Skip to content

Letetresgene Autoleucel Engineered T Cells in NY-ESO-1 Positive Participants With Advanced Myxoid/ Round Cell Liposarcoma

A Pilot Study of NY-ESO-1c259T Cells in Subjects With Advanced Myxoid/ Round Cell Liposarcoma

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02992743
Enrollment
23
Registered
2016-12-14
Start date
2016-12-06
Completion date
2022-03-22
Last updated
2023-04-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neoplasms

Keywords

Myxoid/ round cell liposarcoma, Letetresgene autoleucel, Immuno-oncology, T Cell Receptor, Leukapheresis, NY-ESO-1, Adoptive TCR T-cell therapy

Brief summary

This trial will evaluate safety and efficacy of Letetresgene autoleucel (GSK3377794) in participants with advanced myxoid/round cell liposarcoma or high-grade myxoid liposarcoma.

Detailed description

New York esophageal antigen-1 (NY-ESO-1) and LAGE-1a antigens are tumor-associated proteins that have been found in several tumor types. Clinical trials using adoptively transferred T-cells directed against NY-ESO-1/LAGE-1a have shown objective responses. Letetresgene autoleucel (GSK3377794) is the first generation of NY-ESO-1 specific T-cell receptor (TCR) engineered T-cells. This protocol investigates Letetresgene autoleucel treatment in Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA)-A\*02+ participants with NY-ESO1+ advanced myxoid/round cell liposarcoma or high-grade myxoid liposarcoma.

Interventions

Letetresgene autoleucel (GSK3377794) as an IV infusion.

DRUGCyclophosphamide

Cyclophosphamide will be used as a lymphodepleting chemotherapy.

DRUGFludarabine

Fludarabine will be used as a lymphodepleting chemotherapy.

Sponsors

GlaxoSmithKline
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participant is greater than equal to (\>=)18 years of age at the time of signing the study informed consent. * Participant has a diagnosis of advanced (metastatic or inoperable) high grade myxoid liposarcoma / myxoid round cell liposarcoma confirmed histologically and by the presence of the reciprocal chromosomal translocation t(12;16) (q13;p11) or t(12; 22) (q13;q12). * Participant has measurable disease according to RECIST v1.1 criteria. * Participant must have previously received or be intolerant to anthracycline based therapy for advanced (metastatic or inoperable) disease. * Participants who received neoadjuvant/adjuvant anthracycline based therapy and progressed within 6 months of completion of therapy will be eligible. * Participant must be HLA A\*02:01, HLA A\*02:05 and/or HLA-A\*02:06 positive. * Participant's tumor (either the most recent archival specimen or a fresh biopsy) is positive for NY-ESO-1 expression by a designated central laboratory. * Participant has an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status 0-1. * Participant has a left ventricular ejection fraction \>=45%. * Participant is fit for apheresis and has adequate venous access for the cell collection. * Participants must satisfy pregnancy and contraceptive requirements per protocol and have adequate organ function per protocol specified values.

