Skip to content

Novel Biomarkers for Invasive Aspergillosis

Novel Biomarkers for Invasive Aspergillosis

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03004092
Enrollment
226
Registered
2016-12-28
Start date
2017-01-31
Completion date
2020-02-29
Last updated
2024-07-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aspergillosis Invasive

Keywords

bis(methylthio)gliotoxin, lateral flow device, JF5, Galactomannan, Invasive aspergillosis

Brief summary

Diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis remains difficult, and is often based on a combination of patient characteristics, radiological and microbiological findings. To data, galactomannan (GM) is the only well-validated biomarker available. However, GM still has its shortcomings. There is therefore a need for new, complementary biomarkers. In this study, two of those tests, bis(methylthio)gliotoxin (bmGT) and a lateral flow device, will be validated in a hematological population, and compare it to GM.

Detailed description

Diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis is often difficult to achieve with certainty, as this requires direct evidence of invasive growth on histopathological examination. A probable diagnosis can be suspected based on both clinical and mycological evidence of the disease, in presence of a susceptible patient. The EORTC-MSG guidelines offer a widely accepted basis for this diagnosis. Under these guidelines, mycological evidence can consist of a positive culture of aspergillus spp, or of detection of galactomannan (GM) in a relevant body sample. GM is a part of the Aspergillus mould and can be detected using a commercially available immunoenzymatic sandwich microplate assay. However, like most biomarkers, galactomannan is far from a perfect biomarker. Several beta-lactam antibiotics are known to cause false positives, and anti-mould therapy has been reported to significantly lower the sensitivity\[1\]. Additional biomarkers that could circumvent these problems would therefore be beneficial. A potential new target is gliotoxin (GT), a secondary metabolite of several fungi, the most clinically important of which is Aspergillus\[2\]. GT is released during invasive growth, and can therefore be used as a biomarker of invasive fungal disease by GT-producing fungi. However, GT is quickly removed by red blood cells from circulation, making it an unreliable marker\[3\]. A degradation product of GT, bis(methylthio)gliotoxin (bmGT), appears to be more stable as it is not taken up by red blood cells. Serum bmGT or bmGT in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid has already been shown in small studies to be a potential marker of invasive aspergillosis, especially when used in combination with GM\[3-5\]. Recently, another highly specific test has become available, based on detection of an extracellular glycoprotein secreted during the growth of Aspergillus species, using a monoclonal antibody (JF5) in an immunochromatographic lateral-flow device (LFD)\[6,7\]. This test allows fast (\<15 minutes) testing using a commercially available device. In this study, both the LFD and bmGT will be characterized and validated in a hematological population, and compared to GM.

Interventions

PROCEDUREblood sample

Twice weekly blood sample, and at every outpatient visit

Sponsors

Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥ 16y at start of study * One of the following diagnoses: * De novo, refractory or relapsed AML/MDS receiving intensive chemotherapy * De novo, refractory or relapsed ALL/T-lymphoblastic lymphoma receiving intensive chemotherapy * Aplastic anemia requiring ATG therapy * Any patient admitted for either autologous or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation * Written informed consent obtained from the patient

Exclusion criteria

* AML or ALL beyond the specified inclusion criteria * Directed treatment for possible, probable, or proven invasive aspergillosis, at moment of screening, or with end of treatment \< 6 weeks at screening, or no complete response according to EORTC/MSG criteria, or complete response achieved \< 6 weeks at time of screening.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Diagnostic accuracy of serum bmGT2 weeksDetermine the diagnostic accuracy (specificity, sensitivity predictive values, accuracy and other key diagnostic values) of serum bmGT in the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis, using the revised EORTC criteria as gold standard.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Prognostic value of serum bmGT6 weeksDetermine prognostic value (therapy response / mortality) of initial serum bmGT levels.
Prognostic value of serum bmGT kinetics6 weeksEvaluate serum bmGT kinetics as surrogate marker of therapeutic response.
Renal and hepatic influence on bmGT2 weeksEvaluate the impact of renal and hepatic function on initial bmGT levels and bmGT kinetics.
Diagnostic accuracy of a combination of serum bmGT and serum GM2 weeksDetermine diagnostic accuracy of a combination of serum GM and serum bmGT in the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis.
Diagnostic accuracy of BAL bmGT2 weeksDetermine diagnostic accuracy of bmGT in BAL in the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis.
Diagnostic accuracy of LFD2 weeksDetermine diagnostic accuracy of the lateral flow device (LFD) in BAL and serum in the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis.
Compare bmGT-HPTLC to bmGT-LC/MSSame dayCompare bmGT levels as measured by HPTLC to levels as measured by our own in-house developed chromatographic method.

Countries

Belgium

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 18, 2026