Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse
Conditions
Keywords
Lymphoma, Diffuse-large B-Cell Lymphoma, Durvalumab, Anti-PD-L1 Antibody, MEDI4736, Immune Checkpoint, Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine, Prednisone/Prednisolone, Lenalidomide
Brief summary
This Phase 2, two-arm, open-label study is designed to evaluate the safety, clinical activity, and predictive biomarkers of durvalumab in combination with R-CHOP or R2-CHOP, followed by durvalumab consolidation therapy in previously untreated subjects with high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Induction treatment with R-CHOP (± lenalidomide) will last for a total of up to 6 to 8 treatment cycles (21 day cycles), and the total time on study treatment, including durvalumab consolidation, will last up to 12 months. On 05-Sep-2017, the US FDA has issued a Partial Clinical Hold on this study resulting in the discontinuation of enrollment into Arm B (Durvalumab + Lenalidomide + R-CHOP). After the US FDA Partial Clinical Hold, new eligible participants have been enrolled in Arm A (Durvalumab + R-CHOP).
Detailed description
This research study is conducted in participants with previously untreated, high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Patients with high-risk DLBCL typically have insufficient therapeutic outcomes. Therefore, the addition of novel agents to the currently used induction therapy (R-CHOP) is a rational approach to improve therapeutic outcomes in this disease setting. Based on pre-clinical and clinical observations, it is hypothesized that durvalumab will have activity in DLBCL because the PD 1/PD L1 pathway is involved in the pathophysiology of DLBCL. In particular, the addition of durvalumab may augment the anti-tumor activity of R-CHOP against high-risk DLBCL sub-types. The safety of durvalumab has already been explored. However, as there is limited clinical experience with durvalumab in DLBCL, the study is divided into two stages: * A Safety Run-in Stage to evaluate the safety of the treatment combinations until at least 10 subjects are included in each of the two treatment arms * An Expansion Stage to analyze the clinical activity of the treatment combinations Results posted following Primary Outcome Completion date are based on a database cut-off of August 2, 2018.
Interventions
Durvalumab was supplied in single use vials as a liquid solution containing 500 mg (nominal) of durvalumab at a concentration of 50 mg/mL to be infused by intravenous (IV) injection. Day 1 of each treatment cycle (Induction Period and Consolidation Period) started with the administration of IV durvalumab followed by a 2-hour observation period post infusion.
Subsequent to durvalumab infusion, rituximab was administered by IV. Rituximab administration could be split over 2 consecutive days according to local clinical practice. Rapid infusion of rituximab was not allowed in this clinical study.
A component of the CHOP therapy administered by IV. CHOP therapy was administered following rituximab.
A component of the CHOP therapy administered by IV. CHOP therapy was administered following rituximab.
A component of the CHOP therapy administered by IV. CHOP therapy was administered following rituximab.
Prednisone was administered as an IV infusion or by mouth (PO) on Day 1, followed by PO administration on Days 2-5 of each cycle. Prednisone could be given prior to other drugs of the CHOP therapy. It was administered after lenalidomide dosing in the R2-CHOP treatment arm.
Lenalidomide was administered orally in capsule form on Days 1-14 of the DUR+R2-CHOP treatment arm only.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. CD20+Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma. 2. Ann Arbor stage 3 or 4 or stage 2 with bulky disease 3. High or high-intermediate disease risk. 4. No prior anti-lymphoma treatment. 5. Subject is willing and able to undergo biopsy. 6. Investigator considers R-CHOP immunochemotherapy appropriate. 7. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2. 8. Adequate hematology laboratory results (absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1.5 \* 10\^9/L, platelet count ≥ 75 \* 10\^9/L, hemoglobin ≥ 10.0 g/dL). 9. Adequate biochemistry laboratory results (aspartate aminotransferase (AST/SGOT) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT/SGPT) ≤ 3.0 \* upper limit of normal; bilirubin ≤ 2.0 mg/dL; creatinine clearance of ≥ 40 mL/min). 10. Bi-dimensionally measurable disease (\> 2.0 cm). 11. Subject is using effective contraception.
