Skip to content

ECT Pulse Amplitude and Medial Temporal Lobe Engagement

ECT Pulse Amplitude and Medial Temporal Lobe Engagement

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02999269
Enrollment
62
Registered
2016-12-21
Start date
2016-10-31
Completion date
2020-03-23
Last updated
2023-07-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Major Depressive Disorder

Keywords

electroconvulsive therapy, MRI, major depressive disorder

Brief summary

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) remains the gold-standard treatment for patients with depressive episodes. During a typical four-week ECT series, most depressive episodes will respond to treatment and people will improve their level of functioning (return to work or family). Independent of the antidepressant effect of ECT, many patients experience transient memory impairment. This investigation will examine the impact of one ECT parameter (pulse amplitude or current) on brain changes (structure of connections within the brain) and clinical outcomes. The goal of this investigation is to determine the optimal parameter for an individual patient that will maintain the clinical response (reduce depression severity) and minimize side effects (eliminate memory issues related to treatment).

Detailed description

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) remains the gold-standard treatment for patients with depressive episodes. During a typical four-week ECT series, most depressive episodes remit, and formerly suicidal or psychotically depressed patients will resume their premorbid levels of functioning. Independent of the antidepressant effect of ECT, many patients experience debilitating but transient cognitive effects such as attention and memory deficits. These unwanted side effects are particularly troubling for older patients who are more likely to have existing cognitive deficits. Both the stimulus delivery (electrode placement, pulse amplitude, and pulse width) and seizure induction appear to work in synergy, but the underlying mechanism of action for successful response has yet to be fully elucidated. Moreover, further work is needed to understand the relationship between clinical improvement and cognitive impairment. This investigation will examine the clinical and neurocognitive impact of targeted medial temporal lobe engagement as a function of pulse amplitude, one of several variable factors influencing the ECT charge. The ECT charge is measured in millicoulombs (mC) and derived from multiplying pulse train duration, pulse-pair frequency, pulse width, and pulse amplitude. Pulse amplitude determines the induced electric field strength in the brain and is presently fixed at 900 milliamperes (mA) with no clinical or scientific justification. The central hypothesis of this investigation is that the optimal pulse amplitude for an individual patient will enhance neuroplasticity (clinical response) while minimizing the disruption of dominant hemisphere hippocampal cognitive circuitry (resulting in cognitive stability). The preliminary data informs the dosage range between 600 and 800 mA. Pulse amplitudes outside of this range compromise efficacy (500 mA) or may increase risk of cognitive impairment (900 mA). The first aim of this investigation will identify the electric field strength and neuroplasticity associated with clinical response. Critically, this aim will establish the neuroplasticity threshold, which is defined as the electric field strength necessary to induce neuroplasticity. The second aim will detect the neural correlates of ECT-mediated cognitive changes, which may be related to disrupted dominant hemisphere long-term potentiation. The third aim will use data-driven dual regression to predict the optimal pulse amplitude for an individual patient. This contribution will be significant because the electric field, when manipulated by pulse amplitude, can subsequently maximize hippocampal neuroplasticity (efficacy) and minimize disrupted connectivity (cognitive stability) thus improving clinical outcomes.

Interventions

DEVICEMECTA Spectrum 5000Q Amplitude

Current

Sponsors

The Mind Research Network
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Texas
CollaboratorOTHER
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
CollaboratorNIH
University of New Mexico
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Double-blind (participant and outcomes assessor)

Intervention model description

Subjects randomized to right unilateral ECT with 600, 700, or 800 mA pulse amplitude.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Diagnosis of major depressive disorder (with or without psychotic features) 2. the clinical indications for ECT including treatment resistance or a need for a rapid and definitive response 3. Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 24-item (HDRS-24) \> 21 4. age range between 50 and 80 years of age 5. right-handedness

Exclusion criteria

1. Defined neurological or neurodegenerative disorder (e.g., history of head injury with loss of consciousness \> 5 minutes, epilepsy, Alzheimer's disease) 2. other psychiatric conditions (e.g., schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder) 3. current drug or alcohol use disorder, except for nicotine; and 4) contraindications to MRI.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Depression Severitypost-ECT Hamilton Depression Rating Scale -24 item. The time frame is 4 weeks after study initiation.Hamilton Depression Rating Scale - 24 item. Scores range from 0 to 76 (higher scores indicate more depression severity)
Cognitionpost-ECT Hopkins Verbal Learning Trial-Revised (percent retention score, range 0 - 100, higher is better). The time frame is 4 weeks after study initiation.Hopkins Verbal Learning Trial-Revised (percent retention score, range 0 - 100, higher is better)

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
600 mA Right Unilateral ECT
MECTA Spectrum 5000Q Amplitude MECTA Spectrum 5000Q Amplitude: Current
16
700 mA Right Unilateral ECT
MECTA Spectrum 5000Q Amplitude MECTA Spectrum 5000Q Amplitude: Current
15
800 mA Right Unilateral ECT
MECTA Spectrum 5000Q Amplitude MECTA Spectrum 5000Q Amplitude: Current
16
Total47

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic600 mA Right Unilateral ECTTotal800 mA Right Unilateral ECT700 mA Right Unilateral ECT
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
8 Participants23 Participants8 Participants7 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
8 Participants24 Participants8 Participants8 Participants
Age, Continuous65 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
65 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
67 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
64 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
5 Participants15 Participants5 Participants5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
11 Participants32 Participants11 Participants10 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 24 items37.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.8
36.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.3
33.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.7
38.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.5
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
15 Participants44 Participants15 Participants14 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
16 participants47 participants16 participants15 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
12 Participants32 Participants11 Participants9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants15 Participants5 Participants6 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 200 / 200 / 20
other
Total, other adverse events
5 / 206 / 206 / 20
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 200 / 200 / 20

Outcome results

Primary

Cognition

Hopkins Verbal Learning Trial-Revised (percent retention score, range 0 - 100, higher is better)

Time frame: post-ECT Hopkins Verbal Learning Trial-Revised (percent retention score, range 0 - 100, higher is better). The time frame is 4 weeks after study initiation.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
600 mA Right Unilateral ECTCognition57.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 10
700 mA Right Unilateral ECTCognition68 score on a scaleStandard Error 9
800 mA Right Unilateral ECTCognition62 score on a scaleStandard Error 10
p-value: 0.37Regression, Linear
p-value: 0.5Regression, Linear
p-value: <0.01Regression, Linear
Primary

Depression Severity

Hamilton Depression Rating Scale - 24 item. Scores range from 0 to 76 (higher scores indicate more depression severity)

Time frame: post-ECT Hamilton Depression Rating Scale -24 item. The time frame is 4 weeks after study initiation.

Population: full longitudinal model with an unstructured repeated measures covariance matrix

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
600 mA Right Unilateral ECTDepression Severity22.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.3
700 mA Right Unilateral ECTDepression Severity12.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.1
800 mA Right Unilateral ECTDepression Severity14.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.4
Comparison: For the primary outcomes (change in HDRS24), we performed a full longitudinal model with an unstructured repeated measures covariance matrix on subjects who completed the study in the assigned treatment arm. The dependent variable was HDRS at each visit and the independent variables included progress (time within the ECT series: pre-, mid-, and post-ECT), amplitude, age, sex, pulse width and the following interactions: progress/amplitude, progress/sex, and progress/pulse width.p-value: 0.04Regression, Linear
p-value: 0.0001Regression, Linear

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 10, 2026