Rheumatoid Arthritis
Conditions
Brief summary
This is a Phase IIa/b double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel group, multicenter study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of RO7123520 as adjunctive therapy in participants with RA who are inadequately responding to standard-of-care (methotrexate and anti-TNF-alpha therapy). Part 1 of the study will evaluate safety. Part 2 will evaluate efficacy and safety. Part 3 will evaluate dose-ranging efficacy. Participants will have the option of continuing to the extension period of the study.
Interventions
Participants will continue their pre-trial anti-TNF-alpha therapy at a stable dose.
Participants will continue their pre-trial methotrexate therapy at a stable dose.
Participants will receive intravenous infusion of placebo.
Participants will receive intravenous infusion of RO7123520.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Diagnosis of adult-onset RA as defined by the ACR 2010 criteria, for at least 6 months before screening * Moderately to severely active RA as defined by at least 4/28 tender joints and at least 4/28 swollen joints, and a DAS28 greater than or equal to (≥) 3.2 * For Part 2 only: Active synovitis and/or osteitis as determined by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging * Participants must be taking stable dose of anti-TNF-alpha therapies * Participants on stable oral glucocorticoids within 6 weeks of planned randomization * Participants taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) intermittently (up to 2-3 times weekly) for short-term relief of pain and participants on regular NSAID use (on stable dose for ≥ 4 weeks)
Exclusion criteria
* Parenteral glucocorticoids administration (intramuscular, IV) of ≥50 mg within 6 weeks or less than or equal to (≤) 50 milligrams (mg) within 4 weeks prior to planned randomization, or scheduled parenteral administrations during the study * Joint(s) injected with intra-articular glucocorticoids or hyaluronic acid within 6 weeks prior to planned randomization * Active inflammatory diseases of the joints not related to RA * Systemic autoimmune disease other than RA * Juvenile idiopathic arthritis or juvenile RA and/or RA developed before the age of 16 * Active fibromyalgia that makes appropriate assessment of RA disease activity challenging in the opinion of the Investigator * RA participants functional status class IV according to the ACR 1991 criteria * Participants with severe chronic or recurrent viral, bacterial, parasitic, or fungal infections * History of active hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection * Any identified confirmed congenital or acquired immunodeficiency * Abnormal laboratory values and liver function test * Myocardial infarction within less than 6 months prior to participation in the study * Severe central or peripheral nervous system diseases
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density Lumbar Spine L1-L4 as Assessed by Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Scans | Baseline, Week 12 of PoC and Week 12 of Extension Period Analysis (overall study week 24) | — |
| Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events | Baseline to last participant last visit (approximately 2 years) | An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as adverse events. |
| Proportion of Participants Achieving an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 50 Response at Week 12 | Week 12 of PoC and Week 12 of Extension Period Analysis (overall study week 24) | The ACR50 is a composite measure defined as both improvement of 50% in the number of tender and number of swollen joints, and a 50% improvement in three of the following five criteria: patient global assessment, physician global assessment, functional ability measure \[most often Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)\], visual analog pain scale, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein (CRP). The ACR is reported as percent improvement at discrete time points. |
| Percentage of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies | Baseline | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR20 Response at Week 12 | Week 12 of PoC and Week 12 of Extension Period Analysis (overall study week 24) | The ACR20 is a composite measure defined as both improvement of 20% in the number of tender and number of swollen joints, and a 20% improvement in three of the following five criteria: patient global assessment, physician global assessment, functional ability measure \[most often Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)\], visual analog pain scale, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein (CRP). The ACR is reported as percent improvement at discrete time points. |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR70 Response at Week 12 | Week 12 of PoC and Week 12 of Extension Period Analysis (overall study week 24) | The ACR70 is a composite measure defined as both improvement of 70% in the number of tender and number of swollen joints, and a 70% improvement in three of the following five criteria: patient global assessment, physician global assessment, functional ability measure \[most often Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)\], visual analog pain scale, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein (CRP). The ACR is reported as percent improvement at discrete time points. |
