Skip to content

TRI-REPAIR: TrIcuspid Regurgitation RePAIr With CaRdioband Transcatheter System

TRI-REPAIR: TrIcuspid Regurgitation RePAIr With CaRdioband Transcatheter System

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02981953
Acronym
TRI-REPAIR
Enrollment
40
Registered
2016-12-05
Start date
2016-10-31
Completion date
2019-11-12
Last updated
2021-06-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiac Valve Annuloplasty, Cardiovascular Diseases, Heart Diseases, Heart Valve Diseases, Tricuspid Regurgitation, Tricuspid Valve Insufficiency, Tricuspid Valve Regurgitation

Keywords

Valtech Cardio, Cardioband, Tricuspid

Brief summary

The current management of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is either conservative (by medication) or by surgery, usually in concomitant with other valves repair or replacement. TR can worsen or appear late after successful mitral valve surgery which portends a poor prognosis. However, standard surgical approaches requiring cardiopulmonary bypass and especially second surgery have an excessive risks. Thus many patients are denied surgery because of unfavorable risk-benefit balance. Therefore there is a need for novel devices enabling interventional cardiologists and cardiothoracic surgeons to perform tricuspid annuloplasty by transcatheter methods. Cardioband replicates established surgical techniques (e.g., annuloplasty) using transfemoral approach, without sutures and with adjusted on the beating heart. Similar to the approved indication for mitral annuloplasty. The Cardioband System is expected to allow for treatment of patients that would otherwise not undergo Tricuspid valve repair due to the invasiveness of current techniques.

Detailed description

The Cardioband Transcatheter System (Cardioband) is a marketed system that was approved for treatment of secondary (functional) mitral regurgitation (FMR) (CE granted on September 2015). The Cardioband is an annuloplasty band that is similar to a surgical annuloplasty, however deployed on the beating heart through a transvenous approach. The CE mark study with 30 subjects has been completed and documented significant reduction of severity of MR and improvement in quality of life by Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire (MLHFQ), New York Heart Association (NYHA) and 6- minute walk test (6MWT), in subjects with moderate to severe MR. The aim of the current study is to evaluate the Cardioband annuloplasty system for repair the Tricuspid Regurgitation.

Interventions

DEVICECardioband Tricuspid

The Cardioband Adjustable implant is delivered and anchored to the tricuspid valve annulus by a transfemoral delivery system. The Cardioband TR will be deployed and adjusted under trans-esophageal and fluoroscopy guidance.

Sponsors

Edwards Lifesciences
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Chronic functional tricuspid regurgitation (FTR) with annular diameter ≥ 40 mm with valve Systolic pulmonary pressure (sPAP) ≤ 60mmHg 2. ≥18 years old 3. New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class II-IVa 4. Symptomatic despite Guideline Directed Medical Therapy (GDMT); at minimum patient on diuretic regimen 5. LVEF ≥ 30% 6. Patient is willing and able to comply with all specified study evaluations 7. The Local Site Heart Team concur that surgery will not be offered as a treatment option 8. Transfemoral access of the Cardioband is determined to be feasible

Exclusion criteria

1. Aortic, mitral and/or pulmonic valve stenosis and/or regurgitation ≥ moderate 2. Severe uncontrolled hypertension (Systolic BP ≥ 180 mmHg and/or Diastolic BP ≥ 110 mm Hg) 3. Previous tricuspid valve repair or replacement 4. Trans-tricuspid pacemaker or defibrillator leads suggesting impingement of the of the tricuspid valve leaflets, as evaluated by echocardiography 5. Active endocarditis 6. MI or known unstable angina within the 30 days prior to the index procedure 7. Any percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or transcatheter valvular intervention within 30 days prior to the index 8. Hemodynamic instability or on IV inotropes 9. Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA) within the past 6 months 10. Subject is on chronic dialysis 11. Anemia (Hb \< 9 g/dL) not corrected by transfusion 12. Bleeding disorders or hypercoaguable state 13. Active peptic ulcer or active gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding 14. Contraindication to anticoagulants 15. Known allergy to stainless steel, nickel, and/or polyester 16. Pregnant or lactating; or female of childbearing potential with a positive pregnancy test 24 hours before any study-related radiation exposure 17. In the judgment of the Investigator, co-morbid condition(s) that could limit the subject's ability to participate in the study, including compliance with follow-up requirements, or that could impact the scientific integrity of the study 18. Life expectancy of less than 12 months 19. Impaired judgment and/or is undergoing emergency treatment 20. Currently participating in another investigational drug or device study that has not completed the primary endpoint or that clinically interferes with the endpoints of this study 21. intra-cardiac masses, thrombi or vegetations 22. Patients with cardiac cachexia 23. Subjects in whom transesophageal echocardiography is contraindicated 24. . Known hypersensitivity or contraindication to procedural medications which cannot be adequately managed medically 25. Untreated clinically significant CAD requiring revascularization 26. Echocardiographic evidence of severe right ventricular dysfunction 27. Any coronary or endovascular surgery, within 3 months prior to procedure

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Major Serious Adverse Events (MSAEs) and Serious Adverse Device Effects (SADE)30 daysOverall rate of Major Serious Adverse Events (MSAEs)\* and serious adverse device effects (SADE)
Access, Deployment and Positioning of the Cardioband DeviceIntra-procedureSuccessful access, deployment and positioning of the Cardioband device

