Skip to content

The Effect of Random Vibrations on Perception and Balance

The Effects of Random Vibrations on the Vibratory Perception Threshold of the Foot and Standing Balance in People With Diabetic Neuropathy

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02989831
Enrollment
40
Registered
2016-12-12
Start date
2014-04-30
Completion date
2015-10-31
Last updated
2020-03-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetic Neuropathy

Keywords

diabetic neuropathy, foot ulcers, random vibration, vibration perception threshold, mechanical noise

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of vibrating insoles on vibration perception threshold (VPT) and balance of people with diabetic neuropathy.

Detailed description

Rationale: People with diabetes mellitus often suffer from polyneuropathy. Reduced somatosensation of the feet due to polyneuropathy is one of the major risk factors for ulceration at the plantar side of the feet and may often cause problems in balance. It has been shown that the application of a mechanical noise signal to the feet (a vibration with a random frequency) can reduce the sensation threshold and improve standing balance. However, techniques used in research so far have several problems that limit applicability in daily practice. New vibrating insoles have been developed that overcome these problems, but it is unknown if these insoles have the same effects. Study population: Two samples of 20 consecutive patients with diabetes mellitus will be included. Patients will be included if their VPT is between 25 and 45V. Patients with a history of ulceration on MTP, halllux or heel region will be included in the first sample group. In the second sample group patients with no history of ulceration will be included. Patients with an ulceration or (a history of) amputation will be excluded in both groups. Intervention: First, participants will be standing on vibrating insoles placed on a platform for the measurement of VPT. Secondly, participants will be standing on a force platform while wearing standardized shoes in which vibrating insoles are placed. The insoles are either turned on (i.e. random vibrations applied) or off (i.e. no random vibrations applied). Main study parameters: Vibration perception threshold and centre of pressure displacements.

Interventions

DEVICEVibrating insoles 'on'

Duration: 30-60 seconds

Sponsors

University Medical Center Groningen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diabetes mellitus, type I or type II * Aged 18 years or older * Diagnosed with neuropathy * VPT between 25-45V * Understand Dutch or English * Is able to detect the stimulus at full power

Exclusion criteria

* A history of neuropathic conditions other than diabetes mellitus * Problems with the somatosensory or motor system that affect balance or plantar sensation, not related to DM (for example: CVA) * Severe visual problems * Current ulcer * (a history of) amputation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Decrease in Vibration Perception Threshold (VPT) due to vibrating insolesOne minute
Difference in center of pressure displacement (balance) between the two conditions.1 minute

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Difference in mediolateral velocity of the centre of pressure displacement between the two conditions (vibrating insoles 'on' or 'off').1 minute
Difference in anteroposterior velocity of the centre of pressure displacements between the two conditions (insoles 'on' or 'off')1 minute

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026