Skip to content

Evaluation of Renvela in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease Not On Dialysis And Hyperphosphatemia In China

A Randomized, Double Blind, Parallel Group Study For Assessing The Efficacy And Safety Of Renvela® Tablets For The Treatment Of Hyperphosphatemia In Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease Not On Dialysis Versus Placebo

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03001011
Acronym
RECOVER
Enrollment
202
Registered
2016-12-22
Start date
2017-06-07
Completion date
2019-08-16
Last updated
2022-03-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hyperphosphatemia

Brief summary

Primary Objective: To demonstrate efficacy of Renvela tablets in the reduction of serum phosphorus in hyperphosphatemia in participants with chronic kidney disease not on dialysis. Secondary Objectives: To document the efficacy of Renvela tablets in the reduction of serum lipids (total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol \[LDL-C\]). To document the efficacy of Renvela tablets in the reduction of calcium-phosphorus product. To document the efficacy of Renvela tablets in the reduction of intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH). To document the efficacy of Renvela tablets in proportion of participants reaching the target serum phosphorus level 4.6 milligrams per decilitre (mg/dL) (1.47 millimoles per litre \[mmol/L\], inclusive). To evaluate safety of Renvela tablets.

Detailed description

The total duration of study period per participant was up to 14 weeks.

Interventions

DRUGPlacebo

Pharmaceutical form: tablet Route of administration: oral

DRUGSevelamer Carbonate (GZ419831)