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Tricuspid Regurgitation [Full Analysis Data Set]1, 6, 12, and 24 months over baselineAll data available at each time point was reported as number of patients with TR grades between Trace, Mild, Moderate, Severe. Data analysis per core lab.
Effective Regurgitant Orifice Area (EROA) [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]1, 6, 12, and 24 months over baselineEffective regurgitant orifice area (EROA) at 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months over baseline. Data analysis per core lab
Effective Regurgitant Orifice Area (EROA) [Full Analysis Data Set]1, 6, 12, and 24 months over baselineAll data available for Effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA) at 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months over baseline. Data analysis per core lab.
Regurgitant Volume [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]1, 6, 12, and 24 months over baselineRegurgitant Volume (by Echocardiography) data available at 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months over baseline. Data analysis per core lab.
Regurgitant Volume [Full Analysis Data Set]1, 6, 12, and 24 months over baselineAll data for Regurgitant Volume (by Echocardiography) at 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months over baseline. Data analysis per core lab.
TAPSE [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]1, 6, 12, and 24 months over baselineTricuspid Annular Plane Systolic Excursion at 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months over baseline. Data analysis per core lab.
TAPSE [Full Analysis Data Set]1, 6, 12, and 24 months over baselineAll data for Tricuspid Annular Plane Systolic Excursion at 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months over baseline. Data analyses based on core lab assessment.
NYHA [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]1, 6, 12, and 24 months over baselineNYHA classification data available at 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months over baseline. Measure Description: NYHA Classification - The stages of heart failure: 1. Class I - No symptoms and no limitation in ordinary physical activity 2. Class II - Mild symptoms and slight limitation during ordinary activity. 3. Class III - Marked limitation in activity due to symptoms, even during less-than-ordinary activity. Comfortable only at rest. 4. Class IV - Severe limitations. Experiences symptoms even while at rest.
NYHA [Full Analysis Data Set]1, 6, 12, and 24 months over baselineAll data available for NYHA classification at 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months over baseline. Measure Description: NYHA Classification - The stages of heart failure: 1. Class I - No symptoms and no limitation in ordinary physical activity 2. Class II - Mild symptoms and slight limitation during ordinary activity. 3. Class III - Marked limitation in activity due to symptoms, even during less-than-ordinary activity. Comfortable only at rest. 4. Class IV - Severe limitations. Experiences symptoms even while at rest.
6MWT [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]1, 6, 12, and 24 months over baselineDistance in meters walked during 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT) at 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months over baseline.
6MWT [Full Analysis Data Set]1, 6, 12, and 24 months over baselineDistance in meters walked during 6 minute walk test (6MWT) at 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months over baseline.
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy (KCCQ) [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]1, 6, 12, and 24 months over baselineThe Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12) is a self-administered, 12-item questionnaire that quantifies physical limitations, symptoms, self-sufficiency, social interaction and quality of life. Scores range from 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status. An increase in the KCCQ-12 score reflects an improvement in symptoms for the subject. A mean difference over time of 5 points on the KCCQ-12 summary score reflects a clinically significant change in heart failure status.
Technical Success1, 6, 12, and 24 monthsSuccessful access, deployment and positioning of the Cardioband device and septolateral reduction.
Left Ventricle Ejection Fraction (LVEF) [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]1, 6, 12, and 24 months over baselineLeft ventricle ejection fraction data available for 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months over baseline. Data analysis based on core lab assessment.
Left Ventricle Ejection Fraction (LVEF) [Full Analysis Data Set]1, 6, 12, and 24 months over baselineAll available data for left ventricle ejection fraction at 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months over baseline. Data analysis per echo core lab.
Left Ventricle End Diastolic Volume Index (LVEDVI) [Full Analysis Data Set]1, 6, 12, and 24 months over baselineLeft ventricle end diastolic volume index data available for 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months over baseline.
Left Ventricle End Systolic Volume Index (LVESVI) [Full Analysis Data Set]1, 6, 12, and 24 months over baselineLeft ventricle end systolic volume index data available at 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months over baseline.
NT-pro BNP [Full Analysis Data Set]1, 6, 12, and 24 months over baselineN-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide data available at 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months over baseline.
Diuretic Therapy1, 6, 12, and 24 months over baselineDiuretic Therapy data available at 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months over baseline.
Bilirubin [Full Analysis Data Set]1, 6, 12, and 24 months over baselineBilirubin data available at 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months over baseline.
Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN), Serum Creatinine [Full Analysis Data Set]1, 6, 12, and 24 months over baselineAll available data for Blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and Serum Creatinine at 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months over baseline.
Activity by Wearable Device1, 6, 12, and 24 months over baselineActivity by wearable device available data at 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months over baseline.
Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (GOT) Aspartate Transaminase (AST) [Full Analysis Data Set]1, 6, 12, and 24 months over baselineAll data available for Glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (GOT) and Aspartate Transaminase (AST) at 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months over baseline.
Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (GPT) Alanine Transaminase (ALT) [Full Analysis Data Set]1, 6, 12, and 24 months over baselineAll data available for glutamic pyruvic transaminase (GPT) Alanine Transaminase (ALT) at 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months.
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy (KCCQ) [Full Analysis Data Set]1, 6, 12, and 24 months over baselineThe Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12) is a self-administered, 12-item questionnaire that quantifies physical limitations, symptoms, self-sufficiency, social interaction and quality of life. Scores range from 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status. An increase in the KCCQ-12 score reflects an improvement in symptoms for the subject. A mean difference over time of 5 points on the KCCQ-12 summary score reflects a clinically significant change in heart failure status.
Tricuspid Regurgitation [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]1, 6, 12, and 24 months over baselineData available at each time point was reported as number of patients with TR grades between Trace, Mild, Moderate, and Severe. Data analysis per core lab.

