Skip to content

The International Diabetes Closed Loop (iDCL) Trial: Protocol 1

Clinical Acceptance of the Artificial Pancreas: the International Diabetes Closed Loop (iDCL) Trial: A Randomized Clinical Trial to Assess the Efficacy of Adjunctive Closed Loop Control Versus Sensor-Augmented Pump Therapy in the Management of Type 1 Diabetes

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02985866
Acronym
iDCL
Enrollment
127
Registered
2016-12-07
Start date
2017-10-27
Completion date
2018-09-04
Last updated
2022-12-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Type1 Diabetes Mellitus

Keywords

Artificial Pancreas, Closed Loop Control, Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM), inControl Diabetes Management Platform

Brief summary

The objective of the study is to assess the efficacy and safety of home use of a Control-to-Range (CTR) closed-loop (CL) system.

Detailed description

The protocol is a 3-month parallel group multi-center randomized trial designed to compare Control-to-Range (CTR) closed-loop (CL) with sensor augmented pump therapy (SAP). Approximately 126 subjects will be entered into the randomized trial at approximately seven clinical sites in the United States, such that at least 110 subjects complete the randomized trial. A maximum of 200 subjects may be enrolled in the study in order to achieve the goal of randomizing 126 subjects. In order to have a broad range of glycemic control among the subjects, a study goal will be to have a minimum of 50 subjects with HbA1c ≥ 7.5% and 50 with HbA1c \< 7.5%.

Interventions

Use of CTR at home for 3 months

Use of personal pump with study CGM & glucometer at home for 3 months

Sponsors

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
CollaboratorNIH
Jaeb Center for Health Research
CollaboratorOTHER
TypeZero Technologies
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
DexCom, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Roche Diagnostic Ltd.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Ascensia Diabetes Care
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University of Virginia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
14 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Clinical diagnosis, based on investigator assessment, of type 1 diabetes for at least one year and using insulin for at least 1 year 2. Use of an insulin pump for at least 6 months 3. Age ≥14 years old 4. HbA1c level \<10.5% at screening 5. For females, not currently known to be pregnant 6. Willingness not to add glucose-lowering agents (such as Pramlintide, Metformin, GLP-1 analogs, SGLT2 inhibitors) during the study 7. Willingness, if not assigned to the closed-loop group, to avoid use of any closed-loop control system for the duration of the clinical trial 8. Willingness to suspend use of any personal CGM for the duration of the clinical trial once the unblinded study CGM is in use 9. Willingness to establish network connectivity on at least a weekly basis either via local Wifi network or via a study-provided cellular service 10. Currently using no insulins other than one of the following rapid-acting insulins at the time of enrollment: insulin lispro (Humalog), insulin aspart (Novolog), or insulin glulisine (Apidra) 11. Investigator has confidence that the subject can successfully operate all study devices and is capable of adhering to the protocol 12. For subjects less than 18 years old, living with one or more parent/legal guardian (referred to subsequently as diabetes care partner) committed to participating in study training for emergency procedures for severe hypoglycemia and able to contact the subject in case of an emergency

Exclusion criteria

1. Medical need for chronic acetaminophen 2. Use of any glucose-lowering agent (such as Pramlintide, Metformin, GLP-1 analogs, SGLT2 inhibitors) in the 3 months prior to enrollment 3. Hemophilia or any other bleeding disorder 4. A condition, which in the opinion of the investigator or designee, would put the participant or study at risk including any contraindication to the use of any of the study devices per FDA labeling 5. Participation in another pharmaceutical or device trial at the time of enrollment or during the study 6. Use of a closed-loop system within the last month prior to enrollment 7. Employed by, or having immediate family members employed by TypeZero Technologies, LLC

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time Below 70 mg/dLPost randomization (final 11 weeks)CGM-measured % time below 70 mg/dL - 1st co-primary outcome (superiority)
Time Above 180 mg/dLPost randomization (final 11 weeks)CGM-measured % time above 180 mg/dL - 2nd co-primary outcome (noninferiority)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time in Range 70-180 mg/dLPost randomization (final 11 weeks)CGM-measured % in range 70-180 mg/dL
Time in Range 70-140 mg/dLPost randomization (final 11 weeks)CGM-measured % time in range 70-140 mg/dL
Time Below 60 mg/dLPost randomization (final 11 weeks)CGM-measured % time below 60 mg/dL
Time Above 300 mg/dLPost randomization (final 11 weeks)CGM-measured % time above 300 mg/dL
Coefficient of VariationPost randomization (final 11 weeks)CGM-measured coefficient of variation (CV)
Time Above 250 mg/dLPost randomization (final 11 weeks)CGM-measured % time above 250 mg/dL
Time Below 54 mg/dLPost randomization (final 11 weeks)Percent time CGM readings were below 54 mg/dL