Pharmaceutical form: tablet Route of administration: oral

Sponsors

Sanofi
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participants with chronic kidney disease who had not been on dialysis, and were not expected to begin dialysis, or renal transplantation in the next 4 months from the screening visit. * Had serum phosphorus measurement greater than or equal to (\>=) 5.5 mg/dL (1.78 mmol/L) at screening visit (if participants were not on phosphate binder\[s\] at Screening Visit) OR at the end of Washout Period (if participants were on phosphate binder\[s\] at screening visit). * Had the following laboratory measurements at screening visit: * 25-hydroxy vitamin D \>=10 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL). * intact parathyroid hormone, intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) \<=800 picograms per millilitre (pg/mL). * Signed written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Men or women below 18 years of age. * Any technical/administrative reason that made it impossible to randomize the participant in the study. * Was not of the level of understanding and willingness to cooperate with all visits and procedures, as described in the study protocol. * Not yet received chronic kidney disease diet education before screening visit. * Not willing and not able to avoid changes to diet during the study. * Not willing or able to maintain screening doses of lipid lowering medication, 1, 25 dihydroxy vitamin D, and/or cinacalcet for the duration of the study, except for safety reasons. * Not willing or not able to avoid antacids and phosphate binders containing aluminium, magnesium, calcium, or lanthanum for the duration of the study unless prescribed as an evening calcium supplement. * Had participated in any other investigational drug studies within 30 days, or 5 half lives, whichever is longer, prior to screening visit. * Conditions/situations such as: * Participant was the Investigator or any Subinvestigator, research assistant, pharmacist, study coordinator, other staff or relative thereof directly involved in the conduct of the protocol. * Uncooperative or any condition that could make the participant potentially non-compliant to the study procedures (for example, participants could not be contacted by phones as required in phone call visits). * Evidence of active malignancy. * Not on stable medical condition (for example, but not limited to, active ethanol or drug abuse \[tobacco use acceptable\]; documented poorly controlled diabetes mellitus, poorly controlled hypertension, active vasculitis, human immunodeficiency virus \[HIV\] infection), or had any clinically significant medical conditions. * Had known hypersensitivity to sevelamer or any constituents of Renvela tablets. * Had bowel obstruction, active dysphagia or swallowing disorder, or a predisposition to or current bowel obstruction, ileus, or severe gastrointestinal motility disorders including severe constipation. * Using or plan to use anti-arrhythmic or anti-seizure medications for arrhythmia or seizure disorders. * Was pregnant or breast-feeding. * If the participant was female, and of childbearing potential (pre-menopausal and not surgically sterile), was not willing to use an effective contraceptive method throughout the study. * Had any condition, which in the opinion of the investigator would prohibit the participant's inclusion in the study. The above information was not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Serum Phosphorus at Week 8Baseline, Week 8Baseline of serum phosphorus value was the last serum phosphorus level obtained before the first double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) dosing. Missing Week 8 data were imputed by last observation carried forward \[LOCF\] method.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 8Baseline, Week 8Missing Week 8 data were imputed by LOCF method.
Change From Baseline in Calcium-Phosphorus Product at Week 8Baseline, Week 8Missing Week 8 data were imputed by LOCF method.
Change From Baseline in Intact Parathyroid Hormone (Ipth) Level at Week 8Baseline, Week 8Missing Week 8 data were imputed by LOCF method.
Percentage of Participants Reaching the Target Serum Phosphorus Level (4.6 mg/dL [1.49 mmol/L]) at Week 8Week 8Missing Week 8 data were imputed by LOCF method.
Change From Baseline in Serum Phosphorus Level at Week 4Baseline, Week 4Missing Week 4 data were imputed by LOCF method.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: ElectrolytesFrom first dose of IMP to the last dose of IMP +3 days i.e. up to Day 59Criteria for potentially clinically significant abnormalities: Sodium: \<=129 millimoles (mmol)/L; \>=160 mmol/L Potassium: \<3 mmol/L; \>=5.5 mmol/L Chloride: \<80 mmol/L; \>115 mmol/L.
Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol at Week 8Baseline, Week 8Missing Week 8 data were imputed by LOCF method.
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse EventFrom first dose of IMP to the last dose of IMP +3 days i.e. up to Day 59Any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received investigational medicinal product (IMP) was considered an Adverse Event (AE) without regard to possibility of causal relationship with this treatment. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as AEs that developed or worsened or became serious during TEAE period. On-treatment period was defined as the (time from the first dose of IMP to the last dose of IMP+3 days). A serious adverse event (SAE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death, life-threatening, required initial or prolonged in-patient hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, or considered as medically important event. Any TEAE included participants with both serious and non-serious AEs.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological ParametersFrom first dose of IMP to the last dose of IMP +3 days i.e. up to Day 59Criteria for potentially clinically significant abnormalities: * Hemoglobin: \<=115 g/L (Male\[M\]) or \<=95 g/L (Female \[F\]); \>=185 g/L (M) or \>=165 g/L (F); Decrease from baseline (DFB) \>=20 g/L * Hematocrit: \<=0.37 v/v (M) or \<=0.32 v/v (F); \>=0.55 v/v (M) or \>=0.5 v/v (F) * Red blood cells (RBC): \>=6 Tera/L * Platelets: \<100 Giga/L; \>=700 Giga/L * White blood cells (WBC): \<3.0 Giga/L (Non-Black \[NB\]) or \<2.0 Giga/L (Black \[B\]); \>=16.0 Giga/L * Neutrophils: \<1.5 Giga/L (NB) or \<1.0 Giga/L (B); \<1.0 Giga/L * Lymphocytes: \>4.0 Giga/L * Monocytes: \>0.7 Giga/L * Basophils: \>0.1 Giga/L * Eosinophils: \>0.5 Giga/L or \>upper limit of normal (ULN) (if ULN \>=0.5 Giga/L)
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Function ParametersFrom first dose of IMP to the last dose of IMP +3 days i.e. up to Day 59Criteria for potentially clinically significant abnormalities: Creatinine: \>=150 micromol/L; \>=30% change from baseline, \>=100% change from baseline Creatinine clearance: \<15 mL/min; \>=15 to \<30 mL/min; \>=30 to \<60 mL/min; \>=60 to \<90 mL/min Blood urea nitrogen: \>=17 mmol/L Uric acid: \<120 micromol/L; \>408 micromol/L Glomular Filtration Rate (GFR): \< 15 mL/min/1.73m\^2, \>= 15 - \< 30 mL/min/1.73m\^2, \>= 30 - \< 60 mL/min/1.73m\^2, \>= 60 - \< 90 mL/min/1.73m\^2.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function ParametersFrom first dose of IMP to the last dose of IMP +3 days i.e. up to Day 59Criteria for potentially clinically significant abnormalities: Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT): \>3 ULN; \>5 ULN; \>10 ULN; Aspartate aminotransferase (AST): \>3 ULN.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Signs AbnormalitiesFrom first dose of IMP to the last dose of IMP +3 days i.e. up to Day 59Criteria for potentially clinically significant vital sign abnormalities: Systolic blood pressure (SBP) supine: \<=95 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) and DFB \>=20 mmHg; \>=160 mmHg and increase from baseline (IFB) \>=20 mmHg Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) supine: \<=45 mmHg and DFB \>=10 mmHg; \>=110 mmHg and IFB \>=10 mmHg Heart rate (HR) supine: \<=50 beats per minute (bpm) and DFB \>=20 bpm; \>=120 bpm and IFB \>=20 bpm Weight: \>=5% DFB; \>=5% IFB.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Metabolic ParametersFrom first dose of IMP to the last dose of IMP +3 days i.e. up to Day 59Criteria for potentially clinically significant abnormalities: * Glucose: \<=3.9 mmol/L and \< lower limits of normal (LLN); \>=11.1 mmol/L (unfasted \[unfas\]) or \>=7 mmol/L (fasted \[fas\]) * Triglycerides: \>=4.6 mmol/L * Albumin: \<= 25 g/L.