| Change From Baseline in Simple Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Score at Week 12 | Baseline, Week 12 of PoC and Week 12 of Extension Period Analysis (overall study week 24) | The SDAI consists of 5 parameters used to assess RA disease activity: 28-joint count assessments of tenderness and swelling, participant and investigator global assessments, and CRP levels. A composite score is produced, with remission defined as an SDAI of \<3.3, low disease activity as ≤11, moderate disease activity as ≤26 and high disease activity as \>26. |
| Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score at Week 12 | Baseline, Week 12 of PoC and Week 12 of Extension Period Analysis (overall study week 24) | The CDAI for Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) assesses the severity of the disease using clinical data. It consists of the Patient Global disease Activity (PGA) estimate and the Evaluator Global disease Activity (EGA) estimate, each of which represent assessments of disease activity on a scale of 1-10, with 10 being maximum activity. |
| Serum RO7123520 Concentration | Pre-dose (0 hour), 1 hour post infusion (duration of infusion: approximately 1 hour) on Days 1, 14, 28, 56; Pre-dose (0 hour) on Days 84, 112 | — |
| Synovial Fluid RO7123520 Concentration | Pre-dose (0 hour) on Days 1, 84 | — |
| Change From Baseline in the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 12 | Baseline, Week 12 of PoC and Week 12 of Extension Period Analysis (overall study week 24) | The HAQ-DI is a 20-item, validated questionnaire used to assess difficulty in performing activities of daily living. The questionnaire assesses eight domains of physical functioning: Dressing and Grooming (2 items), Hygiene (3 items), Arising (2 items), Reach (2 items), Eating (3 items), Grip (3 items), Walking (2 items), Common Daily Activities (3 items). The questions assess usual abilities ranging from 0 without any difficulty to 3 unable to do. A lower HAQ-DI score indicates better quality of life. Subscale scores are combined and the mean value is reported for each arm per timepoint. |
| Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) at Week 12 | Baseline, Week 12 of PoC and Week 12 of Extension Period Analysis (overall study week 24) | The DAS28 is a combined index for measuring disease activity in RA; the 28 refers to the number of joints included in the assessment. The index includes swollen and tender joint counts, acute phase response, and general arthritis disease activity status. An overall disease activity score of 5.1 or greater implies active disease, less than 3.2 implies low disease activity, and less that 2.6 implies disease remission. |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Remission at Week 12 | Week 12 of PoC and Week 12 of Extension Period Analysis (overall study week 24) | The DAS28 is a combined index for measuring disease activity in RA; the 28 refers to the number of joints included in the assessment. The index includes swollen and tender joint counts, acute phase response, and general arthritis disease activity status. An overall disease activity score of 5.1 or greater implies active disease, less than 3.2 implies low disease activity, and less that 2.6 implies disease remission. |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving CDAI Remission at Week 12 | Week 12 of PoC and Week 12 of Extension Period Analysis (overall study week 24) | The CDAI for Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) assesses the severity of the disease using clinical data. It consists of the Patient Global disease Activity (PGA) estimate and the Evaluator Global disease Activity (EGA) estimate, each of which represent assessments of disease activity on a scale of 1-10, with 10 being maximum activity. CDAI remission is defined as a score of less than or equal to 2.8. |
Countries
Argentina, Austria, Colombia, Germany, Guatemala, Italy, Mexico, Peru, Spain, United Kingdom, United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Adult men and women with moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who experience an inadequate response to disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy with MTX plus anti-TNF-a therapy.
