Skip to content

A Study of Abemaciclib (LY2835219) Alone or in Combination With Other Agents in Participants With Previously Treated Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

An Adaptive, Open-Label, Randomized Phase 2 Study of Abemaciclib as a Monotherapy and in Combination With Other Agents Versus Choice of Standard of Care (Gemcitabine or Capecitabine) in Patients With Previously Treated Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02981342
Enrollment
106
Registered
2016-12-05
Start date
2017-01-12
Completion date
2018-11-09
Last updated
2019-11-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Keywords

pancreatic cancer

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of abemaciclib alone and in combination with other drugs versus standard of care in participants with previously treated metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

Interventions

DRUGAbemaciclib

Administered orally

Administered orally

DRUGGemcitabine

Administered IV

DRUGCapecitabine

Administered orally

Sponsors

Eli Lilly and Company
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Histological or cytological diagnosis of ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. * Metastatic disease with documented disease progression following previous treatment with at least one, but no more than 2 prior therapies, with one of the prior therapies having been either gemcitabine-based or fluoropyrimidine-based therapy. Neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant therapies for localized resectable or unresectable PDAC each count as a line of therapy if multiagent chemotherapy regimens were administered (and neoadjuvant regimen was different than adjuvant regimen) and if the participant progressed with metastatic disease while taking or within 6 months of completion of (neo)adjuvant therapy. * Measurable disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1. * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1. * Participant for whom treatment with monotherapy chemotherapy such as gemcitabine or capecitabine is a reasonable choice. * Discontinued all prior treatment for cancer at least 14 days prior to initial dose of study treatment. * Adequate organ function. * allow alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) up to 5x upper limit of normal (ULN) if liver metastases. * allow bilirubin up to 2.5 times ULN if elevation is not associated with other signs of liver toxicity or can be explained by mechanical obstruction - requires clinical research physician approval.

