Skip to content

Multinational Clinical Study Comparing Isatuximab, Pomalidomide, and Dexamethasone to Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone in Refractory or Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma Patients

A Phase 3 Randomized, Open-label, Multicenter Study Comparing Isatuximab (SAR650984) in Combination With Pomalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone Versus Pomalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients With Refractory or Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02990338
Acronym
ICARIA-MM
Enrollment
307
Registered
2016-12-13
Start date
2016-12-22
Completion date
2023-11-01
Last updated
2025-01-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Plasma Cell Myeloma

Keywords

Anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody

Brief summary

Primary Objective: To demonstrate the benefit of isatuximab in combination with pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone in the prolongation of Progression Free Survival (PFS) as compared to pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone in participants with refractory or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Secondary Objectives: * To evaluate the Overall Response Rate (ORR) as per International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria in each arm. * To compare the Overall Survival (OS) between the two arms. * To evaluate the Time To Progression (TTP) in each arm. * To evaluate the PFS in high risk cytogenetic population in each arm. * To evaluate the Duration of Response (DOR) in each arm. * To evaluate the safety in both treatment arms. * To determine the Pharmacokinetic profile of isatuximab in combination with pomalidomide. * To evaluate the immunogenicity of isatuximab. * To assess disease-specific and generic health-related quality of life (HRQL), disease and treatment-related symptoms, health state utility, and health status.

Detailed description

The duration of the study for the participants included a period for screening of up to 21 days (or up to 28 days for women who can become pregnant). Participants continued study treatment until disease progression, unacceptable adverse reaction, participants' wish or other reason of discontinuation. During follow-up, participants who discontinued the study treatment due to progression of the disease were followed every 3 months (12 weeks) for survival (or until cut-off date), and participants who discontinued the study treatment prior to documentation of disease progression were followed-up every 4 weeks until disease progression, and then every 3 months (12 weeks) for survival (or until cut-off date).

Interventions

DRUGIsatuximab

Pharmaceutical form: solution for infusion Route of administration: intravenous

DRUGPomalidomide

Pharmaceutical form: capsule Route of administration: oral

DRUGDexamethasone

Pharmaceutical form: tablets or solution for infusion Route of administration: oral or intravenous

Sponsors

Sanofi
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

: * Age superior or equal to 18 years or country's legal age of majority if the legal age was superior to 18 years old. * Participants had a documented diagnosis of multiple myeloma with evidence of measurable disease i.e. serum M protein superior or equal to 0.5 grams per decilitre (g/dL) measured using serum protein immunoelectrophoresis and or urine M protein superior or equal to 200 mg per 24 hours measured using urine protein immunoelectrophoresis. * Participants had received at least 2 prior lines of anti-myeloma therapy, which must include at least 2 consecutive cycles of lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor (bortezomib, carfilzomib or ixazomib) given alone or in combination. * Participants had failed treatment with lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor (bortezomib, carfilzomib, or ixazomib) alone or in combination (Intolerant, progression within 6 months after reaching Partial Response or better). * Participants had progressed on or within 60 days after end of previous therapy before to study entry, i.e., refractory to the last line of treatment.

