Lumbar Plexus Blockade
Conditions
Keywords
Ultrasound-guided lumbar plexus blockade, Shamrock technique, Paramedian transverse scan, USG LPB, USGRA
Brief summary
The primary objective of this study was to compare ultrasound visibility of the lumbar plexus at the intertransverse space between paramedian transverse scan and shamrock technique. Moreover obtaining a clear image of relevant structures is imperative. Thus, the secondary objective was to assess ultrasound visibility of each relevant structure and overall visibility between these two methods.
Detailed description
Background: Ultrasound-guided lumbar plexus block (USG LPB) is regarded as a form of advanced ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia (USGRA). One of the key challenges of USG LPB is visualization of the lumbar plexus. That are currently in use for ultrasound-guided lumbar plexus blockade - paramedian transverse scan (PMTS) and shamrock technique. Method: Twenty-three healthy adult volunteers aged ≥ 18 years were enrolled in this prospective cohort study. Ultrasound visualization results were compared between methods.
Interventions
PROCEDUREshamrock
This scanning technique is performed in the lateral decubitus position with the side of interest facing upwards. The transducer is placed in the transverse plane on the flank of the patient cranially to the iliac crest. The quadratus lumborum muscle is identified medial to the aponeurosis of the transversus abdominis muscle. With the psoas muscle anterior to the transverse process, the erector spinae muscle posterior to the transverse process, and the quadratus lumborum muscle attached to the apex of the transverse process of L4.
PROCEDUREparamedian transverse scan
The ultrasound transducer is positioned 4 cm lateral to the midline along the intercristal line and just above the iliac crest. The transducer is also directed slightly medially.
Sponsors
Mahidol University
Study design
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* healthy volunteer, age \>/= 18
Exclusion criteria
* spinal deformity and history of previous back or spine surgery
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Video (VDO) loops visualization of lumbar plexus | 1 month | Percentage of Video (VDO) loops visualization of lumbar plexus comparing between two techniques |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Ultrasound visibility score of each relevant structures | 1 month | 10 structures: Erector spinae muscle, Quadratus lumborum muscle, Psoas muscle, Vertebral body, Inferior vena cava, Articular process of the lumbar vertebra, Lumbar paravertebral space, lumbar nerve root, Lumbar plexus nerve, Psoas compartment Using 4-point Likert scale (0, not visible; 1, hardly visible; 2, well visible; 3, very well visible) |
| Overall ultrasound visibility score of 10 structures | 1 month | Sum of ultrasound visibility score of 10 relevant structures: Erector spinae muscle, Quadratus lumborum muscle, Psoas muscle, Vertebral body, Inferior vena cava, Articular process of the lumbar vertebra, Lumbar paravertebral space, lumbar nerve root, Lumbar plexus nerve, Psoas compartment |
Countries
Thailand
Outcome results
None listed