Exclusion criteria

* Have a personal history of any of the following conditions: syncope of either unexplained or cardiovascular etiology, ventricular arrhythmia (including but not limited to ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation), or sudden cardiac arrest. Exception: Participants with controlled atrial fibrillation for \>30 days prior to study treatment initiation are eligible. * Have insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus are eligible if adequate control of blood glucose level is obtained by oral anti-diabetics as documented by hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) \<7%. * Have symptomatic central nervous system metastasis. Screening of asymptomatic participants is not required for enrollment. * Have had major surgery within 7 days prior to initiation of study drug to allow for postoperative healing of the surgical wound and site(s). * Have previously received treatment with any cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4 and 6 inhibitor or phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) and/or mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor or have a known hypersensitivity to any component of the investigational products in this study. * Have a known hypersensitivity to investigator's choice of standard of care (gemcitabine or capecitabine).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Stage 1: Disease Control Rate (DCR): Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response of Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR) or Stable Disease (SD)Baseline to Measured Progressive Disease or Start of New Anticancer Therapy (Up to 6 Months)Disease control rate (DCR) is the percentage of participants with a best overall response of CR, PR or SD as defined by RECIST v1.1. CR is defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no appearance of new lesions. PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions (taking as reference the baseline sum LD), no progression of non-target lesions, and no appearance of new lesions. SD is neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease (PD) for target lesions, no progression of non-target lesions, and no appearance of new lesions. PD is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, with reference being the smallest sum on study and an absolute increase of at least 5 mm, or unequivocal progression of non-target lesions, or 1 or more new lesions.
Stage 2: Progression Free Survival (PFS)Baseline to Measured Progressive Disease or Death Due to Any Cause (Up to 6 Months)PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until first observation of objective progressive disease as defined by RECIST v1.1 or death from any cause, whichever comes first. PD is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, with reference being the smallest sum on study and an absolute increase of at least 5 mm, or unequivocal progression of non-target lesions, or 1 or more new lesions. If a patient does not have a complete baseline disease assessment, then the PFS time will be censored at the randomization date, regardless of whether or not objectively determined disease progression or death has been observed for the patient; otherwise, if a patient is not known to have died or have objective progression as of the data inclusion cutoff date for the analysis, the PFS time will be censored at the last complete objective progression-free disease assessment date.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Stage 1: PK: Area Under the Curve (AUC) (AUC[Tau]) of LY3023414Cycle 1 Day 1 through Cycle 4 Day 1 (28 Day Cycles)
Stage 1: PK: Maximum Concentration (Cmax) at Steady State of LY3023414Cycle 1 Day 1 through Cycle 4 Day 1 (28 Day Cycles)
Stage 2: Disease Control Rate (DCR): Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response of CR, PR, and SDBaseline to Measured Progressive Disease or Start of New Anticancer Therapy (Up to 6 Months)
Stage 2: Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR): Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response of CR, PR, or SD With Duration of SD for at Least 6 MonthsBaseline to Disease Progression or Start of New Anticancer Therapy (Up to 6 Months)Clinical benefit rate (CBR) is the percentage of participants with a BOR of CR or PR, or SD ≥6 months. CR is defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions & no appearance of new lesions. PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the LD of target lesions (taking as reference the baseline sum LD), no progression of non-target lesions, and no appearance of new lesions. SD is neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD for target lesions, no progression of non-target lesions, and no appearance of new lesions. PD is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, with reference being the smallest sum on study and an absolute increase of at least 5 mm, or unequivocal progression of non-target lesions, or 1 or more new lesions. No participants were enrolled to stage 2; however, results for stage 2 outcomes are reported from the data collected for participants enrolled to stage 1.
Stage 2: Duration of Response (DoR)Date of CR or PR to Date of Disease Progression or Death Due to Any Cause (Up to 6 Months)
Stage 1: Objective Response Rate (ORR): Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response (BOR) of CR or PRBaseline to Measured Progressive Disease or Start of New Anti-Cancer Therapy (Up to 6 Months)Objective response rate (ORR) is the percentage of participants with a BOR of CR or PR as defined by RECIST v1.1. CR is defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no appearance of new lesions. PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the LD of target lesions (taking as reference the baseline sum LD), no progression of non-target lesions, and no appearance of new lesions.
Stage 2: Change From Baseline in Carbohydrate Antigen 19.9 (CA 19-9) LevelBaseline, 6 MonthsNo participants were enrolled to stage 2; however, results for stage 2 outcomes are reported from the data collected for participants enrolled to stage 1.
Stage 2: Change From Baseline in Pain and Symptom Burden Assessment on the Modified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-sf)Baseline, 6 MonthsmBPI-sf is an 11-item instrument used as a multiple-item measure of cancer pain intensity. In addition to pain intensity (4 items), the mBPI-sf is designed for participants to record the presence of pain in general, pain relief, and pain interference with function (general activity, mood, ability to walk, ability to perform normal work, relations with others, sleep, and enjoyment of life). Responses for the mBPI-sf items are captured through the use of 11-point numeric rating scales anchored at 0 (no pain or does not interfere) and ranged through 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine or completely interferes). The mBPI-sf recall period is 24 hours, and typical completion time for this instrument is less than 5 minutes. No participants were enrolled to stage 2; however, results for stage 2 outcomes are reported from the data collected for participants enrolled to stage 1.
Stage 2: Change From Baseline in Symptom Burden on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)Baseline, 6 MonthsThe EORTC QLQ-C30 self-reported general cancer instrument consists of 30 items covered by 1 of 3 dimensions: 1. Global health status/quality of life (2 items) with scores ranging from 1 (Very Poor) to 7 (Excellent). 2. Functional scales (15 total items addressing either physical, role, emotional, cognitive, or social functioning), each item scores ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much) 3. Symptom scales (13 total items addressing either fatigue, nausea/vomiting, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, or financial impact), each item scores ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much). Raw scores are linearly converted to a 0-100 scale with higher scores reflecting higher levels of function/QOL or higher levels of symptom burden. No participants were enrolled to stage 2; however, results for stage 2 outcomes are reported from the data collected for participants enrolled to stage 1.
Stage 1: PK: Steady State Trough Pre Dose Concentration of LY3023414C2D1: 0h, C3D1: 0h, C4D1: 0hMean steady state exposure was reported by trough pre-dose plasma concentrations.
Stage 1: PK: Mean Single Dose Concentration of LY3023414 at 2h Post-doseC1D1: 2h Post doseMean single dose exposure was reported by plasma concentrations collected approximately 2 hours post-dose.
Stage 2: Overall Survival (OS)Baseline to Death from Any Cause (Up to 10 Months)OS duration is measured from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. for participants who is not known to have died as of the data-inclusion cutoff date, OS was censored at the last known alive date. No participants were enrolled to stage 2; however, results for stage 2 outcomes are reported from the data collected for participants enrolled to stage 1.
Stage 1: Pharmacokinetics (PK): Mean Steady State Exposure of Abemaciclib and Its Metabolites (LSN2839567 (M2), LSN3106726 (M20))Cycle(C)1 Day(D)14: 0 hour(h),0.5h,1h,2h,4h,6h,8h post doseMean steady state exposure was reported as measured by maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax).