Exclusion criteria

* Primary refractory multiple myeloma defined as participants who had never achieved at least a minimal response (MR) with any treatment during the disease course. * Free Light Chain measurable disease only. * Prior therapy with pomalidomide. * Any anti-myeloma drug treatment within 14 days before randomization, including dexamethasone. * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status superior to 2. * Platelets inferior to 75 000 cells per microliter (mcL) if inferior to 50% of bone marrow (BM) nucleated cells are plasma cells, and inferior to 30 000 cells per mcL if superior or equal to 50% of BM nucleated cells are plasma cells. Platelet transfusion was not allowed within three days before the screening visit. * Absolute neutrophil count inferior to 1000 per mcL (1\*10\^9/L). * Creatinine clearance inferior to 30 mL per minute (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease \[MDRD\] Formula). * Total bilirubin superior to 2\*ULN (Upper Limit of Normal). * Corrected serum calcium superior to 14 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) (superior to 3.5 millimoles per liter (mmol/L). * Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and/or Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) superior to 3\*ULN. * Hypersensitivity to immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) (thalidomide or lenalidomide) defined as any hypersensitivity reaction leading to stop IMiDs within the 2 first cycles or toxicity, which does meet intolerance definition. * Hypersensitivity to dexamethasone, sucrose histidine (as base and hydrochloride salt), and polysorbate 80 or any of the components of study therapy that are not amenable to premedication with steroids, or H2 blockers that would prohibit further treatment with these agents. * Significant cardiac dysfunction; myocardial infarction within 12 months; unstable, poorly controlled angina pectoris. * Pregnant or breastfeeding woman or female who intends to become pregnant during the participation in the study. * Male participants who disagreed to practice true abstinence or disagreed to use a condom during sexual contact with a pregnant female or a female of childbearing potential while participating in the study, during dose interruptions and at least 3 or 5 months following study treatment discontinuation, even if he had undergone a successful vasectomy. * All participants who disagreed to refrain from donating blood while on study treatment and for 4 weeks after discontinuation from this study treatment. The above information was not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression Free Survival (PFS)From the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of progression, or the date of death from any cause, or initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment or data cut-off whichever comes first (maximum duration: 76.7 weeks)PFS:time from date of randomization to date of first documentation of progressive disease (PD) determined by Independent Response Committee (IRC) or date of death from any cause, whichever comes first. If progression or death was not observed, participant was censored at date of last progression-free tumor assessment prior to study cut-off date. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method. PD as per International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria was defined as increase of \>=25% from lowest confirmed value in any one of the following criteria: serum M-protein (the absolute increase must be \>=0.5gram(g)/dL), serum M-protein increase \>=1g/dL if lowest M component was \>=5g/dL; urine M-component (absolute increase must be \>=200mg/24hour), appearance of new lesion(s),\>=50% increase from nadir in sum of the products of the maximal perpendicular diameters of measured lesions (SPD) of \>1 lesion, or \>=50% increase in the longest diameter of a previous lesion \>1 centimeter in short axis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Independent Response CommitteeFrom the date of randomization until disease progression, or death, initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment or data cut-off whichever comes first (maximum duration 76.7 weeks)BOR:best sequential response from start of treatment until disease progression, death, initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment/data cut-off, whichever comes first. Ordering of evaluations from best to worse was: sCR,CR,VGPR,PR, minimal response (MR), stable disease (SD), PD, and not evaluable.CR: negative immunofixation on serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas,\<5% plasma cells in bone marrow aspirates. sCR:CR as defined previously plus normal FLC ratio (0.26 to 1.65), absence of clonal cells in bone marrow biopsy. VGPR: serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation,\>=90% reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level \<100mg/24h,\>=90% decrease in SPD compared to baseline in soft tissue plasmacytoma. PR: \>=50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24h urinary M-protein by \>=90%/\<200mg/24h. MR:\>=25% but \<=49% reduction in serum M-protein and reduction in 24h urine M-protein by 50-89%. SD: Not meeting criteria for CR,VGPR,PR,MR/PD.
Percentage of Participants With Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) or Better as Per Independent Response CommitteeFrom the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of progression, death, initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment, or data cut-off whichever comes first (maximum duration 76.7 weeks)VGPR rate was defined as the percentage of participants achieving a VGPR or better as BOR. VGPR was defined as serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or \>=90% reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level \<100 mg/24 h or \>=90% decrease in the sum of maximal perpendicular diameter compared to baseline in soft tissue plasmacytoma. BOR was defined as the best sequential response, using the IRC's assessment of response, from the start of treatment until disease progression (provided that the progression is subsequently confirmed in case of progression requiring confirmation), death, initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment, or cut-off date, whichever occurs first. CR: negative immunofixation on serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas,\<5% plasma cells in bone marrow aspirates.
Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR): Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit as Per Independent Response CommitteeFrom the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of progression, death, initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment or data cut-off whichever comes first (maximum duration 76.7 weeks)CBR was defined as the percentage of participants achieving a MR or better as BOR. MR was defined as \>= 25% but \<= 49% reduction in serum M-protein and reduction in 24h urine M-protein by 50-89%, which still exceed 200 mg/24h; if present at baseline, \>=50% reduction in size (SPD) of soft tissue plasmacytomas was also required. BOR was defined as the best sequential response, using the IRC's assessment of response, from the start of treatment until disease progression (provided that the progression is subsequently confirmed in case of progression requiring confirmation), death, initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment, or cut-off date, whichever occurs first.
Overall Survival (OS): Final AnalysisFrom the date of randomization to date of death from any cause or data cut-off date, whichever was earlier (maximum duration 245.6 weeks)OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to death from any cause. In the absence of confirmation of death, survival time was censored at the last date participant was known to be alive or at the cut-off date, whichever comes first. This pre-specified final analysis was performed when the 220 OS events were met.
Time to Progression (TTP) as Per Independent Response CommitteeFrom the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of progression, or initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment or data cut-off whichever comes first (maximum duration 76.7 weeks)TTP was defined as time from randomization to the date of first documentation of PD, as determined by the IRC. As per IMWG criteria, PD was defined for participants with increase of \>= 25% from lowest confirmed value in any one of the following criteria: serum M-protein (the absolute increase must be \>= 0.5 g/dL), serum M-protein increase \>=1 g/dL if the lowest M component was \>=5 g/dL; urine M-component (the absolute increase must be \>=200 mg/24hour), appearance of new lesion(s), \>=50% increase from nadir in SPD of \>1 lesion, or \>=50% increase in the longest diameter of a previous lesion \>1 centimeter in short axis.
Progression Free Survival in High Risk Cytogenetic PopulationFrom the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of progression, or the date of death from any cause, or initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment or data cut-off whichever comes first (maximum duration 76.7 weeks)PFS in high risk cytogenetic population was defined as PFS in subgroup of participants carrying high risk cytogenetic changes including del(17p), translocation (t)(4;14) or translocation t(14;16) assessed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). PFS was defined as the time from date of randomization to date of first documentation of PD (determined by IRC) or date of death from any cause, whichever comes first. PD defined as per IMWG criteria as: increase of \>=25% from lowest confirmed value in any one of following criteria: serum M-protein (absolute increase must be \>=0.5 g/dL), serum M-protein increase \>=1 g/dL if lowest M component was \>=5 g/dL; urine M-component (absolute increase must be \>=200 mg/24hour), appearance of new lesion(s), \>=50% increase from nadir in SPD of \>1 lesion, or \>=50% increase in the longest diameter of previous lesion \>1 centimeter (cm) in short axis.
Duration of Response (DOR) as Per Independent Response CommitteeFrom the date of the first IRC determined response to the date of first IRC progression or death, whichever occurred first (maximum duration 76.7 weeks)DOR:time from date of first IRC determined response(PR or better) to date of first IRC-PD or death, whichever occurred first.DOR was determined only for participants who had achieved a response of PR or better based on disease assessment by IRC.If progression or death was not observed,participant was censored at date of participants last progression-free tumor assessment prior to initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment(if any)and study cut-off date. PD(IMWG criteria):increase of \>=25% from lowest confirmed value in any one of following criteria: serum M-protein (absolute increase must be \>=0.5 g/dL), serum M-protein increase \>=1g/dL if lowest M component was \>=5g/dL;urine M-component (absolute increase must be \>=200mg/24 hour),appearance of new lesion(s), \>=50% increase from nadir in SPD of \>1 lesion,or \>=50% increase in the longest diameter of a previous lesion \>1 cm in short axis. PR:\>=50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24h urinary M-protein by \>=90%/\<200mg/24h.
Time to First Response (TT1R) as Per Independent Response CommitteeFrom the date of randomization to the date of first IRC determined response, or death or data cut-off whichever comes first (maximum duration 76.7 weeks)TT1R was defined as the time from randomization to the date of first IRC determined response (PR or better) that is subsequently confirmed. PR was defined as \>=50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24 hours urinary M-protein by \>=90% or to \<200 mg/24 h. In addition to the above listed criteria, if present at baseline, a \>=50% reduction in the size (SPD) of soft tissue plasmacytomas was also required.
Time to Best Response (TTBR) as Per Independent Response CommitteeFrom the date of randomization to date of first occurrence of IRC determined best overall response or data cut-off whichever comes first (maximum duration 76.7 weeks)TTBR was defined as the time from randomization to the date of first occurrence of IRC determined BOR (PR or better) that was subsequently confirmed. PR was defined as \>=50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24 hours urinary M-protein by \>=90% or to \<200 mg/24 h. In addition to the above listed criteria, if present at baseline, a \>=50% reduction in the size (SPD) of soft tissue plasmacytomas was also required. BOR was defined as the best sequential response, using the IRC's assessment of response, from the start of treatment until disease progression (provided that the progression is subsequently confirmed in case of progression requiring confirmation), death, initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment, or cut-off date, whichever occurs first.
Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)Up to 76.7 weeksMRD was assessed by next-generation sequencing in bone marrow samples from participants who achieved CR, to determine the depth of response at the molecular level. IMWG criteria for CR: Negative immunofixation on the serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas, and \<5% plasma cells in bone marrow aspirates. MRD was classified as positive or negative at the minimum sensitivity of 1 in 10\^5 nucleated cells. MRD negativity was defined as the absence of the dominant clonotype sequence(s) identified in the bone marrow aspirate collected at screening. MRD positivity was defined as the presence of the dominant clonotype sequence(s) identified in the bone marrow aspirate collected at screening.
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)From randomization up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (maximum duration up to 241.6 weeks for Pd arm and 245.6 weeks for IPd arm)Adverse Event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug and did not necessarily had a causal relationship with the treatment. TEAEs were defined as AEs that developed, worsened (according to the Investigator opinion), or became serious during the treatment period (time from the first dose of study treatments up to 30 days after last dose of study treatments). An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, is a medically important event.
Overall Response Rate (ORR): Percentage of Participants With Disease Response as Per Independent Response Committee (IRC)From the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of progression or initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment or data cut-off whichever comes first (maximum duration 76.7 weeks)ORR (IMWG criteria): percentage of participants with stringent complete response(sCR), complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR), and partial response (PR) as best overall response, assessed by IRC. sCR:negative immunofixation on serum and urine,disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas,\<5% plasma cells in bone marrow aspirates plus normal free light chain(FLC)ratio(0.26-1.65), absence of clonal cells in bone marrow biopsy.CR:negative immunofixation on serum and urine,disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas,\<5% plasma cells in bone marrow aspirates.VGPR: serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation, not on electrophoresis/,\>=90% reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level \<100mg/24h/,\>=90% decrease in SPD compared to baseline in soft tissue plasmacytoma. PR: \>=50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24h urinary M-protein by \>=90%/\<200mg/24h,if present at baseline,\>=50% reduction in the size (SPD) of soft tissue plasmacytomas.
Pharmacokinetic Parameter: Accumulation Ratio of Isatuximab at Concentration at the End of Infusion (CEOI)End of infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 1, and Cycle 4 Day 1Accumulation Ratio was defined as the ratio of CEOI of Cycle 2 Day 1 versus Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 4 Day 1 versus Cycle 1 Day 1, where CEOI was the plasma concentration at the end of infusion.
Pharmacokinetic Parameter: Plasma Concentration of Isatuximab at 1 Hour After End of Infusion (CEOI+1 Hour)Cycle 1:1 hour after End of Infusion on Day 1; Cycle 4:1 hour after End of Infusion on Day 1CEOI+1 hour was defined as the plasma concentration of isatuximab at 1 hour after end of infusion.
PK Parameter: Plasma Concentration of Isatuximab at CtroughPre-infusion on C1D1, C1D8, C1D15, C1D22, C2D1, C2D15, C3D1, C3D15, C4D1, C4D15, C5D1, C6D1, C7D1, C8D1, C9D1, C10D1, C11D1, C12D1, C13D1, C14D1, C15D1, C16D1, C17D1, C18D1, C19D1, C20D1; End of treatment (EOT [30 days after last drug administration])Trough Concentration (Ctrough) is the concentration prior to study drug administration.
PK Parameter: Accumulation Ratio of Isatuximab at Trough Concentration (Ctrough)Pre-infusion on Cycle 1 Day 8, Cycle 2 Day 1, and Cycle 4 Day 1Accumulation Ratio was defined as the ratio of Ctrough of Cycle 2 Day 1 versus Cycle 1 Day 8 and Cycle 4 Day 1 versus Cycle 1 Day 8, where Ctrough is the concentration prior to study drug administration.
Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA)From randomization up to 60 days after last dose of study drug (maximum duration 76.7 weeks)ADA were categorized as: pre-existing, treatment induced and treatment boosted response. Pre-existing ADA was defined as ADA that were present in samples drawn during the pretreatment period (i.e., before the first isatuximab administration). Treatment-induced ADA was defined as ADA that developed at any time during the ADA on-study observation period in participants without preexisting ADA, including participants without pretreatment samples. Treatment boosted ADA was defined as pre-existing ADA that increased at least 2 titer steps between pre-treatment and post-treatment.
Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Cancer Specific Questionnaire With 30 Items (EORTC QLQ-C30): Global Health Status (GHS)/Quality of Life (QOL) ScoreBaseline, Day 1 of each cycle (Cycle 3, Cycle 6, Cycle 9, and Cycle 17)EORTC-Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-C30 is a cancer-specific instrument with 30 questions for evaluation of new chemotherapy and provides an assessment of participant reported outcome dimensions. EORTC QLQ-C30 included GHS/ QOL, functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social), symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting), and 6 single items (dyspnea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation, diarrhea, financial difficulties). Most questions from QLQ-C30 were a 4-point scale (1/Not at All to 4/Very Much), except Items 29-30, which comprise GHS scale and were a 7-point scale (1/Very Poor to 7/Excellent). Answers were converted into grading scale, with values between 0 and 100. A high score represented a favorable outcome with a best quality of life for participant.
Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Multiple Myeloma Specific Module With 20 Items (EORTC QLQ-MY20): Disease Symptoms Domain ScoreBaseline, Day 1 of each cycle (Cycle 3, Cycle 6, Cycle 9, and Cycle 17)EORTC QLQ-MY20 is a validated questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in participants with multiple myeloma. Disease symptoms domain is one of the four domain scores. Disease symptoms domain score used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0 -100 scale, where higher scores = more symptoms and lower health-related quality of life (HRQL) and lower score = less symptoms and more HRQL
Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Multiple Myeloma Specific Module With 20 Items (EORTC QLQ-MY20): Side Effects of Treatment Domain ScoreBaseline, Day 1 of each cycle (Cycle 3, Cycle 6, Cycle 9, and Cycle 17)EORTC QLQ-MY20 is a validated questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in participants with multiple myeloma. Side effects of treatment domain is one of the four domain scores. Side effects of treatment domain score used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale, where higher scores = more side effects and lower HRQL and lower scores = less side effects and better HRQL.
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions (5D), 5 Levels (5L) (EQ-5D-5L) Score: Health State Utility Index ValueBaseline, Day 1 of each cycle (Cycle 3, Cycle 6, Cycle 9, and Cycle 17)The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized measure of health status that provides a general assessment of health and wellbeing. The EQ-5D descriptive system comprises 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has a 5-level response: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. Response options are measured with a 5-point Likert scale (for the 5L version). The 5D-5L systems are converted into a single index utility score between 0 to 1, where higher score indicates a better health state and lower score indicate worse health state.
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Score: Visual Analogic Scale (VAS)Baseline, Day 1 of each cycle (Cycle 3, Cycle 6, Cycle 9, and Cycle 17)EQ-5D-5L is a standardized, participant-rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life. The EQ-5D-5L includes 2 components: the EQ-5D-5L health state utility index (descriptive system) and the EQ-5D-5L Visual Analog Scale. The Visual Analogue Scale is designed to rate the participant's current health state on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst imaginable health state and 100 represents the best imaginable health state.
Pharmacokinetics (PK) Parameter: Plasma Concentration of Isatuximab at End of Infusion (CEOI)End of infusion on Cycle(C)1 Day(D)1 and Cycle1 Day 15; Cycle 2 Day 1; and Cycle 4 Day 1CEOI was defined as the plasma concentration at end of infusion.