Exclusion criteria
1. Diagnosis of lymphoma other than Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma. 2. Composite lymphoma or transformed lymphoma. 3. Primary or secondary Central Nervous System involvement by lymphoma. 4. Seropositive or active viral infection with hepatitis B virus, human immunodeficiency virus or hepatitis C virus. 5. History of other malignancies, unless disease-free for ≥ 5 years. 6. Left ventricular ejection fraction \< 50%. 7. Peripheral neuropathy ≥ Grade 2. 8. Prior use of lenalidomide, or monoclonal antibodies against CTLA-4, PD-1, or PD-L1. 9. High risk of developing thromboembolic events, who are unwilling to take venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. 10. Active or prior documented autoimmune or inflammatory disorders within the past 3 years. 11. Current or prior use of immunosuppressive medication within 28 days before start of treatment.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Complete Response (CR) at the End of Induction Therapy | From first dose of study drug to end of Induction therapy (Day 1 up to Week 26 - maximum duration of Induction Period). | The primary efficacy analysis evaluated the complete response rate (CRR) at the end of the induction therapy in the efficacy evaluable population in a comparative manner against historical control. The response to treatment was assessed according to the 2014 International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria for Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) (Cheson, 2014). CR was defined as a complete metabolic response and radiographic evidence showing target nodes/nodal masses regressed to ≤ 1.5 cm in longest diameter, no new lesions, regression of lymph nodes to normal size, absence of splenomegaly, and absence of bone marrow involvement. Clopper-Pearson two-sided 95% confidence interval is reported. Null hypothesis for the primary endpoint was rejected if the lower limit of the confidence interval for the complete response rate at the completion of the induction therapy in the efficacy evaluable population is above 55%. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Clinical Response in the Biomarker Subpopulation for Immunohistochemistry (IHC) CD8 T-Cell Density | Biomarker biopsies: Days -28 to Day -1. Clinical response: From first dose of study drug to end of Induction therapy (Day 1 up to Week 26 - maximum duration of Induction Period). | Data in the analysis include all participants who received durvalumab, irrespective of the study arm in which they enrolled, because the selected biomarkers have been associated with response in other anti-PD1 or anti-PDL1 studies, such as durvalumab. IHC analysis was performed on the baseline tumor biopsy to quantify CD8 T-cell density. Participants with 'high' values, i.e. above the threshold defined as the median value of 774 cells/mm\^2 found in commercial DLBCL samples using matched analytical methods, were predicted to be responders to treatment with durvalumab. The definition of a complete response was that used in the primary outcome. |
| Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Clinical Response in the Biomarker Subpopulation for Immunohistochemistry (IHC) Programmed Death Ligand - 1 (PDL1) Total Percentage | Biomarker biopsies: Days -28 to Day -1. Clinical response: From first dose of study drug to end of Induction therapy (Day 1 up to Week 26 - maximum duration of Induction Period). | Data in the analysis include all participants who received durvalumab, irrespective of the study arm in which they enrolled, because the selected biomarkers have been associated with response in other anti-PD1 or anti-PDL1 studies, such as durvalumab. IHC analysis was performed on the baseline tumor biopsy to quantify CD8 T-cell density. Participants with 'high' values, i.e. above the threshold defined as the median value of 774 cells/mm\^2 found in commercial DLBCL samples using matched analytical methods, were predicted to be responders to treatment with durvalumab. The definition of a complete response was that used in the primary outcome. |
| Percentage of Participants Who Responded During Induction and Continued Into Consolidation Therapy (Database Cutoff Date: 02-Aug-2018) | From first dose of study drug to completion of at least one cycle in the Consolidation Period (Day 1 up to Week 52) | The percentage of participants who achieved a partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) at the end of Induction and continued into consolidation period in the efficacy evaluable population in a comparative manner against historical control. The response to treatment was assessed according to the 2014 International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria for Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) (Cheson, 2014). CR was defined in outcome #1. PR was defined as a partial metabolic response and radiographic evidence showing ≥ 50% decrease in sum of perpendicular diameters (SPD) of up to 6 target measurable nodes and extranodal sites, no new lesions, spleen must have regressed \> 50% in length beyond normal, and residual bone marrow involvement improved from baseline. Clopper-Pearson two-sided 95% confidence interval is reported. Null hypothesis was rejected if the lower limit of the confidence interval for the rate of subjects who continue consolidation therapy out of all subjects. |
| Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Clinical Response in the Biomarker Subpopulation for the Interferon Gamma Score (IFNG-Score) From Ribonucleic Acid (RNA)-Sequencing Data | Biomarker biopsies: Days -28 to Day -1. Clinical response: From first dose of study drug to end of Induction therapy (Day 1 up to Week 26 - maximum duration of Induction Period). | Data in the analysis include all participants who received durvalumab, irrespective of the study arm in which they enrolled, because the selected biomarkers have been associated with response in other anti-PD1 or anti-PDL1 studies, such as durvalumab. IHC analysis was performed on the baseline tumor biopsy to quantify CD8 T-cell density. Participants with 'high' values, i.e. above the threshold defined as the median value of 774 cells/mm\^2 found in commercial DLBCL samples using matched analytical methods, were predicted to be responders to treatment with durvalumab. The definition of a complete response was that used in the primary outcome. |
| Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) | From the date of the first dose of study drug to within 90 days after the last dose of durvalumab or 28 days after the last dose of any investigational product (IP) whichever is greater. (Up to approximately 72 weeks) | An AE is any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence that may appear or worsen during a study. A serious AE is any AE occurring at any dose that: • Results in death; • Is life-threatening; • Requires or prolongs existing inpatient hospitalization; • Results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; • Is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; • Constitutes an important medical event. The Investigator assessed the relationship of each AE to study drug and graded the severity according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, Version 4.03): - Grade 1 = Mild (no limitation in activity or intervention); - Grade 2 = Moderate (some limitation in activity; no/minimal medical intervention required); - Grade 3 = Severe (marked limitation in activity; medical intervention required, hospitalization possible); - Grade 4 = Life-threatening; - Grade 5 = Death. Relation to IP is determined by the investigator. |
| Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Clinical Response in the Biomarker Subpopulation for Immunohistochemistry (IHC) Programmed Death Ligand - 1 (PDL1) Percentage of Tumor Cells | Biomarker biopsies: Days -28 to Day -1. Clinical response: From first dose of study drug to end of Induction therapy (Day 1 up to Week 26 - maximum duration of Induction Period). | Data in the analysis include all participants who received durvalumab, irrespective of the study arm in which they enrolled, because the selected biomarkers have been associated with response in other anti-PD1 or anti-PDL1 studies, such as durvalumab. IHC analysis was performed on the baseline tumor biopsy to quantify CD8 T-cell density. Participants with 'high' values, i.e. above the threshold defined as the median value of 774 cells/mm\^2 found in commercial DLBCL samples using matched analytical methods, were predicted to be responders to treatment with durvalumab. The definition of a complete response was that used in the primary outcome. |
Countries
Austria, Denmark, Estonia, United Kingdom, United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| DUR + R-CHOP Participants receive Induction Therapy (21-day cycles): Durvalumab 1125 mg intravenously (IV) on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle in combination with 6 to 8 cycles R-CHOP (IV rituximab, doxorubicin, vincristine and cyclophosphamide on Day 1; daily oral/IV prednisone/prednisolone from Day 1 to 5).
Participants then receive Consolidation Therapy (28-day cycles): Durvalumab 1500 mg IV on Day 1 of each 28-day cycle for up to a total of 12 months from C1D1 of induction therapy. | 43 |
| DUR + R2-CHOP Participants receive Induction Therapy (21-day cycles): Cycle 1 - induction therapy of durvalumab in combination with R-CHOP (as described in DUR + R-CHOP arm). Starting at cycle 2 - Durvalumab 1125 mg IV on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle in combination with 6 to 8 cycles R2-CHOP (IV rituximab, doxorubicin, vincristine and cyclophosphamide on Day 1; daily oral/IV prednisone/prednisolone from Day 1 to 5; daily oral lenalidomide 15 mg from Day 1 to 14) from the cycle following COO determination until end of induction therapy (Cycle 6 or Cycle 8) or starting Cycle 1 if ABC subtype is identified prior to C1D1.
