Skip to content

StrataGraft® Skin Tissue in the Promotion of Autologous Skin Regeneration of Complex Skin Defects Due to Thermal Burns That Contain Intact Dermal Elements

A Phase III Open-label, Controlled, Randomized, Multicenter Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of StrataGraft Skin Tissue in Promoting Autologous Skin Tissue Regeneration of Complex Skin Defects Due to Thermal Burns That Contain Intact Dermal Elements and for Which Excision and Autografts Are Clinically Indicated

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03005106
Enrollment
71
Registered
2016-12-29
Start date
2017-05-30
Completion date
2020-03-27
Last updated
2021-07-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Burn, Thermal

Keywords

Trauma-related wound, Deep partial thickness, Skin wound

Brief summary

About 70 participants will be enrolled. They will have complex skin defects because of burns caused by heat. The burns will: * be on 3-49% of the participant's total body surface area (TBSA) * require surgery for skin replacement * include intact dermal elements The burns are called deep, partial-thickness thermal burns because the skin was damaged by heat but still has some dermis that was not damaged. The dermis is the layer of skin under the outer layer (epidermis). It is the thickest layer of the skin that provides strength and flexibility to the skin. All patients will receive both treatments, but on different areas of their burns. Their wounds will not be compared to other patients. One treatment area on their own body will be compared to the other one. This will help to find out if StrataGraft is safe and effective for deep partial thickness burns. It will also see if StrataGraft might help healing enough to use it instead of the patient's own healthy skin to repair the damage.

Interventions

StrataGraft® skin tissue is provided as a suturable rectangular piece of stratified epithelial tissue composed of a living dermal matrix containing dermal fibroblasts overlaid with human epidermal keratinocytes (NIKS®).

PROCEDUREAutograft

The current standard of care procedure for the treatment of severe burns. The procedure involves the removal of a sheet of healthy skin from an uninjured site on the patient and using it to cover the original burn wound.

Sponsors

Stratatech, a Mallinckrodt Company
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

See detailed description

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Subject-specific criteria: 1. Men and women aged ≥ 18 years 2. Written informed consent 3. Sufficient healthy skin identified and reserved as a donor site in the event that the StrataGraft treatment site requires autografting 4. Clinical expectation that the study donor site will heal without grafting 5. Complex skin defects of 3-49% TBSA * Total burn may consist of more than one area Treatment site-specific criteria: 6. Thermal burn(s) with intact dermal elements for which excision and autografting are clinically indicated 7. Total of both study treatment areas can be up to 2000 cm2 8. First excision and grafting of study treatment sites 9. Thermal burn(s) on the torso, arms, or legs

Exclusion criteria

Subject-specific criteria: 1. Pregnant women 2. Prisoners 3. Subjects receiving systemic immunosuppressive therapy 4. Subjects with a known history of malignancy 5. Preadmission insulin-dependent diabetic subjects 6. Subjects with concurrent conditions that in the opinion of the investigator may compromise subject safety or study objectives 7. Expected survival of less than three months 8. Participation in the treatment group of an interventional study within 90 days prior to enrollment Treatment site-specific criteria: 9. Full-thickness burns 10. Chronic wounds 11. The face, head, neck, hands, feet, buttocks, and area over joints 12. Treatment sites immediately adjacent to unexcised eschar 13. Clinical or laboratory determination of infection at the anticipated treatment sites