Countries

France, Germany, Italy

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cardioband Tricuspid Procedure
Tricuspid valve repair with Cardioband implanted via transcatheter procedure under transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and fluoroscopy guidance Cardioband Tricuspid: The Cardioband Adjustable implant is delivered and anchored to the tricuspid valve annulus by a transfemoral delivery system. The Cardioband TR will be deployed and adjusted under trans-esophageal and fluoroscopy guidance.
40
Total40

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyDeath9
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1
Overall StudyWithdrawal to non-compliance1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCardioband Tricuspid Procedure
Active Malignancy0 Participants
Age, Continuous76.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.6
Angina Pectoris0 Participants
Any Cardiac Device with Electrodes
CRT-D Implant
1 Participants
Any Cardiac Device with Electrodes
CRT Implant
0 Participants
Any Cardiac Device with Electrodes
Dual Chamber Pacemaker Implant
3 Participants
Any Cardiac Device with Electrodes
ICD Implant
2 Participants
Any Cardiac Device with Electrodes
Single Chamber Pacemaker Implant
1 Participants
Any Cardiac Device without Electrodes
LAA Closure
2 Participants
Any Cardiac Device without Electrodes
Parachute Implant
0 Participants
Any Cardiac Device without Electrodes
PFO Closure
1 Participants
Aortic Valve
Moderate Regurgitation
0 Participants
Aortic Valve
Moderate Stenosis
0 Participants
Aortic Valve
None
40 Participants
Aortic Valve
Severe Regurgitation
0 Participants
Aortic Valve
Severe Stenosis
0 Participants
Atrial Flutter/Fibrillation
Chronic
12 Participants
Atrial Flutter/Fibrillation
None
3 Participants
Atrial Flutter/Fibrillation
Paroxysmal
5 Participants
Atrial Flutter/Fibrillation
Persistant
20 Participants
CABG
Double
3 Participants
CABG
Single
3 Participants
CABG
Triple/Quadruple/Quintuple
2 Participants
Calculated BMI25.0 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.9
Carotid Intervention0 Participants
Carotid Surgery1 Participants
Chronic Anemia5 Participants
Chronic Liver Disease
Moderate
0 Participants
Chronic Liver Disease
None/Mild
40 Participants
Chronic Liver Disease
Severe
0 Participants
Chronic Lung Disease (Moderate to Severe)11 Participants
Chronic Renal Disease22 Participants
Congestive Heart Failure25 Participants
Coronary Artery Disease17 Participants
Diabetes10 Participants
Dyslipidemia22 Participants
Elevated Pulmonary Pressure (> 35mmHG)19 Participants
Estimated Glomerular Filtration (eGFR)46.3 mL/min/1.73m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.6
EUROSCORE II4.4 Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.9
Flutter/Fibrillation Ablation8 Participants
Frailty Score
Apparently Vulnerable (4)
6 Participants
Frailty Score
Mildly Frail (5)/Moderately Frail (6)
20 Participants
Frailty Score
Severely Frail (7)
0 Participants
Frailty Score
Very Fit (1)
0 Participants
Frailty Score
Well (2)/Well with Treated Comorbid Disease (3)
14 Participants
FTR Etiology
Ischemic
7 Participants
FTR Etiology
Non-ischemic
33 Participants
History of Endocarditis1 Participants
History of Smoking
Current
3 Participants
History of Smoking
None
26 Participants
History of Smoking
Past
11 Participants
Left Ventricle Ejection Franction (LVEF) %56.9 Percent Fraction
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2
Mitral Valve
Moderate Regurgitation
0 Participants
Mitral Valve
Moderate Stenosis
0 Participants
Mitral Valve
None
40 Participants
Mitral Valve
Severe Regurgitation
0 Participants
Mitral Valve
Severe Stenosis
0 Participants
NYHA Class
II
6 Participants
NYHA Class
III
32 Participants
NYHA Class
IV
2 Participants
NYHA Class Grouped
I/II
6 Participants
NYHA Class Grouped
III/IV
34 Participants
Ongoing Inotropic Support0 Participants
Other Relevant Medical Conditions32 Participants
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention8 Participants
Percutaneous Transcatheter Valve Replace/Repair other than Tricuspid
Mitraclip
4 Participants
Percutaneous Transcatheter Valve Replace/Repair other than Tricuspid
Other
0 Participants
Percutaneous Transcatheter Valve Replace/Repair other than Tricuspid
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
0 Participants
Peripheral Vascular Disease7 Participants
Peripheral Vascular Intervention0 Participants
Previous MI2 Participants
Prior Stroke4 Participants
Prior Transient Ischemic Attack2 Participants
Pulmonary Pressure36.5 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.5
Pulmonic Valve
Moderate Regurgitation
0 Participants
Pulmonic Valve
Moderate Stenosis
0 Participants
Pulmonic Valve
None
40 Participants
Pulmonic Valve
Severe Regurgitation
0 Participants
Pulmonic Valve
Severe Stenosis
0 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
29 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
11 Participants
STS Score2.8 Percentage of expected mortality
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.5
Systemic Hypertension33 Participants
Thyreosis
Hyperthyreosis
0 Participants
Thyreosis
Hypothyreosis
12 Participants
Valve Surgery
Aortic Valve
1 Participants
Valve Surgery
Mitral and Aortic Valve
1 Participants
Valve Surgery
Mitral Valve
4 Participants
Valve Surgery
Other
0 Participants
Ventricular Tachyarrhthmia
None
38 Participants
Ventricular Tachyarrhthmia
Non-sustained
0 Participants
Ventricular Tachyarrhthmia
Sustained
1 Participants
Ventricular Tachyarrhthmia
VF
1 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
9 / 40
other
Total, other adverse events
34 / 40
serious
Total, serious adverse events
33 / 40

Outcome results

Primary

Access, Deployment and Positioning of the Cardioband Device

Successful access, deployment and positioning of the Cardioband device

Time frame: Intra-procedure

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureAccess, Deployment and Positioning of the Cardioband Device39 Participants
Primary

Major Serious Adverse Events (MSAEs) and Serious Adverse Device Effects (SADE)

Overall rate of Major Serious Adverse Events (MSAEs)\* and serious adverse device effects (SADE)

Time frame: 30 days

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureMajor Serious Adverse Events (MSAEs) and Serious Adverse Device Effects (SADE)MSAE3 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureMajor Serious Adverse Events (MSAEs) and Serious Adverse Device Effects (SADE)SADE1 Participants
Secondary

6MWT [Full Analysis Data Set]

Distance in meters walked during 6 minute walk test (6MWT) at 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months over baseline.