Exclusion criteria

* Any previous gene therapy using an integrating vector. * Any previous allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. * Participant has history of allergic reactions attributed to compounds of similar chemical or biologic composition to fludarabine, cyclophosphamide or other agents used in the study. * Participant has history of chronic or recurrent (within the last year prior to screening) severe autoimmune or immune mediated disease requiring steroids or other immunosuppressive treatments. * Participant has known active brain or leptomeningeal metastases. * Participant has other prior malignancy that is not in complete remission. * Participant has uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to: * (i) Ongoing or active infection. * (ii) Clinically significant cardiac disease * (iii) Interstitial lung disease (participants with existing pneumonitis as a result of radiation are not excluded, however, participants must not be oxygen dependent). * Participant has active infection with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), Hepatitis B virus (HBV), ), Hepatitis C virus (HCV) or human T-lymphotropic virus (HTLV).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 by Investigator AssessmentUp to 24 monthsOverall response rate (ORR) defined as the percentage of participants with a confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) via investigator assessment per RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria) v1.1 relative to the total number of participants in the analysis population. Partial response is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Complete response is defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to less than (\<)10 millimeters (mm). Confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using the exact (Clopper-Pearson) method.
Best Overall Response (BOR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 by Investigator AssessmentUp to 24 monthsThe Best Overall Response (BOR) with confirmation for a participant is defined as the best confirmed response (Confirmed Complete Response \[CR\] \> Confirmed Partial Response \[PR\] \> Stable Disease \[SD\] \> Progressive Disease \[PD\] \> Not Evaluable \[NE\]) from first T cell infusion until disease progression or initiation of new anti-cancer therapy, whichever is earlier, as assessed by the investigator per RECIST v1.1 Criteria.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression Free Survival (PFS) Assessed by InvestigatorUp to 24 monthsProgression free survival was defined as the interval between the date of T cell infusion and the earliest date of disease progression or death due to any cause. Progressive disease (PD) is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study. PFS based on responses assessed by investigator per RECIST v1.1 is presented. Kaplan-Meier Median and 95% confidence intervals are presented. Confidence intervals were calculated using the Brookmeyer-Crowley method.
Best Overall Response (BOR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 by Independent Reviewer AssessmentUp to 24 monthsThe Best Overall Response (BOR) with confirmation for a participant is defined as the best confirmed response (Confirmed Complete Response \[CR\] \> Confirmed Partial Response \[PR\] \> Stable Disease \[SD\] \> Progressive Disease \[PD\] \> Not Evaluable \[NE\]) from first T cell infusion until disease progression or initiation of new anti-cancer therapy, whichever is earlier, as assessed by independent reviewer per RECIST v1.1 criteria.
Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 by Independent ReviewerUp to 24 monthsOverall response rate (ORR) defined as the percentage of participants with a confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) via independent reviewer assessment per RECIST v1.1 relative to the total number of participants in the analysis population. Partial response is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Complete response is defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to less than (\<)10 millimeters (mm). Confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using the exact (Clopper-Pearson) method.
Time to Response (TTR) Assessed by Independent ReviewerUp to 24 monthsTime to response was defined as the interval of time between the date of T-cell infusion and the first documented evidence of the confirmed response (PR or CR), in the subset of participants with a confirmed PR or CR as their best confirmed overall response. Partial response is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Complete response is defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to less than (\<)10 mm.
Duration of Response (DOR) Assessed by Independent ReviewerUp to 24 monthsDuration of response was defined as the interval between the initial date of confirmed response (PR/CR) and the date of progressive disease or death among participants with a confirmed response per RECIST 1.1. Partial response is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Complete response is defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to less than (\<)10 mm. Kaplan-Meier Median and 95% confidence intervals are presented. Confidence intervals were calculated using the Brookmeyer-Crowley method.
Progression Free Survival (PFS) Assessed by Independent ReviewerUp to 24 monthsProgression free survival was defined as the interval between the date of T cell infusion and the earliest date of disease progression or death due to any cause. Progressive disease (PD) is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study. PFS based on responses assessed by independent reviewer per RECIST v1.1 is presented. Kaplan-Meier Median and 95% confidence intervals are presented. Confidence intervals were calculated using the Brookmeyer-Crowley method.
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Non-SAEsUp to 24 monthsAn AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose can result in death, is life threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth or is medically significant or requires intervention to prevent one or the outcomes listed above.
Number of Participants With Adverse Event of Special Interest (AESI)Up to 24 monthsAn AESI may be of scientific and medical concern related to the treatment, monitored, and rapidly communicated by investigator to sponsor. The AESI included events of Cytokine release syndrome (CRS), Haematopoietic cytopenias (including pancytopenia and aplastic anaemia), Graft versus host disease (GvHD), Immune Effector-Cell Associated Neurotoxicity Syndrome (ICANS), and Guillain-Barre syndrome.
Number of Participants With Any Grade Increase in Hematology Results at Worst-case Post-baselineUp to 24 monthsBlood samples were collected for the analysis of following hematology parameters: hemoglobin, lymphocytes, neutrophils, platelets, leukocytes. Laboratory parameters were graded according to National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version 4.0, where Grade1: mild; Grade 2: moderate; Grade 3: severe or medically significant; Grade 4: life-threatening consequences. Baseline is the most recent, non-missing value from a central laboratory within 7 days prior to the lymphodepleting chemotherapy. An increase in grade is defined as an increase in CTCAE grade relative to baseline grade. Data of number of participants with any grade increase at worst-case post-baseline (maximum grade increase post-baseline) is presented.
Time to Response (TTR) Assessed by InvestigatorUp to 24 monthsTime to response was defined as the interval of time between the date of T-cell infusion and the first documented evidence of the confirmed response (PR or CR), in the subset of participants with a confirmed PR or CR as their best confirmed overall response. Partial response is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Complete response is defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to less than (\<)10 mm.
Number of Participants With Replication Competent Lentivirus (RCL)Day 1 (pre-infusion), and at Week 12, Week 24, and 1 year post-infusionRCL was monitored using a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based assay that detects and measures copies of the gene coding for the vector's envelope protein, namely vesicular stomatitis virus G protein (VSV-G).
Number of Participants With Insertional OncogenesisUp to 2 yearsPeripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) samples were collected for monitoring insertional oncogenesis by PCR for gene modified cells in the blood. DNA from participant identified with \>1% PBMC at \>=1 year post T-cell infusion was sent for integration site analysis. Integration site analysis was used to assess the possibility of insertional oncogenesis. Participants with insertional oncogenesis were participants with any clones representing \>20% of the total.
Number of Participants With Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)Up to 24 MonthsSerum samples were collected to analyze for the presence of ADAs using validated immunoassays.
Maximum Transgene Expansion (Cmax) of GSK3377794Day 2 to Day 15Cmax was defined as peak cell expansion during the interventional phase. Blood samples were collected to measure Cmax.
Time to Cmax (Tmax)Day 2 to Day 15Tmax was defined as time to peak cell expansion during the interventional phase. Blood samples were collected to measure Tmax.
Area Under the Time Curve From Zero to Time 28 Days AUC(0-28) of GSK3377794Up to 28 daysArea under the cell expansion-time curve from first T-cell infusion to Day 28. Blood samples were collected to measure AUC (0-28 days).
Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters- PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, QTcB Interval, QTcF Interval and RR IntervalBaseline, Day 1, Day 4 and Day 8Triplicate 12-Lead ECGs were collected at baseline visit and single ECGs at other timepoints. At each time point during the study ECG was taken using an ECG machine that automatically calculates the heart rate and measured the PR interval, QRS duration, QTcB, QTcF intervals, RR interval and uncorrected QT interval. Baseline is the most recent, non-missing value within 7 days prior to the lymphodepleting chemotherapy. Change from baseline was to be calculated by subtracting post-dose value from baseline value.
Change From Baseline in ECG Mean Heart RateBaseline, Day 1 (Pre-dose), Day 4 and Day 8Single 12-lead ECG was to be obtained at designated time points during the study using an ECG machine that automatically calculates the heart rate and measures PR, QRS, QT, and QTc intervals. Baseline is the most recent, non-missing value within 7 days prior to the lymphodepleting chemotherapy. Change from baseline was to be calculated by subtracting post-dose value from baseline value.
Number of Participants With Any Grade Increase in Clinical Chemistry Results at Worst-case Post-baselineUp to 24 monthsBlood samples were collected for the analysis clinical chemistry parameters: glucose, albumin, alkaline phosphatase, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), bilirubin, creatinine, potassium, magnesium, sodium, phosphate, calcium. Laboratory parameters were graded according to National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version 4.0, where Grade1: mild; Grade 2: moderate; Grade 3: severe or medically significant; Grade 4: life-threatening consequences. Baseline is the most recent, non-missing value from a central laboratory within 7 days prior to the lymphodepleting chemotherapy. An increase in grade is defined as an increase in CTCAE grade relative to baseline grade. Data of number of participants with any grade increase at worst-case post-baseline (maximum grade increase post-baseline) is presented.
Duration of Response (DOR) Assessed by InvestigatorUp to 24 monthsDuration of response was defined as the interval between the initial date of confirmed response (PR/CR) and the date of progressive disease or death among participants with a confirmed response per RECIST 1.1. Partial response is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Complete response is defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to less than (\<)10 millimeters. Kaplan-Meier Median and 95% confidence intervals are presented. Confidence intervals were calculated using the Brookmeyer-Crowley method.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This was an open-label study evaluating the safety and tolerability of autologous T-Cells expressing enhanced T-cell receptors (TCRs) specific for New York esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (NY-ESO)-1 (letetresgene autoleucel, lete-cel, GSK3377794) in Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA)-A\*02:01, HLA-A\*02:05 and/or HLA-A\*02:06 participants with Advanced Myxoid/ Round Cell Liposarcoma.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 23 participants were enrolled in this study. Out of 23 participants, 20 participants received NY-ESO-1c259 T cell infusion.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794
Eligible participants were leukapheresed to manufacture autologous NY-ESO-1c259 T cell receptors (TCR) bearing T-cells. Participants underwent lymphodepleting chemotherapy; cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m\^2/day plus fludarabine 30 mg/m\^2/day on day -7 through day -5 followed by a single infusion of GSK3377794 on Day 1.
13
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794
Eligible participants were leukapheresed to manufacture autologous NY-ESO-1\^c259 TCR bearing T-cells. Participants underwent lymphodepleting chemotherapy consisting of cyclophosphamide 900 mg/m\^2/day starting on day -7 through day -5 plus fludarabine 30 mg/m\^2/day on day -8 through day -5 followed by a single infusion of GSK3377794 on Day 1.
10
Total23

