Skip to content

E. Max Laminate Veneers With and Without Using Galla Chinnesis as Natural Cross Linking and Remineralizing Agent

One Year Clinical Evaluation of E. Max Laminate Veneers With and Without Using Galla Chinnesis as Natural Cross Linking and Remineralizing Agent Before Bonding to Teeth With Amelogenesis Imperfecta

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02994862
Enrollment
16
Registered
2016-12-16
Start date
2016-12-31
Completion date
2017-12-31
Last updated
2016-12-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Amelogenesis Imperfecta

Brief summary

In teeth requiring laminate veneers with amelogenesis imperfecta Will application of galla chinensis before Bonding of laminate veneers with adhesive resin cement provide better survival rate than conventional Bonding method

Detailed description

one year Clinical evaluation of laminate veneers with amelogenesis imperfecta Will application of galla chinensis before Bonding of laminate veneers with adhesive resin cement provide better survival rate than conventional Bonding method

Interventions

OTHERGalla Chinnesis

new Remineralizing Agent before Bonding to teeth with amelogenesis imperfecta

OTHERConventional Bonding

Normal Bonding Protocol

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

All subjects are required to be: * From 18-60 years old, and able to read and sign the informed consent document. * Physically and psychologically able to tolerate conventional restorative procedures * Have no active periodontal or pulpal diseases, have teeth with good restorations * Patients with teeth problems indicated for laminate veneer (e.g. discoloration, fracture not involve more than 50% enamel loss, mild malposition, ….) * Willing to return for follow-up examinations and evaluation

Exclusion criteria

* Patients in the growth stage with partially erupted teeth * Patient with fractured teeth of more than 50% enamel loss * Patients with poor oral hygiene and motivation * Pregnant women * Psychiatric problems or unrealistic expectations * Lack of opposite occluding dentition in the area intended for restoration

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
marginal adaptation assessed by clinical evaluation using dental mirror and probe1 yearclinical evaluation of marginal adaptation

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient satisfaction assessed using a Questionnaire1 YearQuestionnaire for patient satisfaction

Contacts

Primary ContactMohammed mohammed, B.D.S
mgamal400@gmail.com01226500339
Backup ContactJylan Elguindy, Phd

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026