Time frame: 1, 6, 12, and 24 months over baseline

Population: The outcome is reported where data is available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cardioband Tricuspid Procedure6MWT [Full Analysis Data Set]Baseline221.9 MetersStandard Deviation 113
Cardioband Tricuspid Procedure6MWT [Full Analysis Data Set]1 Month289.4 MetersStandard Deviation 118.7
Cardioband Tricuspid Procedure6MWT [Full Analysis Data Set]6 Months279.2 MetersStandard Deviation 130.6
Cardioband Tricuspid Procedure6MWT [Full Analysis Data Set]12 Months273.6 MetersStandard Deviation 133.4
Cardioband Tricuspid Procedure6MWT [Full Analysis Data Set]24 Months288.2 MetersStandard Deviation 120.2
Secondary

6MWT [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]

Distance in meters walked during 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT) at 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months over baseline.

Time frame: 1, 6, 12, and 24 months over baseline

Population: The data is presented as paired data for patients that have baseline data and data for each individual follow up time point. The number of patients with paired data between baseline and 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months is 29, 28, 25, and 17 respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cardioband Tricuspid Procedure6MWT [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]Baseline (1 Month)232.0 MetersStandard Deviation 117.5
Cardioband Tricuspid Procedure6MWT [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]1 Month289.4 MetersStandard Deviation 118.7
Cardioband Tricuspid Procedure6MWT [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]Baseline (6 Months)236.1 MetersStandard Deviation 107.8
Cardioband Tricuspid Procedure6MWT [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]6 Months280.6 MetersStandard Deviation 132.8
Cardioband Tricuspid Procedure6MWT [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]Baseline (12 Months)222.2 MetersStandard Deviation 104.7
Cardioband Tricuspid Procedure6MWT [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]12 Months273.6 MetersStandard Deviation 133.4
Cardioband Tricuspid Procedure6MWT [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]Baseline (24 Months)211.6 MetersStandard Deviation 124.9
Cardioband Tricuspid Procedure6MWT [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]24 Months294.3 MetersStandard Deviation 121
Secondary

Activity by Wearable Device

Activity by wearable device available data at 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months over baseline.

Time frame: 1, 6, 12, and 24 months over baseline

Population: Data was not collected.

Secondary

Bilirubin [Full Analysis Data Set]

Bilirubin data available at 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months over baseline.

Time frame: 1, 6, 12, and 24 months over baseline

Population: The outcome is reported where data is available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureBilirubin [Full Analysis Data Set]Bilirubin Baseline15.7 umol/LStandard Deviation 17.5
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureBilirubin [Full Analysis Data Set]Bilirubin 1 Month14.0 umol/LStandard Deviation 13.4
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureBilirubin [Full Analysis Data Set]Bilirubin 6 Months13.0 umol/LStandard Deviation 5.8
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureBilirubin [Full Analysis Data Set]Bilirubin 12 Months11.6 umol/LStandard Deviation 7.9
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureBilirubin [Full Analysis Data Set]Bilirubin 24 Months7.4 umol/LStandard Deviation 6
Secondary

Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN), Serum Creatinine [Full Analysis Data Set]

All available data for Blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and Serum Creatinine at 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months over baseline.

Time frame: 1, 6, 12, and 24 months over baseline

Population: The outcome is reported where data is available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureBlood Urea Nitrogen (BUN), Serum Creatinine [Full Analysis Data Set]Baseline52.8 mg/dLStandard Deviation 30.3
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureBlood Urea Nitrogen (BUN), Serum Creatinine [Full Analysis Data Set]1 Month52.1 mg/dLStandard Deviation 36
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureBlood Urea Nitrogen (BUN), Serum Creatinine [Full Analysis Data Set]6 Months64.2 mg/dLStandard Deviation 55.1
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureBlood Urea Nitrogen (BUN), Serum Creatinine [Full Analysis Data Set]12 Months49.5 mg/dLStandard Deviation 34.5
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureBlood Urea Nitrogen (BUN), Serum Creatinine [Full Analysis Data Set]24 Months50.5 mg/dLStandard Deviation 55.7
Secondary

Diuretic Therapy

Diuretic Therapy data available at 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months over baseline.

Time frame: 1, 6, 12, and 24 months over baseline

Population: Data was not collected.

Secondary

Effective Regurgitant Orifice Area (EROA) [Full Analysis Data Set]

All data available for Effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA) at 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months over baseline. Data analysis per core lab.

Time frame: 1, 6, 12, and 24 months over baseline

Population: The outcome is reported where data is available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureEffective Regurgitant Orifice Area (EROA) [Full Analysis Data Set]Baseline0.8 cm^2Standard Deviation 0.5
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureEffective Regurgitant Orifice Area (EROA) [Full Analysis Data Set]1 Month0.6 cm^2Standard Deviation 0.6
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureEffective Regurgitant Orifice Area (EROA) [Full Analysis Data Set]6 Months0.4 cm^2Standard Deviation 0.3
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureEffective Regurgitant Orifice Area (EROA) [Full Analysis Data Set]12 Months0.4 cm^2Standard Deviation 0.2
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureEffective Regurgitant Orifice Area (EROA) [Full Analysis Data Set]24 Months0.3 cm^2Standard Deviation 0.2
Secondary

Effective Regurgitant Orifice Area (EROA) [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]

Effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA) at 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months over baseline. Data analysis per core lab