Countries

Australia, Belgium, France, Israel, Spain, Taiwan, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Study was planned for stage 1 & stage 2. No participants were enrolled to stage 2; however, results for stage 2 outcomes are reported from the data collected for participants enrolled to stage 1. Completed participants are those who has CR, PR, SD, or PD and is off treatment.

Pre-assignment details

Per protocol, no efficacy analysis was planned for safety lead in. Purpose of safety lead in was only safety evaluation. All efficacy was done on randomized pts.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
150mg Abemaciclib + 150mg Galunisertib (Safety Lead-in)
Participants received oral dose of 150mg Abemaciclib twice daily for 28 day cycles along with oral dose of 150 mg Galunisertib twice daily for 14 days of 28 days cycle.
7
200mg Abemaciclib
Participants received oral dose of 200mg Abemaciclib twice daily (BID) for 28 day cycles.
33
150mg Abemaciclib + 150mg LY3023414
Participants received oral dose of 150mg Abemaciclib along with 150mg LY3023414 twice daily for 28 day cycles.
33
Gemcitabine or Capecitabine
Participants received either 1000 milligram per square meter (mg/m\^2) of Gemcitabine by intravenous infusion on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of 28 day cycle or 1250 mg/m\^2 oral dose of Capecitabine twice daily for 14 days of 21 day cycle.
33
Total106

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdverse Event0001
Overall StudyDeath0994
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up0100
Overall StudyRandomized, Never Treated0107
Overall StudyStudy closed by sponsor0011
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject0031

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic200mg Abemaciclib150mg Abemaciclib + 150mg LY3023414150mg Abemaciclib + 150mg Galunisertib (Safety Lead-in)Gemcitabine or CapecitabineTotal
Age, Continuous61.09 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.83
62.52 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.97
65.29 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.99
66.85 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.61
63.40 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.34
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants4 Participants0 Participants3 Participants9 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
30 Participants28 Participants7 Participants24 Participants89 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants6 Participants8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
7 Participants5 Participants0 Participants4 Participants16 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants3 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
26 Participants26 Participants7 Participants25 Participants84 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Australia
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants3 Participants5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
8 Participants6 Participants0 Participants5 Participants19 Participants
Region of Enrollment
France
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants6 Participants8 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Israel
2 Participants4 Participants0 Participants5 Participants11 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
5 Participants7 Participants0 Participants3 Participants15 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Taiwan
7 Participants4 Participants0 Participants3 Participants14 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
8 Participants10 Participants7 Participants8 Participants33 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
18 Participants16 Participants4 Participants19 Participants57 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
15 Participants17 Participants3 Participants14 Participants49 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
5 / 722 / 3221 / 3312 / 26
other
Total, other adverse events
7 / 730 / 3233 / 3325 / 26
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 717 / 3218 / 3315 / 26

Outcome results

Primary

Stage 1: Disease Control Rate (DCR): Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response of Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR) or Stable Disease (SD)

Disease control rate (DCR) is the percentage of participants with a best overall response of CR, PR or SD as defined by RECIST v1.1. CR is defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no appearance of new lesions. PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions (taking as reference the baseline sum LD), no progression of non-target lesions, and no appearance of new lesions. SD is neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease (PD) for target lesions, no progression of non-target lesions, and no appearance of new lesions. PD is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, with reference being the smallest sum on study and an absolute increase of at least 5 mm, or unequivocal progression of non-target lesions, or 1 or more new lesions.