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath-Prior to T-Cell Infusion10
Overall StudyDid Not Meet Inclusion/Exclusion10
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up01
Overall StudyNo measurable disease10
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicReduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Total
Age, Continuous50.0 YEARS
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.79
46.0 YEARS
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.61
48.3 YEARS
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.19
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other: More than one race
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
11 Participants10 Participants21 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants3 Participants9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants7 Participants14 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
5 / 130 / 10
other
Total, other adverse events
13 / 1310 / 10
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 137 / 10

Outcome results

Primary

Best Overall Response (BOR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 by Investigator Assessment

The Best Overall Response (BOR) with confirmation for a participant is defined as the best confirmed response (Confirmed Complete Response \[CR\] \> Confirmed Partial Response \[PR\] \> Stable Disease \[SD\] \> Progressive Disease \[PD\] \> Not Evaluable \[NE\]) from first T cell infusion until disease progression or initiation of new anti-cancer therapy, whichever is earlier, as assessed by the investigator per RECIST v1.1 Criteria.

Time frame: Up to 24 months

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) population, which included all participants who underwent leukapheresis and received GSK3377794.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Best Overall Response (BOR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 by Investigator AssessmentPartial Response (PR)2 Participants
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Best Overall Response (BOR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 by Investigator AssessmentProgressive Disease (PD)0 Participants
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Best Overall Response (BOR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 by Investigator AssessmentStable Disease (SD)8 Participants
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Best Overall Response (BOR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 by Investigator AssessmentNot Evaluable (NE)0 Participants
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Best Overall Response (BOR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 by Investigator AssessmentComplete Response (CR)0 Participants
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Best Overall Response (BOR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 by Investigator AssessmentNot Evaluable (NE)0 Participants
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Best Overall Response (BOR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 by Investigator AssessmentComplete Response (CR)0 Participants
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Best Overall Response (BOR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 by Investigator AssessmentPartial Response (PR)4 Participants
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Best Overall Response (BOR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 by Investigator AssessmentStable Disease (SD)5 Participants
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Best Overall Response (BOR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 by Investigator AssessmentProgressive Disease (PD)1 Participants
Primary

Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 by Investigator Assessment

Overall response rate (ORR) defined as the percentage of participants with a confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) via investigator assessment per RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria) v1.1 relative to the total number of participants in the analysis population. Partial response is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Complete response is defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to less than (\<)10 millimeters (mm). Confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using the exact (Clopper-Pearson) method.

Time frame: Up to 24 months

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) population, which included all participants who underwent leukapheresis and received GSK3377794.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 by Investigator Assessment20 Percentage of participants
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 by Investigator Assessment40 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Area Under the Time Curve From Zero to Time 28 Days AUC(0-28) of GSK3377794

Area under the cell expansion-time curve from first T-cell infusion to Day 28. Blood samples were collected to measure AUC (0-28 days).