Time frame: 1, 6, 12, and 24 months over baseline

Population: The data is presented as paired data for patients that have baseline data and data for each individual follow up time point. The number of patients with paired data between baseline and 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months is 28, 21, 18, and 12 respectively. The outcome is reported where data is available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureEffective Regurgitant Orifice Area (EROA) [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]Baseline (1 Month)0.8 cm^2Standard Deviation 0.5
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureEffective Regurgitant Orifice Area (EROA) [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]1 Month0.6 cm^2Standard Deviation 0.6
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureEffective Regurgitant Orifice Area (EROA) [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]Baseline (6 Months)0.8 cm^2Standard Deviation 0.5
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureEffective Regurgitant Orifice Area (EROA) [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]6 Months0.4 cm^2Standard Deviation 0.3
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureEffective Regurgitant Orifice Area (EROA) [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]Baseline (12 Months)0.8 cm^2Standard Deviation 0.5
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureEffective Regurgitant Orifice Area (EROA) [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]12 Months0.4 cm^2Standard Deviation 0.2
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureEffective Regurgitant Orifice Area (EROA) [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]Baseline (24 Months)0.3 cm^2Standard Deviation 0.2
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureEffective Regurgitant Orifice Area (EROA) [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]24 Months-0.6 cm^2Standard Deviation 0.4
Secondary

Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (GOT) Aspartate Transaminase (AST) [Full Analysis Data Set]

All data available for Glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (GOT) and Aspartate Transaminase (AST) at 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months over baseline.

Time frame: 1, 6, 12, and 24 months over baseline

Population: The outcome is reported where data is available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureGlutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (GOT) Aspartate Transaminase (AST) [Full Analysis Data Set]Baseline28.3 U/LStandard Deviation 9.5
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureGlutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (GOT) Aspartate Transaminase (AST) [Full Analysis Data Set]1 Month31.9 U/LStandard Deviation 18.3
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureGlutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (GOT) Aspartate Transaminase (AST) [Full Analysis Data Set]6 Months30.9 U/LStandard Deviation 21.3
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureGlutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (GOT) Aspartate Transaminase (AST) [Full Analysis Data Set]12 Months32.3 U/LStandard Deviation 10.9
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureGlutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (GOT) Aspartate Transaminase (AST) [Full Analysis Data Set]24 Months27.6 U/LStandard Deviation 9.6
Secondary

Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (GPT) Alanine Transaminase (ALT) [Full Analysis Data Set]

All data available for glutamic pyruvic transaminase (GPT) Alanine Transaminase (ALT) at 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months.

Time frame: 1, 6, 12, and 24 months over baseline

Population: The outcome is reported where data is available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureGlutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (GPT) Alanine Transaminase (ALT) [Full Analysis Data Set]Baseline21.9 IU/LStandard Deviation 14
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureGlutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (GPT) Alanine Transaminase (ALT) [Full Analysis Data Set]1 Month25.1 IU/LStandard Deviation 23.8
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureGlutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (GPT) Alanine Transaminase (ALT) [Full Analysis Data Set]6 Months23.4 IU/LStandard Deviation 18.4
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureGlutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (GPT) Alanine Transaminase (ALT) [Full Analysis Data Set]12 Months24.6 IU/LStandard Deviation 12.2
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureGlutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (GPT) Alanine Transaminase (ALT) [Full Analysis Data Set]24 Months18.6 IU/LStandard Deviation 10.2
Secondary

Kansas City Cardiomyopathy (KCCQ) [Full Analysis Data Set]

The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12) is a self-administered, 12-item questionnaire that quantifies physical limitations, symptoms, self-sufficiency, social interaction and quality of life. Scores range from 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status. An increase in the KCCQ-12 score reflects an improvement in symptoms for the subject. A mean difference over time of 5 points on the KCCQ-12 summary score reflects a clinically significant change in heart failure status.

Time frame: 1, 6, 12, and 24 months over baseline

Population: The outcome is reported where data is available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureKansas City Cardiomyopathy (KCCQ) [Full Analysis Data Set]Baseline43.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.9
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureKansas City Cardiomyopathy (KCCQ) [Full Analysis Data Set]1 Month56.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureKansas City Cardiomyopathy (KCCQ) [Full Analysis Data Set]6 Months63.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.8
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureKansas City Cardiomyopathy (KCCQ) [Full Analysis Data Set]12 Months59.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.7
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureKansas City Cardiomyopathy (KCCQ) [Full Analysis Data Set]24 Months58.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.3
Secondary

Kansas City Cardiomyopathy (KCCQ) [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]

The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12) is a self-administered, 12-item questionnaire that quantifies physical limitations, symptoms, self-sufficiency, social interaction and quality of life. Scores range from 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status. An increase in the KCCQ-12 score reflects an improvement in symptoms for the subject. A mean difference over time of 5 points on the KCCQ-12 summary score reflects a clinically significant change in heart failure status.

Time frame: 1, 6, 12, and 24 months over baseline

Population: The data is presented as paired data for patients that have baseline data and data for each individual follow up time point. The number of patients with paired data between baseline and 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months is 37, 35, 31, and 28 respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureKansas City Cardiomyopathy (KCCQ) [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]Baseline (1 Month)44.4 ScoreStandard Deviation 21.8
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureKansas City Cardiomyopathy (KCCQ) [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]1 Month56.7 ScoreStandard Deviation 24
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureKansas City Cardiomyopathy (KCCQ) [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]Baseline (6 Months)44.6 ScoreStandard Deviation 21.1
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureKansas City Cardiomyopathy (KCCQ) [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]Baseline (12 Months)43.3 ScoreStandard Deviation 21.6
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureKansas City Cardiomyopathy (KCCQ) [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]12 Months59.6 ScoreStandard Deviation 22.7
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureKansas City Cardiomyopathy (KCCQ) [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]Baseline (24 Months)47.0 ScoreStandard Deviation 20.9
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureKansas City Cardiomyopathy (KCCQ) [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]24 Months58.0 ScoreStandard Deviation 24.3
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureKansas City Cardiomyopathy (KCCQ) [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]6 Months63.6 ScoreStandard Deviation 23.8
Secondary

Left Ventricle Ejection Fraction (LVEF) [Full Analysis Data Set]

All available data for left ventricle ejection fraction at 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months over baseline. Data analysis per echo core lab.

