Skip to content

PALISADE Follow-on Study (ARC004)

Peanut Allergy Oral Immunotherapy Study of AR101 for Desensitization in Children and Adults (PALISADE) Follow-on Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02993107
Enrollment
388
Registered
2016-12-15
Start date
2016-12-29
Completion date
2019-05-31
Last updated
2022-03-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Peanut Allergy

Keywords

AR101, Characterized Peanut Allergen, CPNA (Characterized Peanut Allergen), OIT (oral immunotherapy), Peanut Allergy, Allergy, Peanut-Allergic Children, Peanut-Allergic Adults, Desensitization, PALISADE

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of AR101 through oral immunotherapy (OIT) in peanut-allergic children and adults who have completed the ARC003 study.

Detailed description

This is an international, multicenter, open-label, 2-arm follow-on study of the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of AR101 in peanut-allergic individuals who have completed the ARC003 study. This study will explore alternative dosing regimens during extended maintenance with AR101.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALAR101

AR101 powder provided in capsules & sachets

Sponsors

Aimmune Therapeutics, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
4 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: * Completion of the ARC003 study * Written informed consent and/or assent from subjects/guardians as appropriate * Use of effective birth control by sexually active female subjects of child-bearing potential Key

Exclusion criteria

* Early discontinuation from the ARC003 study * Meets any longitudinally applicable ARC003 study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 With Treatment-related Adverse Events (TEAE)Up to 126 weeksPercentage of subjects ages 4-17 with at-least 1 TEAE, including serious adverse events, during the overall study period. The percentage of subjects reporting at least 1 TEAE by maximum reported severity is also presented using the 5-point CTCAE severity grading scale. All safety evaluations were conducted using the safety population (all subjects who received at least 1 dose of AR101 during ARC004), age 4-17 years. Safety data are presented for group 1 (former placebo) and Group 2 data are divided into columns for cohort 1 (QD), cohort 2 (overall), cohort 3A (QD), and cohorts 3B and 3C (overall).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 Responding to Each Challenge Dose at Exit DBPCFC (Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Food Challenge)Up to 126 weeksThe percentage of subjects who tolerated each the of 300 mg, 600 mg, 1000 mg, or 2000 mg challenge doses with no more than mild symptoms at exit DBPCFC. Analyses based on DBPCFCs used the completer population (age 4-17 years).

Countries

Canada, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Group 1 (Placebo Crossovers)
Received AR101 during IDE (day 1, 0.5 to 3 or 6 mg; day 2, 3 mg), up-dosing (3-300 mg/day for 22-40 weeks, with dose escalations every 2 weeks), and maintenance (300 mg/day for 24-28 weeks)
111
Group 2: Cohort 1 (Active Rollovers)
Received 300 mg/day (once daily, QD) peanut protein for 28 weeks
117
Group 2: Cohort 2 (Active Rollovers)
Received 300 mg peanut protein every other day (QOD) for 4 weeks, then twice weekly (BIW) for 24 weeks for a total of 28 weeks
48
Group 2: Cohort 3A (Active Rollovers)
Received 300 mg/day peanut protein for 56 weeks
35
Group 2: Cohort 3B (Active Rollovers)
Received 300 mg/day peanut protein for 28 weeks, QOD for 4 weeks, then BIW for 24 weeks (total of 56 weeks)
34
Group 2: Cohort 3C (Active Rollovers)
Received 300 mg/day peanut protein for 28 weeks, QOD for 4 weeks, BIW for 24 weeks, then once weekly (QW) for 28 weeks (total of 84 weeks)
36
Total381

