Skip to content

Comparison of Two Strategies of Glucocorticoid Withdrawal in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients

Comparison of Two Strategies of Glucocorticoid Withdrawal in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients in Low Disease Activity or Remission.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02997605
Acronym
STAR
Enrollment
102
Registered
2016-12-20
Start date
2017-01-31
Completion date
2022-01-27
Last updated
2025-11-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

RheumatoId Arthritis

Keywords

low disease activity, remission

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the proportion of patients who could withdraw from prednisone and hydrocortisone one year after a progressive decrease of GC (GC tapering) or a hydrocortisone replacement therapy in rheumatoid arthritis in remission or low disease activity.

Detailed description

French multicenter double-blind controlled parallel-group randomized clinical trial Phase IV assessing whether a hydrocortisone replacement therapy could increase the success rate of GC withdrawal at one year, in patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis in low disease activity or remission, in comparison to progressive decrease of GC (GC tapering).

Interventions

DRUGGlucoCorticoid

After inclusion in the study, the first part is an open follow-up period where all patients will receive 5 mg of prednisone daily for one month. After one month, if patients still have a DAS28 ≤3.2, they will be randomized into two arms: Group 1: GC tapering group / Group 2: Hydrocortisone replacement group. After randomisation, there are four scheduled visits: M4, M7, M9 and M12. Patients withdrawing from GC therapy will be instructed, that if they start feeling unwell during or after the GC tapering protocol they should not taper the steroid dose any further, but contact the centre responsible for the protocol. If GC induced adrenal insufficiency is confirmed or strongly suspected, GC replacement will be secured using hydrocortisone.

Sponsors

University Hospital, Toulouse
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients ≥ 18 years old. * Fulfilling the 2010 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/EULAR criteria for RA. * Treated with a stable dose of Synthetic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (sDMARD) or Biological Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drug (bDMARD) for at least 3 months. * Who have been treated with prednisone or prednisolone for at least 6 months. * With a stable dose of prednisone or prednisolone of 5mg/day for at least 3 months. * With a DAS28 ≤3.2 for at least 3 months. * Patients with health insurance * Patients who have signed a written informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

* Any chronic condition that would need long term corticoid use (e.g. chronic lung diseases). * Evidence of a flare within the last 3 months. * Evidence of an allergy or intolerance to hydrocortisone or prednisone. * Chronic idiopathic, or autoimmune clinical adrenal insufficiency. * GC joint injections within the last 3 months or scheduled in the next 3 months. * Any GC intake expected more than \>5mg/day within the next 12 months. * Association with sultopride and with live vaccines * Significant trauma or major surgery within the 3 months prior to the baseline visit. * Scheduled surgery in the next 12 months. * Fibromyalgia. * Foreseeable poor compliance with the strategy. * Patient with any condition that would prevent participation in the study and completion of the study procedures, including language limitation. * Alcohol and/or drug misuse as determined by the investigator. * Pregnancy or breastfeeding. * Patient is not willing to sign the informed consent. * Juridical Protection * DAS28\>3.2 after one month of a stable dose of prednisone 5 mg/day.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
proportion of patients who could withdraw from prednisone and hydrocortisone at one yearone year after a progressive decrease of Glucocorticoids or hydrocortisone replacementTo compare a prednisone tapering strategy to a hydrocortisone replacement strategy on the success rate of prednisone and hydrocortisone withdrawal at one year in Rheumatoid Arthritis patients in low disease activity or remission.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
proportion of patients with acute adrenal insufficiencyone yearTo compare the proportion of patients with acute adrenal insufficiency at one year between the two groups.
proportion of patients with biological adrenal insufficiencyone yearTo compare the proportion of patients with biological adrenal insufficiency at one year between the two groups.
proportion of patients needing extra prednisone to control flaresone yearTo compare the proportion of patients needing extra prednisone to control flares
proportion of patients who have at least one flare confirmed by the investigator during the protocol.one yearTo compare the proportion of patients who have at least one flare confirmed by the investigator during the protocol.
area under the curve of means of the FLARE (Flare Assessment in Rheumatoid Arthritis)one yearTo compare the area under the curve of the means of the FLARE (Flare Assessment in Rheumatoid Arthritis) at one year with a self-assessment questionnaire.
proportion of patients who could withdraw from prednisoneone year after a progressive decrease of Glucocorticoids or hydrocortisone replacementTo compare the proportion of patients who could withdraw from prednisone whatever the additional hydrocortisone associated treatment.
medians of Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)4, 7 months and 1 yearTo compare the medians of HAQ at 4, 7 months and one year between the groups.
medians of Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID)4, 7 months and 1 yearTo compare the medians of RAID at 4, 7 months and one year between the groups.
medians of EuroQol 5-dimensional Descriptive system (EQ-5D)4, 7 months and 1 yearTo compare the medians of EQ-5D at 4, 7 months and one year between the groups.
medians of Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue Scale FACIT-F)4, 7 months and 1 yearTo compare the medians of FACIT-F at 4, 7 months and one year between the groups.
proportion of patients with Serious Adverse events1 yearTo compare the proportion of patients with Serious Adverse events at one year between the groups.
proportion of patients in DAS28 remission and in DAS28 low disease activity7 and 12 monthsTo compare the proportion of patients in DAS28 remission and in DAS28 low disease activity at 7 and 12 months between the groups.

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026