Skip to content

Comparison of Laser Assisted Epidermal to Intradermal Administration of Seasonal Influenza Vaccine

Safety and Immunogenicity of Laser Assisted Epidermally Administered Seasonal Influenza Vaccine in Comparison to Intradermally Administered Seasonal Influenza Vaccine

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02988739
Enrollment
20
Registered
2016-12-09
Start date
2017-02-22
Completion date
2017-09-30
Last updated
2018-03-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Influenza in Human

Brief summary

It is the aim of the present study to compare the immunogenicity induced by a laser-assisted epidermally administered seasonal influenza vaccine to an intradermally administered seasonal influenza vaccine.

Detailed description

The skin is an attractive tissue for vaccination due to the impact of the cutaneous micro-environment on the adaptive and non-adaptive immune responses. Conventionally many vaccines are administered subcutaneously. Immune-competent cells however are not resident in the subcutaneous fat tissue, but instead are located in the epidermis and the dermis of the skin. Depending on the targeted skin layer and administration method, different immunological outcomes are thus anticipated following vaccination. In the present study, the immunogenicity (in terms of activation of B-cell mediated and T-cell mediated immune responses) of laser-assisted epidermally administered seasonal influenza vaccine will be compared to needle-based intradermal administration of the same seasonal influenza vaccine.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALseasonal influenza vaccine

influenza vaccine containing 15 µg haemagglutinin of three seasonal influenza virus strains recommended by WHO

Fraction laser device to apply micorpores of defined depth and density into skin.

Sponsors

Medical University of Vienna
CollaboratorOTHER
Pantec Biosolutions AG
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 30 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Written informed consent * 18-30 years old (male or female), * Photo type I to IV (according to Fitzpatrick scale), * Subject must be willing and able to comply with study protocol for the duration of the study, * Females of childbearing potential (FCB) must maintain reliable contraception throughout the study.

Exclusion criteria

* Known pregnancy or positive pregnancy test for women of child bearing potential, * Positive screening assessment for human immunodeficiency virus or viral hepatitis (Hepatitis B or Hepatitis C) * Known or suspected immune dysfunction that is caused by a medical condition, or any other cause and that would interfere with the conduct of the study, * Use, within the past 3 months, of any topical or systemic treatment that would interfere with assessment and/or investigational treatment (anti-inflammatory drugs, immune suppressors or any immune modulator agent), * Use of any topical treatment on the injection site within the last four weeks, * Photo type V and VI (according to Fitzpatrick scale), * Skin lesions or excessive hair growth at treatment site, * Any history of seasonal influenza in the past 6 months, * Any seasonal influenza vaccine in the past, * Preexisting HAI antibody titers of \>40 against more than one influenza strain included in the vaccine, * Acute illness or febrile illness (over 37,5°C) within one week prior to enrollment, * Hypersensitivity to elements of the influenza vaccine (e.g. egg), * Administration of any live vaccine (\< 28 days) or inactivated/toxoid vaccine (\< 14 days) or planned vaccination within 3 months after inclusion, * Medical history of skin cancer, * History of Guillain Barre syndrome or brachial neuritis following previous vaccination, * Any history of having blood transfusions or administration with gamma globulin in the past 3 months * Women of childbearing potential not actively practicing birth control or using medically accepted device or therapy, * Subject being judged as inadequate for following the procedures of the trial by investigator, * Participation in another clinical trial (including follow up phase of a previous clinical trial)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Haemagglutination inhibition (HAI)day 1 and day 29HAI against each vaccine virus strain
Frequency of vaccine specific T-cell respondersday 1, day 15 and day 29Number of subjects achieving a T-cell stimulation index of \>3

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Seroconversion rateday 1 and day 29Proportion of subjects achieving at least a four fold HAI titer increase against each vaccine virus strain from day 1 to day 29
Seroprotection rateday 1 and day 29Proportion of subjects achieving a HAI titer of \> 1:40 against each vaccine virus strain at day 29
Geometric Mean fold rise (GMFR) of antibody titersday 1 and day 29GMFR of antibody titers against each vaccine virus strain from day 1 to day 29.
Magnitude of T-cell responseday 1 , day 15 and day 29Magnitude of T-cell response (SI values) against influenza vaccine on day 1, day 15 and day 29.
Frequency and severity of local and systemic adverse events following vaccinationday 1 to day 29

Countries

Austria

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026