Pre-assignment details
Arms are not mutually exclusive. Proof of Concept: 109 total participants enrolled. Extension Period Analysis: 106 participants from the previous groups, including placebo, received 360 (n=9) or 810 mg/dose (n=97) of RO7123520. Part 3 was not conducted due to early study termination.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| PoC Placebo to Extension Period Analysis RO7123520 In the Proof of Concept (PoC) period, participants received placebo (IV saline matched to RO7123520) + pre-trial anti-TNF-alpha and methotrexate (MTX), on Days 1, 14, 28, and 56. Participants from this group that continued to the Extension Period Analysis period were assigned RO7123520 + pre-trial anti-TNF-alpha and MTX at either 360 or 810 mg/dose up to Week 20 of the Extension Period (overall study Week 32). | 37 |
| RO70123520 360 or 810 mg/Dose In the PoC period, participants not assigned placebo received RO7123520 + pre-trial anti-TNF-alpha and MTX at 810 mg/dose on Days 1, 14, 28, and 56. Participants continuing to the Extension Period Analysis period received 360 or 810 mg/dose up to Week 20 of the Extension Period (overall study Week 32). | 97 |
| Total | 134 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Extension Period Analysis | Adverse Event | 1 | 1 |
| Extension Period Analysis | Participant Non-Compliance | 0 | 1 |
| Extension Period Analysis | Physician Decision | 0 | 1 |
| Extension Period Analysis | Protocol Deviation | 0 | 1 |
| Extension Period Analysis | Study Termination by Sponsor | 0 | 36 |
| Extension Period Analysis | Withdrawal by Subject | 4 | 5 |
| Proof of Concept | Adverse Event | 1 | 1 |
| Proof of Concept | Physician Decision | 1 | 0 |
| Proof of Concept | Protocol Deviation | 0 | 1 |
| Proof of Concept | Study Termination by Sponsor | 0 | 1 |
| Proof of Concept | Withdrawal by Subject | 0 | 4 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | RO70123520 360 or 810 mg/Dose | Total | PoC Placebo to Extension Period Analysis RO7123520 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 53.4 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.8 | 53.7 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.9 | 54.7 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.1 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 73 Participants | 81 Participants | 27 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 18 Participants | 28 Participants | 10 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 16 Participants | 16 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 2 Participants | 2 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 4 Participants | 6 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 3 Participants | 5 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 68 Participants | 75 Participants | 7 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 66 Participants | 93 Participants | 32 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 10 Participants | 13 Participants | 3 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 37 | 0 / 70 | 0 / 9 | 0 / 97 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 10 / 37 | 10 / 70 | 6 / 9 | 17 / 97 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 1 / 37 | 1 / 70 | 1 / 9 | 0 / 97 |
Outcome results
Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density Lumbar Spine L1-L4 as Assessed by Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Scans
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 of PoC and Week 12 of Extension Period Analysis (overall study week 24)
Population: The safety population included all participants who received at least one dose of study medication.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density Lumbar Spine L1-L4 as Assessed by Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Scans | Baseline | 1.02 g/cm^2 | Standard Deviation 0.21 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density Lumbar Spine L1-L4 as Assessed by Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Scans | Week 12 | -0.06 g/cm^2 | Standard Deviation 0.2 |
| Proof of Concept: RO7123520 810mg/Dose | Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density Lumbar Spine L1-L4 as Assessed by Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Scans | Week 12 | 0.71 g/cm^2 | Standard Deviation 5.5 |
| Proof of Concept: RO7123520 810mg/Dose | Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density Lumbar Spine L1-L4 as Assessed by Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Scans | Baseline | 2.51 g/cm^2 | Standard Deviation 12.46 |
| Extension Period Analysis: RO7123520 360mg/Dose | Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density Lumbar Spine L1-L4 as Assessed by Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Scans | Baseline | 1.17 g/cm^2 | Standard Deviation 0.2 |
| Extension Period Analysis: RO7123520 360mg/Dose | Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density Lumbar Spine L1-L4 as Assessed by Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Scans | Week 12 | -0.01 g/cm^2 | Standard Deviation 0.04 |
| Extension Period Analysis: RO70123520 810mg/Dose | Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density Lumbar Spine L1-L4 as Assessed by Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Scans | Baseline | 2.06 g/cm^2 | Standard Deviation 10.53 |
| Extension Period Analysis: RO70123520 810mg/Dose | Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density Lumbar Spine L1-L4 as Assessed by Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Scans | Week 12 | 0.58 g/cm^2 | Standard Deviation 4.98 |
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events
An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as adverse events.