Time frame: Baseline to Measured Progressive Disease or Start of New Anticancer Therapy (Up to 6 Months)

Population: All randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
200mg AbemaciclibStage 1: Disease Control Rate (DCR): Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response of Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR) or Stable Disease (SD)15.2 percentage of Participants
150mg Abemaciclib + 150mg LY3023414Stage 1: Disease Control Rate (DCR): Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response of Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR) or Stable Disease (SD)12.1 percentage of Participants
Gemcitabine or CapecitabineStage 1: Disease Control Rate (DCR): Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response of Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR) or Stable Disease (SD)36.4 percentage of Participants
p-value: 0.0495Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.023Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Primary

Stage 2: Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until first observation of objective progressive disease as defined by RECIST v1.1 or death from any cause, whichever comes first. PD is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, with reference being the smallest sum on study and an absolute increase of at least 5 mm, or unequivocal progression of non-target lesions, or 1 or more new lesions. If a patient does not have a complete baseline disease assessment, then the PFS time will be censored at the randomization date, regardless of whether or not objectively determined disease progression or death has been observed for the patient; otherwise, if a patient is not known to have died or have objective progression as of the data inclusion cutoff date for the analysis, the PFS time will be censored at the last complete objective progression-free disease assessment date.

Time frame: Baseline to Measured Progressive Disease or Death Due to Any Cause (Up to 6 Months)

Population: All randomized participants. Censored participants: Abemaciclib 200 mg: 3, Abemaciclib 150mg + LY3023414 150mg: 8, Gemcitabine \& Capecitabine: 18; No participants were enrolled in stage 2; however, results for stage 2 outcomes are reported from the data collected for participants enrolled in stage 1.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
200mg AbemaciclibStage 2: Progression Free Survival (PFS)1.68 Months
150mg Abemaciclib + 150mg LY3023414Stage 2: Progression Free Survival (PFS)1.81 Months
Gemcitabine or CapecitabineStage 2: Progression Free Survival (PFS)3.25 Months
p-value: 0.0085Log Rank
p-value: 0.0123Log Rank
Secondary

Stage 1: Objective Response Rate (ORR): Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response (BOR) of CR or PR

Objective response rate (ORR) is the percentage of participants with a BOR of CR or PR as defined by RECIST v1.1. CR is defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no appearance of new lesions. PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the LD of target lesions (taking as reference the baseline sum LD), no progression of non-target lesions, and no appearance of new lesions.

Time frame: Baseline to Measured Progressive Disease or Start of New Anti-Cancer Therapy (Up to 6 Months)

Population: All randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
200mg AbemaciclibStage 1: Objective Response Rate (ORR): Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response (BOR) of CR or PR3 percentage of Participants
150mg Abemaciclib + 150mg LY3023414Stage 1: Objective Response Rate (ORR): Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response (BOR) of CR or PR0 percentage of Participants
Gemcitabine or CapecitabineStage 1: Objective Response Rate (ORR): Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response (BOR) of CR or PR3 percentage of Participants
p-value: 1Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.3017Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Stage 1: Pharmacokinetics (PK): Mean Steady State Exposure of Abemaciclib and Its Metabolites (LSN2839567 (M2), LSN3106726 (M20))

Mean steady state exposure was reported as measured by maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax).

Time frame: Cycle(C)1 Day(D)14: 0 hour(h),0.5h,1h,2h,4h,6h,8h post dose

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of Abemaciclib along with Galunisertib and had evaluable PK samples.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
200mg AbemaciclibStage 1: Pharmacokinetics (PK): Mean Steady State Exposure of Abemaciclib and Its Metabolites (LSN2839567 (M2), LSN3106726 (M20))Abemaciclib356 Nanogram per Millilitre (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 137
200mg AbemaciclibStage 1: Pharmacokinetics (PK): Mean Steady State Exposure of Abemaciclib and Its Metabolites (LSN2839567 (M2), LSN3106726 (M20))LSN2839567 (M2)85.1 Nanogram per Millilitre (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 66
200mg AbemaciclibStage 1: Pharmacokinetics (PK): Mean Steady State Exposure of Abemaciclib and Its Metabolites (LSN2839567 (M2), LSN3106726 (M20))LSN3106726 (M20)153 Nanogram per Millilitre (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 58
Secondary

Stage 1: PK: Area Under the Curve (AUC) (AUC[Tau]) of LY3023414

Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 through Cycle 4 Day 1 (28 Day Cycles)

Population: Zero Participants Analyzed: AUC cannot be calculated due to insufficient data collected.

