Skip to content

Comparison of Small Colorectal Polyp Removal Using Cold EMR With Hot EMR

Comparison of Small Colorectal Polyp Removal Using Cold Endoscopic Mucosal Resection With Hot Endoscopic Mucosal Resection: a Pilot Study

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03000868
Enrollment
0
Registered
2016-12-22
Start date
2016-12-01
Completion date
2018-07-26
Last updated
2018-07-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colonic Polyps

Keywords

Colonic Polyps, Endoscopic Mucosal Resection, Colonoscopy

Brief summary

This study evaluates the efficacy of small colorectal polyp removal using cold endoscopic mucosal resection with hot endoscopic mucosal resection. Half of the participants will receive cold endoscopic mucosal resection, while the other half will receive hot endoscopic mucosal resection.

Detailed description

Colorectal polyps are considered as precancerous lesions and endoscopical resection is currently the treatment of choice when it is possible. Colorectal polyps are classified into diminutive polyps (\<5mm in diameter), small polyps (6-9mm in diameter), and large polyps (\>1cm in diameter). There are several endoscopical treatment methods: cold biopsy forceps polypectomy, cold snare polypectomy, hot biopsy forceps polypectomy, hot snare polypectomy, and endoscopic mucosal resection. Cold polypectomy means mechanical removal of the polyp with snare or biopsy forceps without the use of electrocautery, and hot polypectomy means removal of the polyp with the use of electocautery.

Interventions

Cold endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) means removing small colorectal polyps (\<1cm) with snare without the use of electocautery after injection of normal saline into the submucosa.

Hot endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) means removing small colorectalpolyps (\<1cm) with snare without the use of electocautery after injection of normal saline into the submucosa.

Sponsors

Chonnam National University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with colorectal polyps that are \<1cm in diameter who need endoscopic mucosal resection. * Patients who gave informed consents to this study.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients under the age of 19 * Patients who are receiving antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapies * Patients with hypercoagulability (i.e., liver cirrhosis, hemophilia, end-stage renal disease, or chronic kidney disease)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Complete removal of the colorectal polypAt the time of the procedure (endoscopic mucosal resection)The resected specimen will be reviewed microscopically to assess complete resection including the lateral and base margins

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Procedure timeAt the time of the procedure (endoscopic mucosal resection)The time needed for the hot EMR vs cold EMR (minutes) will be assessed.
Complication after endoscopic mucosal resectionWithin 1 monthProcedure-related complications (bleeding, perforation, and post-coagulation syndrome) will be assessed.

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026