Countries

China

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Study was conducted at 38 centers in China. A total of 482 participants were screened between 07 June 2017 & 30 May 2019, of which 280 participants were screen failures. Screen failures were mainly due to serum phosphorus level greater than or equal to \>=5.5 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) (1.78 millimoles per litre \[mmol/L\]) at screening visit.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 202 participants were randomized in the study. Randomization was stratified according to screening serum phosphorus level (\>=5.5 - 6.0 mg/dL \[1.78 - 1.94 mmol/L\] and \>6.0 mg/dL \[1.94 mmol/L\]). Assignment to arms was done centrally using interactive voice/web response system in 1:1 ratio (Renvela \[sevelamer carbonate\]: placebo).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Participants received placebo (for Renvela) orally TID for up to 8 weeks. One to five tablets were taken with meals, as directed by physician and were titrated (up to a maximum of 15 tablets per day) to reach a target goal of serum phosphorus \<= 4.6 mg/dL (\<=1.49 mmol/L).
101
Renvela
Participants received Renvela orally TID for up to 8 weeks. One to five tablets were taken with meals, as directed by physician and were titrated (up to a maximum of 15 tablets per day) to reach a target goal of serum phosphorus \<=4.6 mg/dL (\<=1.49 mmol/L).
101
Total202

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event93
Overall StudyChronic kidney disease lead to dialysis1510
Overall StudyOther than specified above38

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRenvelaTotalPlacebo
Age, Continuous50.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.5
50.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.9
50.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.4
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
101 Participants202 Participants101 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
48 Participants94 Participants46 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
53 Participants108 Participants55 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1010 / 101
other
Total, other adverse events
52 / 10160 / 101
serious
Total, serious adverse events
31 / 10126 / 101

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Serum Phosphorus at Week 8

Baseline of serum phosphorus value was the last serum phosphorus level obtained before the first double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) dosing. Missing Week 8 data were imputed by last observation carried forward \[LOCF\] method.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 8

Population: Modified intention to treat (mITT) population: all participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of IMP \& had both baseline assessment \& at least 1 post-baseline assessment of phosphorus measure. Here, number analyzed = participants with available data at specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Serum Phosphorus at Week 8Baseline2.090 mmol/L
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Serum Phosphorus at Week 8Change at Week 80.010 mmol/L
RenvelaChange From Baseline in Serum Phosphorus at Week 8Baseline2.095 mmol/L
RenvelaChange From Baseline in Serum Phosphorus at Week 8Change at Week 8-0.200 mmol/L
Comparison: A hierarchical testing procedure was used to control type I error \& handle multiple secondary endpoint analyses. Testing was then performed sequentially in order outcome measures (OM) are reported. The hierarchical testing sequence continued only when previous OM was statistically significant at 0.05 level.p-value: <0.0001Wilcoxon rank sum test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Calcium-Phosphorus Product at Week 8