Countries

Australia, Belgium, Canada, Czechia, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Japan, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Slovakia, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, Turkey (Türkiye), United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was conducted at 102 sites in 24 countries. A total of 387 participants were screened between 22 December 2016 and 01 February 2018. Out of which, 307 participants were randomized in 1:1 ratio to IPd (Isatuximab + Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone) and Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone) arms using an interactive response technology (IRT).

Pre-assignment details

Randomization was stratified by age (less than \[\<\] 75 years versus greater than and equal to \[\>=\] 75 years) and number of previous lines of therapy (2 or 3 versus more than 3). Reason for not completed = Reason for definitive treatment discontinuation.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)
Participants received pomalidomide 4 mg PO on Days 1 to 21 of each 28-day treatment cycle plus dexamethasone 40 mg (participants \>= 75 years of age received 20 mg dexamethasone) PO on Days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of each 28-day treatment cycle until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity or participant's wish to discontinue study treatment, or any other reason, whichever comes first (maximum exposure: 306.6 weeks).
153
IPd (Isatuximab + Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)
Participants received isatuximab 10 mg/kg IV infusion on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22 at Cycle 1, and then on Days 1 and 15 of subsequent cycles plus pomalidomide 4 mg PO on Days 1 to 21 of each 28-day treatment cycle and dexamethasone 40 mg (participants \>= 75 years of age received 20 mg dexamethasone), PO or IV on Day 1, 8, 15, 22 of each 28-day treatment cycle until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity or participant's wish to discontinue study treatment, or any other reason, whichever comes first (maximum exposure: 311.0 weeks).
154
Total307

