Arthritis
Conditions
Brief summary
The study is designed as a single center, post-market, non-randomized, open-label, observational clinical study with retrospective and prospective enrollment to evaluate the 2-year post implantation survivorship of the PyroTITAN™ HRA device following the implementation of a new proof test to identify and eliminate devices with sub-standard mechanical integrity.
Detailed description
The study is designed as a single center, post-market, non-randomized, open-label, observational clinical study with retrospective and prospective enrollment to evaluate the 2-year post implantation survivorship of the PyroTITAN™ HRA device following the implementation of a new proof test to identify and eliminate devices with sub-standard mechanical integrity. The results will be compared to data collected in a prior study conducted before implementing the new proof test. The PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder prosthesis device configuration will include humeral resurfacing CAP without cement. Patients will be selected retrospectively and prospectively for recruitment into the study based upon the normally accepted criteria for primary shoulder resurfacing arthroplasty. 137 subjects with PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder prosthesis arthroplasties will be implanted and followed for up to 60 months.
Interventions
Humeral Resurfacing
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Patients of either sex will be included, if they: 1. Present (prospective cohort) or presented (retrospective cohort) for primary shoulder surface replacement or arthroplasty with any of the following diagnoses: 1. Osteoarthritis 2. Rheumatoid / Inflammatory Arthritis 3. Post-traumatic arthritis. 4. Focal and large (Hill-Sachs) osteochondral defects. 2. Subject receives (prospective cohort) the PyroTITAN HRA device after the re-release of the product or received (retrospective cohort) the PyroTITAN HRA device after the re- release of the product and is enrolled in the study prior to their two-year follow-up visit. 3. Subject is able to or capable of providing consent to participate in the clinical investigation. 4. Subject agrees to comply with this protocol, including participating in required follow-up visits at the investigations site and completing study questionnaires. 5. Subject is at least 18 years of age and skeletally mature at the time of surgery.
Exclusion criteria
Patients will be excluded from participation if they: 1. Has/had destruction of the proximal humerus to preclude rigid fixation of the humeral component. 2. Has/had insufficient bone quality as determined by intra- operative evaluation. 3. Has/had arthritis with defective rotator cuff. 4. Has/had had a failed rotator cuff surgery. 5. Has/had loss of musculature, neuromuscular compromise or vascular deficiency in the affected limb rendering the procedure unjustified. 6. Has/had evidence of active infection. 7. Present/presented with a condition of neuromuscular compromise of the shoulder (e.g., neuropathic joints or brachioplexus injury with a flail shoulder joint). 8. Are unwilling or unable to comply with a rehabilitation program or would fail to return for the postoperative follow- up visits prescribed by the protocol. 9. Are/were skeletally immature. 10. Has/had a known allergic reaction to PyroCarbon. 11. Has/had other conditions such as central nervous system disturbances, alcohol or drug addiction, etc. that may make effective evaluation of the joint replacement difficult or impossible. 12. Has/had known, active metastatic or neoplastic disease. 13. Are/were taking \> 10mg/day corticosteroids (e.g. prednisone) excluding inhalers, within 3 months prior to surgery. 14. Are/were under 21 years of age or over 75. 15. Require/required glenoid replacement. 16. Retrospective patients cannot be enrolled if they are two year or greater out from the index surgery. 17. Women, who are pregnant or are planning to become pregnant.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Device Survival: Kaplan-Meir Estimate | 2 years | Device survival was defined as the absence of device fracture at the two year time-point. Percentage of participants with survival of the device estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Cumulative Device Success | 2-Years and 5-Years | Device success was defined as the absence of device fracture over time. Cumulative device success was determined by the percentage of participants with no device fractures by the two year & five year time-points. |
| Cumulative Device Survival | 2-Years and 5-Years | Device survival was defined as the absence of device revision over time. Cumulative device survival was determined by the percentage of participants with no device revisions by the two year & five year time-points. |
| Device Functionality: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Score | Baseline, 2-Years and 5-Years | ASES scores range from 0 to 100, with a score of 0 indicating a worse shoulder condition and 100 indicating the best shoulder condition. |
| Device Functionality: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - Pain | Baseline, 2-Years and 5-Years | The VAS Pain score range was from 0 to 100, with 0 representing no pain and 100 representing the worse possible pain. |
