Skip to content

PyroTITAN Humeral Resurfacing Arthroplasty (HRA)

A Clinical and Radiological Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the PyroTITAN Humeral Resurfacing Arthroplasty (HRA) Device in a New Cohort of Patients After Product Re-Release

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02983292
Acronym
HRA
Enrollment
137
Registered
2016-12-06
Start date
2016-10-31
Completion date
2023-02-08
Last updated
2024-11-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Arthritis

Brief summary

The study is designed as a single center, post-market, non-randomized, open-label, observational clinical study with retrospective and prospective enrollment to evaluate the 2-year post implantation survivorship of the PyroTITAN™ HRA device following the implementation of a new proof test to identify and eliminate devices with sub-standard mechanical integrity.

Detailed description

The study is designed as a single center, post-market, non-randomized, open-label, observational clinical study with retrospective and prospective enrollment to evaluate the 2-year post implantation survivorship of the PyroTITAN™ HRA device following the implementation of a new proof test to identify and eliminate devices with sub-standard mechanical integrity. The results will be compared to data collected in a prior study conducted before implementing the new proof test. The PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder prosthesis device configuration will include humeral resurfacing CAP without cement. Patients will be selected retrospectively and prospectively for recruitment into the study based upon the normally accepted criteria for primary shoulder resurfacing arthroplasty. 137 subjects with PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder prosthesis arthroplasties will be implanted and followed for up to 60 months.

Interventions

DEVICEPyroTITAN™ HRA

Humeral Resurfacing

Sponsors

Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
OTHER

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patients of either sex will be included, if they: 1. Present (prospective cohort) or presented (retrospective cohort) for primary shoulder surface replacement or arthroplasty with any of the following diagnoses: 1. Osteoarthritis 2. Rheumatoid / Inflammatory Arthritis 3. Post-traumatic arthritis. 4. Focal and large (Hill-Sachs) osteochondral defects. 2. Subject receives (prospective cohort) the PyroTITAN HRA device after the re-release of the product or received (retrospective cohort) the PyroTITAN HRA device after the re- release of the product and is enrolled in the study prior to their two-year follow-up visit. 3. Subject is able to or capable of providing consent to participate in the clinical investigation. 4. Subject agrees to comply with this protocol, including participating in required follow-up visits at the investigations site and completing study questionnaires. 5. Subject is at least 18 years of age and skeletally mature at the time of surgery.