Time frame: Up to 28 days

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) population which included all participants who underwent leukapheresis and received GSK3377794. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Area Under the Time Curve From Zero to Time 28 Days AUC(0-28) of GSK3377794727135.6 Days*copies per microgram genomic DNAGeometric Coefficient of Variation 223.9
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Area Under the Time Curve From Zero to Time 28 Days AUC(0-28) of GSK33777941142798.27 Days*copies per microgram genomic DNAGeometric Coefficient of Variation 70.7
Secondary

Best Overall Response (BOR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 by Independent Reviewer Assessment

The Best Overall Response (BOR) with confirmation for a participant is defined as the best confirmed response (Confirmed Complete Response \[CR\] \> Confirmed Partial Response \[PR\] \> Stable Disease \[SD\] \> Progressive Disease \[PD\] \> Not Evaluable \[NE\]) from first T cell infusion until disease progression or initiation of new anti-cancer therapy, whichever is earlier, as assessed by independent reviewer per RECIST v1.1 criteria.

Time frame: Up to 24 months

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) population, which included all participants who underwent leukapheresis and received GSK3377794.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Best Overall Response (BOR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 by Independent Reviewer AssessmentPartial Response (PR)2 Participants
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Best Overall Response (BOR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 by Independent Reviewer AssessmentProgressive Disease (PD)0 Participants
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Best Overall Response (BOR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 by Independent Reviewer AssessmentStable Disease (SD)8 Participants
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Best Overall Response (BOR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 by Independent Reviewer AssessmentNot Evaluable (NE)0 Participants
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Best Overall Response (BOR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 by Independent Reviewer AssessmentComplete Response (CR)0 Participants
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Best Overall Response (BOR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 by Independent Reviewer AssessmentNot Evaluable (NE)3 Participants
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Best Overall Response (BOR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 by Independent Reviewer AssessmentComplete Response (CR)0 Participants
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Best Overall Response (BOR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 by Independent Reviewer AssessmentPartial Response (PR)4 Participants
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Best Overall Response (BOR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 by Independent Reviewer AssessmentStable Disease (SD)3 Participants
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Best Overall Response (BOR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 by Independent Reviewer AssessmentProgressive Disease (PD)0 Participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in ECG Mean Heart Rate

Single 12-lead ECG was to be obtained at designated time points during the study using an ECG machine that automatically calculates the heart rate and measures PR, QRS, QT, and QTc intervals. Baseline is the most recent, non-missing value within 7 days prior to the lymphodepleting chemotherapy. Change from baseline was to be calculated by subtracting post-dose value from baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 1 (Pre-dose), Day 4 and Day 8

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) population which included all participants who underwent leukapheresis and received GSK3377794. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Change From Baseline in ECG Mean Heart RateBASELINE73.0 Beats per minute (beats/minute)Standard Deviation 12.34
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Change From Baseline in ECG Mean Heart RateDAY 11.6 Beats per minute (beats/minute)Standard Deviation 10.08
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Change From Baseline in ECG Mean Heart RateDAY 420.1 Beats per minute (beats/minute)Standard Deviation 16.34
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Change From Baseline in ECG Mean Heart RateDAY 85.4 Beats per minute (beats/minute)Standard Deviation 12.72
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Change From Baseline in ECG Mean Heart RateDAY 89.1 Beats per minute (beats/minute)Standard Deviation 16.37
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Change From Baseline in ECG Mean Heart RateBASELINE78.0 Beats per minute (beats/minute)Standard Deviation 20.06
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Change From Baseline in ECG Mean Heart RateDAY 438.9 Beats per minute (beats/minute)Standard Deviation 21.95
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Change From Baseline in ECG Mean Heart RateDAY 14.8 Beats per minute (beats/minute)Standard Deviation 14.2
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters- PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, QTcB Interval, QTcF Interval and RR Interval

Triplicate 12-Lead ECGs were collected at baseline visit and single ECGs at other timepoints. At each time point during the study ECG was taken using an ECG machine that automatically calculates the heart rate and measured the PR interval, QRS duration, QTcB, QTcF intervals, RR interval and uncorrected QT interval. Baseline is the most recent, non-missing value within 7 days prior to the lymphodepleting chemotherapy. Change from baseline was to be calculated by subtracting post-dose value from baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 1, Day 4 and Day 8