| Number of Participants With Device-Related Adverse Events | Post-operatively to 5-Years | Count of participants with device-related Non-Serious & Serious Adverse Events were the event was related to device use (e.g., component breakage) as determined by investigator assessment. |
| Device Functionality: Western Ontario Osteoarthritis Score (WOOS) | Baseline, 2-Years and 5-Years | The WOOS score was based on 19 questions ranging from 0 to 100 with 0 being the best result and 100 being the worst result. A lower score indicated a better outcome. |
| Device Functionality: QuickDASH Outcome Measure | Baseline, 2-Years and 5-Years | The QuickDASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand) score ranged from 0 (no disability) to 100 (most severe disability) based on 11 questions scored 1 to 5 each (for disability/symptoms) and 4 questions scored 1 to 5 each (for performance/sport/work). A lower score indicates a better outcome. |
| Device Functionality: Constant Murley Score (CMS) | Baseline, 2-Years and 5-Years | The Constant Murley Score (CMS) is a 100-point scale composed of individual parameters. The test is divided into four subscales: pain (15 points), activities of daily living (20 points), strength (25 points) and Range of Motion (ROM) (40 points). Subscales are combined to indicate a total CMS score. The total CMS score ranges from 0 to 100 points, with higher scores indicating a better outcome. |
| Device Functionality: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - Satisfaction | Baseline, 2-Years and 5-Years | The VAS Satisfaction score range was from 0 to 100, with 0 representing the worst result and 100 representing the best result. |
Countries
Australia
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Participants were enrolled in the study at one (1) site in Australia and participated between 24 Oct 2016 to 08 Feb 2023.
Pre-assignment details
Overall, 137 participants were enrolled in the study, and fifty-two (52) participants discontinued from the study before completion.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder System Participants implanted with PyroTITAN™ Humeral Resurfacing Arthroplasty (HRA) Shoulder System | 137 |
| Total | 137 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Death | 1 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 3 |
| Overall Study | Participant did not return due to COVID-19 related lockdown | 30 |
| Overall Study | Participant failed to return for follow-up visits | 6 |
| Overall Study | Participant relocation | 1 |
| Overall Study | Participant unwell & cannot travel | 2 |
| Overall Study | Participant withdrew consent | 2 |
| Overall Study | Revision | 7 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder System | — |
|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 57.0 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.7 | — |
| Body Mass Index (BMI) | 30.1 kg/m^2 STANDARD_DEVIATION 5 | — |
| Dominant Side Left | 14 Participants | — |
| Dominant Side Missing | 0 Participants | — |
| Dominant Side Right | 123 Participants | — |
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | — | — Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Australia | 137 participants | — |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 100 Participants | — |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 37 Participants | — |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 1 / 137 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 12 / 137 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 47 / 137 |
Outcome results
Device Survival: Kaplan-Meir Estimate
Device survival was defined as the absence of device fracture at the two year time-point. Percentage of participants with survival of the device estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: 2 years
Population: Participants with data available at the time frame indicated
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder System | Device Survival: Kaplan-Meir Estimate | 98.47 percentage of participants |
Cumulative Device Success
Device success was defined as the absence of device fracture over time. Cumulative device success was determined by the percentage of participants with no device fractures by the two year & five year time-points.
Time frame: 2-Years and 5-Years
Population: Participants with data available at the time frame indicated
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder System | Cumulative Device Success | 5-Years | 97.5 percentage of participants |
| PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder System | Cumulative Device Success | 2-Years | 98.5 percentage of participants |
Cumulative Device Survival
Device survival was defined as the absence of device revision over time. Cumulative device survival was determined by the percentage of participants with no device revisions by the two year & five year time-points.
Time frame: 2-Years and 5-Years
Population: Participants with data available at the time frame indicated
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder System | Cumulative Device Survival | 2-Years | 96.24 percentage of participants |
| PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder System | Cumulative Device Survival | 5-Years | 94.17 percentage of participants |
Device Functionality: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Score
ASES scores range from 0 to 100, with a score of 0 indicating a worse shoulder condition and 100 indicating the best shoulder condition.