Exclusion criteria

Patients will be excluded from participation if they: 1. Has/had destruction of the proximal humerus to preclude rigid fixation of the humeral component. 2. Has/had insufficient bone quality as determined by intra- operative evaluation. 3. Has/had arthritis with defective rotator cuff. 4. Has/had had a failed rotator cuff surgery. 5. Has/had loss of musculature, neuromuscular compromise or vascular deficiency in the affected limb rendering the procedure unjustified. 6. Has/had evidence of active infection. 7. Present/presented with a condition of neuromuscular compromise of the shoulder (e.g., neuropathic joints or brachioplexus injury with a flail shoulder joint). 8. Are unwilling or unable to comply with a rehabilitation program or would fail to return for the postoperative follow- up visits prescribed by the protocol. 9. Are/were skeletally immature. 10. Has/had a known allergic reaction to PyroCarbon. 11. Has/had other conditions such as central nervous system disturbances, alcohol or drug addiction, etc. that may make effective evaluation of the joint replacement difficult or impossible. 12. Has/had known, active metastatic or neoplastic disease. 13. Are/were taking \> 10mg/day corticosteroids (e.g. prednisone) excluding inhalers, within 3 months prior to surgery. 14. Are/were under 21 years of age or over 75. 15. Require/required glenoid replacement. 16. Retrospective patients cannot be enrolled if they are two year or greater out from the index surgery. 17. Women, who are pregnant or are planning to become pregnant.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Device Survival: Kaplan-Meir Estimate2 yearsDevice survival was defined as the absence of device fracture at the two year time-point. Percentage of participants with survival of the device estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cumulative Device Success2-Years and 5-YearsDevice success was defined as the absence of device fracture over time. Cumulative device success was determined by the percentage of participants with no device fractures by the two year & five year time-points.
Cumulative Device Survival2-Years and 5-YearsDevice survival was defined as the absence of device revision over time. Cumulative device survival was determined by the percentage of participants with no device revisions by the two year & five year time-points.
Device Functionality: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) ScoreBaseline, 2-Years and 5-YearsASES scores range from 0 to 100, with a score of 0 indicating a worse shoulder condition and 100 indicating the best shoulder condition.
Device Functionality: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - PainBaseline, 2-Years and 5-YearsThe VAS Pain score range was from 0 to 100, with 0 representing no pain and 100 representing the worse possible pain.
Number of Participants With Device-Related Adverse EventsPost-operatively to 5-YearsCount of participants with device-related Non-Serious & Serious Adverse Events were the event was related to device use (e.g., component breakage) as determined by investigator assessment.
Device Functionality: Western Ontario Osteoarthritis Score (WOOS)Baseline, 2-Years and 5-YearsThe WOOS score was based on 19 questions ranging from 0 to 100 with 0 being the best result and 100 being the worst result. A lower score indicated a better outcome.
Device Functionality: QuickDASH Outcome MeasureBaseline, 2-Years and 5-YearsThe QuickDASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand) score ranged from 0 (no disability) to 100 (most severe disability) based on 11 questions scored 1 to 5 each (for disability/symptoms) and 4 questions scored 1 to 5 each (for performance/sport/work). A lower score indicates a better outcome.
Device Functionality: Constant Murley Score (CMS)Baseline, 2-Years and 5-YearsThe Constant Murley Score (CMS) is a 100-point scale composed of individual parameters. The test is divided into four subscales: pain (15 points), activities of daily living (20 points), strength (25 points) and Range of Motion (ROM) (40 points). Subscales are combined to indicate a total CMS score. The total CMS score ranges from 0 to 100 points, with higher scores indicating a better outcome.
Device Functionality: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - SatisfactionBaseline, 2-Years and 5-YearsThe VAS Satisfaction score range was from 0 to 100, with 0 representing the worst result and 100 representing the best result.

Countries

Australia

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were enrolled in the study at one (1) site in Australia and participated between 24 Oct 2016 to 08 Feb 2023.

Pre-assignment details

Overall, 137 participants were enrolled in the study, and fifty-two (52) participants discontinued from the study before completion.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder System
Participants implanted with PyroTITAN™ Humeral Resurfacing Arthroplasty (HRA) Shoulder System
137
Total137

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyDeath1
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up3
Overall StudyParticipant did not return due to COVID-19 related lockdown30
Overall StudyParticipant failed to return for follow-up visits6
Overall StudyParticipant relocation1
Overall StudyParticipant unwell & cannot travel2
Overall StudyParticipant withdrew consent2
Overall StudyRevision7

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder System
Age, Continuous57.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.7
Body Mass Index (BMI)30.1 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5
Dominant Side
Left
14 Participants
Dominant Side
Missing
0 Participants
Dominant Side
Right
123 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Region of Enrollment
Australia
137 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
100 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
37 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 137
other
Total, other adverse events
12 / 137
serious
Total, serious adverse events
47 / 137

Outcome results

Primary

Device Survival: Kaplan-Meir Estimate

Device survival was defined as the absence of device fracture at the two year time-point. Percentage of participants with survival of the device estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Participants with data available at the time frame indicated

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder SystemDevice Survival: Kaplan-Meir Estimate98.47 percentage of participants
Secondary

Cumulative Device Success

Device success was defined as the absence of device fracture over time. Cumulative device success was determined by the percentage of participants with no device fractures by the two year & five year time-points.

Time frame: 2-Years and 5-Years

Population: Participants with data available at the time frame indicated

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder SystemCumulative Device Success5-Years97.5 percentage of participants
PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder SystemCumulative Device Success2-Years98.5 percentage of participants
Secondary

Cumulative Device Survival

Device survival was defined as the absence of device revision over time. Cumulative device survival was determined by the percentage of participants with no device revisions by the two year & five year time-points.