Participants then receive Consolidation Therapy (28-day cycles): Durvalumab 1500 mg IV on Day 1 of each 28-day cycle for up to a total of 12 months from C1D1 of induction therapy. | 3 |
| Total | 46 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 9 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Death | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Other reasons | 4 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Progressive disease | 9 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 6 | 0 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Total | DUR + R-CHOP | DUR + R2-CHOP |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 61.5 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.57 | 61.1 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.77 | 67.7 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.62 |
| Age, Customized <65 years | 24 Participants | 23 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Age, Customized >=65 years | 22 Participants | 20 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Ann Arbor Stage at Diagnosis Stage I | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Ann Arbor Stage at Diagnosis Stage II | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Ann Arbor Stage at Diagnosis Stage III | 11 Participants | 9 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Ann Arbor Stage at Diagnosis Stage IV | 35 Participants | 34 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 0 = Fully Active | 18 Participants | 16 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 1 = Restricted activity but ambulatory | 19 Participants | 19 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 2 = Ambulatory but unable to work | 9 Participants | 8 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 3 = Limited Self-Care | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 4 = Completely Disabled, No self-care | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 46 Participants | 43 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| International Prognostic Index (IPSS) Score 0-1: Low risk | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| International Prognostic Index (IPSS) Score 2: Low-Intermediate risk | 9 Participants | 9 Participants | 0 Participants |
| International Prognostic Index (IPSS) Score 3: High-Intermediate risk | 21 Participants | 21 Participants | 0 Participants |
| International Prognostic Index (IPSS) Score 4-5: High risk | 11 Participants | 9 Participants | 2 Participants |
| International Prognostic Index (IPSS) Score Missing | 5 Participants | 4 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Presence of Bulky Disease at Baseline No | 23 Participants | 22 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Presence of Bulky Disease at Baseline Yes | 23 Participants | 21 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Black or African American | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Not Colected or Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Other | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White | 45 Participants | 42 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 18 Participants | 17 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 28 Participants | 26 Participants | 2 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 5 / 43 | 1 / 3 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 43 / 43 | 3 / 3 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 23 / 43 | 1 / 3 |
Outcome results
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Complete Response (CR) at the End of Induction Therapy
The primary efficacy analysis evaluated the complete response rate (CRR) at the end of the induction therapy in the efficacy evaluable population in a comparative manner against historical control. The response to treatment was assessed according to the 2014 International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria for Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) (Cheson, 2014). CR was defined as a complete metabolic response and radiographic evidence showing target nodes/nodal masses regressed to ≤ 1.5 cm in longest diameter, no new lesions, regression of lymph nodes to normal size, absence of splenomegaly, and absence of bone marrow involvement. Clopper-Pearson two-sided 95% confidence interval is reported. Null hypothesis for the primary endpoint was rejected if the lower limit of the confidence interval for the complete response rate at the completion of the induction therapy in the efficacy evaluable population is above 55%.
Time frame: From first dose of study drug to end of Induction therapy (Day 1 up to Week 26 - maximum duration of Induction Period).
Population: Efficacy Evaluable Population includes participants who completed at least one cycle of their assigned treatment, had a baseline assessment by CT scan and at least one post baseline tumor response assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| DUR + R-CHOP | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Complete Response (CR) at the End of Induction Therapy | 54.1 percentage of participants |
| DUR + R2-CHOP | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Complete Response (CR) at the End of Induction Therapy | 66.7 percentage of participants |
Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)
An AE is any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence that may appear or worsen during a study. A serious AE is any AE occurring at any dose that: • Results in death; • Is life-threatening; • Requires or prolongs existing inpatient hospitalization; • Results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; • Is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; • Constitutes an important medical event. The Investigator assessed the relationship of each AE to study drug and graded the severity according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, Version 4.03): - Grade 1 = Mild (no limitation in activity or intervention); - Grade 2 = Moderate (some limitation in activity; no/minimal medical intervention required); - Grade 3 = Severe (marked limitation in activity; medical intervention required, hospitalization possible); - Grade 4 = Life-threatening; - Grade 5 = Death. Relation to IP is determined by the investigator.
