Skip to content

Safety and Effectiveness of BM-MSC vs AT-MSC in the Treatment of SCI Patients.

Comparative Evaluation of Safety and Effectiveness of Autologous Bone Marrow Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells (BM-MSC) vs Adipose Tissue Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells (AT-MSC) in the Treatment of Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Patient.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02981576
Enrollment
14
Registered
2016-12-05
Start date
2016-11-30
Completion date
2019-01-20
Last updated
2019-09-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Spinal Cord Injuries

Keywords

Spinal Cord Injury, Mesenchymal Stem Cells

Brief summary

Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) is a devastating condition that leads to permanent functional and neurological deficits in injured individuals. The limited ability of the Central Nervous System (CNS) to spontaneously regenerate impairs axonal regeneration and functional recovery of the spinal cord. The leading causes are motor-vehicle crashes, sports-associated accidents, falls, and violence-related injuries. Unfortunately, there is still no effective clinical treatment for SCI. In recent years, tissue engineering and regenerative medicine based approaches have been proposed as alternatives for SCI repair/regeneration. Mesnchymal stem cells (MSC) use in SCI showed promising results in several studies. Our aim is to assess and compare the safety and effectiveness of autologous BM-MSC vs autologous AT-MSC in these patients.

Detailed description

The study will be conducted at Cell Therapy Center (CTC) in Jordan, where 14 SCI patients meeting the inclusion criteria will be recruited and blindly divided into 2 groups of equal numbers. The first groups will be treated with autologous BM-MSC, while the second group will be treated with autologous AT-MSC. The outcomes and improvements will be assessed using the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (AIS). Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) will be performed at base line and after 12 months of the stem cell transplantation.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALAutologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells

Autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells will be collected from patients, prepared in the lab and then injected intrathecally.

Sponsors

University of Jordan
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Complete spinal cord injury grade AIS-A or -B, or incomplete C * At least 2 weeks since time of injury * Cognitively unaffected * Motivated for stem cell transplantation

Exclusion criteria

* Reduced cognition * Age under 18 years of above 70 years * Significant osteoporosis in spine and/or joints * Pregnancy (Adequate contraceptive use is required for women in fertile age) * Anoxic brain injury * Neurodegenerative diseases * Evidence of meningitis * Positive serology for Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), Hepatitis B Virus (HBV), Hepatitis C Virus (HCV), or Syphilis. * Medical Complications that contraindicate surgery, including major respiratory complications. * Use of metal implants close to vascular structures (such as cardiac pacemaker or prosthesis) that contraindicate Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). * Other medical conditions which can interfere with stem cell transplantation * Inability to provide informed consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparing the number of side effects and the improvement on ASIA Impairment score between SCI patients receiving autologous AT-MSC vs BM-MSC.12 monthsComparing the number of SCI patients with any relevant side effects observed and the measured outcome in each arm by follow up Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and clinical signs and symptoms using ASIA scoring system..

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Investigating the number of side effects in SCI patients receiving autologous BM-MSC.12 monthsAssessing the number of SCI patients with any relevant side effects observed.
Investigating the effectiveness of autologous BM-MSC in treating SCI patients.12 monthsAssessing the therapeutic benefits of the injected Autologous BM-MSC by follow up Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and clinical signs and symptoms using ASIA scoring system.
Investigating the number of side effects in SCI patients receiving autologous AT-MSC.12 monthsAssessing the number of SCI patients with any relevant side effects observed.
Investigating the effectiveness of autologous AT-MSC in treating SCI patients.12 monthsAssessing the therapeutic benefits of the injected Autologous AT-MSC by follow up Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and clinical signs and symptoms using ASIA scoring system.

Countries

Jordan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026