Time frame: 2-Years and 5-Years

Population: Participants with data available at the time frame indicated

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder SystemCumulative Device Survival2-Years96.24 percentage of participants
PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder SystemCumulative Device Survival5-Years94.17 percentage of participants
Secondary

Device Functionality: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Score

ASES scores range from 0 to 100, with a score of 0 indicating a worse shoulder condition and 100 indicating the best shoulder condition.

Time frame: Baseline, 2-Years and 5-Years

Population: Participants with data available at the time frame indicated

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder SystemDevice Functionality: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) ScoreBaseline31.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.7
PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder SystemDevice Functionality: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Score2-Years83.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.8
PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder SystemDevice Functionality: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Score5-Years88.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.5
Secondary

Device Functionality: Constant Murley Score (CMS)

The Constant Murley Score (CMS) is a 100-point scale composed of individual parameters. The test is divided into four subscales: pain (15 points), activities of daily living (20 points), strength (25 points) and Range of Motion (ROM) (40 points). Subscales are combined to indicate a total CMS score. The total CMS score ranges from 0 to 100 points, with higher scores indicating a better outcome.

Time frame: Baseline, 2-Years and 5-Years

Population: Participants with data available at the time frame indicated

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder SystemDevice Functionality: Constant Murley Score (CMS)Baseline50.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15
PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder SystemDevice Functionality: Constant Murley Score (CMS)2-Years79.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.3
PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder SystemDevice Functionality: Constant Murley Score (CMS)5-Years83.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.9
Secondary

Device Functionality: QuickDASH Outcome Measure

The QuickDASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand) score ranged from 0 (no disability) to 100 (most severe disability) based on 11 questions scored 1 to 5 each (for disability/symptoms) and 4 questions scored 1 to 5 each (for performance/sport/work). A lower score indicates a better outcome.

Time frame: Baseline, 2-Years and 5-Years

Population: Participants with data available at the time frame indicated

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder SystemDevice Functionality: QuickDASH Outcome MeasureBaseline49.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16
PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder SystemDevice Functionality: QuickDASH Outcome Measure2-Years15.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.1
PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder SystemDevice Functionality: QuickDASH Outcome Measure5-Years14.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17
Secondary

Device Functionality: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - Pain

The VAS Pain score range was from 0 to 100, with 0 representing no pain and 100 representing the worse possible pain.

Time frame: Baseline, 2-Years and 5-Years

Population: Participants with data available at the time frame indicated

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder SystemDevice Functionality: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - PainBaseline66 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21
PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder SystemDevice Functionality: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - Pain2-Years12.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.4
PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder SystemDevice Functionality: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - Pain5-Years9.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.9
Secondary

Device Functionality: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - Satisfaction

The VAS Satisfaction score range was from 0 to 100, with 0 representing the worst result and 100 representing the best result.

Time frame: Baseline, 2-Years and 5-Years

Population: Participants with data available at the time frame indicated

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder SystemDevice Functionality: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - SatisfactionBaseline15.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.5
PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder SystemDevice Functionality: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - Satisfaction2-Years89.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.9
PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder SystemDevice Functionality: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - Satisfaction5-Years92.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.1
Secondary

Device Functionality: Western Ontario Osteoarthritis Score (WOOS)

The WOOS score was based on 19 questions ranging from 0 to 100 with 0 being the best result and 100 being the worst result. A lower score indicated a better outcome.

Time frame: Baseline, 2-Years and 5-Years

Population: Participants with data available at the time frame indicated

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder SystemDevice Functionality: Western Ontario Osteoarthritis Score (WOOS)Baseline66.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.1
PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder SystemDevice Functionality: Western Ontario Osteoarthritis Score (WOOS)2-Years14.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 89.1
PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder SystemDevice Functionality: Western Ontario Osteoarthritis Score (WOOS)5-Years11.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.5
Secondary

Number of Participants With Device-Related Adverse Events

Count of participants with device-related Non-Serious & Serious Adverse Events were the event was related to device use (e.g., component breakage) as determined by investigator assessment.

Time frame: Post-operatively to 5-Years

Population: Participants with data available at the time frame indicated

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder SystemNumber of Participants With Device-Related Adverse EventsDevice-Related Non-Serious Adverse Event6 Participants
PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder SystemNumber of Participants With Device-Related Adverse EventsDevice-Related Serious Adverse Event6 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026