Skip to content

Neurophysiological and Acute Pharmacological Studies in FXS Patients

Neurophysiological and Acute Pharmacological Studies in FXS Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02998151
Enrollment
29
Registered
2016-12-20
Start date
2016-01-31
Completion date
2020-11-30
Last updated
2021-11-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fragile X Syndrome

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to utilize neurophysiologic assessments, behavioral measures and clinical measures to assess how much deficits associated with Fragile X Syndrome from pre-dose to post-dose using pharmacology.

Interventions

DRUGAcamprosate

two 666mg pills

DRUGLovastatin

two 20mg pills

DRUGMinocycline

two 135mg pills

DRUGPlacebo

placebo pill

DRUGBaclofen

one 30mg pill

Sponsors

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
CollaboratorNIH
Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

This study was designed as a 4-intervention crossover, with all study participants receiving all possible interventions. These were originally placebo, acamprosate, minocycline, and lovastatin. Midway through the study (n=16) it was determined that acamprosate was undetectable in serum and this intervention was replaced by baclofen. Remaining participants (n=13) received baclofen and 5 participants were re-enrolled to receive baclofen or a second round of placebo, so investigators and participants would remain blinded to drug status during the baclofen visit. The second round of placebo was not analyzed.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
15 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects ages 15-55, with fragile X syndrome (FXS) who completed the study entitled Mechanisms and brain circuits underlying fragile X syndrome (IRB # 2015-8425). FXS is defined as full FMR1 mutations (\>200 CGG repeats) confirmed by genetic testing. * General good health as determined by physical exam, medical history and laboratory work up.

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects with a history of intolerance to acamprosate, lovastatin, or minocycline will be excluded. * Subjects will also be excluded if they have taken any investigational drug within 3 months, have a history of substance abuse or dependence within 6 months, or significant psychiatric or central nervous system neurological disease unrelated to FXS. * Uncontrolled seizures impact EEG data as do anticonvulsants, barbiturates, lithium and benzodiazepines and are exclusions (within 5 half-lives). Those taking other psychiatric medications must be on stable doses for 4 weeks before any testing. * For female subjects of child bearing potential, a positive urine pregnancy test. * Potential subjects with a creatinine clearance \< 50 mL/min will be excluded. * Identified medical issues, inability to tolerate study procedures or study drug per the discretion of the Principal Investigator.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in EEG Relative Gamma PowerPre-dose, 4-hour post-doseEEG relative gamma power at rest was calculated as the percent of power in the gamma frequencies relative to the sum of power in all frequency bands, averaged across electrodes, and calculated separately at pre-dose and post-dose timepoints. To assess the impact of drug, the pre-dose relative gamma power was subtracted from post-dose relative gamma power. Higher numbers indicate more relative gamma power post-dose; lower numbers indicate more relative gamma power pre-dose.
Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement4-hour post-doseThe Clinical Global Impressions - Improvement (CGI-I) requires the clinician to assess how much the patient's illness has changed relative to pre-dose, from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Woodcock Johnson Test of Cognitive Abilities - Auditory Attention Task4-hour post-doseWoodcock Johnson Test of Cognitive Abilities III Auditory Attention subscale. Participants must identify orally presented words amid increasingly intense background noise. The scores for this subtask range from 0-50, with higher scores indicating a better outcome. Raw scores for this subscale are reported (rather than standard scores, or age- or grade-equivalents).
Change From Pre-dose in the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status at 4 Hours Post DosePre-dose, 4-hour post doseFour 10-item lists of unrelated words were presented orally to the examinee who was then required to immediately recall words presented, at both pre-dose and post-dose timepoints. The impact of drug was assessed by subtracting the number of words remembered post-dose from the number of words remembered pre-dose. Lower numbers indicate more words remembered post-dose; higher numbers indicate more words remembered pre-dose.
Test of Attentional Performance for Children (KiTAP) Test of AlertnessPredose, 4-hour post-doseComputerized task where an examinee is required to push a key when a target stimulus is presented on the screen. Scores are presented as change in median reaction time (RT), in milliseconds.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Participants engaged in a baseline visit to gather preliminary data and ensure study compliance. Participants were then randomly assigned to different sequences for receiving acamprosate, lovastatin, minocycline, baclofen, and placebo. There was a 2-week washout period between visits.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Study Participants
Participants received, in random order, a single dose of placebo, acamprosate, lovastatin, minocycline, or baclofen, with a two-week washout period between doses. Midway through the study (n=16) it was determined that acamprosate was undetectable in serum and this intervention was replaced by baclofen. Remaining participants (n=13) received baclofen and 5 participants were re-enrolled to receive baclofen or a second round of placebo, so investigators and participants would remain blinded to drug status during the baclofen visit. The second round of placebo was not analyzed.
29
Total29

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyParticipant declined to re-enroll for baclofen8
Overall StudyParticipant was not offered acamprosate; acamprosate was discontinued and replaced with baclofen13
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject3

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Study Participants
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
29 Participants
Age, Continuous24.71 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.56
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
29 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
25 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
29 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
20 Participants
Woodcock Johnson Test of Cognitive Abilities - Auditory Attention Task30.89 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.92

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 270 / 160 / 290 / 270 / 18
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 277 / 164 / 294 / 274 / 18
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 270 / 160 / 290 / 270 / 18

Outcome results

Primary

Change in EEG Relative Gamma Power

EEG relative gamma power at rest was calculated as the percent of power in the gamma frequencies relative to the sum of power in all frequency bands, averaged across electrodes, and calculated separately at pre-dose and post-dose timepoints. To assess the impact of drug, the pre-dose relative gamma power was subtracted from post-dose relative gamma power. Higher numbers indicate more relative gamma power post-dose; lower numbers indicate more relative gamma power pre-dose.

