Skip to content

The Clinical Performance of Inlay Zirconia Bridges

The Clinical Performance of Inlay Zirconia Bridges Using Three Different Designs

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02995876
Enrollment
30
Registered
2016-12-19
Start date
2016-06-30
Completion date
2018-08-15
Last updated
2018-09-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dental Crowns

Brief summary

When missing tooth structure or teeth are replaced, minimal biologic risk should be involved to re-establish function and esthetics. The increased use of the adhesive technique and preservation of dental tissues have greatly impacted conservative tooth preparation design. The development use of zirconia technology and all-ceramic systems has opened the potential for fabrication inlays zirconia bridges with durability and good aesthetics. The purpose of this study is to clinically evaluate the placement of inlay bridge made of a Y-TZP framework veneered with a pressed ceramic and bonded with a completely adhesive approach in the replacement of a single missing tooth.

Detailed description

This study evaluates the use of inlay bridge made of Zirconia and all ceramic systems with three designs in the replacement process of one single tooth (i.e. a missing premolar or molar.) The first design is going to be fabricated with CAD/CAM Zirconia and the occlusal surface from e-max press. The second design is going to be fabricated with CAD/CAM Zirconia and the occlusal surface from e-max press and the internal surface coated with glaze layer to improve the adhesion. The third design is going to be fabricated with CAD/CAM Zirconia and the occlusal surface from e-max press and the internal surface coated with a layer of e-max ceramic press to improve the adhesion.

Interventions

PROCEDUREGlaze layer

A coating of a glaze layer will be used at the inner surface of the bridge to improve adhesion

PROCEDUREE-max Press layer

A coating of E-max Press layer will be used at the inner surface of the bridge to improve adhesion

Sponsors

Damascus University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Good oral hygiene 2. Low susceptibility to caries 3. Parallel alignment of abutment teeth 4. Immobility of the abutment teeth 5. Minimum height of abutment teeth ≥ 5 mm (connector thickness) 6. Maximum mesio-distal extension of the inter-dental gap of 9 mm (width of premolar) or 12 mm (width of molar)

Exclusion criteria

* Severe para-functional habits. * Short clinical crowns (\<5 mm) * Extensive defects of the clinical crown, * Loosening of teeth because of factors related to the periodontal tissues.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in marginal fitImmediately within five minutes following cementation (T1), 3 months (T2), 6 months (T3), 12 months (T4) following applicationTo examine if there is a gap between inlay margins and tooth cavity margins .It will be measured by a probe.
Change in the Retention StatusImmediately within five minutes following cementation (T1), 3 months (T2), 6 months (T3), 12 months (T4) following applicationThe resistance of a prosthesis to displacement will be measured.
Change in Material IntegrityImmediately within five minutes following cementation (T1), 3 months (T2), 6 months (T3), 12 months (T4) following applicationTo examine macroscopically the presence of cracks or fractures in the veneering ceramic (retainers or pontics) or any fractures at the connectors.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Marginal Color MatchingImmediately within five minutes following cementation (T1), 3 months (T2), 6 months (T3), 12 months (T4) following applicationExamination will be done macroscopically to detect the presence of any difference in color between the margins of the tooth and inlays

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in SensitivityImmediately within five minutes following cementation (T1), 3 months (T2), 6 months (T3), 12 months (T4) following applicationThe presence of any spontaneous or stimulated pain will be assumed.
Change in ShadeImmediately within five minutes following cementation (T1), 3 months (T2), 6 months (T3), 12 months (T4) following applicationThe shade is going to be determined using Vita(R) shade guide.
Change in Patients' SatisfactionImmediately within five minutes following cementation (T1), 3 months (T2), 6 months (T3), 12 months (T4) following applicationA questionnaire will be used to detect the level of satisfaction regarding function and shade

Countries

Syria

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026