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters- PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, QTcB Interval, QTcF Interval and RR IntervalQRS Duration, DAY 42.3 Milliseconds (msec)Standard Deviation 20.43
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters- PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, QTcB Interval, QTcF Interval and RR IntervalPR Interval, DAY 1-2.3 Milliseconds (msec)Standard Deviation 8.66
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters- PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, QTcB Interval, QTcF Interval and RR IntervalPR Interval, DAY 4-10.7 Milliseconds (msec)Standard Deviation 17.18
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters- PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, QTcB Interval, QTcF Interval and RR IntervalPR Interval, DAY 8-8.1 Milliseconds (msec)Standard Deviation 14.9
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters- PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, QTcB Interval, QTcF Interval and RR IntervalQRS Duration, BASELINE91.2 Milliseconds (msec)Standard Deviation 16.53
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters- PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, QTcB Interval, QTcF Interval and RR IntervalQRS Duration, DAY 12.8 Milliseconds (msec)Standard Deviation 18.87
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters- PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, QTcB Interval, QTcF Interval and RR IntervalPR Interval, BASELINE152.9 Milliseconds (msec)Standard Deviation 14.59
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters- PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, QTcB Interval, QTcF Interval and RR IntervalQRS Duration, DAY 8-2.7 Milliseconds (msec)Standard Deviation 25.75
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters- PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, QTcB Interval, QTcF Interval and RR IntervalQT Interval, BASELINE401.1 Milliseconds (msec)Standard Deviation 11.71
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters- PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, QTcB Interval, QTcF Interval and RR IntervalQT Interval, DAY 1-6.4 Milliseconds (msec)Standard Deviation 23.51
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters- PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, QTcB Interval, QTcF Interval and RR IntervalQT Interval, DAY 4-49.4 Milliseconds (msec)Standard Deviation 38.59
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters- PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, QTcB Interval, QTcF Interval and RR IntervalQT Interval, DAY 8-16.7 Milliseconds (msec)Standard Deviation 21.63
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters- PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, QTcB Interval, QTcF Interval and RR IntervalQTcB Interval, BASELINE427 Milliseconds (msec)Standard Deviation 4.24
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters- PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, QTcB Interval, QTcF Interval and RR IntervalQTcB Interval, DAY 128 Milliseconds (msec)
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters- PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, QTcB Interval, QTcF Interval and RR IntervalQTcB Interval, DAY 410 Milliseconds (msec)Standard Deviation 24.04
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters- PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, QTcB Interval, QTcF Interval and RR IntervalQTcB Interval, DAY 81 Milliseconds (msec)
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters- PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, QTcB Interval, QTcF Interval and RR IntervalQTcF Interval, BASELINE429.9 Milliseconds (msec)Standard Deviation 23.75
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters- PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, QTcB Interval, QTcF Interval and RR IntervalQTcF Interval, DAY 1-10.1 Milliseconds (msec)Standard Deviation 21.06
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters- PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, QTcB Interval, QTcF Interval and RR IntervalQTcF Interval, DAY 4-25.3 Milliseconds (msec)Standard Deviation 36.62
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters- PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, QTcB Interval, QTcF Interval and RR IntervalQTcF Interval, DAY 8-7.5 Milliseconds (msec)Standard Deviation 22.63
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters- PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, QTcB Interval, QTcF Interval and RR IntervalRR Interval, BASELINE842.6 Milliseconds (msec)Standard Deviation 144.62
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters- PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, QTcB Interval, QTcF Interval and RR IntervalRR Interval, DAY 1-15.8 Milliseconds (msec)Standard Deviation 98.77
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters- PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, QTcB Interval, QTcF Interval and RR IntervalRR Interval, DAY 4-162.5 Milliseconds (msec)Standard Deviation 179.21
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters- PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, QTcB Interval, QTcF Interval and RR IntervalRR Interval, DAY 8-71.6 Milliseconds (msec)Standard Deviation 109.66
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters- PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, QTcB Interval, QTcF Interval and RR IntervalRR Interval, DAY 4-188 Milliseconds (msec)Standard Deviation 11.31
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters- PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, QTcB Interval, QTcF Interval and RR IntervalPR Interval, BASELINE142 Milliseconds (msec)Standard Deviation 12.72
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters- PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, QTcB Interval, QTcF Interval and RR IntervalQTcB Interval, BASELINE423.3 Milliseconds (msec)Standard Deviation 19.35
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters- PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, QTcB Interval, QTcF Interval and RR IntervalPR Interval, DAY 1-2.2 Milliseconds (msec)Standard Deviation 9.82
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters- PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, QTcB Interval, QTcF Interval and RR IntervalQTcF Interval, DAY 43.3 Milliseconds (msec)Standard Deviation 31.1
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters- PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, QTcB Interval, QTcF Interval and RR IntervalPR Interval, DAY 4-4 Milliseconds (msec)Standard Deviation 12.96
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters- PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, QTcB Interval, QTcF Interval and RR IntervalQTcB Interval, DAY 136.3 Milliseconds (msec)Standard Deviation 34.03
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters- PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, QTcB Interval, QTcF Interval and RR IntervalPR Interval, DAY 81 Milliseconds (msec)Standard Deviation 9.32
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters- PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, QTcB Interval, QTcF Interval and RR IntervalRR Interval, DAY 15.3 Milliseconds (msec)Standard Deviation 43.1
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters- PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, QTcB Interval, QTcF Interval and RR IntervalQRS Duration, BASELINE86.1 Milliseconds (msec)Standard Deviation 15.01
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters- PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, QTcB Interval, QTcF Interval and RR IntervalQTcB Interval, DAY 48 Milliseconds (msec)Standard Deviation 25.46
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters- PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, QTcB Interval, QTcF Interval and RR IntervalQRS Duration, DAY 10.9 Milliseconds (msec)Standard Deviation 6.49
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters- PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, QTcB Interval, QTcF Interval and RR IntervalQTcF Interval, DAY 816.2 Milliseconds (msec)Standard Deviation 39.96
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters- PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, QTcB Interval, QTcF Interval and RR IntervalQRS Duration, DAY 40.8 Milliseconds (msec)Standard Deviation 5.75
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters- PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, QTcB Interval, QTcF Interval and RR IntervalQTcB Interval, DAY 847 Milliseconds (msec)Standard Deviation 50.27
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters- PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, QTcB Interval, QTcF Interval and RR IntervalQRS Duration, DAY 8-1 Milliseconds (msec)Standard Deviation 5.86
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters- PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, QTcB Interval, QTcF Interval and RR IntervalRR Interval, DAY 8-138.5 Milliseconds (msec)Standard Deviation 77.72
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters- PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, QTcB Interval, QTcF Interval and RR IntervalQT Interval, BASELINE389.3 Milliseconds (msec)Standard Deviation 33.57
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters- PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, QTcB Interval, QTcF Interval and RR IntervalQTcF Interval, BASELINE425.3 Milliseconds (msec)Standard Deviation 16.18
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters- PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, QTcB Interval, QTcF Interval and RR IntervalQT Interval, DAY 1-8.1 Milliseconds (msec)Standard Deviation 33.74
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters- PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, QTcB Interval, QTcF Interval and RR IntervalRR Interval, BASELINE807.6 Milliseconds (msec)Standard Deviation 166.39
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters- PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, QTcB Interval, QTcF Interval and RR IntervalQT Interval, DAY 4-72.5 Milliseconds (msec)Standard Deviation 47.65
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters- PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, QTcB Interval, QTcF Interval and RR IntervalQTcF Interval, DAY 11.3 Milliseconds (msec)Standard Deviation 17.36
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters- PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, QTcB Interval, QTcF Interval and RR IntervalQT Interval, DAY 8-4.4 Milliseconds (msec)Standard Deviation 43.41
Secondary

