Skip to content

Early or Late Booster for Basic Life Support?

Does an Early Booster Session Improve Performance and Retention of Skills in Basic Life Support Compared to a Later Booster? A Simulation Based Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02998723
Enrollment
95
Registered
2016-12-20
Start date
2016-11-30
Completion date
2017-04-30
Last updated
2018-09-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Basic Life Support

Keywords

Basic Life Support, Education, Medical, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, Learning

Brief summary

Attrition of skills after basic life support (BLS) training is common. Psychology studies have established that for basic memory recall tasks, spaced learning strategies improve retention. Spaced learning is often organized as a refresher or 'booster' course after initial training. This study aims to investigate if this principle holds true for BLS skills, which require rapid memory recall and efficient deployment of procedural skills while under time pressure.

Detailed description

Novice laypeople who have not received BLS training in the 6 months leading up to the date of participation will be recruited from the University of Ottawa and the general public. Participants will be randomized into one of three groups: early booster, late booster, or no booster (control). Currently, no booster is the educational standard. The early booster group will receive a booster at 3 weeks, the late booster at 2 months, and no booster for the control. All participants will undergo BLS training, an immediate post-test, and a retention post-test at 4 months. Post-tests involve a simulated cardiac arrest scenario. Raters will be blinded to the group allocation and simulation test order.

Interventions

The early booster group will receive a booster teaching session at 3 weeks post-training followed by feedback.

The late booster group will receive a booster teaching session at 2 months post-training followed by feedback

Sponsors

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Laypeople who have not received any BLS training or practice in the 6 months leading up to the date of their participation will be recruited.

Exclusion criteria

* Under 18 years old; * Non layperson and Basic Life Training in less than 6 months.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Basic Life Support performance, as measured by the standardized Heart and Stroke Heartsaver checklist4 monthsBLS performance, as measured by the standardized Heart and Stroke Heartsaver checklist

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Accuracy of compression depth4 monthsPercentage of compressions that are deep enough
Compression ratio4 monthsThe percentage of time during the scenario that compressions are done
Hand position4 monthsThe percentage of time the hand position is correct
Time to start chest compression;4 monthsTime from entering the scene to initiation of compression (in seconds)
Ventilation success rate4 monthsThe percentage of time ventilations are done with adequate volume 400-700mls
Time to defibrillation using AED.4 monthsTime from start to defibrillation using AED (in seconds)
Tidal volume4 monthsMean tidal volume (ml)

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 18, 2026