Time frame: Baseline to last participant last visit (approximately 2 years)
Population: The safety population included all participants who received at least one dose of study medication.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events | 48.6 Percentage of Participants |
| Proof of Concept: RO7123520 810mg/Dose | Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events | 60.0 Percentage of Participants |
| Extension Period Analysis: RO7123520 360mg/Dose | Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events | 66.7 Percentage of Participants |
| Extension Period Analysis: RO70123520 810mg/Dose | Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events | 60.8 Percentage of Participants |
Percentage of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies
Time frame: Baseline
Population: This outcome measure only includes the immunogenicity population, which was the PoC 810 mg dose group. These participants had at least 1 pre-dose ADA assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies | 0 Percent |
Proportion of Participants Achieving an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 50 Response at Week 12
The ACR50 is a composite measure defined as both improvement of 50% in the number of tender and number of swollen joints, and a 50% improvement in three of the following five criteria: patient global assessment, physician global assessment, functional ability measure \[most often Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)\], visual analog pain scale, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein (CRP). The ACR is reported as percent improvement at discrete time points.
Time frame: Week 12 of PoC and Week 12 of Extension Period Analysis (overall study week 24)
Population: The efficacy population included all randomized participants. Overall study = up to 32 weeks per participant. PoC = Weeks 1-12, Extension Period Analysis = Weeks 1-20 (overall study weeks 13-32)
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Proportion of Participants Achieving an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 50 Response at Week 12 | 16.2 Percent |
| Proof of Concept: RO7123520 810mg/Dose | Proportion of Participants Achieving an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 50 Response at Week 12 | 11.1 Percent |
| Extension Period Analysis: RO7123520 360mg/Dose | Proportion of Participants Achieving an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 50 Response at Week 12 | 0 Percent |
| Extension Period Analysis: RO70123520 810mg/Dose | Proportion of Participants Achieving an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 50 Response at Week 12 | 1.0 Percent |
Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score at Week 12
The CDAI for Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) assesses the severity of the disease using clinical data. It consists of the Patient Global disease Activity (PGA) estimate and the Evaluator Global disease Activity (EGA) estimate, each of which represent assessments of disease activity on a scale of 1-10, with 10 being maximum activity.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 of PoC and Week 12 of Extension Period Analysis (overall study week 24)
Population: The efficacy population included all randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score at Week 12 | Baseline | 37.05 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.99 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score at Week 12 | Week 12 | -17.44 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.11 |
| Proof of Concept: RO7123520 810mg/Dose | Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score at Week 12 | Baseline | 37.38 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.14 |
| Proof of Concept: RO7123520 810mg/Dose | Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score at Week 12 | Week 12 | -14.44 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.96 |
| Extension Period Analysis: RO7123520 360mg/Dose | Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score at Week 12 | Baseline | 30.89 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.31 |
| Extension Period Analysis: RO70123520 810mg/Dose | Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score at Week 12 | Baseline | 32.17 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.91 |
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) at Week 12
The DAS28 is a combined index for measuring disease activity in RA; the 28 refers to the number of joints included in the assessment. The index includes swollen and tender joint counts, acute phase response, and general arthritis disease activity status. An overall disease activity score of 5.1 or greater implies active disease, less than 3.2 implies low disease activity, and less that 2.6 implies disease remission.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 of PoC and Week 12 of Extension Period Analysis (overall study week 24)
Population: The efficacy population included all randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) at Week 12 | Baseline | 6.29 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.78 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) at Week 12 | Week 12 | -1.62 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.28 |
| Proof of Concept: RO7123520 810mg/Dose | Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) at Week 12 | Baseline | 6.28 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.03 |
| Proof of Concept: RO7123520 810mg/Dose | Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) at Week 12 | Week 12 | -1.15 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.06 |
