Skip to content

Code Blue Outcomes & Process Improvement Through Leadership Optimization Using Teleintensivists-Simulation

Code Blue Outcomes & Process Improvement Through Leadership Optimization Using Teleintensivists-Simulation

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03000829
Acronym
COPILOT-Sim
Enrollment
1001
Registered
2016-12-22
Start date
2016-12-31
Completion date
2018-12-31
Last updated
2024-05-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiac Arrest

Keywords

Code blue, Code team, Crisis team leadership, Cardiopulmonary resuscitation, Telemedicine, Simulation, Mock code, In-hospital cardiac arrest

Brief summary

This multicenter randomized trial will employ in-situ cardiac arrest simulations (mock codes) to test whether using telemedicine technology to add an intensive care physician as the copilot for cardiac arrest resuscitation teams influences chest compression quality, resuscitation protocol adherence, team function, and provider experience.

Detailed description

Only 15-30% of patients who suffer in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) survive to hospital discharge. Factors associated with lower mortality and improved function include provision of high-quality, minimally-interrupted chest compressions and swift defibrillation of eligible arrhythmias. Unfortunately, resuscitation teams provide suboptimal care to 25-40% of IHCA victims. A dedicated IHCA team copilot may improve resuscitation team performance by providing the team leader with parallel analysis, situational awareness augmentation, action checking, protocol verification, and error correction. Critical care physician involvement via a telemedicine link could allow experienced specialists to fill the copilot role in a cost and resource-efficient manner, particularly in smaller hospitals with fewer available physicians. The current study will evaluate how consultation by an off-site intensive care physician via a telemedicine link influences local IHCA teams' quality of care, team function and provider experience during simulated cardiac arrest events (mock codes).

Interventions

OTHERTele-intensivist consultation

Standardized consultation to on-site cardiac arrest team by off-site intensivist via two-way audiovisual link using a mobile telemedicine cart

OTHERSimulated observation by ICU physician

Display of silent, pre-recorded, non-interactive videotape of an ICU physician. The on-site cardiac arrest team will be told that an intensive care physician is observing the mock code.

Sponsors

Intermountain Health Care, Inc.
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

(on-site cardiac arrest team): * Are 18 years of age or older Inclusion criteria (teleintensivist cardiac arrest team copilot): * Are 18 years of age or older * Are a board-certified or board-eligible critical care physician * Provide clinical care through the Intermountain Healthcare Telecritical Care program

Exclusion criteria

(both groups): * Are under 18 years of age * Are a member of the study research team