Time frame: 1, 6, 12, and 24 months over baseline

Population: The outcome is reported where data is available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureLeft Ventricle Ejection Fraction (LVEF) [Full Analysis Data Set]Baseline56.9 percent fractionStandard Deviation 10.2
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureLeft Ventricle Ejection Fraction (LVEF) [Full Analysis Data Set]1 Month57.0 percent fractionStandard Deviation 8.3
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureLeft Ventricle Ejection Fraction (LVEF) [Full Analysis Data Set]6 Months57.8 percent fractionStandard Deviation 7.1
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureLeft Ventricle Ejection Fraction (LVEF) [Full Analysis Data Set]12 Months59.0 percent fractionStandard Deviation 6.3
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureLeft Ventricle Ejection Fraction (LVEF) [Full Analysis Data Set]24 Months56.9 percent fractionStandard Deviation 6.5
Secondary

Left Ventricle Ejection Fraction (LVEF) [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]

Left ventricle ejection fraction data available for 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months over baseline. Data analysis based on core lab assessment.

Time frame: 1, 6, 12, and 24 months over baseline

Population: The data is presented as paired data for patients that have baseline data and data for each individual follow up time point. The number of patients with paired data between baseline and 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months is 31, 30, 25, and 19 respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureLeft Ventricle Ejection Fraction (LVEF) [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]Baseline (1 Month)56.7 percent fractionStandard Deviation 10
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureLeft Ventricle Ejection Fraction (LVEF) [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]1 Month57.0 percent fractionStandard Deviation 8.4
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureLeft Ventricle Ejection Fraction (LVEF) [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]Baseline (6 Months)56.2 percent fractionStandard Deviation 10
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureLeft Ventricle Ejection Fraction (LVEF) [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]6 Months57.4 percent fractionStandard Deviation 7.1
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureLeft Ventricle Ejection Fraction (LVEF) [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]Baseline (12 Months)56.6 percent fractionStandard Deviation 10.1
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureLeft Ventricle Ejection Fraction (LVEF) [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]12 Months58.8 percent fractionStandard Deviation 6.5
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureLeft Ventricle Ejection Fraction (LVEF) [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]Baseline (24 Months)57.8 percent fractionStandard Deviation 8.8
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureLeft Ventricle Ejection Fraction (LVEF) [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]24 Months56.6 percent fractionStandard Deviation 6.6
Secondary

Left Ventricle End Diastolic Volume Index (LVEDVI) [Full Analysis Data Set]

Left ventricle end diastolic volume index data available for 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months over baseline.

Time frame: 1, 6, 12, and 24 months over baseline

Population: Data was not collected.

Secondary

Left Ventricle End Systolic Volume Index (LVESVI) [Full Analysis Data Set]

Left ventricle end systolic volume index data available at 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months over baseline.

Time frame: 1, 6, 12, and 24 months over baseline

Population: Data was not collected.

Secondary

NT-pro BNP [Full Analysis Data Set]

N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide data available at 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months over baseline.

Time frame: 1, 6, 12, and 24 months over baseline

Population: The outcome is reported where data is available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureNT-pro BNP [Full Analysis Data Set]Baseline2899.3 ng/LStandard Deviation 2632.5
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureNT-pro BNP [Full Analysis Data Set]1 Month2874.5 ng/LStandard Deviation 2860.5
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureNT-pro BNP [Full Analysis Data Set]6 Months2563.1 ng/LStandard Deviation 2510.2
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureNT-pro BNP [Full Analysis Data Set]12 Months2095.5 ng/LStandard Deviation 2306.4
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureNT-pro BNP [Full Analysis Data Set]24 Months2119.1 ng/LStandard Deviation 2461.3
Secondary

NYHA [Full Analysis Data Set]

All data available for NYHA classification at 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months over baseline. Measure Description: NYHA Classification - The stages of heart failure: 1. Class I - No symptoms and no limitation in ordinary physical activity 2. Class II - Mild symptoms and slight limitation during ordinary activity. 3. Class III - Marked limitation in activity due to symptoms, even during less-than-ordinary activity. Comfortable only at rest. 4. Class IV - Severe limitations. Experiences symptoms even while at rest.

Time frame: 1, 6, 12, and 24 months over baseline

Population: The outcome is reported where data is available.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureNYHA [Full Analysis Data Set]12 MonthsIV1 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureNYHA [Full Analysis Data Set]24 MonthsI6 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureNYHA [Full Analysis Data Set]12 MonthsII12 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureNYHA [Full Analysis Data Set]12 MonthsIII7 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureNYHA [Full Analysis Data Set]BaselineI0 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureNYHA [Full Analysis Data Set]BaselineII6 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureNYHA [Full Analysis Data Set]BaselineIII32 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureNYHA [Full Analysis Data Set]BaselineIV2 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureNYHA [Full Analysis Data Set]1 MonthI5 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureNYHA [Full Analysis Data Set]1 MonthII22 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureNYHA [Full Analysis Data Set]1 MonthIII10 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureNYHA [Full Analysis Data Set]1 MonthIV0 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureNYHA [Full Analysis Data Set]6 MonthsI8 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureNYHA [Full Analysis Data Set]6 MonthsII19 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureNYHA [Full Analysis Data Set]6 MonthsIII8 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureNYHA [Full Analysis Data Set]6 MonthsIV0 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureNYHA [Full Analysis Data Set]12 MonthsI10 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureNYHA [Full Analysis Data Set]24 MonthsII12 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureNYHA [Full Analysis Data Set]24 MonthsIII7 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureNYHA [Full Analysis Data Set]24 MonthsIV0 Participants
Secondary

NYHA [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]

NYHA classification data available at 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months over baseline. Measure Description: NYHA Classification - The stages of heart failure: 1. Class I - No symptoms and no limitation in ordinary physical activity 2. Class II - Mild symptoms and slight limitation during ordinary activity. 3. Class III - Marked limitation in activity due to symptoms, even during less-than-ordinary activity. Comfortable only at rest. 4. Class IV - Severe limitations. Experiences symptoms even while at rest.