| Extension Period Analysis: RO7123520 360mg/Dose | Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) at Week 12 | Baseline | 5.42 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.63 |
| Extension Period Analysis: RO70123520 810mg/Dose | Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) at Week 12 | Baseline | 5.82 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.28 |
Change From Baseline in Simple Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Score at Week 12
The SDAI consists of 5 parameters used to assess RA disease activity: 28-joint count assessments of tenderness and swelling, participant and investigator global assessments, and CRP levels. A composite score is produced, with remission defined as an SDAI of \<3.3, low disease activity as ≤11, moderate disease activity as ≤26 and high disease activity as \>26.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 of PoC and Week 12 of Extension Period Analysis (overall study week 24)
Population: The efficacy population included all randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Simple Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Score at Week 12 | Baseline | 38.84 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.58 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Simple Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Score at Week 12 | Week 12 | -17.48 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.48 |
| Proof of Concept: RO7123520 810mg/Dose | Change From Baseline in Simple Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Score at Week 12 | Week 12 | -14.99 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.19 |
| Proof of Concept: RO7123520 810mg/Dose | Change From Baseline in Simple Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Score at Week 12 | Baseline | 39.02 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.55 |
| Extension Period Analysis: RO7123520 360mg/Dose | Change From Baseline in Simple Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Score at Week 12 | Baseline | 31.23 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.25 |
| Extension Period Analysis: RO7123520 360mg/Dose | Change From Baseline in Simple Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Score at Week 12 | Week 12 | -15.33 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.24 |
| Extension Period Analysis: RO70123520 810mg/Dose | Change From Baseline in Simple Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Score at Week 12 | Baseline | 34.08 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.69 |
| Extension Period Analysis: RO70123520 810mg/Dose | Change From Baseline in Simple Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Score at Week 12 | Week 12 | -13.15 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.56 |
Change From Baseline in the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 12
The HAQ-DI is a 20-item, validated questionnaire used to assess difficulty in performing activities of daily living. The questionnaire assesses eight domains of physical functioning: Dressing and Grooming (2 items), Hygiene (3 items), Arising (2 items), Reach (2 items), Eating (3 items), Grip (3 items), Walking (2 items), Common Daily Activities (3 items). The questions assess usual abilities ranging from 0 without any difficulty to 3 unable to do. A lower HAQ-DI score indicates better quality of life. Subscale scores are combined and the mean value is reported for each arm per timepoint.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 of PoC and Week 12 of Extension Period Analysis (overall study week 24)
Population: The efficacy population included all randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 12 | Baseline | 1.63 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.64 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 12 | Week 12 | -0.15 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.52 |
| Proof of Concept: RO7123520 810mg/Dose | Change From Baseline in the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 12 | Week 12 | -0.24 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.51 |
| Proof of Concept: RO7123520 810mg/Dose | Change From Baseline in the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 12 | Baseline | 1.61 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.76 |
| Extension Period Analysis: RO7123520 360mg/Dose | Change From Baseline in the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 12 | Baseline | 1.29 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Extension Period Analysis: RO7123520 360mg/Dose | Change From Baseline in the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 12 | Week 12 | -0.21 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.74 |
| Extension Period Analysis: RO70123520 810mg/Dose | Change From Baseline in the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 12 | Baseline | 1.59 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.71 |
| Extension Period Analysis: RO70123520 810mg/Dose | Change From Baseline in the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 12 | Week 12 | -0.21 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.49 |
Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR20 Response at Week 12
The ACR20 is a composite measure defined as both improvement of 20% in the number of tender and number of swollen joints, and a 20% improvement in three of the following five criteria: patient global assessment, physician global assessment, functional ability measure \[most often Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)\], visual analog pain scale, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein (CRP). The ACR is reported as percent improvement at discrete time points.
