Skip to content

Combined Bio- and Neuro- Feedback vs. Varenicline Use for Smoking Cessation

Multidisciplinary Tools for Improving the Efficacy of Public Prevention Measures Against Smoking

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02991781
Enrollment
106
Registered
2016-12-14
Start date
2017-01-31
Completion date
2019-06-30
Last updated
2020-02-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Asthma, Smoking

Brief summary

This study will develop and experimentally test the efficiency of a neurofeedback training protocol vs. varenicline use for smoking cessation.

Detailed description

This study will develop and experimentally test the efficiency of a neurofeedback(NF) training protocol for smoking cessation. As non-pharmacological, non-invasive and painless brainwave technique, NF contributes to teach individuals how they can take the control of their mind through operant conditioning. NF regulates brain function in natural way. Studies have reported an 80% rate of reducing or eliminating the need for traditional medication14. Therefore, other nicotine substitutes (such as varenicline) which may carry their own toxicity risk factor may become redundant. The protocol will include 5 bio- and 25 Neuro-feedback sessions, lasting approximately 36 months. The electrophysiological evaluation of the efficacy of the intervention will include EEG resting state and a multifeature Mismatch Negativity (MMN) evoked response measurements before and after the participation of human volunteers. These data will be analyzed in terms of cortical activation patterns and cortical connectivity. Questionnaires will be used to collect behavioral and psychometric data regarding smoking related behaviors. Additionally, a clinical evaluation including spirometry, exhaled carbon monoxide, total antioxidant capacity, vitamine E, and cotinine will be conducted. The data will be collected prior, during, after the completion of the study and after a one-year follow up. The Neurofeedback intervention will be compared to a different group of participants that will follow an intervention based on varenicline use for approximately 3 months. The electrophysiological evaluation of the efficacy of the intervention will include EEG resting state and a sleep polysomnography measurement. Questionnaires and clinical evaluation include the same measurements as the neurofeedback intervention but only in 3 time points: prior, during, after the completion of the study.

Interventions

OTHERBiofeedback and Neurofeedback Training

The protocol will consist of 5 sessions of skin temperature biofeedback and 20 sessions of a neurofeedback training protocol that will consist of Alpha-Theta ratio up-training. The aim of the training is to reach a crossover state, were initially Alpha activity will increase and then in a deeper state, the Theta activity will take over. This state is associated with a reverie and disidentification with problems, stress or traumatic experiences. Therefore, the subjects will learn how to increase their Theta/Alpha ratio.

DRUGVarenicline use for smoking cessation

The protocol will consist 1 mg varenicline use twice daily following a 1-week titration for 3 months.

Subjects will receive equal sessions of sham neurofeedback, and thus serve as a control group for the analysis and design of the study.

Subjects will not receive any intervention, but they will be measured via a clinical and psychometric evaluation with a time-difference of 3 months. This is equal to the intervention time. Hence, the subjects in this intervention type will serve as a control group for the analysis and design of the study.

Sponsors

AAI Scientific Cultural Services Ltd (AAISCS)
CollaboratorOTHER
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF GENERAL PRACTITIONERS IN BULGARIA
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Being continuous tobacco smokers (\>10 cigarettes per day) for at least 6 months * Being unemployed for at least 3 months * Being diagnosed with Asthma * Being diagnosed with C.O.P.D. * Age \< 35, for the group of Young Unemployed * Age \>35 years, for the groups of Asthma and C.O.P.D. patients

Exclusion criteria

* Diagnosed neurological, mental or psychiatric illness * Drug-resistance epilepsy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Neurofeedback vs. Varenicline efficacy for smoking cessation2 yearsThe outcome measure is the effect size of each intervention measured in standardized percentage of participants that give up smoking.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Depression2 yearsThe outcome measure is the change from baseline in the scoring of the Beck's Depression Inventory, which is evaluating depression, after the completion of the intervention.
Effectiveness in changing quality of life as measured by EuroQL-5D2 yearsThe outcome measure is the change from baseline in the scoring of the a questionnaire evaluating quality of life (EuroQL-5D), after the completion of the intervention.
Anxiety2 yearsThe outcome measure is the change from baseline in the scoring of the Spielberger's State -Trait Anxiety Inventory , which is evaluating anxiety, after the completion of the intervention.
General health2 yearsThe outcome measure is the change from baseline in the scoring of the General Health Questionnaire which is evaluating general health, after the completion of the intervention.
Neuroplastic effects of combined bio- and neuro- feedback training in the mismatch negativity response2 yearsThe outcome measure is the change from baseline in the activation of the Mismatch Negativity response of the auditory cortex after the completion of the intervention.
Sleep quality during varenicline use2 yearsThe outcome measure is the change from baseline in the scoring in psychometric tests evaluating sleep quality.
Neuroplastic effects of combined bio- and neuro- feedback training in the resting state cortical activity2 yearsThe outcome measure is the change from baseline in the activation of the resting state cortical network after the completion of the intervention.

Countries

Bulgaria, Cyprus, Greece

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 10, 2026