Skip to content

Safety and Risk Assessment of Obese Parturient Underwent Cesarean Section(CS) Delivery Under Different Anesthesia Ways

Safety and Risk Assessment of Obese Parturient Underwent Cesarean Section(CS) Delivery Under General Anesthesia or Intraspinal Anesthesia

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03002636
Enrollment
900
Registered
2016-12-26
Start date
2013-01-31
Completion date
2016-09-30
Last updated
2016-12-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cesarean Section

Keywords

Obesity, Anesthesia Complications, Body Mass Index (BMI)

Brief summary

900 parturient who underwent CS under general anesthesia(GA) , intraspinal anesthesia included epidural anesthesia(EA) and combined spinal-epidural anesthesia(CSEA), which were divided into 3 groups: Morbid Obesity group (n=300) with body mass index (BMI) \>40 kg/m2 , severe Obesity group (n=300) with 30 kg/m2≤BMI ≤40 kg/m2 and non-Obesity group(n=300) with BMI\<30 kg/m2. Findings Between January 1, 2013 and September 30, 2016, a total of 1000 women met inclusion criteria and 900 women received allocated intervention. All patients were divided into three groups: Morbid Obesity group(n=300), Severe Obesity group(n=300) and non-Obesity group(n=300) according to body mass index (BMI) \>40 kg/m2, 30 kg/m2≤BMI ≤40 kg/m2 and BMI\<30 kg/m2.900 patients completed the protocol and related data were analysed.

Detailed description

900 parturient who underwent CS under general anesthesia(GA) , intraspinal anesthesia included epidural anesthesia(EA) and combined spinal-epidural anesthesia(CSEA), which were divided into 3 groups

Interventions

PROCEDUREanesthesia

Anesthesia : (1) General Anesthesia (GA)(2) Epidural Anesthesia (EA) (3) Combined Spinal-Epidural Anesthesia (CSEA)

Sponsors

International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Fudan University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
24 Years to 35 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients with ASA Physical Status gradeΙΙ~ΙΙΙ.

Exclusion criteria

* scoliosis, congenital heart disease, lung, liver, kidney diseases or increased intracranial pressure (ICP)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patients numbers of obese parturient complications2 yearsPatients numbers of emergency, fetal macrosomia, gestational diabetes mellitus (GMD), CS history, fetal distress, elderly parturient women(≥35 years), prenatal fever, arrhythmias, abnormalities of the heart, hypertension(pre-eclampsia), multiple pregnancy, precious child, amniotic fluid abnormality, amout of bleeding, neonate Apgar's Score(1min), Apgar's Score(5min), and patients numbers of EA, GA, PACU (Postanesthesia Care Unit ) and ICU (Intensive Care Unit) for duration of hospital stay and anesthesia puncture times with 5\>n≥3 and n≥5 in three groups included non-Obesity group, severe Obesity group and Morbid Obesity group were also recorded. In addition, we also recorded puncture patients numbers in sitting position for all groups.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 8, 2026