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalGroup 1 (Placebo Crossovers)Group 2: Cohort 1 (Active Rollovers)Group 2: Cohort 2 (Active Rollovers)Group 2: Cohort 3A (Active Rollovers)Group 2: Cohort 3B (Active Rollovers)Group 2: Cohort 3C (Active Rollovers)
Age, Customized
Age 18-55 years
30 Participants11 Participants8 Participants2 Participants4 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Age, Customized
Age 4-17 years
351 Participants100 Participants109 Participants46 Participants31 Participants31 Participants34 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
31 Participants13 Participants9 Participants3 Participants4 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
350 Participants98 Participants108 Participants45 Participants31 Participants33 Participants35 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
35 Participants7 Participants14 Participants7 Participants3 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
7 Participants3 Participants3 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
40 Participants15 Participants8 Participants7 Participants4 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
297 Participants86 Participants92 Participants33 Participants28 Participants30 Participants28 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
162 Participants39 Participants55 Participants22 Participants16 Participants13 Participants17 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
219 Participants72 Participants62 Participants26 Participants19 Participants21 Participants19 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
EG007
affected / at risk
EG008
affected / at risk
EG009
affected / at risk
EG010
affected / at risk
EG011
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1000 / 1090 / 460 / 310 / 310 / 340 / 110 / 80 / 20 / 40 / 30 / 2
other
Total, other adverse events
98 / 10090 / 10936 / 4627 / 3128 / 3133 / 3410 / 116 / 81 / 22 / 42 / 32 / 2
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1001 / 1090 / 460 / 311 / 311 / 340 / 111 / 80 / 20 / 40 / 30 / 2

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 With Treatment-related Adverse Events (TEAE)

Percentage of subjects ages 4-17 with at-least 1 TEAE, including serious adverse events, during the overall study period. The percentage of subjects reporting at least 1 TEAE by maximum reported severity is also presented using the 5-point CTCAE severity grading scale. All safety evaluations were conducted using the safety population (all subjects who received at least 1 dose of AR101 during ARC004), age 4-17 years. Safety data are presented for group 1 (former placebo) and Group 2 data are divided into columns for cohort 1 (QD), cohort 2 (overall), cohort 3A (QD), and cohorts 3B and 3C (overall).