Duration of Response (DOR) Assessed by Independent Reviewer

Duration of response was defined as the interval between the initial date of confirmed response (PR/CR) and the date of progressive disease or death among participants with a confirmed response per RECIST 1.1. Partial response is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Complete response is defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to less than (\<)10 mm. Kaplan-Meier Median and 95% confidence intervals are presented. Confidence intervals were calculated using the Brookmeyer-Crowley method.

Time frame: Up to 24 months

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) population which included all participants who underwent leukapheresis and received GSK3377794. Only responders by independent reviewer were included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Duration of Response (DOR) Assessed by Independent ReviewerNA Months
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Duration of Response (DOR) Assessed by Independent Reviewer7.16 Months
Secondary

Duration of Response (DOR) Assessed by Investigator

Duration of response was defined as the interval between the initial date of confirmed response (PR/CR) and the date of progressive disease or death among participants with a confirmed response per RECIST 1.1. Partial response is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Complete response is defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to less than (\<)10 millimeters. Kaplan-Meier Median and 95% confidence intervals are presented. Confidence intervals were calculated using the Brookmeyer-Crowley method.

Time frame: Up to 24 months

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) population which included all participants who underwent leukapheresis and received GSK3377794. Only responders by investigator assessment were included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Duration of Response (DOR) Assessed by Investigator5.31 Months
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Duration of Response (DOR) Assessed by Investigator7.47 Months
Secondary

Maximum Transgene Expansion (Cmax) of GSK3377794

Cmax was defined as peak cell expansion during the interventional phase. Blood samples were collected to measure Cmax.

Time frame: Day 2 to Day 15

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) population which included all participants who underwent leukapheresis and received GSK3377794. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Maximum Transgene Expansion (Cmax) of GSK337779466991.71 Copies per microgram genomic DNAGeometric Coefficient of Variation 127
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Maximum Transgene Expansion (Cmax) of GSK3377794108485.91 Copies per microgram genomic DNAGeometric Coefficient of Variation 53.4
Secondary

Number of Participants With Adverse Event of Special Interest (AESI)

An AESI may be of scientific and medical concern related to the treatment, monitored, and rapidly communicated by investigator to sponsor. The AESI included events of Cytokine release syndrome (CRS), Haematopoietic cytopenias (including pancytopenia and aplastic anaemia), Graft versus host disease (GvHD), Immune Effector-Cell Associated Neurotoxicity Syndrome (ICANS), and Guillain-Barre syndrome.

Time frame: Up to 24 months

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) population which included all participants who underwent leukapheresis and received GSK3377794.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Number of Participants With Adverse Event of Special Interest (AESI)Cytokine release syndrome6 Participants
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Number of Participants With Adverse Event of Special Interest (AESI)Participants with any AESI10 Participants
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Number of Participants With Adverse Event of Special Interest (AESI)Haematopoietic cytopenias (including pancytopenia and aplastic anaemia)10 Participants
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Number of Participants With Adverse Event of Special Interest (AESI)Participants with any AESI10 Participants
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Number of Participants With Adverse Event of Special Interest (AESI)Cytokine release syndrome10 Participants
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Number of Participants With Adverse Event of Special Interest (AESI)Haematopoietic cytopenias (including pancytopenia and aplastic anaemia)10 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Any Grade Increase in Clinical Chemistry Results at Worst-case Post-baseline

Blood samples were collected for the analysis clinical chemistry parameters: glucose, albumin, alkaline phosphatase, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), bilirubin, creatinine, potassium, magnesium, sodium, phosphate, calcium. Laboratory parameters were graded according to National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version 4.0, where Grade1: mild; Grade 2: moderate; Grade 3: severe or medically significant; Grade 4: life-threatening consequences. Baseline is the most recent, non-missing value from a central laboratory within 7 days prior to the lymphodepleting chemotherapy. An increase in grade is defined as an increase in CTCAE grade relative to baseline grade. Data of number of participants with any grade increase at worst-case post-baseline (maximum grade increase post-baseline) is presented.