Missing Week 8 data were imputed by LOCF method.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 8

Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, overall number of participants analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Calcium-Phosphorus Product at Week 80.0200 mmol^2/L^2
RenvelaChange From Baseline in Calcium-Phosphorus Product at Week 8-0.4960 mmol^2/L^2
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Intact Parathyroid Hormone (Ipth) Level at Week 8

Missing Week 8 data were imputed by LOCF method.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 8

Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, overall number of participants analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Intact Parathyroid Hormone (Ipth) Level at Week 87.2380 nanogram per liter (ng/L)
RenvelaChange From Baseline in Intact Parathyroid Hormone (Ipth) Level at Week 80.0000 nanogram per liter (ng/L)
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 8

Missing Week 8 data were imputed by LOCF method.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 8

Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, overall number of participants analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 8-0.030 mmol/L
RenvelaChange From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 8-0.830 mmol/L
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Serum Phosphorus Level at Week 4

Missing Week 4 data were imputed by LOCF method.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 4

Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, overall number of participants analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Serum Phosphorus Level at Week 4-0.020 mmol/L
RenvelaChange From Baseline in Serum Phosphorus Level at Week 4-0.240 mmol/L
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol at Week 8

Missing Week 8 data were imputed by LOCF method.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 8

Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, overall number of participants analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total Cholesterol at Week 8-0.115 mmol/L
RenvelaChange From Baseline in Total Cholesterol at Week 8-0.830 mmol/L
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes

Criteria for potentially clinically significant abnormalities: Sodium: \<=129 millimoles (mmol)/L; \>=160 mmol/L Potassium: \<3 mmol/L; \>=5.5 mmol/L Chloride: \<80 mmol/L; \>115 mmol/L.

Time frame: From first dose of IMP to the last dose of IMP +3 days i.e. up to Day 59

Population: Analysis was performed on safety population. Here, number analyzed = participants with available data for specified categories.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: ElectrolytesSodium >=160 mmol/L0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: ElectrolytesPotassium >=5.5 mmol/L36 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: ElectrolytesSodium <=129 mmol/L1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: ElectrolytesPotassium <3 mmol/L0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: ElectrolytesChloride >115 mmol/L0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: ElectrolytesChloride <80 mmol/L0 Participants
RenvelaNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: ElectrolytesChloride >115 mmol/L0 Participants
RenvelaNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: ElectrolytesSodium <=129 mmol/L3 Participants
RenvelaNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: ElectrolytesSodium >=160 mmol/L0 Participants
RenvelaNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: ElectrolytesPotassium <3 mmol/L0 Participants
RenvelaNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: ElectrolytesPotassium >=5.5 mmol/L46 Participants
RenvelaNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: ElectrolytesChloride <80 mmol/L2 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters

Criteria for potentially clinically significant abnormalities: * Hemoglobin: \<=115 g/L (Male\[M\]) or \<=95 g/L (Female \[F\]); \>=185 g/L (M) or \>=165 g/L (F); Decrease from baseline (DFB) \>=20 g/L * Hematocrit: \<=0.37 v/v (M) or \<=0.32 v/v (F); \>=0.55 v/v (M) or \>=0.5 v/v (F) * Red blood cells (RBC): \>=6 Tera/L * Platelets: \<100 Giga/L; \>=700 Giga/L * White blood cells (WBC): \<3.0 Giga/L (Non-Black \[NB\]) or \<2.0 Giga/L (Black \[B\]); \>=16.0 Giga/L * Neutrophils: \<1.5 Giga/L (NB) or \<1.0 Giga/L (B); \<1.0 Giga/L * Lymphocytes: \>4.0 Giga/L * Monocytes: \>0.7 Giga/L * Basophils: \>0.1 Giga/L * Eosinophils: \>0.5 Giga/L or \>upper limit of normal (ULN) (if ULN \>=0.5 Giga/L)