Time frame: Up to 126 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group 1 (Overall)Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 With Treatment-related Adverse Events (TEAE)Grade 2: Moderate58 Participants
Group 1 (Overall)Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 With Treatment-related Adverse Events (TEAE)Grade 1: Mild37 Participants
Group 1 (Overall)Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 With Treatment-related Adverse Events (TEAE)Grade 4: Life-Threatening0 Participants
Group 1 (Overall)Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 With Treatment-related Adverse Events (TEAE)Grade 3: Severe3 Participants
Group 1 (Overall)Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 With Treatment-related Adverse Events (TEAE)Grade 5: Death0 Participants
Group 1 (Overall)Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 With Treatment-related Adverse Events (TEAE)SAEs0 Participants
Group 1 (Overall)Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 With Treatment-related Adverse Events (TEAE)All AEs98 Participants
Group 2: Cohort 1 (QD)Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 With Treatment-related Adverse Events (TEAE)All AEs90 Participants
Group 2: Cohort 1 (QD)Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 With Treatment-related Adverse Events (TEAE)Grade 1: Mild58 Participants
Group 2: Cohort 1 (QD)Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 With Treatment-related Adverse Events (TEAE)SAEs1 Participants
Group 2: Cohort 1 (QD)Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 With Treatment-related Adverse Events (TEAE)Grade 2: Moderate29 Participants
Group 2: Cohort 1 (QD)Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 With Treatment-related Adverse Events (TEAE)Grade 4: Life-Threatening0 Participants
Group 2: Cohort 1 (QD)Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 With Treatment-related Adverse Events (TEAE)Grade 5: Death0 Participants
Group 2: Cohort 1 (QD)Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 With Treatment-related Adverse Events (TEAE)Grade 3: Severe3 Participants
Group 2: Cohort 2 (Overall)Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 With Treatment-related Adverse Events (TEAE)Grade 1: Mild22 Participants
Group 2: Cohort 2 (Overall)Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 With Treatment-related Adverse Events (TEAE)All AEs36 Participants
Group 2: Cohort 2 (Overall)Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 With Treatment-related Adverse Events (TEAE)Grade 5: Death0 Participants
Group 2: Cohort 2 (Overall)Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 With Treatment-related Adverse Events (TEAE)SAEs0 Participants
Group 2: Cohort 2 (Overall)Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 With Treatment-related Adverse Events (TEAE)Grade 2: Moderate14 Participants
Group 2: Cohort 2 (Overall)Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 With Treatment-related Adverse Events (TEAE)Grade 3: Severe0 Participants
Group 2: Cohort 2 (Overall)Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 With Treatment-related Adverse Events (TEAE)Grade 4: Life-Threatening0 Participants
Group 2: Cohort 3A (QD)Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 With Treatment-related Adverse Events (TEAE)Grade 1: Mild15 Participants
Group 2: Cohort 3A (QD)Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 With Treatment-related Adverse Events (TEAE)Grade 5: Death0 Participants
Group 2: Cohort 3A (QD)Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 With Treatment-related Adverse Events (TEAE)SAEs0 Participants
Group 2: Cohort 3A (QD)Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 With Treatment-related Adverse Events (TEAE)Grade 4: Life-Threatening0 Participants
Group 2: Cohort 3A (QD)Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 With Treatment-related Adverse Events (TEAE)All AEs27 Participants
Group 2: Cohort 3A (QD)Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 With Treatment-related Adverse Events (TEAE)Grade 2: Moderate12 Participants
Group 2: Cohort 3A (QD)Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 With Treatment-related Adverse Events (TEAE)Grade 3: Severe0 Participants
Group 2: Cohort 3B (Overall)Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 With Treatment-related Adverse Events (TEAE)All AEs28 Participants
Group 2: Cohort 3B (Overall)Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 With Treatment-related Adverse Events (TEAE)Grade 1: Mild13 Participants
Group 2: Cohort 3B (Overall)Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 With Treatment-related Adverse Events (TEAE)Grade 2: Moderate15 Participants
Group 2: Cohort 3B (Overall)Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 With Treatment-related Adverse Events (TEAE)Grade 4: Life-Threatening0 Participants
Group 2: Cohort 3B (Overall)Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 With Treatment-related Adverse Events (TEAE)Grade 3: Severe0 Participants
Group 2: Cohort 3B (Overall)Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 With Treatment-related Adverse Events (TEAE)Grade 5: Death0 Participants
Group 2: Cohort 3B (Overall)Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 With Treatment-related Adverse Events (TEAE)SAEs1 Participants
Group 2: Cohort 3C (Overall)Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 With Treatment-related Adverse Events (TEAE)Grade 3: Severe3 Participants
Group 2: Cohort 3C (Overall)Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 With Treatment-related Adverse Events (TEAE)Grade 5: Death0 Participants
Group 2: Cohort 3C (Overall)Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 With Treatment-related Adverse Events (TEAE)Grade 1: Mild12 Participants
Group 2: Cohort 3C (Overall)Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 With Treatment-related Adverse Events (TEAE)All AEs33 Participants
Group 2: Cohort 3C (Overall)Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 With Treatment-related Adverse Events (TEAE)Grade 2: Moderate18 Participants
Group 2: Cohort 3C (Overall)Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 With Treatment-related Adverse Events (TEAE)Grade 4: Life-Threatening0 Participants
Group 2: Cohort 3C (Overall)Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 With Treatment-related Adverse Events (TEAE)SAEs1 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 Responding to Each Challenge Dose at Exit DBPCFC (Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Food Challenge)

The percentage of subjects who tolerated each the of 300 mg, 600 mg, 1000 mg, or 2000 mg challenge doses with no more than mild symptoms at exit DBPCFC. Analyses based on DBPCFCs used the completer population (age 4-17 years).

