Skip to content

Chronic Ankle Instability, Surgical Repair: Open Versus Closed

Does Arthroscopic Anatomic Repair of the Anterior Talofibular Ligament Provide Better Functional Outcome Compared to Open Anatomic Repair in Patients With Chronic Ankle Instability: a Multicentre Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02998333
Acronym
CAISR
Enrollment
41
Registered
2016-12-20
Start date
2017-01-31
Completion date
2025-03-31
Last updated
2025-10-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Ankle Instability

Keywords

Instability, Ankle, Surgical stabilization

Brief summary

Rationale: Lateral ankle ligament injuries may be a result of ankle sprains. In 10-30% of patients with lateral ankle ligament injuries, chronic lateral ankle instability may be present. If conservative treatment fails, instability is treated surgically. Anatomic repair (also known as the Bröstrom procedure) is the current golden standard for surgical treatment of chronic ankle instability. The Bröstrom started out as an open technique and is now also performed arthroscopically. Both approaches are considered standard care and provide good results. Which approach is best, has not yet been researched. In this study it is hypothesized arthroscopic repair provides better functional outcome compared to open repair during short term follow-up. Objective: The main objective of this study is to compare the functional outcome after arthroscopic and open anatomic repair in patients with chronic lateral ankle instability, and secondly to assess ankle stability and ankle Range of Motion (ROM) after arthroscopic and open ligament repair. Study design: A Non-Blinded Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Study population: All patients willing to participate, from an age of 18 years old, with persisting ankle instability for at least 6 months, eligible for anatomic repair. Intervention: Both groups of patients are surgically treated with anatomic repair of the anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL). One group is treated arthroscopically and the other by the open approach. Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary outcome measure is functional outcome 6 months after surgery measured using the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score. The main study parameter is a difference of ≥10 2 points per FAOS subscale between both treatment groups (Minimal Important Change = 10 points; 2 per subscale).

Interventions

Surgical stabilization of the ankle joint, performed as an open or arthroscopic procedure.

Sponsors

Zimmer Biomet
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Centro Hospitalar do Porto
CollaboratorOTHER
Site Hôpital orthopédique
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Amphia Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Albert Schweitzer Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Gwendolyn Vuurberg
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients are 18 years or older; * Experience pain and/or a sensation of instability during sports and/or daily activity; * Isolated lateral ankle instability; * Planned for surgical repair of the ATFL; * At least one previous episode of an ankle inversion sprain; * Complaints for at least 6 months; * Failed previous conservative treatment.

Exclusion criteria

* Serious concomitant injury (like arthrosis, ruled out using an AP and lateral x-ray according to standard protocol); * Foot or ankle fracture in past; * Previous foot or ankle surgery; * ROM restriction of \>10 degrees; * Medial instability; * Severe misalignment; * Ankle/foot deformities (e.g. severe flat foot); * Systemic comorbidity leading to delayed recovery (e.g. Diabetes Mellitus, Rheumatoid Arthritis) * (general) Hyper laxity * Inability or unwillingness to provide consent * Present factors that may cause difficulty of follow-up

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Functional outcome6 monthsThe primary outcome measures is a difference in pain and disability between both treatment groups as measured a Functional Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) score change of ≥2 points per subscale measured at 6 months follow-up.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Functional outcome FAOS3- and 6 monthsFor assessment disablement
Functional outcome Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain3- and 6 monthsFor pain assessment
Functional outcome Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT)3- and 6 monthsFor instability assessment
Anterior Drawer Test (ADT)Pre-operative, instraoperative, 3- and 6 months postoperativeThe anterior drawer test is registered per mm (range 0-15mm) displacement and according to the manual anterior drawer test (M-ATT) categories (grade 0-3).
Range of Motion (ROM)Pre-operative, instraoperative, 3- and 6 months postoperativeROM is registered in degrees of dorsi- and plantarflexion and is measured using a goniometer. Assessment is performed pre-operatively, and at 3- and 6-months postoperatively.

Countries

Netherlands, Portugal, Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026