Secondary

Stage 1: PK: Maximum Concentration (Cmax) at Steady State of LY3023414

Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 through Cycle 4 Day 1 (28 Day Cycles)

Population: Zero Participants Analyzed: Cmax cannot be calculated due to insufficient data collected.

Secondary

Stage 1: PK: Mean Single Dose Concentration of LY3023414 at 2h Post-dose

Mean single dose exposure was reported by plasma concentrations collected approximately 2 hours post-dose.

Time frame: C1D1: 2h Post dose

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of 150mg LY3023414 and had evaluable PK samples.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
200mg AbemaciclibStage 1: PK: Mean Single Dose Concentration of LY3023414 at 2h Post-dose518 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 67
Secondary

Stage 1: PK: Steady State Trough Pre Dose Concentration of LY3023414

Mean steady state exposure was reported by trough pre-dose plasma concentrations.

Time frame: C2D1: 0h, C3D1: 0h, C4D1: 0h

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of 150mg LY3023414 and had evaluable PK samples.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
200mg AbemaciclibStage 1: PK: Steady State Trough Pre Dose Concentration of LY302341427.3 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 450
Secondary

Stage 2: Change From Baseline in Carbohydrate Antigen 19.9 (CA 19-9) Level

No participants were enrolled to stage 2; however, results for stage 2 outcomes are reported from the data collected for participants enrolled to stage 1.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 Months

Population: All randomized participants with baseline and post baseline CA 19-9 measurement.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
200mg AbemaciclibStage 2: Change From Baseline in Carbohydrate Antigen 19.9 (CA 19-9) Level4281.53 U/mLStandard Deviation 8177.89
150mg Abemaciclib + 150mg LY3023414Stage 2: Change From Baseline in Carbohydrate Antigen 19.9 (CA 19-9) Level3225.29 U/mLStandard Deviation 5730.25
Gemcitabine or CapecitabineStage 2: Change From Baseline in Carbohydrate Antigen 19.9 (CA 19-9) Level-501.17 U/mLStandard Deviation 7198.7
Secondary

Stage 2: Change From Baseline in Pain and Symptom Burden Assessment on the Modified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-sf)

mBPI-sf is an 11-item instrument used as a multiple-item measure of cancer pain intensity. In addition to pain intensity (4 items), the mBPI-sf is designed for participants to record the presence of pain in general, pain relief, and pain interference with function (general activity, mood, ability to walk, ability to perform normal work, relations with others, sleep, and enjoyment of life). Responses for the mBPI-sf items are captured through the use of 11-point numeric rating scales anchored at 0 (no pain or does not interfere) and ranged through 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine or completely interferes). The mBPI-sf recall period is 24 hours, and typical completion time for this instrument is less than 5 minutes. No participants were enrolled to stage 2; however, results for stage 2 outcomes are reported from the data collected for participants enrolled to stage 1.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 Months

