue from which fat and fat-free mass (or lean body mass) were estimated.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 48
Population: Pharmacodynamic analysis set
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| BYM338 10 mg/kg | Change From Baseline in Lean Body Mass (LBM) Measured by DXA | week 24 | 1.72 Kg |
| BYM338 10 mg/kg | Change From Baseline in Lean Body Mass (LBM) Measured by DXA | week 48 | 1.70 Kg |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Lean Body Mass (LBM) Measured by DXA | week 24 | 0.23 Kg |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Lean Body Mass (LBM) Measured by DXA | week 48 | -0.44 Kg |
Comparison: week 24p-value: 0.00380% CI: [0.82, 2.06]Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
Comparison: week 48p-value: <0.00180% CI: [1.36, 2.93]Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
Secondary
Change From Baseline in Total Body Fat Mass by Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) at Week 24
Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was used to assess changes in body composition, including total fat and lean body mass (FM and LBM) and appendicular skeletal fat and muscle mass (aFM and aLBM). DXA instruments had a source that generated x-rays split into two energies which measured bone mineral mass and soft tissue from which fat and fat-free mass (or lean body mass) were estimated.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Population: Pharmacodynamic analysis set
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| BYM338 10 mg/kg | Change From Baseline in Total Body Fat Mass by Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) at Week 24 | -5.37 kg |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Total Body Fat Mass by Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) at Week 24 | -0.18 kg |
p-value: <0.00180% CI: [-6.01, -4.37]Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
Secondary
Change From Baseline in Waist Circumference
Waist circumference is the length in cm of the circumference to the nearest 0.1 cm at the level of the umbilicus with the subject in the upright position. A negative change indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 52
Population: Pharmacodynamic analysis set
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| BYM338 10 mg/kg | Change From Baseline in Waist Circumference | week 24 | -5.04 cm |
| BYM338 10 mg/kg | Change From Baseline in Waist Circumference | week 52 | -9.00 cm |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Waist Circumference | week 24 | -0.95 cm |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Waist Circumference | week 52 | 0.45 cm |
Comparison: week 24p-value: <0.00180% CI: [-5.26, -2.92]Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
Comparison: week 52p-value: <0.00180% CI: [-11.3, -7.64]Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
Secondary
Change From Baseline in Waist to Hip Ratio
Hip circumference was measured at the greatest protrusion of the buttocks. Combined with waist circumference, the waist-to-hip ratio was derived during data analysis.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 52
Population: Pharmacodynamic analysis set
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| BYM338 10 mg/kg | Change From Baseline in Waist to Hip Ratio | week 24 | -0.02 ratio |
| BYM338 10 mg/kg | Change From Baseline in Waist to Hip Ratio | week 52 | -0.05 ratio |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Waist to Hip Ratio | week 52 | 0.01 ratio |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Waist to Hip Ratio | week 24 | -0.01 ratio |
Comparison: week 24p-value: 0.06280% CI: [-0.03, 0]Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
Comparison: week 52p-value: <0.00180% CI: [-0.08, -0.04]Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
Secondary
Change From Baseline in Weight
Body weight was measured to the nearest 0.1 kilogram (kg) in indoor clothing without shoes. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 48
Population: Pharmacodynamic analysis set
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| BYM338 10 mg/kg | Change From Baseline in Weight | week 24 | -3.99 Kg |
| BYM338 10 mg/kg | Change From Baseline in Weight | week 48 | -5.90 Kg |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Weight | week 48 | -0.79 Kg |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Weight | week 24 | -0.57 Kg |
Comparison: week 24p-value: <0.00180% CI: [-4.54, -2.31]Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
Comparison: week 48p-value: <0.00180% CI: [-6.74, -3.47]Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure
Secondary
Immunogenicity Assessed by the Number of Participants Developing Anti-BYM338 Antibodies During the Trial
Describes the number of participants tested positive for anti-BYM338 antibodies after the start of bimagrumab (BYM338) treatment. A validated bridging enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used for the confirmation of the presence of anti-BYM338 antibodies in human serum.