Time frame: From the date of the first dose of study drug to within 90 days after the last dose of durvalumab or 28 days after the last dose of any investigational product (IP) whichever is greater. (Up to approximately 72 weeks)
Population: Safety Population, which consists of all participants who received at least 1 dose of the study medications. Participants were analyzed in the arm of the actual treatment received.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| DUR + R-CHOP | Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) | >=1 serious TEAE related to R-CHOP | 10 Participants |
| DUR + R-CHOP | Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) | >=1 TEAE related to durvalumab or any other IP | 41 Participants |
| DUR + R-CHOP | Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) | >=1 TEAE related to R-CHOP | 40 Participants |
| DUR + R-CHOP | Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) | >=1 serious TEAE related to any IP | 14 Participants |
| DUR + R-CHOP | Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) | >=1 leading to discontinuation of durvalumab | 13 Participants |
| DUR + R-CHOP | Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) | >=1 TEAE severity grade 3-4 related to any IP | 31 Participants |
| DUR + R-CHOP | Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) | >=1 leading to discontinuation of R-CHOP | 4 Participants |
| DUR + R-CHOP | Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) | >=1 TEAE severity grade 3-4 | 37 Participants |
| DUR + R-CHOP | Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) | >=1 TEAE severity grade 5 | 3 Participants |
| DUR + R-CHOP | Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) | >=1 leading to discontinuation of any IP | 13 Participants |
| DUR + R-CHOP | Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) | >=1 TEAE related to durvalumab | 33 Participants |
| DUR + R-CHOP | Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) | >=1 leading to interruption of durvalumab | 15 Participants |
| DUR + R-CHOP | Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) | >=1 TEAE severity grade 5 related to any IP | 0 Participants |
| DUR + R-CHOP | Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) | >=1 leading to interruption of R-CHOP | 12 Participants |
| DUR + R-CHOP | Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) | >=1 TEAE severity grade 3-4 related to durvalumab | 18 Participants |
| DUR + R-CHOP | Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) | >=1 leading to interruption of any IP | 18 Participants |
| DUR + R-CHOP | Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) | >=1 serious TEAE | 23 Participants |
| DUR + R-CHOP | Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) | >=1 leading to infusion interruption of durvalumab | 2 Participants |
| DUR + R-CHOP | Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) | >= 1 Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) | 43 Participants |
| DUR + R-CHOP | Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) | >=1 leading to dose reduction of vincristine | 4 Participants |
| DUR + R-CHOP | Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) | >=1 serious TEAE related to durvalumab | 10 Participants |
| DUR + R-CHOP | Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) | >=1 TEAE severity grade 3-4 related to R-CHOP | 27 Participants |
| DUR + R2-CHOP | Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) | >=1 leading to interruption of durvalumab | 2 Participants |
| DUR + R2-CHOP | Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) | >=1 leading to interruption of R-CHOP | 1 Participants |
| DUR + R2-CHOP | Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) | >=1 leading to interruption of any IP | 3 Participants |
| DUR + R2-CHOP | Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) | >=1 leading to infusion interruption of durvalumab | 0 Participants |
| DUR + R2-CHOP | Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) | >=1 leading to dose reduction of vincristine | 1 Participants |
| DUR + R2-CHOP | Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) | >=1 leading to dose reduction of lenalidomide | 1 Participants |
| DUR + R2-CHOP | Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) | >=1 serious TEAE | 1 Participants |
| DUR + R2-CHOP | Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) | >=1 leading to interruption of lenalidomide | 2 Participants |
| DUR + R2-CHOP | Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) | >= 1 Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) | 3 Participants |
| DUR + R2-CHOP | Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) | >=1 TEAE related to durvalumab | 3 Participants |
| DUR + R2-CHOP | Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) | >=1 TEAE related to R-CHOP | 3 Participants |
| DUR + R2-CHOP | Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) | >=1 TEAE related to lenalidomide | 3 Participants |
| DUR + R2-CHOP | Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) | >=1 TEAE related to durvalumab or any other IP | 3 Participants |
| DUR + R2-CHOP | Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) | >=1 TEAE severity grade 3-4 | 3 Participants |
| DUR + R2-CHOP | Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) | >=1 TEAE severity grade 3-4 related to durvalumab | 1 Participants |
| DUR + R2-CHOP | Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) | >=1 TEAE severity grade 3-4 related to R-CHOP | 3 Participants |
| DUR + R2-CHOP | Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) | >=1 TEAE severity grade 3-4 related to lenalidomid | 2 Participants |
| DUR + R2-CHOP | Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) | >=1 TEAE severity grade 3-4 related to any IP | 3 Participants |