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This parallel-group, multicenter, randomized unblinded clinical trial was conducted at 7 US university centers. Participants were diagnosed with type 1 diabetes, treated with insulin for at least 1 year, using pump therapy for at least 6 months, age 14 and above, & HbA1c \<10.5% (91 mmol/mol). A study goal was to have at least 50 participants with HbA1c\<7.5% (58 mmol/mol) and at least 50 participants with HbA1c \>7.5% (58 mmol/mol). Participants were screened October 2017 - May 2018.

Pre-assignment details

Participants who used a personal Dexcom G4 or G5 CGM pre-study for at least 21 of the prior 28 days proceeded directly to randomization. For these participants, the data downloaded from the personal CGM provided the 2-week baseline data. All others wore a blinded study CGM for 2 weeks to collect baseline data, followed by 2 weeks of training using an unblinded study CGM. Successful completion of the run-in was followed by randomization.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Artificial Pancreas (Closed Loop Control)
Subjects will be provided the Artificial Pancreas (AP) system which includes the inControl Diabetes Management Platform, a study insulin pump, study continuous glucose monitor (CGM), and a study glucometer. This AP system is designed to help control blood sugar in people living with type 1 diabetes. Artificial Pancreas: Use of CTR at home for 3 months
65
Sensor Augmented Therapy
Subjects will continue to use their personal insulin pump with a study continuous glucose monitor (CGM) and study glucometer. Sensor Augmented Therapy: Use of personal pump with study CGM & glucometer at home for 3 months
62
Total127

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyPoor CGM data11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSensor Augmented TherapyArtificial Pancreas (Closed Loop Control)Total
Age, Customized
<21
17 Participants18 Participants35 Participants
Age, Customized
21 to <35
21 Participants19 Participants40 Participants
Age, Customized
35 to <65
21 Participants25 Participants46 Participants
Age, Customized
≥65
3 Participants3 Participants6 Participants
BMI at enrollment (kg/m2)
<18
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
BMI at enrollment (kg/m2)
18 to <25
29 Participants22 Participants51 Participants
BMI at enrollment (kg/m2)
25 to <30
22 Participants23 Participants45 Participants
BMI at enrollment (kg/m2)
≥30
11 Participants18 Participants29 Participants
C-Peptide at randomization (nmol/L): Laboratory
<0.003
45 Participants48 Participants93 Participants
C-Peptide at randomization (nmol/L): Laboratory
0.003 to <0.1
13 Participants9 Participants22 Participants
C-Peptide at randomization (nmol/L): Laboratory
0.1 to <0.5
4 Participants6 Participants10 Participants
C-Peptide at randomization (nmol/L): Laboratory
≥0.5
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Diabetes duration at randomization (years)
10 to <20
29 Participants13 Participants42 Participants
Diabetes duration at randomization (years)
1 to <5
3 Participants10 Participants13 Participants
Diabetes duration at randomization (years)
20 to <30
13 Participants18 Participants31 Participants
Diabetes duration at randomization (years)
30 to <40
9 Participants6 Participants15 Participants
Diabetes duration at randomization (years)
≥40
3 Participants8 Participants11 Participants
Diabetes duration at randomization (years)
5 to <10
5 Participants10 Participants15 Participants
Diabetes ketoacidosis events in the last 12 months
0
61 Participants64 Participants125 Participants
Diabetes ketoacidosis events in the last 12 months
1
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Diabetes ketoacidosis events in the last 12 months
2
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants6 Participants9 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
59 Participants59 Participants118 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
HbA1c at randomization: laboratory
<7.0% (53 mmol/ml)
21 Participants22 Participants43 Participants
HbA1c at randomization: laboratory
7.0% to <7.5% (53 to <58 mmol/mol)
12 Participants11 Participants23 Participants
HbA1c at randomization: laboratory
7.5% to <8.0% (58 to <64 mmol/mol)
15 Participants13 Participants28 Participants
HbA1c at randomization: laboratory
8.0% to ≤10.5% (64 to ≤91 mmol/mol)
14 Participants19 Participants33 Participants
Prior CGM use
Current
44 Participants48 Participants92 Participants
Prior CGM use
In past, but not current
14 Participants16 Participants30 Participants
Prior CGM use
Never
4 Participants1 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants3 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
4 Participants3 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants3 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
55 Participants55 Participants110 Participants
Severe hypoglycemic events in past 12 months
0
58 Participants63 Participants121 Participants
Severe hypoglycemic events in past 12 months
1
4 Participants2 Participants6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
28 Participants32 Participants60 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
34 Participants33 Participants67 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 650 / 62
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 652 / 62
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 650 / 62