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event2322
Overall StudyContinue with therapy available commercially01
Overall StudyPhysician's decision26
Overall StudyPoor compliance to protocol01
Overall StudyProgressive disease118107
Overall StudyRandomized and not treated42
Overall StudyTreatment extension study06
Overall StudyUnconfirmed disease progression per investigator01
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject68

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicIPd (Isatuximab + Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)TotalPd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)
Age, Continuous66.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.1
65.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3
65.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
21 Participants36 Participants15 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants4 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
2 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
12 Participants20 Participants8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
118 Participants244 Participants126 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
65 Participants148 Participants83 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
89 Participants159 Participants70 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
115 / 153110 / 154
other
Total, other adverse events
139 / 149145 / 152
serious
Total, serious adverse events
91 / 149112 / 152

Outcome results

Primary

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS:time from date of randomization to date of first documentation of progressive disease (PD) determined by Independent Response Committee (IRC) or date of death from any cause, whichever comes first. If progression or death was not observed, participant was censored at date of last progression-free tumor assessment prior to study cut-off date. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method. PD as per International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria was defined as increase of \>=25% from lowest confirmed value in any one of the following criteria: serum M-protein (the absolute increase must be \>=0.5gram(g)/dL), serum M-protein increase \>=1g/dL if lowest M component was \>=5g/dL; urine M-component (absolute increase must be \>=200mg/24hour), appearance of new lesion(s),\>=50% increase from nadir in sum of the products of the maximal perpendicular diameters of measured lesions (SPD) of \>1 lesion, or \>=50% increase in the longest diameter of a previous lesion \>1 centimeter in short axis.

Time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of progression, or the date of death from any cause, or initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment or data cut-off whichever comes first (maximum duration: 76.7 weeks)

Population: Analysis was performed on Intent-to-treat (ITT) population which included all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Progression Free Survival (PFS)6.47 months
IPd (Isatuximab + Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Progression Free Survival (PFS)11.53 months
Comparison: Confidence interval (CI) for Kaplan-Meier estimates were calculated with log-log transformation of survival function and methods of Brookmeyer and Crowley.p-value: 0.000595% CI: [0.436, 0.814]Log Rank
Secondary

Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Cancer Specific Questionnaire With 30 Items (EORTC QLQ-C30): Global Health Status (GHS)/Quality of Life (QOL) Score

EORTC-Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-C30 is a cancer-specific instrument with 30 questions for evaluation of new chemotherapy and provides an assessment of participant reported outcome dimensions. EORTC QLQ-C30 included GHS/ QOL, functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social), symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting), and 6 single items (dyspnea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation, diarrhea, financial difficulties). Most questions from QLQ-C30 were a 4-point scale (1/Not at All to 4/Very Much), except Items 29-30, which comprise GHS scale and were a 7-point scale (1/Very Poor to 7/Excellent). Answers were converted into grading scale, with values between 0 and 100. A high score represented a favorable outcome with a best quality of life for participant.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 1 of each cycle (Cycle 3, Cycle 6, Cycle 9, and Cycle 17)

Population: Analysis was performed on safety population evaluable for global health status. Here, 'Number analyzed' = participants with available data for each specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Cancer Specific Questionnaire With 30 Items (EORTC QLQ-C30): Global Health Status (GHS)/Quality of Life (QOL) ScoreDay 1: Cycle 3-1.45 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.03
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Cancer Specific Questionnaire With 30 Items (EORTC QLQ-C30): Global Health Status (GHS)/Quality of Life (QOL) ScoreDay 1: Cycle 91.06 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.97
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Cancer Specific Questionnaire With 30 Items (EORTC QLQ-C30): Global Health Status (GHS)/Quality of Life (QOL) ScoreDay 1: Cycle 6-0.12 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.26
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Cancer Specific Questionnaire With 30 Items (EORTC QLQ-C30): Global Health Status (GHS)/Quality of Life (QOL) ScoreDay 1: Cycle 17-9.17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.36
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Cancer Specific Questionnaire With 30 Items (EORTC QLQ-C30): Global Health Status (GHS)/Quality of Life (QOL) ScoreBaseline61.19 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.64
IPd (Isatuximab + Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Cancer Specific Questionnaire With 30 Items (EORTC QLQ-C30): Global Health Status (GHS)/Quality of Life (QOL) ScoreDay 1: Cycle 17-1.92 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.29
IPd (Isatuximab + Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Cancer Specific Questionnaire With 30 Items (EORTC QLQ-C30): Global Health Status (GHS)/Quality of Life (QOL) ScoreBaseline60.10 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.02
IPd (Isatuximab + Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Cancer Specific Questionnaire With 30 Items (EORTC QLQ-C30): Global Health Status (GHS)/Quality of Life (QOL) ScoreDay 1: Cycle 3-1.22 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.42
IPd (Isatuximab + Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Cancer Specific Questionnaire With 30 Items (EORTC QLQ-C30): Global Health Status (GHS)/Quality of Life (QOL) ScoreDay 1: Cycle 6-0.16 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.28
IPd (Isatuximab + Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Cancer Specific Questionnaire With 30 Items (EORTC QLQ-C30): Global Health Status (GHS)/Quality of Life (QOL) ScoreDay 1: Cycle 90.41 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.99
Secondary

Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Multiple Myeloma Specific Module With 20 Items (EORTC QLQ-MY20): Disease Symptoms Domain Score

EORTC QLQ-MY20 is a validated questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in participants with multiple myeloma. Disease symptoms domain is one of the four domain scores. Disease symptoms domain score used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0 -100 scale, where higher scores = more symptoms and lower health-related quality of life (HRQL) and lower score = less symptoms and more HRQL

Time frame: Baseline, Day 1 of each cycle (Cycle 3, Cycle 6, Cycle 9, and Cycle 17)

Population: Analysis was performed on safety population evaluable for disease symptoms. Here, 'Number analyzed' = participants with available data for each specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Multiple Myeloma Specific Module With 20 Items (EORTC QLQ-MY20): Disease Symptoms Domain ScoreDay 1: Cycle 3-3.79 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.09
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Multiple Myeloma Specific Module With 20 Items (EORTC QLQ-MY20): Disease Symptoms Domain ScoreDay 1: Cycle 9-2.83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.04
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Multiple Myeloma Specific Module With 20 Items (EORTC QLQ-MY20): Disease Symptoms Domain ScoreDay 1: Cycle 6-4.08 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.95
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Multiple Myeloma Specific Module With 20 Items (EORTC QLQ-MY20): Disease Symptoms Domain ScoreDay 1: Cycle 17-3.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.54
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Multiple Myeloma Specific Module With 20 Items (EORTC QLQ-MY20): Disease Symptoms Domain ScoreBaseline24.91 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.67
IPd (Isatuximab + Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Multiple Myeloma Specific Module With 20 Items (EORTC QLQ-MY20): Disease Symptoms Domain ScoreDay 1: Cycle 170.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.4
IPd (Isatuximab + Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Multiple Myeloma Specific Module With 20 Items (EORTC QLQ-MY20): Disease Symptoms Domain ScoreBaseline24.12 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.54
IPd (Isatuximab + Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Multiple Myeloma Specific Module With 20 Items (EORTC QLQ-MY20): Disease Symptoms Domain ScoreDay 1: Cycle 3-2.07 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.51
IPd (Isatuximab + Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Multiple Myeloma Specific Module With 20 Items (EORTC QLQ-MY20): Disease Symptoms Domain ScoreDay 1: Cycle 6-3.30 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.01
IPd (Isatuximab + Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Multiple Myeloma Specific Module With 20 Items (EORTC QLQ-MY20): Disease Symptoms Domain ScoreDay 1: Cycle 9-4.66 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.73
Secondary

Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Multiple Myeloma Specific Module With 20 Items (EORTC QLQ-MY20): Side Effects of Treatment Domain Score

EORTC QLQ-MY20 is a validated questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in participants with multiple myeloma. Side effects of treatment domain is one of the four domain scores. Side effects of treatment domain score used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale, where higher scores = more side effects and lower HRQL and lower scores = less side effects and better HRQL.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 1 of each cycle (Cycle 3, Cycle 6, Cycle 9, and Cycle 17)

Population: Analysis was performed on safety population evaluable for side effects of treatment. Here, 'Number analyzed' = participants with available data for each specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Multiple Myeloma Specific Module With 20 Items (EORTC QLQ-MY20): Side Effects of Treatment Domain ScoreDay 1: Cycle 31.69 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.54
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Multiple Myeloma Specific Module With 20 Items (EORTC QLQ-MY20): Side Effects of Treatment Domain ScoreDay 1: Cycle 91.43 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.66
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Multiple Myeloma Specific Module With 20 Items (EORTC QLQ-MY20): Side Effects of Treatment Domain ScoreDay 1: Cycle 6-0.13 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.1
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Multiple Myeloma Specific Module With 20 Items (EORTC QLQ-MY20): Side Effects of Treatment Domain ScoreDay 1: Cycle 17-2.93 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.94
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Multiple Myeloma Specific Module With 20 Items (EORTC QLQ-MY20): Side Effects of Treatment Domain ScoreBaseline17.49 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.25
IPd (Isatuximab + Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Multiple Myeloma Specific Module With 20 Items (EORTC QLQ-MY20): Side Effects of Treatment Domain ScoreDay 1: Cycle 173.02 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.72
IPd (Isatuximab + Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Multiple Myeloma Specific Module With 20 Items (EORTC QLQ-MY20): Side Effects of Treatment Domain ScoreBaseline15.60 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.63
IPd (Isatuximab + Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Multiple Myeloma Specific Module With 20 Items (EORTC QLQ-MY20): Side Effects of Treatment Domain ScoreDay 1: Cycle 32.61 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.39
IPd (Isatuximab + Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Multiple Myeloma Specific Module With 20 Items (EORTC QLQ-MY20): Side Effects of Treatment Domain ScoreDay 1: Cycle 62.11 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.78
IPd (Isatuximab + Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Multiple Myeloma Specific Module With 20 Items (EORTC QLQ-MY20): Side Effects of Treatment Domain ScoreDay 1: Cycle 93.14 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.88
Secondary

Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions (5D), 5 Levels (5L) (EQ-5D-5L) Score: Health State Utility Index Value

The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized measure of health status that provides a general assessment of health and wellbeing. The EQ-5D descriptive system comprises 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has a 5-level response: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. Response options are measured with a 5-point Likert scale (for the 5L version). The 5D-5L systems are converted into a single index utility score between 0 to 1, where higher score indicates a better health state and lower score indicate worse health state.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 1 of each cycle (Cycle 3, Cycle 6, Cycle 9, and Cycle 17)

Population: Analysis was performed on safety population evaluable for health state utility index. Here, 'Number analyzed' = participants with available data for each specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions (5D), 5 Levels (5L) (EQ-5D-5L) Score: Health State Utility Index ValueDay 1: Cycle 3-0.01 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.22
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions (5D), 5 Levels (5L) (EQ-5D-5L) Score: Health State Utility Index ValueDay 1: Cycle 9-0.03 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.27
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions (5D), 5 Levels (5L) (EQ-5D-5L) Score: Health State Utility Index ValueDay 1: Cycle 60.02 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.22
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions (5D), 5 Levels (5L) (EQ-5D-5L) Score: Health State Utility Index ValueDay 1: Cycle 17-0.02 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.19
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions (5D), 5 Levels (5L) (EQ-5D-5L) Score: Health State Utility Index ValueBaseline0.70 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.24
IPd (Isatuximab + Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions (5D), 5 Levels (5L) (EQ-5D-5L) Score: Health State Utility Index ValueDay 1: Cycle 17-0.01 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.23
IPd (Isatuximab + Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions (5D), 5 Levels (5L) (EQ-5D-5L) Score: Health State Utility Index ValueBaseline0.71 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.21
IPd (Isatuximab + Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions (5D), 5 Levels (5L) (EQ-5D-5L) Score: Health State Utility Index ValueDay 1: Cycle 3-0.01 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.22
IPd (Isatuximab + Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions (5D), 5 Levels (5L) (EQ-5D-5L) Score: Health State Utility Index ValueDay 1: Cycle 6-0.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2
IPd (Isatuximab + Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions (5D), 5 Levels (5L) (EQ-5D-5L) Score: Health State Utility Index ValueDay 1: Cycle 9-0.01 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.15
Secondary

Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Score: Visual Analogic Scale (VAS)

EQ-5D-5L is a standardized, participant-rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life. The EQ-5D-5L includes 2 components: the EQ-5D-5L health state utility index (descriptive system) and the EQ-5D-5L Visual Analog Scale. The Visual Analogue Scale is designed to rate the participant's current health state on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst imaginable health state and 100 represents the best imaginable health state.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 1 of each cycle (Cycle 3, Cycle 6, Cycle 9, and Cycle 17)

Population: Analysis was performed on safety population evaluable for visual analogue scale. Here, 'Number analyzed' = participants with available data for each specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Score: Visual Analogic Scale (VAS)Day 1: Cycle 30.26 centimeterStandard Deviation 17.37
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Score: Visual Analogic Scale (VAS)Day 1: Cycle 94.42 centimeterStandard Deviation 19.78
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Score: Visual Analogic Scale (VAS)Day 1: Cycle 62.49 centimeterStandard Deviation 18.83
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Score: Visual Analogic Scale (VAS)Day 1: Cycle 17-1.70 centimeterStandard Deviation 12.39
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Score: Visual Analogic Scale (VAS)Baseline65.38 centimeterStandard Deviation 19.31
IPd (Isatuximab + Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Score: Visual Analogic Scale (VAS)Day 1: Cycle 17-3.00 centimeterStandard Deviation 12.58
IPd (Isatuximab + Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Score: Visual Analogic Scale (VAS)Baseline66.62 centimeterStandard Deviation 19.32
IPd (Isatuximab + Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Score: Visual Analogic Scale (VAS)Day 1: Cycle 30.92 centimeterStandard Deviation 19.41
IPd (Isatuximab + Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Score: Visual Analogic Scale (VAS)Day 1: Cycle 61.19 centimeterStandard Deviation 17.7
IPd (Isatuximab + Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Score: Visual Analogic Scale (VAS)Day 1: Cycle 91.96 centimeterStandard Deviation 16.6
Secondary

Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR): Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit as Per Independent Response Committee

CBR was defined as the percentage of participants achieving a MR or better as BOR. MR was defined as \>= 25% but \<= 49% reduction in serum M-protein and reduction in 24h urine M-protein by 50-89%, which still exceed 200 mg/24h; if present at baseline, \>=50% reduction in size (SPD) of soft tissue plasmacytomas was also required. BOR was defined as the best sequential response, using the IRC's assessment of response, from the start of treatment until disease progression (provided that the progression is subsequently confirmed in case of progression requiring confirmation), death, initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment, or cut-off date, whichever occurs first.