Time frame: Week 12 of PoC and Week 12 of Extension Period Analysis (overall study week 24)
Population: The efficacy population included all randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR20 Response at Week 12 | 43.2 Percent |
| Proof of Concept: RO7123520 810mg/Dose | Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR20 Response at Week 12 | 27.8 Percent |
| Extension Period Analysis: RO7123520 360mg/Dose | Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR20 Response at Week 12 | 0 Percent |
| Extension Period Analysis: RO70123520 810mg/Dose | Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR20 Response at Week 12 | 11.3 Percent |
Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR70 Response at Week 12
The ACR70 is a composite measure defined as both improvement of 70% in the number of tender and number of swollen joints, and a 70% improvement in three of the following five criteria: patient global assessment, physician global assessment, functional ability measure \[most often Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)\], visual analog pain scale, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein (CRP). The ACR is reported as percent improvement at discrete time points.
Time frame: Week 12 of PoC and Week 12 of Extension Period Analysis (overall study week 24)
Population: The efficacy population included all randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR70 Response at Week 12 | 0 Percent |
| Proof of Concept: RO7123520 810mg/Dose | Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR70 Response at Week 12 | 1.4 Percent |
| Extension Period Analysis: RO7123520 360mg/Dose | Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR70 Response at Week 12 | 0 Percent |
| Extension Period Analysis: RO70123520 810mg/Dose | Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR70 Response at Week 12 | 0 Percent |
Percentage of Participants Achieving CDAI Remission at Week 12
The CDAI for Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) assesses the severity of the disease using clinical data. It consists of the Patient Global disease Activity (PGA) estimate and the Evaluator Global disease Activity (EGA) estimate, each of which represent assessments of disease activity on a scale of 1-10, with 10 being maximum activity. CDAI remission is defined as a score of less than or equal to 2.8.
Time frame: Week 12 of PoC and Week 12 of Extension Period Analysis (overall study week 24)
Population: The efficacy population included all randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving CDAI Remission at Week 12 | 0 Percent |
| Proof of Concept: RO7123520 810mg/Dose | Percentage of Participants Achieving CDAI Remission at Week 12 | 1.4 Percent |
| Extension Period Analysis: RO7123520 360mg/Dose | Percentage of Participants Achieving CDAI Remission at Week 12 | 0 Percent |
| Extension Period Analysis: RO70123520 810mg/Dose | Percentage of Participants Achieving CDAI Remission at Week 12 | 0 Percent |
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Remission at Week 12
The DAS28 is a combined index for measuring disease activity in RA; the 28 refers to the number of joints included in the assessment. The index includes swollen and tender joint counts, acute phase response, and general arthritis disease activity status. An overall disease activity score of 5.1 or greater implies active disease, less than 3.2 implies low disease activity, and less that 2.6 implies disease remission.
Time frame: Week 12 of PoC and Week 12 of Extension Period Analysis (overall study week 24)
Population: The efficacy population included all randomized participants.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Remission at Week 12 | 0 Percent |
| Proof of Concept: RO7123520 810mg/Dose | Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Remission at Week 12 | 1.4 Percent |
| Extension Period Analysis: RO7123520 360mg/Dose | Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Remission at Week 12 | 0 Percent |
| Extension Period Analysis: RO70123520 810mg/Dose | Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Remission at Week 12 | 0 Percent |
Serum RO7123520 Concentration
Time frame: Pre-dose (0 hour), 1 hour post infusion (duration of infusion: approximately 1 hour) on Days 1, 14, 28, 56; Pre-dose (0 hour) on Days 84, 112
Population: All enrolled participants were included in the PK population. No PK analysis was performed due to an insufficient number of available participant samples for processing.
Synovial Fluid RO7123520 Concentration
Time frame: Pre-dose (0 hour) on Days 1, 84
Population: All enrolled participants were included in the PK population. No PK analysis was performed due to an insufficient number of available participant samples for processing.