Population: All randomized participants with baseline \& post baseline value for the mBPI-sf specified item.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
200mg AbemaciclibStage 2: Change From Baseline in Pain and Symptom Burden Assessment on the Modified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-sf)BPI Mean Pain Interference Score0.55 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.44
200mg AbemaciclibStage 2: Change From Baseline in Pain and Symptom Burden Assessment on the Modified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-sf)Pain at its Worst in Last 24 hours0.63 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.47
200mg AbemaciclibStage 2: Change From Baseline in Pain and Symptom Burden Assessment on the Modified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-sf)Pain at its Least in Last 24 hours0.86 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.42
200mg AbemaciclibStage 2: Change From Baseline in Pain and Symptom Burden Assessment on the Modified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-sf)Pain on the Average0.62 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.45
200mg AbemaciclibStage 2: Change From Baseline in Pain and Symptom Burden Assessment on the Modified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-sf)Pain Right Now0.38 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.34
200mg AbemaciclibStage 2: Change From Baseline in Pain and Symptom Burden Assessment on the Modified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-sf)Pain Interfered General Activity0.64 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.47
200mg AbemaciclibStage 2: Change From Baseline in Pain and Symptom Burden Assessment on the Modified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-sf)Pain Interfered with Mood0.54 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.41
200mg AbemaciclibStage 2: Change From Baseline in Pain and Symptom Burden Assessment on the Modified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-sf)Pain Interfered Walking Ability0.05 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.55
200mg AbemaciclibStage 2: Change From Baseline in Pain and Symptom Burden Assessment on the Modified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-sf)Pain Interfered with Normal Work1.07 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.51
200mg AbemaciclibStage 2: Change From Baseline in Pain and Symptom Burden Assessment on the Modified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-sf)Pain Interfered with Relations0.39 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.52
200mg AbemaciclibStage 2: Change From Baseline in Pain and Symptom Burden Assessment on the Modified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-sf)Pain Interfered with Sleep0.19 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.53
200mg AbemaciclibStage 2: Change From Baseline in Pain and Symptom Burden Assessment on the Modified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-sf)Pain Interfered Enjoyment of Life0.69 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.62
150mg Abemaciclib + 150mg LY3023414Stage 2: Change From Baseline in Pain and Symptom Burden Assessment on the Modified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-sf)Pain Interfered Enjoyment of Life0.39 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.72
150mg Abemaciclib + 150mg LY3023414Stage 2: Change From Baseline in Pain and Symptom Burden Assessment on the Modified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-sf)BPI Mean Pain Interference Score0.50 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.51
150mg Abemaciclib + 150mg LY3023414Stage 2: Change From Baseline in Pain and Symptom Burden Assessment on the Modified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-sf)Pain Interfered with Mood0.28 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.48
150mg Abemaciclib + 150mg LY3023414Stage 2: Change From Baseline in Pain and Symptom Burden Assessment on the Modified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-sf)Pain Interfered with Normal Work0.66 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.59
150mg Abemaciclib + 150mg LY3023414Stage 2: Change From Baseline in Pain and Symptom Burden Assessment on the Modified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-sf)Pain at its Worst in Last 24 hours-0.33 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.55
150mg Abemaciclib + 150mg LY3023414Stage 2: Change From Baseline in Pain and Symptom Burden Assessment on the Modified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-sf)Pain Interfered General Activity0.07 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.55
150mg Abemaciclib + 150mg LY3023414Stage 2: Change From Baseline in Pain and Symptom Burden Assessment on the Modified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-sf)Pain Interfered with Sleep0.34 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.61
150mg Abemaciclib + 150mg LY3023414Stage 2: Change From Baseline in Pain and Symptom Burden Assessment on the Modified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-sf)Pain at its Least in Last 24 hours0.18 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.49
150mg Abemaciclib + 150mg LY3023414Stage 2: Change From Baseline in Pain and Symptom Burden Assessment on the Modified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-sf)Pain Interfered Walking Ability0.83 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.64
150mg Abemaciclib + 150mg LY3023414Stage 2: Change From Baseline in Pain and Symptom Burden Assessment on the Modified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-sf)Pain Right Now0.34 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.59
150mg Abemaciclib + 150mg LY3023414Stage 2: Change From Baseline in Pain and Symptom Burden Assessment on the Modified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-sf)Pain on the Average-0.03 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.51
150mg Abemaciclib + 150mg LY3023414Stage 2: Change From Baseline in Pain and Symptom Burden Assessment on the Modified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-sf)Pain Interfered with Relations0.67 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.61