Time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of progression, death, initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment or data cut-off whichever comes first (maximum duration 76.7 weeks)

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR): Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit as Per Independent Response Committee46.4 percentage of participants
IPd (Isatuximab + Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR): Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit as Per Independent Response Committee66.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

Duration of Response (DOR) as Per Independent Response Committee

DOR:time from date of first IRC determined response(PR or better) to date of first IRC-PD or death, whichever occurred first.DOR was determined only for participants who had achieved a response of PR or better based on disease assessment by IRC.If progression or death was not observed,participant was censored at date of participants last progression-free tumor assessment prior to initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment(if any)and study cut-off date. PD(IMWG criteria):increase of \>=25% from lowest confirmed value in any one of following criteria: serum M-protein (absolute increase must be \>=0.5 g/dL), serum M-protein increase \>=1g/dL if lowest M component was \>=5g/dL;urine M-component (absolute increase must be \>=200mg/24 hour),appearance of new lesion(s), \>=50% increase from nadir in SPD of \>1 lesion,or \>=50% increase in the longest diameter of a previous lesion \>1 cm in short axis. PR:\>=50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24h urinary M-protein by \>=90%/\<200mg/24h.

Time frame: From the date of the first IRC determined response to the date of first IRC progression or death, whichever occurred first (maximum duration 76.7 weeks)

Population: Analysis was performed on responders in ITT population. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Duration of Response (DOR) as Per Independent Response Committee11.07 months
IPd (Isatuximab + Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Duration of Response (DOR) as Per Independent Response Committee13.27 months
Secondary

Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA)

ADA were categorized as: pre-existing, treatment induced and treatment boosted response. Pre-existing ADA was defined as ADA that were present in samples drawn during the pretreatment period (i.e., before the first isatuximab administration). Treatment-induced ADA was defined as ADA that developed at any time during the ADA on-study observation period in participants without preexisting ADA, including participants without pretreatment samples. Treatment boosted ADA was defined as pre-existing ADA that increased at least 2 titer steps between pre-treatment and post-treatment.

Time frame: From randomization up to 60 days after last dose of study drug (maximum duration 76.7 weeks)

Population: Analysis was performed on ADA evaluable population which included participants who received at least one dose of study drug from the IPd arm with at least one ADA assessment during the ADA on-study observation period with a reportable result. Data for this OM was not planned to be collected and analyzed for Pd arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA)Pre-existing ADA0 Participants
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA)Treatment induced ADA0 Participants
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA)Treatment boosted ADA0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)

MRD was assessed by next-generation sequencing in bone marrow samples from participants who achieved CR, to determine the depth of response at the molecular level. IMWG criteria for CR: Negative immunofixation on the serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas, and \<5% plasma cells in bone marrow aspirates. MRD was classified as positive or negative at the minimum sensitivity of 1 in 10\^5 nucleated cells. MRD negativity was defined as the absence of the dominant clonotype sequence(s) identified in the bone marrow aspirate collected at screening. MRD positivity was defined as the presence of the dominant clonotype sequence(s) identified in the bone marrow aspirate collected at screening.

Time frame: Up to 76.7 weeks

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population who were evaluable for MRD.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)MRD negative:1 in 10^40 Participants
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)MRD negative:1 in 10^50 Participants
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)MRD negative:1 in 10^60 Participants
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)MRD positive:1 in 10^42 Participants
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)MRD positive:1 in 10^52 Participants
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)MRD positive:1 in 10^62 Participants
IPd (Isatuximab + Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)MRD positive:1 in 10^56 Participants
IPd (Isatuximab + Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)MRD negative:1 in 10^410 Participants
IPd (Isatuximab + Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)MRD positive:1 in 10^44 Participants
IPd (Isatuximab + Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)MRD negative:1 in 10^58 Participants
IPd (Isatuximab + Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)MRD positive:1 in 10^69 Participants
IPd (Isatuximab + Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)MRD negative:1 in 10^62 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

Adverse Event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug and did not necessarily had a causal relationship with the treatment. TEAEs were defined as AEs that developed, worsened (according to the Investigator opinion), or became serious during the treatment period (time from the first dose of study treatments up to 30 days after last dose of study treatments). An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, is a medically important event.

Time frame: From randomization up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (maximum duration up to 241.6 weeks for Pd arm and 245.6 weeks for IPd arm)

Population: Analysis was performed on safety population which included all participants from the ITT population who received at least one dose or a part of a dose of the study treatments.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Any TEAE146 Participants
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Any treatment emergent SAE91 Participants
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Any TEAE leading to treatment discontinuation22 Participants
IPd (Isatuximab + Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Any TEAE151 Participants
IPd (Isatuximab + Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Any treatment emergent SAE112 Participants
IPd (Isatuximab + Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Any TEAE leading to treatment discontinuation19 Participants
Secondary

Overall Response Rate (ORR): Percentage of Participants With Disease Response as Per Independent Response Committee (IRC)

ORR (IMWG criteria): percentage of participants with stringent complete response(sCR), complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR), and partial response (PR) as best overall response, assessed by IRC. sCR:negative immunofixation on serum and urine,disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas,\<5% plasma cells in bone marrow aspirates plus normal free light chain(FLC)ratio(0.26-1.65), absence of clonal cells in bone marrow biopsy.CR:negative immunofixation on serum and urine,disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas,\<5% plasma cells in bone marrow aspirates.VGPR: serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation, not on electrophoresis/,\>=90% reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level \<100mg/24h/,\>=90% decrease in SPD compared to baseline in soft tissue plasmacytoma. PR: \>=50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24h urinary M-protein by \>=90%/\<200mg/24h,if present at baseline,\>=50% reduction in the size (SPD) of soft tissue plasmacytomas.

Time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of progression or initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment or data cut-off whichever comes first (maximum duration 76.7 weeks)

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Overall Response Rate (ORR): Percentage of Participants With Disease Response as Per Independent Response Committee (IRC)35.3 percentage of participants
IPd (Isatuximab + Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Overall Response Rate (ORR): Percentage of Participants With Disease Response as Per Independent Response Committee (IRC)60.4 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.0001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS): Final Analysis

OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to death from any cause. In the absence of confirmation of death, survival time was censored at the last date participant was known to be alive or at the cut-off date, whichever comes first. This pre-specified final analysis was performed when the 220 OS events were met.

Time frame: From the date of randomization to date of death from any cause or data cut-off date, whichever was earlier (maximum duration 245.6 weeks)

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Overall Survival (OS): Final Analysis17.71 months
IPd (Isatuximab + Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Overall Survival (OS): Final Analysis24.57 months
p-value: 0.031995% CI: [0.594, 1.015]Log Rank
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Independent Response Committee

BOR:best sequential response from start of treatment until disease progression, death, initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment/data cut-off, whichever comes first. Ordering of evaluations from best to worse was: sCR,CR,VGPR,PR, minimal response (MR), stable disease (SD), PD, and not evaluable.CR: negative immunofixation on serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas,\<5% plasma cells in bone marrow aspirates. sCR:CR as defined previously plus normal FLC ratio (0.26 to 1.65), absence of clonal cells in bone marrow biopsy. VGPR: serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation,\>=90% reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level \<100mg/24h,\>=90% decrease in SPD compared to baseline in soft tissue plasmacytoma. PR: \>=50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24h urinary M-protein by \>=90%/\<200mg/24h. MR:\>=25% but \<=49% reduction in serum M-protein and reduction in 24h urine M-protein by 50-89%. SD: Not meeting criteria for CR,VGPR,PR,MR/PD.