Time frame: Pre-dose, 4-hour post-dose

Population: Missing 1 placebo, 1 lovastatin who contributed data with excessive movement or other artifact, or were unable to complete the task.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange in EEG Relative Gamma Power0.0024 percent of power in gamma frequenciesStandard Deviation 0.0265
AcamprosateChange in EEG Relative Gamma Power-0.0077 percent of power in gamma frequenciesStandard Deviation 0.0252
LovastatinChange in EEG Relative Gamma Power-0.0039 percent of power in gamma frequenciesStandard Deviation 0.0225
MinocyclineChange in EEG Relative Gamma Power0.0019 percent of power in gamma frequenciesStandard Deviation 0.0235
BaclofenChange in EEG Relative Gamma Power-0.0160 percent of power in gamma frequenciesStandard Deviation 0.0346
Primary

Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement

The Clinical Global Impressions - Improvement (CGI-I) requires the clinician to assess how much the patient's illness has changed relative to pre-dose, from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse).

Time frame: 4-hour post-dose

Population: CGI-I was not collected for one participant on their minocycline day and another participant on their baclofen day.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboClinical Global Impressions-Improvement3.70 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.61
AcamprosateClinical Global Impressions-Improvement3.88 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.62
LovastatinClinical Global Impressions-Improvement3.97 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
MinocyclineClinical Global Impressions-Improvement3.81 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.49
BaclofenClinical Global Impressions-Improvement3.94 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.43
Secondary

Change From Pre-dose in the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status at 4 Hours Post Dose

Four 10-item lists of unrelated words were presented orally to the examinee who was then required to immediately recall words presented, at both pre-dose and post-dose timepoints. The impact of drug was assessed by subtracting the number of words remembered post-dose from the number of words remembered pre-dose. Lower numbers indicate more words remembered post-dose; higher numbers indicate more words remembered pre-dose.

Time frame: Pre-dose, 4-hour post dose

Population: One participant is missing from placebo, acamprosate, lovastatin, and minocycline conditions due to being unable to repeat list words back to experimenter (nonverbal). Baclofen and placebo are each additionally missing one participant who did not complete the pre-dose or post-dose task.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Pre-dose in the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status at 4 Hours Post Dose-.20 number of words rememberedStandard Deviation 4.23
AcamprosateChange From Pre-dose in the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status at 4 Hours Post Dose-1.47 number of words rememberedStandard Deviation 5.17
LovastatinChange From Pre-dose in the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status at 4 Hours Post Dose-1.25 number of words rememberedStandard Deviation 3.85
MinocyclineChange From Pre-dose in the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status at 4 Hours Post Dose-.69 number of words rememberedStandard Deviation 5.58
BaclofenChange From Pre-dose in the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status at 4 Hours Post Dose-.88 number of words rememberedStandard Deviation 3.35
Secondary

Test of Attentional Performance for Children (KiTAP) Test of Alertness

Computerized task where an examinee is required to push a key when a target stimulus is presented on the screen. Scores are presented as change in median reaction time (RT), in milliseconds.

Time frame: Predose, 4-hour post-dose

Population: One participant is missing from the placebo, acamprosate, lovastatin, and minocycline conditions due to being unable to participate in the task. An additional one participant each is missing from placebo, acamprosate, and lovastatin conditions due to uncollected data at either the pre-dose or post-dose timepoint.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboTest of Attentional Performance for Children (KiTAP) Test of Alertness13.76 change in median RT in millisecondsStandard Deviation 188.37
AcamprosateTest of Attentional Performance for Children (KiTAP) Test of Alertness-28.64 change in median RT in millisecondsStandard Deviation 137.21
LovastatinTest of Attentional Performance for Children (KiTAP) Test of Alertness18.59 change in median RT in millisecondsStandard Deviation 169.39
MinocyclineTest of Attentional Performance for Children (KiTAP) Test of Alertness26.85 change in median RT in millisecondsStandard Deviation 226.69
BaclofenTest of Attentional Performance for Children (KiTAP) Test of Alertness-31.44 change in median RT in millisecondsStandard Deviation 171.91
Secondary

Woodcock Johnson Test of Cognitive Abilities - Auditory Attention Task

Woodcock Johnson Test of Cognitive Abilities III Auditory Attention subscale. Participants must identify orally presented words amid increasingly intense background noise. The scores for this subtask range from 0-50, with higher scores indicating a better outcome. Raw scores for this subscale are reported (rather than standard scores, or age- or grade-equivalents).

Time frame: 4-hour post-dose

Population: Data is missing from 2 placebo, 1 acamprosate, 1 lovastatin, 2 minocycline, and 1 baclofen.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboWoodcock Johnson Test of Cognitive Abilities - Auditory Attention Task32.84 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.77
AcamprosateWoodcock Johnson Test of Cognitive Abilities - Auditory Attention Task33.07 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.48
LovastatinWoodcock Johnson Test of Cognitive Abilities - Auditory Attention Task32.93 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.31
MinocyclineWoodcock Johnson Test of Cognitive Abilities - Auditory Attention Task33.24 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.04
BaclofenWoodcock Johnson Test of Cognitive Abilities - Auditory Attention Task33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.17

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 13, 2026