| DUR + R2-CHOP | Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) | >=1 TEAE severity grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| DUR + R2-CHOP | Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) | >=1 TEAE severity grade 5 related to any IP | 0 Participants |
| DUR + R2-CHOP | Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) | >=1 serious TEAE related to any IP | 1 Participants |
| DUR + R2-CHOP | Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) | >=1 serious TEAE related to durvalumab | 1 Participants |
| DUR + R2-CHOP | Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) | >=1 serious TEAE related to R-CHOP | 1 Participants |
| DUR + R2-CHOP | Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) | >=1 serious TEAE related to lenalidomide | 1 Participants |
| DUR + R2-CHOP | Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) | >=1 leading to discontinuation of durvalumab | 0 Participants |
| DUR + R2-CHOP | Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) | >=1 leading to discontinuation of R-CHOP | 0 Participants |
| DUR + R2-CHOP | Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) | >=1 leading to discontinuation of lenalidomide | 0 Participants |
| DUR + R2-CHOP | Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) | >=1 leading to discontinuation of any IP | 0 Participants |
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Clinical Response in the Biomarker Subpopulation for Immunohistochemistry (IHC) CD8 T-Cell Density
Data in the analysis include all participants who received durvalumab, irrespective of the study arm in which they enrolled, because the selected biomarkers have been associated with response in other anti-PD1 or anti-PDL1 studies, such as durvalumab. IHC analysis was performed on the baseline tumor biopsy to quantify CD8 T-cell density. Participants with 'high' values, i.e. above the threshold defined as the median value of 774 cells/mm\^2 found in commercial DLBCL samples using matched analytical methods, were predicted to be responders to treatment with durvalumab. The definition of a complete response was that used in the primary outcome.
Time frame: Biomarker biopsies: Days -28 to Day -1. Clinical response: From first dose of study drug to end of Induction therapy (Day 1 up to Week 26 - maximum duration of Induction Period).
Population: The RNA Biomarker Analysis Set included all Efficacy Evaluable participants who have RNA Sequencing analysis performed on a biopsy sample and collected from the participant before treatment on the protocol. Population included participants who received durvalumab. Samples with whole transcriptome data of low quality were excluded from the set.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| DUR + R-CHOP | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Clinical Response in the Biomarker Subpopulation for Immunohistochemistry (IHC) CD8 T-Cell Density | 67 percentage of participants |
| DUR + R2-CHOP | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Clinical Response in the Biomarker Subpopulation for Immunohistochemistry (IHC) CD8 T-Cell Density | 64 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Clinical Response in the Biomarker Subpopulation for Immunohistochemistry (IHC) Programmed Death Ligand - 1 (PDL1) Percentage of Tumor Cells
Data in the analysis include all participants who received durvalumab, irrespective of the study arm in which they enrolled, because the selected biomarkers have been associated with response in other anti-PD1 or anti-PDL1 studies, such as durvalumab. IHC analysis was performed on the baseline tumor biopsy to quantify CD8 T-cell density. Participants with 'high' values, i.e. above the threshold defined as the median value of 774 cells/mm\^2 found in commercial DLBCL samples using matched analytical methods, were predicted to be responders to treatment with durvalumab. The definition of a complete response was that used in the primary outcome.
Time frame: Biomarker biopsies: Days -28 to Day -1. Clinical response: From first dose of study drug to end of Induction therapy (Day 1 up to Week 26 - maximum duration of Induction Period).
Population: The RNA Biomarker Analysis Set included all Efficacy Evaluable participants who have RNA Sequencing analysis performed on a biopsy sample and collected from the participant before treatment on the protocol. Population included participants who received durvalumab. Samples with whole transcriptome data of low quality were excluded from the set.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| DUR + R-CHOP | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Clinical Response in the Biomarker Subpopulation for Immunohistochemistry (IHC) Programmed Death Ligand - 1 (PDL1) Percentage of Tumor Cells | 64 percentage of participants |
| DUR + R2-CHOP | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Clinical Response in the Biomarker Subpopulation for Immunohistochemistry (IHC) Programmed Death Ligand - 1 (PDL1) Percentage of Tumor Cells | 56 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Clinical Response in the Biomarker Subpopulation for Immunohistochemistry (IHC) Programmed Death Ligand - 1 (PDL1) Total Percentage
Data in the analysis include all participants who received durvalumab, irrespective of the study arm in which they enrolled, because the selected biomarkers have been associated with response in other anti-PD1 or anti-PDL1 studies, such as durvalumab. IHC analysis was performed on the baseline tumor biopsy to quantify CD8 T-cell density. Participants with 'high' values, i.e. above the threshold defined as the median value of 774 cells/mm\^2 found in commercial DLBCL samples using matched analytical methods, were predicted to be responders to treatment with durvalumab. The definition of a complete response was that used in the primary outcome.