Outcome results

Primary

Time Above 180 mg/dL

CGM-measured % time above 180 mg/dL - 2nd co-primary outcome (noninferiority)

Time frame: Post randomization (final 11 weeks)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Artificial Pancreas (Closed Loop Control)Time Above 180 mg/dL34 percentage of total CGM timeStandard Deviation 11
Sensor Augmented TherapyTime Above 180 mg/dL39 percentage of total CGM timeStandard Deviation 15
Comparison: Statistical analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis, and all participants with any amount of post randomization data were included in all analyses.p-value: <0.0001Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Time Below 70 mg/dL

CGM-measured % time below 70 mg/dL - 1st co-primary outcome (superiority)

Time frame: Post randomization (final 11 weeks)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Artificial Pancreas (Closed Loop Control)Time Below 70 mg/dL2.4 percentage of total CGM timeStandard Deviation 1.7
Sensor Augmented TherapyTime Below 70 mg/dL4.0 percentage of total CGM timeStandard Deviation 3.4
Comparison: Statistical analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis, and all participants with any amount of post randomization data were included in all analyses.p-value: <0.0001Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Coefficient of Variation

CGM-measured coefficient of variation (CV)

Time frame: Post randomization (final 11 weeks)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Artificial Pancreas (Closed Loop Control)Coefficient of Variation37 PercentageStandard Deviation 5
Sensor Augmented TherapyCoefficient of Variation38 PercentageStandard Deviation 5
Comparison: Same as for the primary outcomesp-value: <0.05Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Time Above 250 mg/dL

CGM-measured % time above 250 mg/dL

Time frame: Post randomization (final 11 weeks)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Artificial Pancreas (Closed Loop Control)Time Above 250 mg/dL11.2 PercentageStandard Deviation 7.4
Sensor Augmented TherapyTime Above 250 mg/dL13.7 PercentageStandard Deviation 11.4
Comparison: Same as for the primary outcomesp-value: <0.05Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Time Above 300 mg/dL

CGM-measured % time above 300 mg/dL

Time frame: Post randomization (final 11 weeks)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Artificial Pancreas (Closed Loop Control)Time Above 300 mg/dL4.4 PercentageStandard Deviation 4.2
Sensor Augmented TherapyTime Above 300 mg/dL5.7 PercentageStandard Deviation 7.1
Comparison: Same as for the primary outcomesp-value: <0.05Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Time Below 54 mg/dL

Percent time CGM readings were below 54 mg/dL

Time frame: Post randomization (final 11 weeks)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Artificial Pancreas (Closed Loop Control)Time Below 54 mg/dL0.6 PercentageStandard Deviation 0.6
Sensor Augmented TherapyTime Below 54 mg/dL1.1 PercentageStandard Deviation 1.2
Comparison: Same as for the primary outcomesp-value: <0.05Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Time Below 60 mg/dL

CGM-measured % time below 60 mg/dL

Time frame: Post randomization (final 11 weeks)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Artificial Pancreas (Closed Loop Control)Time Below 60 mg/dL1.1 PercentageStandard Deviation 1
Sensor Augmented TherapyTime Below 60 mg/dL1.9 PercentageStandard Deviation 1.9
Comparison: Same as for the primary outcomesp-value: <0.05Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Time in Range 70-140 mg/dL

CGM-measured % time in range 70-140 mg/dL

Time frame: Post randomization (final 11 weeks)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Artificial Pancreas (Closed Loop Control)Time in Range 70-140 mg/dL39 PercentageStandard Deviation 10
Sensor Augmented TherapyTime in Range 70-140 mg/dL35 PercentageStandard Deviation 12
Comparison: Same as for the primary outcomesp-value: <0.05Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Time in Range 70-180 mg/dL

CGM-measured % in range 70-180 mg/dL

Time frame: Post randomization (final 11 weeks)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Artificial Pancreas (Closed Loop Control)Time in Range 70-180 mg/dL64 PercentageStandard Deviation 11
Sensor Augmented TherapyTime in Range 70-180 mg/dL57 PercentageStandard Deviation 14
Comparison: Same as for the primary outcomesp-value: <0.05Mixed Models Analysis

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 19, 2026