Time frame: Up to 126 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Group 1 (Overall)Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 Responding to Each Challenge Dose at Exit DBPCFC (Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Food Challenge)Percentage (and 95% CI) tolerating 1000 mg72.2 Percent of participants
Group 1 (Overall)Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 Responding to Each Challenge Dose at Exit DBPCFC (Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Food Challenge)Percentage (and 95% CI) tolerating 2000 mg51.4 Percent of participants
Group 1 (Overall)Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 Responding to Each Challenge Dose at Exit DBPCFC (Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Food Challenge)Percentage (and 95% CI) tolerating 300 mg98.6 Percent of participants
Group 1 (Overall)Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 Responding to Each Challenge Dose at Exit DBPCFC (Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Food Challenge)Percentage (and 95% CI) tolerating 600 mg86.1 Percent of participants
Group 2: Cohort 1 (QD)Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 Responding to Each Challenge Dose at Exit DBPCFC (Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Food Challenge)Percentage (and 95% CI) tolerating 1000 mg80.6 Percent of participants
Group 2: Cohort 1 (QD)Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 Responding to Each Challenge Dose at Exit DBPCFC (Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Food Challenge)Percentage (and 95% CI) tolerating 300 mg98.1 Percent of participants
Group 2: Cohort 1 (QD)Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 Responding to Each Challenge Dose at Exit DBPCFC (Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Food Challenge)Percentage (and 95% CI) tolerating 2000 mg48.5 Percent of participants
Group 2: Cohort 1 (QD)Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 Responding to Each Challenge Dose at Exit DBPCFC (Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Food Challenge)Percentage (and 95% CI) tolerating 600 mg89.3 Percent of participants
Group 2: Cohort 2 (Overall)Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 Responding to Each Challenge Dose at Exit DBPCFC (Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Food Challenge)Percentage (and 95% CI) tolerating 2000 mg36.8 Percent of participants
Group 2: Cohort 2 (Overall)Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 Responding to Each Challenge Dose at Exit DBPCFC (Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Food Challenge)Percentage (and 95% CI) tolerating 1000 mg57.9 Percent of participants
Group 2: Cohort 2 (Overall)Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 Responding to Each Challenge Dose at Exit DBPCFC (Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Food Challenge)Percentage (and 95% CI) tolerating 600 mg71.1 Percent of participants
Group 2: Cohort 2 (Overall)Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 Responding to Each Challenge Dose at Exit DBPCFC (Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Food Challenge)Percentage (and 95% CI) tolerating 300 mg94.7 Percent of participants
Group 2: Cohort 3A (QD)Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 Responding to Each Challenge Dose at Exit DBPCFC (Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Food Challenge)Percentage (and 95% CI) tolerating 600 mg96.2 Percent of participants
Group 2: Cohort 3A (QD)Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 Responding to Each Challenge Dose at Exit DBPCFC (Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Food Challenge)Percentage (and 95% CI) tolerating 1000 mg96.2 Percent of participants
Group 2: Cohort 3A (QD)Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 Responding to Each Challenge Dose at Exit DBPCFC (Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Food Challenge)Percentage (and 95% CI) tolerating 2000 mg80.8 Percent of participants
Group 2: Cohort 3A (QD)Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 Responding to Each Challenge Dose at Exit DBPCFC (Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Food Challenge)Percentage (and 95% CI) tolerating 300 mg100.0 Percent of participants
Group 2: Cohort 3B (Overall)Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 Responding to Each Challenge Dose at Exit DBPCFC (Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Food Challenge)Percentage (and 95% CI) tolerating 2000 mg45.5 Percent of participants
Group 2: Cohort 3B (Overall)Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 Responding to Each Challenge Dose at Exit DBPCFC (Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Food Challenge)Percentage (and 95% CI) tolerating 300 mg81.8 Percent of participants
Group 2: Cohort 3B (Overall)Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 Responding to Each Challenge Dose at Exit DBPCFC (Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Food Challenge)Percentage (and 95% CI) tolerating 1000 mg68.2 Percent of participants
Group 2: Cohort 3B (Overall)Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 Responding to Each Challenge Dose at Exit DBPCFC (Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Food Challenge)Percentage (and 95% CI) tolerating 600 mg77.3 Percent of participants
Group 2: Cohort 3C (Overall)Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 Responding to Each Challenge Dose at Exit DBPCFC (Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Food Challenge)Percentage (and 95% CI) tolerating 2000 mg42.9 Percent of participants
Group 2: Cohort 3C (Overall)Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 Responding to Each Challenge Dose at Exit DBPCFC (Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Food Challenge)Percentage (and 95% CI) tolerating 600 mg76.2 Percent of participants
Group 2: Cohort 3C (Overall)Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 Responding to Each Challenge Dose at Exit DBPCFC (Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Food Challenge)Percentage (and 95% CI) tolerating 1000 mg66.7 Percent of participants
Group 2: Cohort 3C (Overall)Percentage of Subjects Ages 4-17 Responding to Each Challenge Dose at Exit DBPCFC (Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Food Challenge)Percentage (and 95% CI) tolerating 300 mg90.5 Percent of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 14, 2026