Time frame: 1, 6, 12, and 24 months over baseline

Population: The data is presented as paired data for patients that have baseline data and data for each individual follow up time point. The number of patients with paired data between baseline, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months is 37, 35, 30, and 25 respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureNYHA [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]Baseline (1 Month)I0 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureNYHA [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]Baseline (1 Month)II6 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureNYHA [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]Baseline (1 Month)III30 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureNYHA [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]Baseline (1 Month)IV1 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureNYHA [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]1 MonthI5 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureNYHA [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]1 MonthII22 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureNYHA [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]1 MonthIII10 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureNYHA [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]1 MonthIV0 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureNYHA [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]Baseline (6 Months)I0 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureNYHA [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]Baseline (6 Months)II6 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureNYHA [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]Baseline (6 Months)III28 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureNYHA [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]Baseline (6 Months)IV1 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureNYHA [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]6 MonthsI8 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureNYHA [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]6 MonthsIII8 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureNYHA [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]6 MonthsIV0 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureNYHA [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]Baseline (12 Months)I0 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureNYHA [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]Baseline (12 Months)II6 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureNYHA [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]Baseline (12 Months)III23 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureNYHA [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]Baseline (12 Months)IV1 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureNYHA [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]12 MonthsI10 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureNYHA [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]12 MonthsII12 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureNYHA [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]12 MonthsIII7 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureNYHA [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]12 MonthsIV1 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureNYHA [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]Baseline (24 Months)I0 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureNYHA [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]Baseline (24 Months)II5 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureNYHA [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]Baseline (24 Months)III20 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureNYHA [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]Baseline (24 Months)IV0 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureNYHA [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]24 MonthsI6 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureNYHA [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]24 MonthsII12 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureNYHA [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]24 MonthsIII7 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureNYHA [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]24 MonthsIV0 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureNYHA [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]6 MonthsII19 Participants
Secondary

Regurgitant Volume [Full Analysis Data Set]

All data for Regurgitant Volume (by Echocardiography) at 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months over baseline. Data analysis per core lab.

Time frame: 1, 6, 12, and 24 months over baseline

Population: The outcome is reported where data is available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureRegurgitant Volume [Full Analysis Data Set]Baseline104.4 mlStandard Deviation 37
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureRegurgitant Volume [Full Analysis Data Set]1 Month86.7 mlStandard Deviation 51.7
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureRegurgitant Volume [Full Analysis Data Set]6 Months78.4 mlStandard Deviation 43.2
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureRegurgitant Volume [Full Analysis Data Set]12 Months79.4 mlStandard Deviation 35.4
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureRegurgitant Volume [Full Analysis Data Set]24 Months56.7 mlStandard Deviation 37.3
Secondary

Regurgitant Volume [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]

Regurgitant Volume (by Echocardiography) data available at 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months over baseline. Data analysis per core lab.

Time frame: 1, 6, 12, and 24 months over baseline

Population: The data is presented as paired data for patients that have baseline data and data for each individual follow up time point. The number of patients with paired data between baseline and 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months is 11, 12, 3, and 4 respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureRegurgitant Volume [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]Baseline (1 Month)97.1 mlStandard Deviation 35.6
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureRegurgitant Volume [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]1 Month70.7 mlStandard Deviation 50.5
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureRegurgitant Volume [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]Baseline (6 Months)104.2 mlStandard Deviation 33.5
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureRegurgitant Volume [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]6 Months76.9 mlStandard Deviation 51.5
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureRegurgitant Volume [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]Baseline (12 Months)76.5 mlStandard Deviation 32.2
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureRegurgitant Volume [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]12 Months51.2 mlStandard Deviation 16.9
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureRegurgitant Volume [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]Baseline (24 Months)98.1 mlStandard Deviation 41.5
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureRegurgitant Volume [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]24 Months47.2 mlStandard Deviation 35.3
Secondary

TAPSE [Full Analysis Data Set]

All data for Tricuspid Annular Plane Systolic Excursion at 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months over baseline. Data analyses based on core lab assessment.

Time frame: 1, 6, 12, and 24 months over baseline

Population: The outcome is reported where data is available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureTAPSE [Full Analysis Data Set]Baseline1.5 cmStandard Deviation 0.3
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureTAPSE [Full Analysis Data Set]30 Days1.4 cmStandard Deviation 0.4
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureTAPSE [Full Analysis Data Set]6 Months1.4 cmStandard Deviation 0.4
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureTAPSE [Full Analysis Data Set]12 Months1.3 cmStandard Deviation 0.3
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureTAPSE [Full Analysis Data Set]24 Months1.4 cmStandard Deviation 0.4
Secondary

TAPSE [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]

Tricuspid Annular Plane Systolic Excursion at 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months over baseline. Data analysis per core lab.