Time frame: From the date of randomization until disease progression, or death, initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment or data cut-off whichever comes first (maximum duration 76.7 weeks)

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Independent Response CommitteeStringent complete response0.7 percentage of participants
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Independent Response CommitteeComplete response1.3 percentage of participants
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Independent Response CommitteeVery good partial response6.5 percentage of participants
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Independent Response CommitteePartial response26.8 percentage of participants
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Independent Response CommitteeMinimal response11.1 percentage of participants
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Independent Response CommitteeStable disease29.4 percentage of participants
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Independent Response CommitteeProgressive Disease9.2 percentage of participants
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Independent Response CommitteeNot evaluable10.5 percentage of participants
IPd (Isatuximab + Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Independent Response CommitteeNot evaluable4.5 percentage of participants
IPd (Isatuximab + Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Independent Response CommitteeStringent complete response0 percentage of participants
IPd (Isatuximab + Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Independent Response CommitteeMinimal response6.5 percentage of participants
IPd (Isatuximab + Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Independent Response CommitteeComplete response4.5 percentage of participants
IPd (Isatuximab + Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Independent Response CommitteeProgressive Disease3.9 percentage of participants
IPd (Isatuximab + Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Independent Response CommitteeVery good partial response27.3 percentage of participants
IPd (Isatuximab + Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Independent Response CommitteeStable disease21.4 percentage of participants
IPd (Isatuximab + Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Independent Response CommitteePartial response28.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) or Better as Per Independent Response Committee

VGPR rate was defined as the percentage of participants achieving a VGPR or better as BOR. VGPR was defined as serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or \>=90% reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level \<100 mg/24 h or \>=90% decrease in the sum of maximal perpendicular diameter compared to baseline in soft tissue plasmacytoma. BOR was defined as the best sequential response, using the IRC's assessment of response, from the start of treatment until disease progression (provided that the progression is subsequently confirmed in case of progression requiring confirmation), death, initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment, or cut-off date, whichever occurs first. CR: negative immunofixation on serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas,\<5% plasma cells in bone marrow aspirates.

Time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of progression, death, initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment, or data cut-off whichever comes first (maximum duration 76.7 weeks)

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Percentage of Participants With Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) or Better as Per Independent Response Committee8.5 percentage of participants
IPd (Isatuximab + Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Percentage of Participants With Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) or Better as Per Independent Response Committee31.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Pharmacokinetic Parameter: Accumulation Ratio of Isatuximab at Concentration at the End of Infusion (CEOI)

Accumulation Ratio was defined as the ratio of CEOI of Cycle 2 Day 1 versus Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 4 Day 1 versus Cycle 1 Day 1, where CEOI was the plasma concentration at the end of infusion.

Time frame: End of infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 1, and Cycle 4 Day 1

Population: Analysis was performed on PK population. Here, 'Number analyzed' = participants with available data for each specified category. Data for this OM was not planned to be collected and analyzed for Pd arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Pharmacokinetic Parameter: Accumulation Ratio of Isatuximab at Concentration at the End of Infusion (CEOI)C2D1 versus C1D11.860 ratioGeometric Coefficient of Variation 170.9185
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Pharmacokinetic Parameter: Accumulation Ratio of Isatuximab at Concentration at the End of Infusion (CEOI)C4D1 versus C1D11.777 ratioGeometric Coefficient of Variation 224.2542
Secondary

Pharmacokinetic Parameter: Plasma Concentration of Isatuximab at 1 Hour After End of Infusion (CEOI+1 Hour)

CEOI+1 hour was defined as the plasma concentration of isatuximab at 1 hour after end of infusion.

Time frame: Cycle 1:1 hour after End of Infusion on Day 1; Cycle 4:1 hour after End of Infusion on Day 1

Population: Analysis was performed on PK population. Here, 'Number analyzed' = participants with available data for each specified category. Data for this OM was not planned to be collected and analyzed for Pd arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Pharmacokinetic Parameter: Plasma Concentration of Isatuximab at 1 Hour After End of Infusion (CEOI+1 Hour)C1D1171.55 mcg/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 38.299
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Pharmacokinetic Parameter: Plasma Concentration of Isatuximab at 1 Hour After End of Infusion (CEOI+1 Hour)C4D1294.96 mcg/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 57.331
Secondary

Pharmacokinetics (PK) Parameter: Plasma Concentration of Isatuximab at End of Infusion (CEOI)

CEOI was defined as the plasma concentration at end of infusion.

Time frame: End of infusion on Cycle(C)1 Day(D)1 and Cycle1 Day 15; Cycle 2 Day 1; and Cycle 4 Day 1

Population: Analysis was performed on PK population which included participants who received at least 1 dose of Isatuximab, with data for at least 1 PK parameter available. Here, 'Number analyzed' = participants with available data for each specified category. Data for this outcome measure (OM) was not planned to be collected and analyzed for Pd arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Pharmacokinetics (PK) Parameter: Plasma Concentration of Isatuximab at End of Infusion (CEOI)End of infusion: C1D1163.05 microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 34.528
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Pharmacokinetics (PK) Parameter: Plasma Concentration of Isatuximab at End of Infusion (CEOI)End of infusion: C1D15269.20 microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 32.622
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Pharmacokinetics (PK) Parameter: Plasma Concentration of Isatuximab at End of Infusion (CEOI)End of infusion: C2D1299.85 microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 35.921
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Pharmacokinetics (PK) Parameter: Plasma Concentration of Isatuximab at End of Infusion (CEOI)End of infusion: C4D1279.31 microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 47.555
Secondary

PK Parameter: Accumulation Ratio of Isatuximab at Trough Concentration (Ctrough)

Accumulation Ratio was defined as the ratio of Ctrough of Cycle 2 Day 1 versus Cycle 1 Day 8 and Cycle 4 Day 1 versus Cycle 1 Day 8, where Ctrough is the concentration prior to study drug administration.

Time frame: Pre-infusion on Cycle 1 Day 8, Cycle 2 Day 1, and Cycle 4 Day 1

Population: Analysis was performed on PK population. Here, 'Number analyzed' = participants with available data for each specified category. Data for this OM was not planned to be collected and analyzed for Pd arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)PK Parameter: Accumulation Ratio of Isatuximab at Trough Concentration (Ctrough)C2D1 versus C1D82.689 ratioGeometric Coefficient of Variation 734.5547
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)PK Parameter: Accumulation Ratio of Isatuximab at Trough Concentration (Ctrough)C4D1 versus C1D82.620 ratioGeometric Coefficient of Variation 645.4171
Secondary

PK Parameter: Plasma Concentration of Isatuximab at Ctrough

Trough Concentration (Ctrough) is the concentration prior to study drug administration.

