Skip to content

COMparison of Physiological Algorithms for Real-time Evaluation of Atrial Fibrillation

COMparison of Physiological Algorithms for Real-time Evaluation of Atrial Fibrillation

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02997254
Acronym
COMPARE_AF
Enrollment
1000
Registered
2016-12-20
Start date
2016-12-01
Completion date
2027-06-30
Last updated
2025-11-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Abnormal Heart Rhythms, Atrial Fibrillation

Keywords

atrial fibrillation, ablation, abnormal heart rhythm

Brief summary

This is a cohort study to evaluate algorithms for mapping atrial fibrillation by mapping atrial structure and mapping electrical activity to detect physiologically important areas. A key innovation of the observation study is to assess tracking of physiological activity in AF, in relation to tissue activity (MAP recordings), and in relation to AF waves of activity. This observational work extends prior studies that focused on focal and rotational activity, dispersion of electrical activity, low voltage activity and others.

Detailed description

In this study, the investigators will compare mapping approaches for atrial fibrillation ablation. First, investigators will compare approaches to map atrial structure from collected computed tomography (CT) scans or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans acquired routinely in patients undergoing ablation for atrial fibrillation. Imaging will be acquired from a variety of clinically approved Second, investigators will compare approaches to analyze electrograms collected routinely at clinical electrophysiology study (EPS) in patients undergoing ablation for atrial fibrillation. Electrograms will be recorded from a variety of clinically approved catheters under standard of care conditions, and will be analyzed to better understand the mechanisms for atrial fibrillation and its relationship to outcomes. Electrograms include unipolar recordings, bipolar recordings and, monophasic action potential recordings using FDA-cleared catheters. The investigators anticipate analyzing data from 1000 patients from inception of the study.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Stanford University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* aged 21-80 yrs who underwent electrophysiology study for ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

Exclusion criteria

* Poor data quality of recordings of AF

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Diagnostic AccuracyAt the time of procedureComparing electrogram analysis systems to diagnose sites of importance in Atrial Fibrillation

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Analysis TimeAt time of procedure.Comparing time required to segment atrial structures from computed tomography or magnetic resonance images.

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactSanjiv M Narayan, MD, PhD
sanjiv1@stanford.edu(650) 723-9363
Backup ContactKathleen C Mills, BA
kmills2@stanford.edu(650) 723-9363

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 24, 2026