Skip to content

Autologous Platelet Rich Plasma on Low Back Pain

Autologous Platelet Rich Plasma in Ultrasound Guided Intervertebral Disk Injection Therapy for Chronic Low Back Pain

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02983747
Enrollment
112
Registered
2016-12-06
Start date
2019-11-01
Completion date
2022-12-30
Last updated
2022-05-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Low Back Pain

Keywords

Platelet Rich Plasma, Intervertebral Disk Injection Therapy, Low Back Pain, Ultrasound Guided, Degenerative Spinal Disease

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection therapy for low back pain patients. Our hypothesis is that PRP will reduce the pain feeling and benefit for restore of the intervertebral disk.

Interventions

OTHERPRP Treatment(P)

Ultrasound(Philips® iU22 ultrasound system) guided intra-disk injection using 2 ml of platelet rich plasma, containing 0.2 ml of calcium chloride(SINE®, SHANGHAI XINYI PHARMACEUTIAL Co . Ltd .) per treatment

DRUGMedication Treatment(Loxoprofen Sodium tablets,M)

Loxoprofen Sodium tablets(LOXONNIN®, DAICHI SANKYO PHARMACEUTIAL (SHANGHAI) Co . Ltd .),P.O., 60mg, three times a day

Sponsors

Shanghai Changzheng Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Chronic low back pain more than 2months * Visual analog scale score more than 4 * Positive X-ray, MRI or CT scan findings * Pfirrmann grading I-III * Well understanding and communication ability

Exclusion criteria

* History of allergy * Hemorrhagic trend or use of anticoagulant therapy * Mental diseases * Active infection or recent infectious diseases within 3 months * Local skin infection near the puncture location * Severe lumbar spinal stenosis, lumbar spondylolisthesis, ossification of posterior longitudinal * Ligament and lumbar disc herniation(more than 5mm) * Immunologic diseases * Tumors * Metastatic disease * Recent surgery less than 3 months) * Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual Analog Scale(VAS)1 yearPain relief evaluated using change from baseline in Visual Analog Scale (VAS):baseline, 1 week ,and 1 month, 2 months, 6 months, 12 months after intervention.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)1 yearPain relief and functions evaluated using change from baseline in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI): baseline, 1 week ,and 1 month, 2 months, 6 months, 12 months after intervention.
Functional Rating Index1 yearSpinal functions evaluated using change from baseline by Functional Rating Index: baseline, 1 week ,and 1 month, 2 months, 6 months, 12 months after intervention.
Measuring the Quality of life using SF-36 questionnaire1 yearFunctions evaluated using change from baseline in SF-36:baseline, 1 week ,and 1 month, 2 months, 6 months, 12 months after intervention.
Imaging change1 yearImaging change by MRI scan: : baseline, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months after intervention.
Number of patients with side effectWithin 1 year after injection therapyRecord how many patients had side effects after intervention (eg.aggravation of pain\*(VAS change increased more than 3 from baseline),anaphylaxis,sensory/motion disturbances).

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactXuhua Lu, M.D.
xuhualu@hotmail.com86-21-81885793
Backup ContactHai-bin Wang, M.D.
wanghb0222@hotmail.com86-21-81885793

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026