Time frame: Baseline, 2-Years and 5-Years
Population: Participants with data available at the time frame indicated
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder System | Device Functionality: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Score | Baseline | 31.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.7 |
| PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder System | Device Functionality: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Score | 2-Years | 83.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.8 |
| PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder System | Device Functionality: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Score | 5-Years | 88.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.5 |
Device Functionality: Constant Murley Score (CMS)
The Constant Murley Score (CMS) is a 100-point scale composed of individual parameters. The test is divided into four subscales: pain (15 points), activities of daily living (20 points), strength (25 points) and Range of Motion (ROM) (40 points). Subscales are combined to indicate a total CMS score. The total CMS score ranges from 0 to 100 points, with higher scores indicating a better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline, 2-Years and 5-Years
Population: Participants with data available at the time frame indicated
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder System | Device Functionality: Constant Murley Score (CMS) | Baseline | 50.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 15 |
| PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder System | Device Functionality: Constant Murley Score (CMS) | 2-Years | 79.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.3 |
| PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder System | Device Functionality: Constant Murley Score (CMS) | 5-Years | 83.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.9 |
Device Functionality: QuickDASH Outcome Measure
The QuickDASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand) score ranged from 0 (no disability) to 100 (most severe disability) based on 11 questions scored 1 to 5 each (for disability/symptoms) and 4 questions scored 1 to 5 each (for performance/sport/work). A lower score indicates a better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline, 2-Years and 5-Years
Population: Participants with data available at the time frame indicated
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder System | Device Functionality: QuickDASH Outcome Measure | Baseline | 49.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 16 |
| PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder System | Device Functionality: QuickDASH Outcome Measure | 2-Years | 15.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.1 |
| PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder System | Device Functionality: QuickDASH Outcome Measure | 5-Years | 14.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 17 |
Device Functionality: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - Pain
The VAS Pain score range was from 0 to 100, with 0 representing no pain and 100 representing the worse possible pain.
Time frame: Baseline, 2-Years and 5-Years
Population: Participants with data available at the time frame indicated
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder System | Device Functionality: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - Pain | Baseline | 66 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 21 |
| PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder System | Device Functionality: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - Pain | 2-Years | 12.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.4 |
| PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder System | Device Functionality: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - Pain | 5-Years | 9.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.9 |
Device Functionality: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - Satisfaction
The VAS Satisfaction score range was from 0 to 100, with 0 representing the worst result and 100 representing the best result.
Time frame: Baseline, 2-Years and 5-Years
Population: Participants with data available at the time frame indicated
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder System | Device Functionality: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - Satisfaction | Baseline | 15.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.5 |
| PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder System | Device Functionality: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - Satisfaction | 2-Years | 89.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.9 |
| PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder System | Device Functionality: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - Satisfaction | 5-Years | 92.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.1 |
Device Functionality: Western Ontario Osteoarthritis Score (WOOS)
The WOOS score was based on 19 questions ranging from 0 to 100 with 0 being the best result and 100 being the worst result. A lower score indicated a better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline, 2-Years and 5-Years
Population: Participants with data available at the time frame indicated
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder System | Device Functionality: Western Ontario Osteoarthritis Score (WOOS) | Baseline | 66.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.1 |
| PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder System | Device Functionality: Western Ontario Osteoarthritis Score (WOOS) | 2-Years | 14.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 89.1 |
| PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder System | Device Functionality: Western Ontario Osteoarthritis Score (WOOS) | 5-Years | 11.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.5 |
Number of Participants With Device-Related Adverse Events
Count of participants with device-related Non-Serious & Serious Adverse Events were the event was related to device use (e.g., component breakage) as determined by investigator assessment.
Time frame: Post-operatively to 5-Years
Population: Participants with data available at the time frame indicated
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder System | Number of Participants With Device-Related Adverse Events | Device-Related Non-Serious Adverse Event | 6 Participants |
| PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder System | Number of Participants With Device-Related Adverse Events | Device-Related Serious Adverse Event | 6 Participants |