Time frame: Biomarker biopsies: Days -28 to Day -1. Clinical response: From first dose of study drug to end of Induction therapy (Day 1 up to Week 26 - maximum duration of Induction Period).
Population: The RNA Biomarker Analysis Set included all Efficacy Evaluable participants who have RNA Sequencing analysis performed on a biopsy sample and collected from the participant before treatment on the protocol. Population included participants who received durvalumab. Samples with whole transcriptome data of low quality were excluded from the set.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| DUR + R-CHOP | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Clinical Response in the Biomarker Subpopulation for Immunohistochemistry (IHC) Programmed Death Ligand - 1 (PDL1) Total Percentage | 75 percentage of participants |
| DUR + R2-CHOP | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Clinical Response in the Biomarker Subpopulation for Immunohistochemistry (IHC) Programmed Death Ligand - 1 (PDL1) Total Percentage | 20 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Clinical Response in the Biomarker Subpopulation for the Interferon Gamma Score (IFNG-Score) From Ribonucleic Acid (RNA)-Sequencing Data
Data in the analysis include all participants who received durvalumab, irrespective of the study arm in which they enrolled, because the selected biomarkers have been associated with response in other anti-PD1 or anti-PDL1 studies, such as durvalumab. IHC analysis was performed on the baseline tumor biopsy to quantify CD8 T-cell density. Participants with 'high' values, i.e. above the threshold defined as the median value of 774 cells/mm\^2 found in commercial DLBCL samples using matched analytical methods, were predicted to be responders to treatment with durvalumab. The definition of a complete response was that used in the primary outcome.
Time frame: Biomarker biopsies: Days -28 to Day -1. Clinical response: From first dose of study drug to end of Induction therapy (Day 1 up to Week 26 - maximum duration of Induction Period).
Population: The RNA Biomarker Analysis Set included all Efficacy Evaluable participants who have RNA Sequencing analysis performed on a biopsy sample and collected from the participant before treatment on the protocol. Population included participants who received durvalumab. Samples with whole transcriptome data of low quality were excluded from the set.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| DUR + R-CHOP | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Clinical Response in the Biomarker Subpopulation for the Interferon Gamma Score (IFNG-Score) From Ribonucleic Acid (RNA)-Sequencing Data | 43 percentage of participants |
| DUR + R2-CHOP | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Clinical Response in the Biomarker Subpopulation for the Interferon Gamma Score (IFNG-Score) From Ribonucleic Acid (RNA)-Sequencing Data | 60 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Who Responded During Induction and Continued Into Consolidation Therapy (Database Cutoff Date: 02-Aug-2018)
The percentage of participants who achieved a partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) at the end of Induction and continued into consolidation period in the efficacy evaluable population in a comparative manner against historical control. The response to treatment was assessed according to the 2014 International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria for Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) (Cheson, 2014). CR was defined in outcome #1. PR was defined as a partial metabolic response and radiographic evidence showing ≥ 50% decrease in sum of perpendicular diameters (SPD) of up to 6 target measurable nodes and extranodal sites, no new lesions, spleen must have regressed \> 50% in length beyond normal, and residual bone marrow involvement improved from baseline. Clopper-Pearson two-sided 95% confidence interval is reported. Null hypothesis was rejected if the lower limit of the confidence interval for the rate of subjects who continue consolidation therapy out of all subjects.
Time frame: From first dose of study drug to completion of at least one cycle in the Consolidation Period (Day 1 up to Week 52)
Population: Efficacy Evaluable Population includes participants who completed at least one cycle of their assigned treatment, had a baseline assessment by CT scan and at least one post baseline tumor response assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| DUR + R-CHOP | Percentage of Participants Who Responded During Induction and Continued Into Consolidation Therapy (Database Cutoff Date: 02-Aug-2018) | 67.6 percentage of participants |
| DUR + R2-CHOP | Percentage of Participants Who Responded During Induction and Continued Into Consolidation Therapy (Database Cutoff Date: 02-Aug-2018) | 66.7 percentage of participants |