Time frame: From first dose of IMP to the last dose of IMP +3 days i.e. up to Day 59

Population: Analysis was performed on safety population. Here, number analyzed = participants with available data for the specified categories.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological ParametersHematocrit >0.55 v/v (M) or >=0.5 v/v (F)0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological ParametersWBC <3.0 Giga/L (NB) or <2.0 Giga/L (B)2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological ParametersHemoglobin >=185 g/L (M) or >=165 g/L (F)0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological ParametersWBC >=16.0 Giga/L0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological ParametersRBC >=6 Tera/L0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological ParametersNeutrophils <1.5 Giga/L (NB) or <1.0 Giga/L (B)0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological ParametersHematocrit <=0.37 v/v (M) or <=0.32 v/v (F)68 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological ParametersLymphocytes >4 Giga/L0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological ParametersPlatelets <100 Giga/L3 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological ParametersMonocytes >0.7 Giga/L0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological ParametersHemoglobin DFB >=20 g/L9 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological ParametersBasophils >0.1 Giga/L0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological ParametersPlatelets >=700 Giga/L0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological ParametersEosinophils >0.5 Giga/L or >ULN (ULN >=0.5 Giga/L)4 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological ParametersHemoglobin <=115 g/L (M) or <=95 g/L (F)59 Participants
RenvelaNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological ParametersEosinophils >0.5 Giga/L or >ULN (ULN >=0.5 Giga/L)6 Participants
RenvelaNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological ParametersHemoglobin <=115 g/L (M) or <=95 g/L (F)54 Participants
RenvelaNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological ParametersHemoglobin >=185 g/L (M) or >=165 g/L (F)0 Participants
RenvelaNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological ParametersHemoglobin DFB >=20 g/L6 Participants
RenvelaNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological ParametersHematocrit <=0.37 v/v (M) or <=0.32 v/v (F)67 Participants
RenvelaNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological ParametersHematocrit >0.55 v/v (M) or >=0.5 v/v (F)0 Participants
RenvelaNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological ParametersRBC >=6 Tera/L1 Participants
RenvelaNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological ParametersPlatelets <100 Giga/L4 Participants
RenvelaNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological ParametersPlatelets >=700 Giga/L0 Participants
RenvelaNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological ParametersWBC <3.0 Giga/L (NB) or <2.0 Giga/L (B)0 Participants
RenvelaNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological ParametersWBC >=16.0 Giga/L0 Participants
RenvelaNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological ParametersNeutrophils <1.5 Giga/L (NB) or <1.0 Giga/L (B)0 Participants
RenvelaNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological ParametersLymphocytes >4 Giga/L0 Participants
RenvelaNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological ParametersMonocytes >0.7 Giga/L0 Participants
RenvelaNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological ParametersBasophils >0.1 Giga/L0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters

Criteria for potentially clinically significant abnormalities: Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT): \>3 ULN; \>5 ULN; \>10 ULN; Aspartate aminotransferase (AST): \>3 ULN.

Time frame: From first dose of IMP to the last dose of IMP +3 days i.e. up to Day 59

Population: Analysis was performed on safety population. Here, number analyzed = participants with available data for specified categories.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function ParametersALT >3 ULN1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function ParametersALT >5 ULN1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function ParametersALT >10 ULN0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function ParametersAST >3 ULN0 Participants
RenvelaNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function ParametersAST >3 ULN0 Participants
RenvelaNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function ParametersALT >3 ULN0 Participants
RenvelaNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function ParametersALT >10 ULN0 Participants
RenvelaNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function ParametersALT >5 ULN0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Metabolic Parameters

Criteria for potentially clinically significant abnormalities: * Glucose: \<=3.9 mmol/L and \< lower limits of normal (LLN); \>=11.1 mmol/L (unfasted \[unfas\]) or \>=7 mmol/L (fasted \[fas\]) * Triglycerides: \>=4.6 mmol/L * Albumin: \<= 25 g/L.