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Fraction of Pulseless Time With no Chest CompressionsFrom initiation of intervention or placebo control until completion of two complete cycles of CPR (an average of 4 minutes)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Fraction of Chest Compressions With Complete ReleaseFrom initiation of intervention or placebo control until completion of two complete cycles of CPR (an average of 4 minutes)
Fraction of Chest Compressions at Target RateFrom initiation of intervention or placebo control until completion of two complete cycles of CPR (an average of 4 minutes)
Time to First Dose of EpinephrineFrom initiation of simulation through termination of simulation, an average of 15 minutes
Overall ACLS Protocol Adherence (Using Checklist Adapted From McEvoy ACLS Assessment Tool)From initiation of simulation through termination of simulation, an average of 15 minutes
ACLS Protocol Errors (Using Checklist Adapted From McEvoy ACLS Assessment Tool)From initiation of simulation through termination of simulation, an average of 15 minutes
Time From Onset of Shockable Rhythm to DefibrillationFrom onset of simulated VF or VT until first defibrillation or end of simulation
Types of Input by Telemedical Intensivist CopilotFrom initiation of simulation through termination of simulation, an average of 15 minutes
Opinions of Study Subjects About Experience Participating in Simulated Cardiac Arrest, Using a Locally-developed and Validated Survey InstrumentImmediately after simulationMeasured domains: understanding of telemedicine intensivist copilot's role, beliefs about telemedicine intensivist copilot's ability to integrate with on site team, ability to influence on-site team performance, comfort with telemedicine intensivist copilot's role, and function of telemedicine interface
Short-form State-Trait Anxiety Inventory ScoreImmediately after simulationThe short-form State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) measures acute stress experienced by respondents using 6 questions (scores for each question range from 1 to 4, with higher values indicating more stress). Analyzed respondent-level values use the total score (range 4-24) obtained by summing the score for each of the six questions, with higher values indicating more respondent-reported acute stress.
Presence of Telemedicine Audiovisual Connection Problems for Intervention Group Simulation EventFrom initiation of simulation through termination of simulation, an average of 15 minutes
Team Emergency Assessment Measure ScoreFrom initiation of simulation through termination of simulation, an average of 15 minutesThe validated Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM) evaluates non-technical performance of the on-site resuscitation team. The score (range 0-4) for each simulation was obtained by averaging the mean score for each of 11 component scores (each component item scored 0-4, with higher values representing better performance).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Tele-intensivist Consultation
Standardized consultation to on-site cardiac arrest response team by off-site intensivist via two-way audiovisual link using a mobile telemedicine cart Tele-intensivist consultation: Standardized consultation to on-site cardiac arrest team by off-site intensivist via two-way audiovisual link using a mobile telemedicine cart
521
Tele-intensivist Consultation
Standardized consultation to on-site cardiac arrest response team by off-site intensivist via two-way audiovisual link using a mobile telemedicine cart Tele-intensivist consultation: Standardized consultation to on-site cardiac arrest team by off-site intensivist via two-way audiovisual link using a mobile telemedicine cart
45
Control
Simulated observation by ICU physician by displaying a silent, pre-recorded, non-interactive videotape of an ICU physician. The on-site participants will be told that an intensive care physician is observing the mock code. Simulated observation by ICU physician: Display of silent, pre-recorded, non-interactive videotape of an ICU physician. The on-site cardiac arrest team will be told that an intensive care physician is observing the mock code.
466
Control
Simulated observation by ICU physician by displaying a silent, pre-recorded, non-interactive videotape of an ICU physician. The on-site participants will be told that an intensive care physician is observing the mock code. Simulated observation by ICU physician: Display of silent, pre-recorded, non-interactive videotape of an ICU physician. The on-site cardiac arrest team will be told that an intensive care physician is observing the mock code.
37
Total1,069

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicControlTotalTele-intensivist Consultation
Age, Customized
Age
NA Simulation eventsNA Simulation eventsNA Simulation events
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
466 participants987 participants521 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
NA Simulation eventsNA Simulation eventsNA Simulation events
Sex: Female, Male
Male
NA Simulation eventsNA Simulation eventsNA Simulation events

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 00 / 0
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 4660 / 521
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 4660 / 521

Outcome results

Primary

Fraction of Pulseless Time With no Chest Compressions

Time frame: From initiation of intervention or placebo control until completion of two complete cycles of CPR (an average of 4 minutes)

Population: Pre-specified analysis included completed simulations for which complete compression quality data were available. Per protocol, simulations for which equipment malfunction precluded measurement of compression quality were excluded, as were intervention-group simulations classified as run-in simulations because they occurred before optimization of the telemedicine audio equipment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tele-intensivist ConsultationFraction of Pulseless Time With no Chest Compressions0.22 Fraction analysis time CPR not deliveredStandard Deviation 0.13
ControlFraction of Pulseless Time With no Chest Compressions0.19 Fraction analysis time CPR not deliveredStandard Deviation 0.1
p-value: 0.41t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

ACLS Protocol Errors (Using Checklist Adapted From McEvoy ACLS Assessment Tool)

Time frame: From initiation of simulation through termination of simulation, an average of 15 minutes

Population: Pre-specified analysis included completed simulations for which complete compression quality data were available. Per protocol, simulations for which equipment malfunction or simulation error precluded measurement of protocol adherence were excluded, as were intervention-group simulations classified as run-in simulations because they occurred before optimization of the telemedicine audio equipment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tele-intensivist ConsultationACLS Protocol Errors (Using Checklist Adapted From McEvoy ACLS Assessment Tool)2.8 Number of protocol errorsStandard Deviation 1.7
ControlACLS Protocol Errors (Using Checklist Adapted From McEvoy ACLS Assessment Tool)2.9 Number of protocol errorsStandard Deviation 1.4
p-value: 0.84t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Fraction of Chest Compressions at Target Rate

