Skip to content

Over 2000 Epidural Anesthesias for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy - a Retrospective Analysis

Over 2000 Procedures of Epidural Anesthesia for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy - a Retrospective Analysis

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02986997
Enrollment
2000
Registered
2016-12-08
Start date
2016-12-31
Completion date
2017-09-30
Last updated
2017-04-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anesthesia, Local, Nephrolithiasis

Keywords

epidural anesthesia, prone position, percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Brief summary

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) is a renal lithiasis treatment. It is usually two staged: it begins in the lithotomy position for ureteral catheter placement and retrograde pyelography and, subsequently, an optimal renal access is obtained in the prone position. In most of the centers, the PNL is done under general anesthesia (GA) that is associated with a risk of complications due to putting an intubated, muscle-relaxed, unconscious patient in a prone position. In our Department the procedure is usually performed under epidural anesthesia. The aim of this study was to evaluate the epidural anesthesia performed for PNL over the last decade in the Medical University of Warsaw Urology Department

Detailed description

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy is a renal lithiasis endoscopic treatment. It is usually two staged: it begins in the lithotomy position for ureteral catheter placement and retrograde pyelography and, subsequently, an optimal renal access is obtained in the prone position. The PNL is usually two staged. It begins in the lithotomy position for cystoscopic placement of ureteral catheter and retrograde pyelography and, subsequently, a patient is placed mainly in the prone position for percutaneous access and stone removal. This position offers more options for puncture. In most of the centers, the PNL is done under GA, that is associated with a risk of complications due to putting an intubated, muscle-relaxed, unconscious patient in a prone position. Other complications, including blood transfusion, nausea and vomiting or fever, are more often observed after the general then after the regional anesthesia; the cost of general anesthesia is also higher. The regional anesthesia that can be performed independently for the PNL includes spinal, epidural or combined spinal-epidural blocks. A segmental epidural block is better than spinal anesthesia in terms of hemodynamic stability, postoperative analgesia, patient's satisfaction and reduced incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. For epidural anesthesia it takes longer to act than for spinal one but it allows avoiding the motor block so the patient can change the position from lithotomy into prone himself with a little assistance. The position of a patient should not be changed rapidly right after the spinal anesthesia has been performed, due to the risk of too high anesthesia level and hemodynamic complications. The aim of the study was to evaluate the epidural anesthesia performed for PNL over the last decade in the Medical University of Warsaw Urology Department.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Medical University of Warsaw
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* PNL procedure

Exclusion criteria

* no PNL procedure

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
effectiveness of epidural anesthesia for PNL evaluated by a number of participants having this procedure completed5 monthsThe investigator evaluates whether the procedure could be completely performed under epidural anesthesia

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Epidural anesthesia complication rate evaluated by a number of vessel or spinal puncture5 monthsThe investigator counts all the vessel and spinal punctures done with the Tuohy needle

Countries

Poland

Contacts

Primary ContactKarolina Dobronska, MD
karolinapladzyk@gmail.com48 501323534
Backup ContactLidia I Jureczko, PhD MD
jureczko@gmail.com48 50054419

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026