Time frame: From first dose of IMP to the last dose of IMP +3 days i.e. up to Day 59

Population: Analysis was performed on safety population. Here, number analyzed = participants with available data for specified categories.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Metabolic ParametersTriglycerides: >=4.6 mmol/L0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Metabolic ParametersGlucose: =< 3.9 mmol/L and < LLN1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Metabolic ParametersGlucose: >=11.1 mmol/L(unfas); >=7 mmol/L(fas)5 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Metabolic ParametersAlbumin: <= 25 g/L1 Participants
RenvelaNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Metabolic ParametersAlbumin: <= 25 g/L0 Participants
RenvelaNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Metabolic ParametersTriglycerides: >=4.6 mmol/L2 Participants
RenvelaNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Metabolic ParametersGlucose: >=11.1 mmol/L(unfas); >=7 mmol/L(fas)6 Participants
RenvelaNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Metabolic ParametersGlucose: =< 3.9 mmol/L and < LLN1 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Function Parameters

Criteria for potentially clinically significant abnormalities: Creatinine: \>=150 micromol/L; \>=30% change from baseline, \>=100% change from baseline Creatinine clearance: \<15 mL/min; \>=15 to \<30 mL/min; \>=30 to \<60 mL/min; \>=60 to \<90 mL/min Blood urea nitrogen: \>=17 mmol/L Uric acid: \<120 micromol/L; \>408 micromol/L Glomular Filtration Rate (GFR): \< 15 mL/min/1.73m\^2, \>= 15 - \< 30 mL/min/1.73m\^2, \>= 30 - \< 60 mL/min/1.73m\^2, \>= 60 - \< 90 mL/min/1.73m\^2.

Time frame: From first dose of IMP to the last dose of IMP +3 days i.e. up to Day 59

Population: Analysis was performed on safety population. Here, number analyzed = participants with available data for specified categories.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Function ParametersCreatinine >=150 micromol/L84 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Function ParametersCreatinine >=30% change from baseline15 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Function ParametersCreatinine >=100% change from baseline3 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Function ParametersCreatinine Clearance <15 mL/min77 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Function ParametersCreatinine clearance >=15 to <30 mL/min6 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Function ParametersCreatinine clearance >=30 to <60 mL/min1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Function ParametersCreatinine clearance >=60 to <90 mL/min0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Function ParametersBlood Urea Nitrogen >=17 mmol/L77 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Function ParametersUric acid <120 micromol/L0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Function ParametersUric acid >408 micromol/L56 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Function ParametersGFR < 15 mL/min/1.73m^282 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Function ParametersGFR >= 15 - < 30 mL/min/1.73m^22 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Function ParametersGFR >= 30 - < 60 mL/min/1.73m^20 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Function ParametersGFR >= 60 - < 90 mL/min/1.73m^20 Participants
RenvelaNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Function ParametersGFR < 15 mL/min/1.73m^286 Participants
RenvelaNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Function ParametersCreatinine >=150 micromol/L89 Participants
RenvelaNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Function ParametersBlood Urea Nitrogen >=17 mmol/L83 Participants
RenvelaNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Function ParametersCreatinine >=30% change from baseline33 Participants
RenvelaNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Function ParametersGFR >= 30 - < 60 mL/min/1.73m^20 Participants
RenvelaNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Function ParametersCreatinine >=100% change from baseline3 Participants
RenvelaNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Function ParametersUric acid <120 micromol/L0 Participants
RenvelaNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Function ParametersCreatinine Clearance <15 mL/min81 Participants
RenvelaNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Function ParametersGFR >= 15 - < 30 mL/min/1.73m^23 Participants
RenvelaNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Function ParametersCreatinine clearance >=15 to <30 mL/min8 Participants
RenvelaNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Function ParametersUric acid >408 micromol/L67 Participants
RenvelaNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Function ParametersCreatinine clearance >=30 to <60 mL/min0 Participants
RenvelaNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Function ParametersGFR >= 60 - < 90 mL/min/1.73m^20 Participants
RenvelaNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Function ParametersCreatinine clearance >=60 to <90 mL/min0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Signs Abnormalities

