Skip to content

Nasotracheal Intubation Over a Bougie

Nasotracheal Intubation Over a Bougie Placed Via a Subsequently Removed Nasal Trumpet

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03003455
Enrollment
257
Registered
2016-12-28
Start date
2012-03-31
Completion date
2016-02-29
Last updated
2016-12-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Nasal Bleeding, Nasotracheal Intubation

Keywords

Nasotracheal Intubation

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether nasal intubation over a bougie placed via a nasal trumpet will decrease nasal trauma when compared to the conventional technique of blind nasal endotracheal tube passage.

Detailed description

Conventional nasotracheal intubation techniques (or Conventional Videolaryngoscopic Techniques, CVT) are known to be associated with significant trauma to the patient's nares and the endotracheal tube itself. The investigators propose an alternative technique (Nasotracheal intubation over a bougie placed via a subsequently removed nasal trumpet, or NIB) which involves using Seldinger technique over a bougie placed via a nasal trumpet which promises to not only be less traumatic to the patient and the endotracheal tube, but also to take less time to perform and have a higher first-attempt success rate than conventional methods. The investigators propose a randomized prospective interventional study comparing this new technique with conventional technique to see if a significant difference exists.

Interventions

PROCEDURENasotracheal intubation over a bougie

Nasotracheal intubation over a bougie, placed with videolaryngoscopy assistance, via a nasopharyngeal airway with or without the aid of Magill forceps

PROCEDUREConventional Nasotracheal Intubation

Blind passage of an endotracheal tube via the nare followed by videolaryngoscopy-assisted passage through the glottis, with or without the aid of Magill forceps

Sponsors

University of Iowa
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
8 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients scheduled for elective surgery with an anesthetic plan including asleep nasotracheal intubation

Exclusion criteria

* Patients needing emergent airway protection * Patients undergoing emergency surgery * Patients whom are known to be pregnant * Patients whom are currently anticoagulated (including daily aspirin use) * Patients whose anesthetic includes the use of nitrous oxide * Patients whom are currently incarcerated * Patients 7 years of age or younger * Mentally incompetent adults * Patients whom refuse involvement in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Nasal trauma60-90 seconds post-intubationBleeding noted on nasopharyngeal exam by surgical resident

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Nasal trauma5 minutes post-intubationBleeding noted on nasopharyngeal exam by surgical resident
Time to intubationMeasured immediately post-intubationTime from first entrance of ETT or bougie into the nare to the presence of end-tidal CO2 via nasotracheal ETT
First attempt success rateMeasured immediately post-intubationWhether or not there was successful nasotracheal intubation on the first attempt
Need for Magill forcepsMeasured Immediately post-intubationWhether or not Magill forceps were used during airway management

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026