Time frame: From initiation of intervention or placebo control until completion of two complete cycles of CPR (an average of 4 minutes)

Population: Pre-specified analysis included completed simulations for which complete compression quality data were available. Per protocol, simulations for which equipment malfunction or simulation error precluded measurement of compression quality were excluded, as were intervention-group simulations classified as run-in simulations because they occurred before optimization of the telemedicine audio equipment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tele-intensivist ConsultationFraction of Chest Compressions at Target Rate0.59 Fraction compression in analysis windowStandard Deviation 0.23
ControlFraction of Chest Compressions at Target Rate0.58 Fraction compression in analysis windowStandard Deviation 0.29
p-value: 0.87t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Fraction of Chest Compressions With Complete Release

Time frame: From initiation of intervention or placebo control until completion of two complete cycles of CPR (an average of 4 minutes)

Population: Pre-specified analysis included completed simulations for which complete compression quality data were available. Per protocol, simulations for which equipment malfunction or simulation error precluded measurement of compression quality were excluded, as were intervention-group simulations classified as run-in simulations because they occurred before optimization of the telemedicine audio equipment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tele-intensivist ConsultationFraction of Chest Compressions With Complete Release0.89 Fraction compression in analysis windowStandard Deviation 0.14
ControlFraction of Chest Compressions With Complete Release0.89 Fraction compression in analysis windowStandard Deviation 0.15
p-value: 0.97t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Opinions of Study Subjects About Experience Participating in Simulated Cardiac Arrest, Using a Locally-developed and Validated Survey Instrument

Measured domains: understanding of telemedicine intensivist copilot's role, beliefs about telemedicine intensivist copilot's ability to integrate with on site team, ability to influence on-site team performance, comfort with telemedicine intensivist copilot's role, and function of telemedicine interface

Time frame: Immediately after simulation

Population: Pre-specified analysis included complete surveys returned by on-site participants in completed simulations for which complete compression quality data were available. Per protocol, simulations for which equipment malfunction or simulation error precluded measurement of resuscitation quality were excluded, as were intervention-group simulations classified as run-in simulations because they occurred before optimization of the telemedicine audio equipment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Tele-intensivist ConsultationOpinions of Study Subjects About Experience Participating in Simulated Cardiac Arrest, Using a Locally-developed and Validated Survey InstrumentSurvey participant: Telemedical intensivist consultation improved the resuscitation care quality.174 Participants
Tele-intensivist ConsultationOpinions of Study Subjects About Experience Participating in Simulated Cardiac Arrest, Using a Locally-developed and Validated Survey InstrumentSurvey participant: Telemedical intensivist consultation helped team function more smoothly.176 Participants
Secondary

Overall ACLS Protocol Adherence (Using Checklist Adapted From McEvoy ACLS Assessment Tool)

Time frame: From initiation of simulation through termination of simulation, an average of 15 minutes

Population: Pre-specified analysis included completed simulations for which complete compression quality data were available. Per protocol, simulations for which equipment malfunction or simulation error precluded measurement of protocol adherence were excluded, as were intervention-group simulations classified as run-in simulations because they occurred before optimization of the telemedicine audio equipment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tele-intensivist ConsultationOverall ACLS Protocol Adherence (Using Checklist Adapted From McEvoy ACLS Assessment Tool)0.77 Fraction of eligible actions performedStandard Deviation 0.11
ControlOverall ACLS Protocol Adherence (Using Checklist Adapted From McEvoy ACLS Assessment Tool)0.78 Fraction of eligible actions performedStandard Deviation 0.12
p-value: 0.62t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Presence of Telemedicine Audiovisual Connection Problems for Intervention Group Simulation Event

Time frame: From initiation of simulation through termination of simulation, an average of 15 minutes

Population: Pre-specified analysis included completed simulations for which complete compression quality data were available. Per protocol, simulations for which equipment malfunction precluded measurement of compression quality were excluded, as were intervention-group simulations classified as run-in simulations because they occurred before optimization of the telemedicine audio equipment.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
Tele-intensivist ConsultationPresence of Telemedicine Audiovisual Connection Problems for Intervention Group Simulation Event14 Simulation events
Secondary

Short-form State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Score

The short-form State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) measures acute stress experienced by respondents using 6 questions (scores for each question range from 1 to 4, with higher values indicating more stress). Analyzed respondent-level values use the total score (range 4-24) obtained by summing the score for each of the six questions, with higher values indicating more respondent-reported acute stress.

