Skip to content

Optical Head-Mounted Display Technology for Low Vision Rehabilitation

Optical Head-Mounted Display Technology for Low Vision Rehabilitation

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02983305
Enrollment
22
Registered
2016-12-06
Start date
2017-06-26
Completion date
2018-11-21
Last updated
2019-10-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy, Retinal Dystrophies

Brief summary

The goal of this study is to examine the ability of optical head-mounted display technology to enlarge the visual field of patients with severe visual field loss due to retinal dystrophy and to improve mobility and patient-reported outcomes.

Detailed description

Worldwide it is estimated that 191 million people have moderate to severe visual impairment (MSVI) and an additional 32.4 million are blind. Patients with uncorrectable MSVI may undergo low vision rehabilitation (LVR), which has been shown to improve functional abilities, such as mobility. However, existing LVR strategies do not adequately address severe visual field constriction. In this pilot study, the investigators will test the hypothesis that optical head-mounted display (HMD) technology expands constricted visual fields and improves mobility outcomes for patients with retinal dystrophy. We will use the Moverio HMD platform which is considered a non-significant risk device. Outcomes for patients with retinal dystrophy will be compared to normal age-matched controls.

Interventions

Head-mounted displays (HMD) are a class of technology that are worn on the user's head and project an image either in front of or into the eye.

Sponsors

University of Michigan
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

for subjects with retinal dystrophy: * diagnosis of retinal dystrophy * severe vision loss that constitutes legal blindness * able to perform a reliable Goldmann visual field test * constricted visual field less than or equal to 20 degrees by Goldmann perimetry using the III4e stimulus in at least one eye with best-corrected visual acuity ≥ 20/60 Inclusion criteria for control subjects: * healthy controls * visit history with the Comprehensive and Pediatric Ophthalmology Services at the University of Michigan * able to perform a reliable Goldmann visual field test

Exclusion criteria

for subjects with retinal dystrophy: * movement disorder that precludes evaluation of mobility * functional vision loss * pregnant women

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in the Planimetric Area of Goldmann Visual Field With the Use of Head-mounted Display Technology Compared to Baseline (Measured in Degrees Squared)Baseline and two to four weeksUsing computer software we will calculate the area of participants' Goldmann visual fields in order to obtain a summary quantitative measurement of the extent of peripheral vision. Average of both eyes visual fields with intervention.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Gait Speed Compared to Baseline (Measured in Seconds)Baseline and two to four weeksGait speed will be measured using an inertial measurement unit attached to participants' shoes and will quantify the time taken to move from the beginning to end of a short mobility course. Average of data from both feet with intervention.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Retinal Dystrophy
Subjects with retinal dystrophy will have their visual field, gait and self-reported mobility tested at baseline. Subjects will then be fit with a head-mounted display and undergo a brief training with the investigators to learn about use of the device. After a 2 week period of in-home adaptation to the device, their visual field, gait and self-reported mobility will be retested. Head-Mounted Display: Head-mounted displays (HMD) are a class of technology that are worn on the user's head and project an image either in front of or into the eye.
10
Healthy Age-Matched Controls
Age-matched control subjects without eye disease will have their visual field, gait and self-reported mobility tested at baseline. Control subjects will then be fit with a head-mounted display and undergo a brief training with the investigators to learn about use of the device. After a 2 week period of in-home adaptation to the device, their visual field, gait and self-reported mobility will be retested. Head-Mounted Display: Head-mounted displays (HMD) are a class of technology that are worn on the user's head and project an image either in front of or into the eye.
10
Total20

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall Studyincomplete data20

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRetinal DystrophyHealthy Age-Matched ControlsTotal
Age, Continuous33.5 years33 years33.5 years
Gait Speed1.27 meters per second1.25 meters per second1.26 meters per second
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants5 Participants10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants5 Participants10 Participants
Visual Field Area568.96 degrees^219280.09 degrees^219009.42 degrees^2

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 120 / 10
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 120 / 10
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 120 / 10

Outcome results

Primary

Change in the Planimetric Area of Goldmann Visual Field With the Use of Head-mounted Display Technology Compared to Baseline (Measured in Degrees Squared)

Using computer software we will calculate the area of participants' Goldmann visual fields in order to obtain a summary quantitative measurement of the extent of peripheral vision. Average of both eyes visual fields with intervention.

Time frame: Baseline and two to four weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Retinal DystrophyChange in the Planimetric Area of Goldmann Visual Field With the Use of Head-mounted Display Technology Compared to Baseline (Measured in Degrees Squared)563.08 degrees^2
Healthy Age-Matched ControlsChange in the Planimetric Area of Goldmann Visual Field With the Use of Head-mounted Display Technology Compared to Baseline (Measured in Degrees Squared)-3799.19 degrees^2
Comparison: Test of equivalence of visual field area at baseline.p-value: 0.0001Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Test of equivalence of visual field area under intervention conditions.p-value: 0.0001Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Comparison between study arms of the change in the visual field area (average of both eyes) detected between baseline and intervention.p-value: 0.003Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Change in Gait Speed Compared to Baseline (Measured in Seconds)

Gait speed will be measured using an inertial measurement unit attached to participants' shoes and will quantify the time taken to move from the beginning to end of a short mobility course. Average of data from both feet with intervention.

Time frame: Baseline and two to four weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Retinal DystrophyChange in Gait Speed Compared to Baseline (Measured in Seconds)-.01 meters per second
Healthy Age-Matched ControlsChange in Gait Speed Compared to Baseline (Measured in Seconds)-.01 meters per second
Comparison: Test of equivalence of gait speed at baseline.p-value: 0.38Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Test of equivalence of gait speed under intervention conditions.p-value: 0.27Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Comparison between study arms of the change in the gait speed detected between baseline and intervention.p-value: 0.79Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026