Comparison of Routine Endotracheal Intubation With McGrath Videolaryngoscope and Pentax AirwayScope

Status

Completed

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT02997488

Enrollment

140

Registered

2016-12-20

Start date

2017-02-09

Completion date

2017-06-14

Last updated

2017-06-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intubation

Keywords

videolaryngoscope

Brief summary

Recently many kinds of indirect videolaryngoscopes were developed. These videolaryngoscopes provide easier intubation, help intubation difficulty, are used good tool for education. McGrath Videolaryngoscope and Pentax AirwayScope are kinds of these videolaryngoscopes. The purpose of this study is to compare of routine endotracheal intubation with McGrath Videolaryngoscope and Pentax AirwayScope by means of providing better laryngeal view, easier and faster intubation.

Interventions

DEVICEPentax Airwayscope

intubation using Pentax Airwayscope

DEVICEMcGrath Videolaryngoscope

intubation using McGrath Videolaryngoscope

Study design

Observational model

CASE_CONTROL

Time perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Age

19 Years to 65 Years

Healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria

* an American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA) 1 or 2

Exclusion criteria

* a suspected difficult airway (Mallampati score Ⅳ) * known cervical spine injury * required rapid sequence induction * emergency operation

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame	Description
Time to intubation	10 minutes around intubation	from entering of blade between incisors to appearance of first end tidal CO2 curve using capnograph

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026