Skip to content

Bioactive Glass and Platelet Rich Fibrin in Intrabony Defects

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF BIOACTIVE GLASS PUTTY AND PLATELET RICH FIBRIN IN THE TREATMENT OF HUMAN PERIODONTAL INTRABONY DEFECTS- A CLINICAL AND RADIOGRAPHICAL STUDY

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02982681
Enrollment
10
Registered
2016-12-05
Start date
2015-04-30
Completion date
2016-08-31
Last updated
2016-12-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Periodontal Diseases, Bone Resorption

Keywords

Periodontal disease, Platelet rich fibrin

Brief summary

Background: Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) and bioactive glass putty has been shown to be effective in promoting reduction in probing depth, gain in clinical attachment, and defect fill in intrabony periodontal defects. The individual role played by bioactive glass putty in combination with PRF is yet to be elucidated. AIM: To compare the clinical effectiveness of the combination of Plaltelet Rich Fibrin and Bioactive Glass Putty and Bioactive glass putty regenerative techniques for intrabony defects in humans. Material and methods: Ten pairs of intrabony defects were surgically treated with PRF and Bioactive glass putty (Test group) on one side or bioactive glass putty (Control group) on other side. The primary outcomes of the study included changes in probing depth, attachment level and bone fill of Osseous defect. The clinical parameters were recorded at baseline, 3, 6, and 9 months. Radiographic assessment was done using standardized intra oral periapical radiographs. Comparisions were made within each group between baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 9 months using the ANOVA test followed by Bonferroni test.

Detailed description

INTRODUCTION Periodontitis is an infectious disease that causes destruction of the attachment apparatus.\[1\].The mainstay aim of periodontal treatment is the regeneration of the lost attachment apparatus of the teeth. Variety of treatment modalities are available for periodontal regenerative therapy including bone grafts, bone substitutes, Guided Tissue Regeneration, growth factors, application of tissue engineering or the combination of two or more of the above listed approaches. \[2\] Alloplasts, may be an effective alternative to allograft and xenografts as there is no risk of disease transmission and the supply is unlimited.\[3\] The Bioactive glass promotes osteogenesis by adsorption and concentrations of protein utilized by osteoblast to form a mineralized extracellular matrix. \[4\] The advantage of the putty form of bioactive glass is the glycerine and polyethylene glycol which makes the glass particle coherent and thus enhancing handling characteristics and minimal migration of graft particles from the defect site. \[5\] Histological evaluation of material has shown that the particulate tends to retard the down growth of epithelial tissue. \[6,7,8,9\] Growth factors play a pivotal role in periodontal regeneration. Platelet Rich Fibrin is believed to release polypeptide growth factors, such as transforming growth factors-ß, platelet derived growth factors, vascular endothelial growth factors and matrix glycoproteins (such as thrombospondin -1) into the surgical wound in a sustained fashion for at least 7 days as shown in vitro. \[10\] Thus, given the unique graft with osteoconductive, osteoinductive and osteostimulative properties and properties of autologous PRF, application of combination approach was attempted for the assessment of their additional benefits to the healing mechanisms and periodontal regeneration in intrabony defects. Materials and methods Patient Selection This randomized control trial was carried out in the Department of Periodontics and Oral Implantology, Santosh Dental College and Hospital, Santosh University, Ghaziabad. Ten patients suffering chronic localized periodontitis aged between 20 -50 years (7 males and 3 females) with 10 pairs of contalateral intraosseous defects (n=20) comprised the study population. A total of 20 bone defects (10 pairs) were decided by the statisticion to be of statistical strength. Convenient sampling design was used for the enrolment of study patients. Ethical approval was taken from the institutional ethical committee The patients were explained in detail about the procedure and a written informed consent was taken. The intrabony defects were diagnosed clinically with moderate to deep periodontal pockets \> or = 5mm and with clinical and radiographic evidence of vertical/angular osseous defects. \[3\] Patients with systemic diseases, on anticoagulants, those with habit of smoking and alcohol, with known history of allergy to graft material and who have undergone periodontal surgical treatment for chronic periodontitis within twelve months for the same defects were excluded from the study. PRESURGICAL THERAPY Patients underwent phase I therapy. The selected defects were evaluated after 2 weeks, and persistent pockets \> or = 5mm and patients with clinical radiographic evidence of angular osseous defects were scheduled for surgery. Clinical Parameters : Oral hygiene status was recorded using the gingival index of Loe & Sillness,\[11\]; with score 0 indicating absence of inflammation and score 3 indicating severe inflammation and plaque index of Silness & Loe. \[12\] Probing pocket depth and Clinical attachment level were recorded at baseline on the day of surgery, 3, 6 and 9 months intervals using UNC-15 probe and customized acrylic occlusal stents grooved in the area of defect to provide reproducible insertion axis- The following measurements were recorded with customized acrylic stent: * Fixed reference point (FRP) to the base of pocket (BP) * Fixed reference point (FRP) to the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) * Fixed reference point (FRP) to the gingival margin (GM) PPD and CAL were calculated from these probing measurements as: * PPD = (FRP to BP) - (FRP to GM) * CAL= (FRP to BP) - (FRP to CEJ) Radiographic measurements: Standardized intra-oral periapical radiographs of the defects were taken using a paralleling technique.\[13\] Amount of defect fill: Defects were measured from the fixed reference point (distance between the cemento-enamel junction to the radiographic base of the bone defect ) with the help of 1.1 mm grid and the following radiographic features were recorded on the day of surgery, 3, 6 and 9 months intervals.

Interventions

DRUGPlatelet rich fibrin

In the test site the graft was then carefully compacted from the base of the defect coronally. PRF membrane was placed in the test site

The control site were packed with the bioactive glass graft alone

Sponsors

Santosh University
CollaboratorOTHER
Dr. D. Y. Patil Dental College & Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* The intrabony defects were diagnosed clinically with moderate to deep periodontal pockets \> or = 5mm and with clinical and radiographic evidence of vertical/angular osseous defects.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with systemic diseases, on anticoagulants, those with habit of smoking and alcohol, with known history of allergy to graft material and who have undergone periodontal surgical treatment for chronic periodontitis within twelve months for the same defects were excluded from the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intrabony defect fillbaseline to 9 monthschange in intrabony defect fill from baseline to 9 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Probing depthbaseline to 9 monthschange in probing depth from baseline to 9 months
Clinical attachment levelbaseline to 9 monthschange in Clinical attachment level from baseline to 9 months
Gingival Indexbaseline to 9 monthschange in Gingival Index from baseline to 9 months

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026