Criteria for potentially clinically significant vital sign abnormalities: Systolic blood pressure (SBP) supine: \<=95 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) and DFB \>=20 mmHg; \>=160 mmHg and increase from baseline (IFB) \>=20 mmHg Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) supine: \<=45 mmHg and DFB \>=10 mmHg; \>=110 mmHg and IFB \>=10 mmHg Heart rate (HR) supine: \<=50 beats per minute (bpm) and DFB \>=20 bpm; \>=120 bpm and IFB \>=20 bpm Weight: \>=5% DFB; \>=5% IFB.

Time frame: From first dose of IMP to the last dose of IMP +3 days i.e. up to Day 59

Population: Analysis was performed on safety population. Here, number analyzed = participants with available data for specified categories.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Signs AbnormalitiesSBP (supine) <=95 mmHg and DFB >=20 mmHg0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Signs AbnormalitiesSBP (supine) >=160 mmHg and IFB >=20 mmHg17 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Signs AbnormalitiesDBP (supine) <=45 mmHg and DFB >=10 mmHg0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Signs AbnormalitiesDBP (supine) >=110 mmHg and IFB >=10 mmHg2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Signs AbnormalitiesHR (supine) <=50 bpm and DFB >= 20 bpm0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Signs AbnormalitiesHR (supine) >=120 bpm and IFB >=20 bpm0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Signs AbnormalitiesWeight >=5% DFB12 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Signs AbnormalitiesWeight >=5% IFB14 Participants
RenvelaNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Signs AbnormalitiesWeight >=5% IFB9 Participants
RenvelaNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Signs AbnormalitiesSBP (supine) <=95 mmHg and DFB >=20 mmHg0 Participants
RenvelaNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Signs AbnormalitiesHR (supine) <=50 bpm and DFB >= 20 bpm0 Participants
RenvelaNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Signs AbnormalitiesSBP (supine) >=160 mmHg and IFB >=20 mmHg12 Participants
RenvelaNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Signs AbnormalitiesWeight >=5% DFB7 Participants
RenvelaNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Signs AbnormalitiesDBP (supine) <=45 mmHg and DFB >=10 mmHg0 Participants
RenvelaNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Signs AbnormalitiesHR (supine) >=120 bpm and IFB >=20 bpm0 Participants
RenvelaNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Signs AbnormalitiesDBP (supine) >=110 mmHg and IFB >=10 mmHg3 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Event

Any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received investigational medicinal product (IMP) was considered an Adverse Event (AE) without regard to possibility of causal relationship with this treatment. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as AEs that developed or worsened or became serious during TEAE period. On-treatment period was defined as the (time from the first dose of IMP to the last dose of IMP+3 days). A serious adverse event (SAE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death, life-threatening, required initial or prolonged in-patient hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, or considered as medically important event. Any TEAE included participants with both serious and non-serious AEs.

Time frame: From first dose of IMP to the last dose of IMP +3 days i.e. up to Day 59

Population: Analysis was performed on safety population that consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of IMP.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse EventAny TEAE86 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse EventAny Treatment emergent SAE31 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Eventany TEAE leading to permanent discontinuation21 Participants
RenvelaNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse EventAny TEAE83 Participants
RenvelaNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse EventAny Treatment emergent SAE26 Participants
RenvelaNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Eventany TEAE leading to permanent discontinuation12 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Reaching the Target Serum Phosphorus Level (4.6 mg/dL [1.49 mmol/L]) at Week 8

Missing Week 8 data were imputed by LOCF method.

Time frame: Week 8

Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, overall number of participants analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Reaching the Target Serum Phosphorus Level (4.6 mg/dL [1.49 mmol/L]) at Week 86.6 percentage of participants
RenvelaPercentage of Participants Reaching the Target Serum Phosphorus Level (4.6 mg/dL [1.49 mmol/L]) at Week 815.5 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 18, 2026