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Area of Treatment Sites Requiring Autografting by Month 33 MonthsPercent area autografted by Month 3 is the sum of the percent areas at each study session/visit, up to and including Study Session 7/Month 3 (± 14 d).
Number of Participants Classified as a Responder (Based on Durable Wound Closure at Month 3)Month 3Wound closure of the treatment site was defined as complete skin re-epithelialization and the absence of drainage. A participant whose StrataGraft treatment site achieves durable wound closure without autograft placement is classified as a responder.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain at the Designated Donor Sites by Day 14Day 3, Day 7 and Day 14, average of the 3 days reportedPain scores from the FACES scale range from 0 (no pain) to 5 (worst pain). Pain scores from Day 3, Day 7, and Day 14 (where available) are averaged for the summary statistics.
Total Scar Assessment (POSAS) Score by Observer at Month 3at Month 3Total Score is the sum of the scores for vascularization, pigmentation, thickness, relief, pliability, and surface area. For each of the 6 assessment categories, the scale ranged from 1=normal skin to 10=worst scar imaginable, with the highest possible score of 10. A higher score indicates worse scarring, so the best possible total score for the 6 categories is 6, and the worst possible score is 60.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Participants
StrataGraft Skin Tissue: StrataGraft® skin tissue is provided as a suturable rectangular piece of stratified epithelial tissue composed of a living dermal matrix containing dermal fibroblasts overlaid with human epidermal keratinocytes (NIKS®). Autograft: The current standard of care procedure for the treatment of severe burns. The procedure involves the removal of a sheet of healthy skin from an uninjured site on the patient and using it to cover the original burn wound.
71
Total71

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event1
Overall StudyDeath2
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up16
Overall StudyPhysician Decision1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Participants
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
8 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
63 Participants
Age, Continuous45 years
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
10 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
61 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
14 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
55 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
71 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
16 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
55 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
2 / 71
other
Total, other adverse events
49 / 71
serious
Total, serious adverse events
10 / 71

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants Classified as a Responder (Based on Durable Wound Closure at Month 3)

Wound closure of the treatment site was defined as complete skin re-epithelialization and the absence of drainage. A participant whose StrataGraft treatment site achieves durable wound closure without autograft placement is classified as a responder.

Time frame: Month 3

Population: Modified Intent to Treat Population

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants Classified as a Responder (Based on Durable Wound Closure at Month 3)59 Participants
95% CI: [74.4, 91.8]
Primary

Percent Area of Treatment Sites Requiring Autografting by Month 3

Percent area autografted by Month 3 is the sum of the percent areas at each study session/visit, up to and including Study Session 7/Month 3 (± 14 d).

Time frame: 3 Months

Population: Modified Intent to Treat Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsPercent Area of Treatment Sites Requiring Autografting by Month 3StrataGraft (Treatment) Sites4.33 percentage of treatment sitesStandard Deviation 21.58
All ParticipantsPercent Area of Treatment Sites Requiring Autografting by Month 3Autograft (Control) Sites102.10 percentage of treatment sitesStandard Deviation 13.14
p-value: <0.0001one-sided Wilcoxin Signed RankTtest
Secondary

Pain at the Designated Donor Sites by Day 14

Pain scores from the FACES scale range from 0 (no pain) to 5 (worst pain). Pain scores from Day 3, Day 7, and Day 14 (where available) are averaged for the summary statistics.

Time frame: Day 3, Day 7 and Day 14, average of the 3 days reported

Population: Modified Intent to Treat

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsPain at the Designated Donor Sites by Day 14StrataGraft (Treatment)0.15 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.54
All ParticipantsPain at the Designated Donor Sites by Day 14Autograft (Control)2.55 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
p-value: <0.00011-sided, paired t-test
Secondary

Total Scar Assessment (POSAS) Score by Observer at Month 3

Total Score is the sum of the scores for vascularization, pigmentation, thickness, relief, pliability, and surface area. For each of the 6 assessment categories, the scale ranged from 1=normal skin to 10=worst scar imaginable, with the highest possible score of 10. A higher score indicates worse scarring, so the best possible total score for the 6 categories is 6, and the worst possible score is 60.

Time frame: at Month 3

Population: Maximum number of participants with data at Month 3 in the modified Intent to Treat population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsTotal Scar Assessment (POSAS) Score by Observer at Month 3StrataGraft (Treatment)6.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.71
All ParticipantsTotal Scar Assessment (POSAS) Score by Observer at Month 3Autograft (Control)16.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.71
p-value: <0.00011-sided, paired t-test

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 19, 2026