Time frame: Up to 24 months

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) population which included all participants who underwent leukapheresis and received GSK3377794.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Number of Participants With Any Grade Increase in Clinical Chemistry Results at Worst-case Post-baselineGlucose Hypoglycemia1 Participants
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Number of Participants With Any Grade Increase in Clinical Chemistry Results at Worst-case Post-baselinePotassium Hypokalemia5 Participants
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Number of Participants With Any Grade Increase in Clinical Chemistry Results at Worst-case Post-baselineAST8 Participants
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Number of Participants With Any Grade Increase in Clinical Chemistry Results at Worst-case Post-baselineMagnesium Hypermagnesemia5 Participants
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Number of Participants With Any Grade Increase in Clinical Chemistry Results at Worst-case Post-baselineAlkaline Phosphatase4 Participants
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Number of Participants With Any Grade Increase in Clinical Chemistry Results at Worst-case Post-baselineMagnesium Hypomagnesemia2 Participants
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Number of Participants With Any Grade Increase in Clinical Chemistry Results at Worst-case Post-baselineBilirubin3 Participants
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Number of Participants With Any Grade Increase in Clinical Chemistry Results at Worst-case Post-baselinePhosphate9 Participants
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Number of Participants With Any Grade Increase in Clinical Chemistry Results at Worst-case Post-baselineAlbumin9 Participants
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Number of Participants With Any Grade Increase in Clinical Chemistry Results at Worst-case Post-baselineSodium Hypernatremia2 Participants
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Number of Participants With Any Grade Increase in Clinical Chemistry Results at Worst-case Post-baselineCreatinine4 Participants
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Number of Participants With Any Grade Increase in Clinical Chemistry Results at Worst-case Post-baselineSodium Hyponatremia8 Participants
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Number of Participants With Any Grade Increase in Clinical Chemistry Results at Worst-case Post-baselineALT7 Participants
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Number of Participants With Any Grade Increase in Clinical Chemistry Results at Worst-case Post-baselineCalcium Corrected for Albumin Hypercalcemia2 Participants
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Number of Participants With Any Grade Increase in Clinical Chemistry Results at Worst-case Post-baselinePotassium Hyperkalemia1 Participants
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Number of Participants With Any Grade Increase in Clinical Chemistry Results at Worst-case Post-baselineCalcium Corrected for Albumin Hypocalcemia1 Participants
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Number of Participants With Any Grade Increase in Clinical Chemistry Results at Worst-case Post-baselineGlucose Hyperglycemia5 Participants
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Number of Participants With Any Grade Increase in Clinical Chemistry Results at Worst-case Post-baselineCalcium Corrected for Albumin Hypocalcemia7 Participants
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Number of Participants With Any Grade Increase in Clinical Chemistry Results at Worst-case Post-baselineGlucose Hyperglycemia8 Participants
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Number of Participants With Any Grade Increase in Clinical Chemistry Results at Worst-case Post-baselineGlucose Hypoglycemia4 Participants
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Number of Participants With Any Grade Increase in Clinical Chemistry Results at Worst-case Post-baselineAlbumin9 Participants
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Number of Participants With Any Grade Increase in Clinical Chemistry Results at Worst-case Post-baselineAlkaline Phosphatase6 Participants
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Number of Participants With Any Grade Increase in Clinical Chemistry Results at Worst-case Post-baselineALT7 Participants
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Number of Participants With Any Grade Increase in Clinical Chemistry Results at Worst-case Post-baselineAST8 Participants
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Number of Participants With Any Grade Increase in Clinical Chemistry Results at Worst-case Post-baselineBilirubin2 Participants
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Number of Participants With Any Grade Increase in Clinical Chemistry Results at Worst-case Post-baselineCreatinine2 Participants
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Number of Participants With Any Grade Increase in Clinical Chemistry Results at Worst-case Post-baselinePotassium Hyperkalemia1 Participants
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Number of Participants With Any Grade Increase in Clinical Chemistry Results at Worst-case Post-baselinePotassium Hypokalemia9 Participants
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Number of Participants With Any Grade Increase in Clinical Chemistry Results at Worst-case Post-baselineMagnesium Hypermagnesemia2 Participants
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Number of Participants With Any Grade Increase in Clinical Chemistry Results at Worst-case Post-baselineMagnesium Hypomagnesemia6 Participants
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Number of Participants With Any Grade Increase in Clinical Chemistry Results at Worst-case Post-baselinePhosphate10 Participants
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Number of Participants With Any Grade Increase in Clinical Chemistry Results at Worst-case Post-baselineSodium Hypernatremia1 Participants
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Number of Participants With Any Grade Increase in Clinical Chemistry Results at Worst-case Post-baselineSodium Hyponatremia9 Participants
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Number of Participants With Any Grade Increase in Clinical Chemistry Results at Worst-case Post-baselineCalcium Corrected for Albumin Hypercalcemia1 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Any Grade Increase in Hematology Results at Worst-case Post-baseline

Blood samples were collected for the analysis of following hematology parameters: hemoglobin, lymphocytes, neutrophils, platelets, leukocytes. Laboratory parameters were graded according to National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version 4.0, where Grade1: mild; Grade 2: moderate; Grade 3: severe or medically significant; Grade 4: life-threatening consequences. Baseline is the most recent, non-missing value from a central laboratory within 7 days prior to the lymphodepleting chemotherapy. An increase in grade is defined as an increase in CTCAE grade relative to baseline grade. Data of number of participants with any grade increase at worst-case post-baseline (maximum grade increase post-baseline) is presented.

Time frame: Up to 24 months

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) population which included all participants who underwent leukapheresis and received GSK3377794.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Number of Participants With Any Grade Increase in Hematology Results at Worst-case Post-baselineNeutrophils10 Participants
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Number of Participants With Any Grade Increase in Hematology Results at Worst-case Post-baselinePlatelets9 Participants
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Number of Participants With Any Grade Increase in Hematology Results at Worst-case Post-baselineLymphocyte count decreased10 Participants
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Number of Participants With Any Grade Increase in Hematology Results at Worst-case Post-baselineLeukocytes10 Participants
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Number of Participants With Any Grade Increase in Hematology Results at Worst-case Post-baselineHemoglobin Anemia9 Participants
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Number of Participants With Any Grade Increase in Hematology Results at Worst-case Post-baselineLeukocytes10 Participants
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Number of Participants With Any Grade Increase in Hematology Results at Worst-case Post-baselineHemoglobin Anemia10 Participants
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Number of Participants With Any Grade Increase in Hematology Results at Worst-case Post-baselineLymphocyte count decreased10 Participants
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Number of Participants With Any Grade Increase in Hematology Results at Worst-case Post-baselinePlatelets10 Participants
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Number of Participants With Any Grade Increase in Hematology Results at Worst-case Post-baselineNeutrophils10 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Insertional Oncogenesis

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) samples were collected for monitoring insertional oncogenesis by PCR for gene modified cells in the blood. DNA from participant identified with \>1% PBMC at \>=1 year post T-cell infusion was sent for integration site analysis. Integration site analysis was used to assess the possibility of insertional oncogenesis. Participants with insertional oncogenesis were participants with any clones representing \>20% of the total.