Time frame: 1, 6, 12, and 24 months over baseline

Population: The data is presented as paired data for patients that have baseline data and data for each individual follow up time point. The number of patients with paired data between baseline, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months is 28, 26, 24, and 17 respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureTAPSE [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]Baseline (30 Days)1.4 cmStandard Deviation 0.4
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureTAPSE [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]30 Days1.3 cmStandard Deviation 0.4
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureTAPSE [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]Baseline (6 Months)1.4 cmStandard Deviation 0.4
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureTAPSE [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]6 Months1.4 cmStandard Deviation 0.3
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureTAPSE [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]Baseline (12 Months)1.4 cmStandard Deviation 0.3
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureTAPSE [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]12 Months1.3 cmStandard Deviation 0.3
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureTAPSE [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]Baseline (24 Months)1.4 cmStandard Deviation 0.4
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureTAPSE [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]24 Months1.3 cmStandard Deviation 0.4
Secondary

Technical Success

Successful access, deployment and positioning of the Cardioband device and septolateral reduction.

Time frame: 1, 6, 12, and 24 months

Population: Data was not collected

Secondary

Tricuspid Regurgitation [Full Analysis Data Set]

All data available at each time point was reported as number of patients with TR grades between Trace, Mild, Moderate, Severe. Data analysis per core lab.

Time frame: 1, 6, 12, and 24 months over baseline

Population: The outcome is reported where data is available.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureTricuspid Regurgitation [Full Analysis Data Set]BaselineNone0 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureTricuspid Regurgitation [Full Analysis Data Set]BaselineMild0 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureTricuspid Regurgitation [Full Analysis Data Set]BaselineModerate0 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureTricuspid Regurgitation [Full Analysis Data Set]BaselineSevere40 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureTricuspid Regurgitation [Full Analysis Data Set]1 MonthNone0 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureTricuspid Regurgitation [Full Analysis Data Set]1 MonthMild5 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureTricuspid Regurgitation [Full Analysis Data Set]1 MonthModerate11 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureTricuspid Regurgitation [Full Analysis Data Set]1 MonthSevere21 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureTricuspid Regurgitation [Full Analysis Data Set]6 MonthsNone0 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureTricuspid Regurgitation [Full Analysis Data Set]6 MonthsMild3 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureTricuspid Regurgitation [Full Analysis Data Set]6 MonthsModerate10 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureTricuspid Regurgitation [Full Analysis Data Set]6 MonthsSevere20 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureTricuspid Regurgitation [Full Analysis Data Set]12 MonthsNone0 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureTricuspid Regurgitation [Full Analysis Data Set]12 MonthsMild2 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureTricuspid Regurgitation [Full Analysis Data Set]12 MonthsModerate9 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureTricuspid Regurgitation [Full Analysis Data Set]12 MonthsSevere16 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureTricuspid Regurgitation [Full Analysis Data Set]24 MonthsNone0 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureTricuspid Regurgitation [Full Analysis Data Set]24 MonthsMild8 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureTricuspid Regurgitation [Full Analysis Data Set]24 MonthsModerate7 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureTricuspid Regurgitation [Full Analysis Data Set]24 MonthsSevere5 Participants
Secondary

Tricuspid Regurgitation [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]

Data available at each time point was reported as number of patients with TR grades between Trace, Mild, Moderate, and Severe. Data analysis per core lab.

Time frame: 1, 6, 12, and 24 months over baseline

Population: The data is presented as paired data for patients that have baseline data and data for each individual follow up time point. The number of patients with paired data between baseline, 1 month, 30 days, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months is 37, 33, 37, and 20 respectively. The outcome is reported where data is available.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureTricuspid Regurgitation [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]Baseline (6 Months)Severe33 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureTricuspid Regurgitation [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]Baseline (1 Month)None0 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureTricuspid Regurgitation [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]Baseline (1 Month)Mild0 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureTricuspid Regurgitation [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]Baseline (1 Month)Moderate0 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureTricuspid Regurgitation [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]Baseline (1 Month)Severe37 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureTricuspid Regurgitation [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]1 MonthNone0 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureTricuspid Regurgitation [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]1 MonthMild5 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureTricuspid Regurgitation [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]1 MonthModerate11 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureTricuspid Regurgitation [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]1 MonthSevere21 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureTricuspid Regurgitation [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]Baseline (6 Months)None0 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureTricuspid Regurgitation [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]Baseline (6 Months)Mild0 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureTricuspid Regurgitation [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]Baseline (6 Months)Moderate0 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureTricuspid Regurgitation [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]6 MonthsNone0 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureTricuspid Regurgitation [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]6 MonthsMild3 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureTricuspid Regurgitation [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]6 MonthsModerate10 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureTricuspid Regurgitation [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]6 MonthsSevere20 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureTricuspid Regurgitation [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]Baseline (12 Months)None0 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureTricuspid Regurgitation [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]Baseline (12 Months)Mild0 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureTricuspid Regurgitation [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]Baseline (12 Months)Moderate0 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureTricuspid Regurgitation [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]Baseline (12 Months)Severe27 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureTricuspid Regurgitation [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]12 MonthsNone0 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureTricuspid Regurgitation [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]12 MonthsMild2 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureTricuspid Regurgitation [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]12 MonthsModerate9 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureTricuspid Regurgitation [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]12 MonthsSevere16 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureTricuspid Regurgitation [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]Baseline (24 Months)None0 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureTricuspid Regurgitation [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]Baseline (24 Months)Mild0 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureTricuspid Regurgitation [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]Baseline (24 Months)Moderate0 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureTricuspid Regurgitation [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]Baseline (24 Months)Severe20 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureTricuspid Regurgitation [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]24 MonthsNone0 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureTricuspid Regurgitation [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]24 MonthsMild8 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureTricuspid Regurgitation [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]24 MonthsModerate7 Participants
Cardioband Tricuspid ProcedureTricuspid Regurgitation [Paired Baseline and Follow-Up]24 MonthsSevere5 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 3, 2026