Time frame: Immediately after simulation

Population: Pre-specified analysis included completed surveys by participants completed simulations for which complete compression quality data were available. Per protocol, participants in simulations for which equipment malfunction or simulation error precluded measurement of compression quality were excluded, as were participants in intervention-group simulations classified as run-in simulations because they occurred before optimization of the telemedicine audio equipment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tele-intensivist ConsultationShort-form State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Score12.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
ControlShort-form State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Score12.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
p-value: 0.92Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Team Emergency Assessment Measure Score

The validated Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM) evaluates non-technical performance of the on-site resuscitation team. The score (range 0-4) for each simulation was obtained by averaging the mean score for each of 11 component scores (each component item scored 0-4, with higher values representing better performance).

Time frame: From initiation of simulation through termination of simulation, an average of 15 minutes

Population: Pre-specified analysis included completed simulations for which complete compression quality data were available. Per protocol, simulations for which equipment malfunction or simulation error precluded measurement of team performance were excluded, as were intervention-group simulations classified as run-in simulations because they occurred before optimization of the telemedicine audio equipment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tele-intensivist ConsultationTeam Emergency Assessment Measure Score3.2 score on composite TEAM scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
ControlTeam Emergency Assessment Measure Score3.3 score on composite TEAM scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
p-value: 0.4t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Time From Onset of Shockable Rhythm to Defibrillation

Time frame: From onset of simulated VF or VT until first defibrillation or end of simulation

Population: Pre-specified analysis included completed simulations for which complete compression quality data were available and resuscitation team delivered ≥1 shock to the mannequin during the simulation. Per protocol, simulations for which equipment malfunction or simulation error precluded measurement of protocol adherence were excluded, as were intervention-group simulations classified as run-in simulations because they occurred before optimization of the telemedicine audio equipment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tele-intensivist ConsultationTime From Onset of Shockable Rhythm to Defibrillation37 secondsStandard Deviation 33
ControlTime From Onset of Shockable Rhythm to Defibrillation36 secondsStandard Deviation 25
p-value: 0.86t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Time to First Dose of Epinephrine

Time frame: From initiation of simulation through termination of simulation, an average of 15 minutes

Population: Pre-specified analysis included completed simulations for which complete compression quality data were available and epinephrine was administered. Per protocol, simulations for which equipment malfunction or simulation error precluded measurement of protocol adherence were excluded, as were intervention-group simulations classified as run-in simulations because they occurred before optimization of the telemedicine audio equipment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tele-intensivist ConsultationTime to First Dose of Epinephrine329 secondsStandard Deviation 130
ControlTime to First Dose of Epinephrine344 secondsStandard Deviation 124
p-value: 0.63t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Types of Input by Telemedical Intensivist Copilot

Time frame: From initiation of simulation through termination of simulation, an average of 15 minutes

Population: Pre-specified analysis included completed simulations for which complete compression quality data were available. Per protocol, simulations for which equipment malfunction or simulation error precluded measurement of telemedical intensivist input were excluded, as were intervention-group simulations classified as run-in simulations because they occurred before optimization of the telemedicine audio equipment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
Tele-intensivist ConsultationTypes of Input by Telemedical Intensivist CopilotArrest etiology identification27 Simulation events
Tele-intensivist ConsultationTypes of Input by Telemedical Intensivist CopilotArrest etiology treatment24 Simulation events
Tele-intensivist ConsultationTypes of Input by Telemedical Intensivist CopilotMedical record review26 Simulation events
Tele-intensivist ConsultationTypes of Input by Telemedical Intensivist CopilotRole clarity for on-site team19 Simulation events
Tele-intensivist ConsultationTypes of Input by Telemedical Intensivist CopilotCPR quality10 Simulation events

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 19, 2026