Time frame: Up to 2 years

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) population which included all participants who underwent leukapheresis and received GSK3377794. Number of participants analyzed comprises participants for whom integration site analysis was conducted.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Number of Participants With Insertional Oncogenesis0 Participants
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Number of Participants With Insertional Oncogenesis0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)

Serum samples were collected to analyze for the presence of ADAs using validated immunoassays.

Time frame: Up to 24 Months

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) population which included all participants who underwent leukapheresis and received GSK3377794. Only those participants with post-baseline ADA results were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Number of Participants With Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)0 Participants
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Number of Participants With Positive Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Replication Competent Lentivirus (RCL)

RCL was monitored using a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based assay that detects and measures copies of the gene coding for the vector's envelope protein, namely vesicular stomatitis virus G protein (VSV-G).

Time frame: Day 1 (pre-infusion), and at Week 12, Week 24, and 1 year post-infusion

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) population which included all participants who underwent leukapheresis and received GSK3377794.. Only those participants with RCL assessed post T-cell infusion were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Number of Participants With Replication Competent Lentivirus (RCL)0 Participants
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Number of Participants With Replication Competent Lentivirus (RCL)0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Non-SAEs

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose can result in death, is life threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth or is medically significant or requires intervention to prevent one or the outcomes listed above.

Time frame: Up to 24 months

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population, which included all participants who underwent leukapheresis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Non-SAEsSAEs5 Participants
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Non-SAEsNon-SAEs13 Participants
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Non-SAEsSAEs7 Participants
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Non-SAEsNon-SAEs10 Participants
Secondary

Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 by Independent Reviewer

Overall response rate (ORR) defined as the percentage of participants with a confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) via independent reviewer assessment per RECIST v1.1 relative to the total number of participants in the analysis population. Partial response is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Complete response is defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to less than (\<)10 millimeters (mm). Confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using the exact (Clopper-Pearson) method.

Time frame: Up to 24 months

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) population, which included all participants who underwent leukapheresis and received GSK3377794.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 by Independent Reviewer20 Percentage of participants
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 by Independent Reviewer40 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Progression Free Survival (PFS) Assessed by Independent Reviewer

Progression free survival was defined as the interval between the date of T cell infusion and the earliest date of disease progression or death due to any cause. Progressive disease (PD) is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study. PFS based on responses assessed by independent reviewer per RECIST v1.1 is presented. Kaplan-Meier Median and 95% confidence intervals are presented. Confidence intervals were calculated using the Brookmeyer-Crowley method.

Time frame: Up to 24 months

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) population which included all participants who underwent leukapheresis and received GSK3377794.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Progression Free Survival (PFS) Assessed by Independent Reviewer4.67 Months
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Progression Free Survival (PFS) Assessed by Independent Reviewer9.03 Months
Secondary

Progression Free Survival (PFS) Assessed by Investigator

Progression free survival was defined as the interval between the date of T cell infusion and the earliest date of disease progression or death due to any cause. Progressive disease (PD) is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study. PFS based on responses assessed by investigator per RECIST v1.1 is presented. Kaplan-Meier Median and 95% confidence intervals are presented. Confidence intervals were calculated using the Brookmeyer-Crowley method.

Time frame: Up to 24 months

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) population which included all participants who underwent leukapheresis and received GSK3377794.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Progression Free Survival (PFS) Assessed by Investigator5.36 Months
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Progression Free Survival (PFS) Assessed by Investigator8.74 Months
Secondary

Time to Cmax (Tmax)

Tmax was defined as time to peak cell expansion during the interventional phase. Blood samples were collected to measure Tmax.

Time frame: Day 2 to Day 15

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) population which included all participants who underwent leukapheresis and received GSK3377794. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Time to Cmax (Tmax)2 Days
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Time to Cmax (Tmax)4 Days
Secondary

Time to Response (TTR) Assessed by Independent Reviewer

Time to response was defined as the interval of time between the date of T-cell infusion and the first documented evidence of the confirmed response (PR or CR), in the subset of participants with a confirmed PR or CR as their best confirmed overall response. Partial response is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Complete response is defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to less than (\<)10 mm.

Time frame: Up to 24 months

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) population which included all participants who underwent leukapheresis and received GSK3377794. Only responders by independent reviewer were included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Time to Response (TTR) Assessed by Independent Reviewer2.366 Months
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Time to Response (TTR) Assessed by Independent Reviewer1.889 Months
Secondary

Time to Response (TTR) Assessed by Investigator

Time to response was defined as the interval of time between the date of T-cell infusion and the first documented evidence of the confirmed response (PR or CR), in the subset of participants with a confirmed PR or CR as their best confirmed overall response. Partial response is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Complete response is defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to less than (\<)10 mm.

Time frame: Up to 24 months

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) population which included all participants who underwent leukapheresis and received GSK3377794. Only responders by investigator assessment were included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Reduced Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Time to Response (TTR) Assessed by Investigator1.856 Months
Standard Lymphodepletion Dose Plus GSK3377794Time to Response (TTR) Assessed by Investigator1.938 Months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 26, 2026