Time frame: Pre-infusion on C1D1, C1D8, C1D15, C1D22, C2D1, C2D15, C3D1, C3D15, C4D1, C4D15, C5D1, C6D1, C7D1, C8D1, C9D1, C10D1, C11D1, C12D1, C13D1, C14D1, C15D1, C16D1, C17D1, C18D1, C19D1, C20D1; End of treatment (EOT [30 days after last drug administration])

Population: Analysis was performed on PK population. Here, 'Number analyzed' = participants with available data for each specified category. Data for this OM was not planned to be collected and analyzed for Pd arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)PK Parameter: Plasma Concentration of Isatuximab at CtroughC18D1216.70 mcg/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 58.273
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)PK Parameter: Plasma Concentration of Isatuximab at CtroughC1D10.00 mcg/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 1194.973
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)PK Parameter: Plasma Concentration of Isatuximab at CtroughC1D831.49 mcg/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 53.602
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)PK Parameter: Plasma Concentration of Isatuximab at CtroughC16D1206.60 mcg/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 50.965
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)PK Parameter: Plasma Concentration of Isatuximab at CtroughC1D1557.89 mcg/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 54.764
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)PK Parameter: Plasma Concentration of Isatuximab at CtroughC1D2284.82 mcg/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 57.666
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)PK Parameter: Plasma Concentration of Isatuximab at CtroughC2D189.09 mcg/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 60.155
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)PK Parameter: Plasma Concentration of Isatuximab at CtroughC2D1589.35 mcg/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 61.167
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)PK Parameter: Plasma Concentration of Isatuximab at CtroughC3D164.15 mcg/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 76.469
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)PK Parameter: Plasma Concentration of Isatuximab at CtroughC3D1591.73 mcg/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 78.406
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)PK Parameter: Plasma Concentration of Isatuximab at CtroughC4D186.05 mcg/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 70.062
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)PK Parameter: Plasma Concentration of Isatuximab at CtroughC4D15105.42 mcg/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 68.035
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)PK Parameter: Plasma Concentration of Isatuximab at CtroughC5D1106.08 mcg/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 65.275
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)PK Parameter: Plasma Concentration of Isatuximab at CtroughC6D1111.33 mcg/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 64.985
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)PK Parameter: Plasma Concentration of Isatuximab at CtroughC7D1134.14 mcg/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 60.017
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)PK Parameter: Plasma Concentration of Isatuximab at CtroughC8D1146.15 mcg/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 55.946
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)PK Parameter: Plasma Concentration of Isatuximab at CtroughC9D1162.84 mcg/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 65.193
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)PK Parameter: Plasma Concentration of Isatuximab at CtroughC10D1145.86 mcg/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 60.719
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)PK Parameter: Plasma Concentration of Isatuximab at CtroughC11D1169.39 mcg/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 56.078
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)PK Parameter: Plasma Concentration of Isatuximab at CtroughC12D1182.32 mcg/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 56.814
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)PK Parameter: Plasma Concentration of Isatuximab at CtroughC13D1215.85 mcg/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 54.667
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)PK Parameter: Plasma Concentration of Isatuximab at CtroughC14D1214.88 mcg/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 55.172
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)PK Parameter: Plasma Concentration of Isatuximab at CtroughC15D1253.61 mcg/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 58.885
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)PK Parameter: Plasma Concentration of Isatuximab at CtroughC17D1242.79 mcg/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 45.364
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)PK Parameter: Plasma Concentration of Isatuximab at CtroughC19D1240.36 mcg/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 42.099
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)PK Parameter: Plasma Concentration of Isatuximab at CtroughC20D1164.07 mcg/mL
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)PK Parameter: Plasma Concentration of Isatuximab at CtroughEOT9.51 mcg/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 136.883
Secondary

Progression Free Survival in High Risk Cytogenetic Population

PFS in high risk cytogenetic population was defined as PFS in subgroup of participants carrying high risk cytogenetic changes including del(17p), translocation (t)(4;14) or translocation t(14;16) assessed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). PFS was defined as the time from date of randomization to date of first documentation of PD (determined by IRC) or date of death from any cause, whichever comes first. PD defined as per IMWG criteria as: increase of \>=25% from lowest confirmed value in any one of following criteria: serum M-protein (absolute increase must be \>=0.5 g/dL), serum M-protein increase \>=1 g/dL if lowest M component was \>=5 g/dL; urine M-component (absolute increase must be \>=200 mg/24hour), appearance of new lesion(s), \>=50% increase from nadir in SPD of \>1 lesion, or \>=50% increase in the longest diameter of previous lesion \>1 centimeter (cm) in short axis.

Time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of progression, or the date of death from any cause, or initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment or data cut-off whichever comes first (maximum duration 76.7 weeks)

Population: Analysis was performed in high-risk cytogenetic population which included participants carrying del (17p), t(4;14) or t(14;16) in each arm.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Progression Free Survival in High Risk Cytogenetic Population3.745 months
IPd (Isatuximab + Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Progression Free Survival in High Risk Cytogenetic Population7.491 months
Secondary

Time to Best Response (TTBR) as Per Independent Response Committee

TTBR was defined as the time from randomization to the date of first occurrence of IRC determined BOR (PR or better) that was subsequently confirmed. PR was defined as \>=50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24 hours urinary M-protein by \>=90% or to \<200 mg/24 h. In addition to the above listed criteria, if present at baseline, a \>=50% reduction in the size (SPD) of soft tissue plasmacytomas was also required. BOR was defined as the best sequential response, using the IRC's assessment of response, from the start of treatment until disease progression (provided that the progression is subsequently confirmed in case of progression requiring confirmation), death, initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment, or cut-off date, whichever occurs first.

Time frame: From the date of randomization to date of first occurrence of IRC determined best overall response or data cut-off whichever comes first (maximum duration 76.7 weeks)

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Time to Best Response (TTBR) as Per Independent Response Committee5.06 months
IPd (Isatuximab + Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Time to Best Response (TTBR) as Per Independent Response Committee4.30 months
Secondary

Time to First Response (TT1R) as Per Independent Response Committee

TT1R was defined as the time from randomization to the date of first IRC determined response (PR or better) that is subsequently confirmed. PR was defined as \>=50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24 hours urinary M-protein by \>=90% or to \<200 mg/24 h. In addition to the above listed criteria, if present at baseline, a \>=50% reduction in the size (SPD) of soft tissue plasmacytomas was also required.

Time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of first IRC determined response, or death or data cut-off whichever comes first (maximum duration 76.7 weeks)

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Time to First Response (TT1R) as Per Independent Response Committee3.02 months
IPd (Isatuximab + Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Time to First Response (TT1R) as Per Independent Response Committee1.94 months
Secondary

Time to Progression (TTP) as Per Independent Response Committee

TTP was defined as time from randomization to the date of first documentation of PD, as determined by the IRC. As per IMWG criteria, PD was defined for participants with increase of \>= 25% from lowest confirmed value in any one of the following criteria: serum M-protein (the absolute increase must be \>= 0.5 g/dL), serum M-protein increase \>=1 g/dL if the lowest M component was \>=5 g/dL; urine M-component (the absolute increase must be \>=200 mg/24hour), appearance of new lesion(s), \>=50% increase from nadir in SPD of \>1 lesion, or \>=50% increase in the longest diameter of a previous lesion \>1 centimeter in short axis.

Time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of progression, or initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment or data cut-off whichever comes first (maximum duration 76.7 weeks)

Population: Analysis was performed on ITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Pd (Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Time to Progression (TTP) as Per Independent Response Committee7.75 months
IPd (Isatuximab + Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone)Time to Progression (TTP) as Per Independent Response Committee12.71 months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 3, 2026