Time frame: 392 days
Population: Safety analysis set
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| BYM338 10 mg/kg | Immunogenicity Assessed by the Number of Participants Developing Anti-BYM338 Antibodies During the Trial | Confirmed with positive immunogenicity | 2 Participants |
| Placebo | Immunogenicity Assessed by the Number of Participants Developing Anti-BYM338 Antibodies During the Trial | Confirmed with positive immunogenicity | 4 Participants |
Secondary
Maximum Observed Serum Concentration(Cmax) Derived on Day 1, 168 and 308
Cmax is the observed maximum plasma concentration following administration (μg/mL).
Time frame: Day 1, 168, 308 at pre-dose and 45 mins post-dose
Population: Pharmacokinetics (PK) analysis set - PK samples were only obtained and evaluated for subjects treated with BYM338
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BYM338 10 mg/kg | Maximum Observed Serum Concentration(Cmax) Derived on Day 1, 168 and 308 | Day 1 | 283 μg/mL | Standard Deviation 32 |
| BYM338 10 mg/kg | Maximum Observed Serum Concentration(Cmax) Derived on Day 1, 168 and 308 | Day 168 | 292 μg/mL | Standard Deviation 45.3 |
| BYM338 10 mg/kg | Maximum Observed Serum Concentration(Cmax) Derived on Day 1, 168 and 308 | Day 308 | 271 μg/mL | Standard Deviation 31.1 |
Secondary
The Trough Observed Analyte Concentration (Ctrough) of Repeat Doses of BYM338 10 mg/kg on Day 84, 168, 252, 308 and 336
The trough observed analyte concentration (Ctrough) is the concentration that is just prior to the beginning of, or at the end of, a dosing interval (μg/mL).
Time frame: Day 84, 252, 336 at pre-dose only. Day 168, 308 at pre-dose and 45 mins post-dose
Population: Pharmacokinetics (PK) analysis set - PK samples were only obtained and evaluated for subjects treated with BYM338
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BYM338 10 mg/kg | The Trough Observed Analyte Concentration (Ctrough) of Repeat Doses of BYM338 10 mg/kg on Day 84, 168, 252, 308 and 336 | Day 84 | 25.3 μg/mL | Standard Deviation 6.2 |
| BYM338 10 mg/kg | The Trough Observed Analyte Concentration (Ctrough) of Repeat Doses of BYM338 10 mg/kg on Day 84, 168, 252, 308 and 336 | Day 168 | 27.5 μg/mL | Standard Deviation 8.37 |
| BYM338 10 mg/kg | The Trough Observed Analyte Concentration (Ctrough) of Repeat Doses of BYM338 10 mg/kg on Day 84, 168, 252, 308 and 336 | Day 252 | 31.0 μg/mL | Standard Deviation 11.2 |
| BYM338 10 mg/kg | The Trough Observed Analyte Concentration (Ctrough) of Repeat Doses of BYM338 10 mg/kg on Day 84, 168, 252, 308 and 336 | Day 308 | 29.9 μg/mL | Standard Deviation 11 |
| BYM338 10 mg/kg | The Trough Observed Analyte Concentration (Ctrough) of Repeat Doses of BYM338 10 mg/kg on Day 84, 168, 252, 308 and 336 | Day 336 | 27.8 μg/mL | Standard Deviation 10.9 |
Secondary
Time to Reach the Maximum Concentration After Drug Administration (Tmax) Derived on Day 168 and 308
Tmax is the time to reach peak or maximum concentration (h) after the drug administration.
Time frame: Day 1, 168, 308 at pre-dose and 45 mins post-dose
Population: Pharmacokinetics (PK) analysis set - PK samples were only obtained and evaluated for subjects treated with BYM338
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| BYM338 10 mg/kg | Time to Reach the Maximum Concentration After Drug Administration (Tmax) Derived on Day 168 and 308 | Day 1 | 0.750 hr |
| BYM338 10 mg/kg | Time to Reach the Maximum Concentration After Drug Administration (Tmax) Derived on Day 168 and 308 | Day 168 | 0.750 hr |
| BYM338 10 mg/kg | Time to Reach the Maximum Concentration After Drug Administration (Tmax) Derived on Day 168 and 308 | Day 308 | 0.750 hr |