: SOCKET SHIELD TECHNIQUE VERSUS EMPTY SOCKET TECHNIQUE

IMMEDIATE IMPLANT PLACEMENT IN THE ESTHETIC ZONE: SOCKET SHIELD TECHNIQUE VERSUS EMPTY SOCKET TECHNIQUE FOR PRESERVATION OF LABIAL ALVEOLAR BONE INTEGRITY

Status

UNKNOWN

Phases

Study type

Interventional

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT02992366

Enrollment

Registered

2016-12-14

Start date

2016-12-31

Completion date

2017-12-31

Last updated

2016-12-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dental Implant Placement, Socket Shield Technique Implant Placement

Keywords

socket shield, volumetric tissue alteration, immediate implant

Brief summary

To evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of socket shield technique compared with conventional immediate implant placement.

Detailed description

To evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of socket shield technique compared with conventional immediate implant placement. PICO * P: patient require immediate dental implant placement for esthetic consideration * I: socket shield technique * C: conventional immediate implant placement * O: Outcome name Measuring device Measuring unit Primary outcome Vertical and horizontal bone level Cone beam Computer Tomography (CBCT) Millimeter Secondary outcome (a) Pocket probing depth Periodontal probe Millimeter Secondary outcome (b) Labial Alveolar crestal bone height compared with the lingual side Cone beam Computer Tomography (CBCT) Millimeter

Interventions

PROCEDUREimplant placement

implant placement

Study design

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Intervention model

PARALLEL

Primary purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Healthy volunteers

Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients with remaining roots in the esthetic zone with intact periodontal condition indicated for extraction. 2. Physically able to tolerate conventional surgical and restorative procedures 3. Signing of an informed consent form 4. Implant insertion torque \> 32 N cm with good primary stability

Exclusion criteria

1. Systemic diseases contraindicating implant placement eg uncontrolled diabetes 2. Severe bruxism 3. Active infection in the teeth to be treated 4. Vertical root fractures with displacement in the teeth of the surgical area

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Vertical and horizontal bone level	9 months

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Pocket probing depth	9 months
Labial Alveolar crestal bone height compared with the lingual side	9 months

Contacts

Primary ContactAhmed G. Khater, Bsc

drahmedgamalkhater@gmail.com+201111717300

Backup ContactMostafa I. Shindy, lecturer

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026