Gemcitabine or CapecitabineStage 2: Change From Baseline in Pain and Symptom Burden Assessment on the Modified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-sf)Pain on the Average-0.07 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.53
Gemcitabine or CapecitabineStage 2: Change From Baseline in Pain and Symptom Burden Assessment on the Modified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-sf)Pain Right Now-0.38 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.61
Gemcitabine or CapecitabineStage 2: Change From Baseline in Pain and Symptom Burden Assessment on the Modified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-sf)Pain Interfered with Relations0.26 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.63
Gemcitabine or CapecitabineStage 2: Change From Baseline in Pain and Symptom Burden Assessment on the Modified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-sf)Pain Interfered General Activity0.22 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.57
Gemcitabine or CapecitabineStage 2: Change From Baseline in Pain and Symptom Burden Assessment on the Modified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-sf)Pain Interfered with Mood0.60 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.5
Gemcitabine or CapecitabineStage 2: Change From Baseline in Pain and Symptom Burden Assessment on the Modified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-sf)Pain Interfered Walking Ability0.19 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.67
Gemcitabine or CapecitabineStage 2: Change From Baseline in Pain and Symptom Burden Assessment on the Modified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-sf)Pain Interfered with Sleep-0.56 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.65
Gemcitabine or CapecitabineStage 2: Change From Baseline in Pain and Symptom Burden Assessment on the Modified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-sf)BPI Mean Pain Interference Score0.05 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.54
Gemcitabine or CapecitabineStage 2: Change From Baseline in Pain and Symptom Burden Assessment on the Modified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-sf)Pain at its Worst in Last 24 hours-0.02 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.57
Gemcitabine or CapecitabineStage 2: Change From Baseline in Pain and Symptom Burden Assessment on the Modified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-sf)Pain Interfered with Normal Work0.19 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.61
Gemcitabine or CapecitabineStage 2: Change From Baseline in Pain and Symptom Burden Assessment on the Modified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-sf)Pain at its Least in Last 24 hours0.39 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.51
Gemcitabine or CapecitabineStage 2: Change From Baseline in Pain and Symptom Burden Assessment on the Modified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-sf)Pain Interfered Enjoyment of Life-0.13 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.75
Comparison: Pain at its Worst in Last 24 Hoursp-value: 0.38395% CI: [-0.84, 2.13]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Pain at its Worst in Last 24 Hoursp-value: 0.69295% CI: [-1.91, 1.28]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Pain at its Least in Last 24 Hoursp-value: 0.46995% CI: [-0.85, 1.8]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Pain at its Least in Last 24 Hoursp-value: 0.77695% CI: [-1.62, 1.22]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Pain on the Averagep-value: 0.32895% CI: [-0.72, 2.11]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Pain on the Averagep-value: 0.95495% CI: [-1.45, 1.54]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Pain Right Nowp-value: 0.3595% CI: [-0.85, 2.36]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Pain right now.p-value: 0.40595% CI: [-1.01, 2.44]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Pain Interfered General Activityp-value: 0.56595% CI: [-1.06, 1.91]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Pain Interfered General Activityp-value: 0.84895% CI: [-1.74, 1.43]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Pain Interfered with Moodp-value: 0.92895% CI: [-1.37, 1.25]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Pain Interfered with Moodp-value: 0.6595% CI: [-1.71, 1.08]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Pain Interfered Walking Abilityp-value: 0.86595% CI: [-1.89, 1.6]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Pain Interfered Walking Abilityp-value: 0.49795% CI: [-1.23, 2.5]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Pain Interfered with Normal Workp-value: 0.27295% CI: [-0.72, 2.5]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Pain Interfered with Normal Workp-value: 0.58395% CI: [-1.25, 2.19]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Pain Interfered with Relationsp-value: 0.87695% CI: [-1.53, 1.79]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Pain Interfered with relations.p-value: 0.64495% CI: [-1.37, 2.19]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Pain Interfered with Sleepp-value: 0.38495% CI: [-0.97, 2.48]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.31895% CI: [-0.9, 2.71]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Pain Interfered Enjoyment of Lifep-value: 0.40795% CI: [-1.15, 2.78]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Pain Interfered Enjoyment of Lifep-value: 0.6295% CI: [-1.58, 2.62]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: BPI-Mean Interference Scorep-value: 0.47595% CI: [-0.9, 1.91]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: BPI-Mean Interference Scorep-value: 0.5495% CI: [-1.04, 1.96]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Stage 2: Change From Baseline in Symptom Burden on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)

The EORTC QLQ-C30 self-reported general cancer instrument consists of 30 items covered by 1 of 3 dimensions: 1. Global health status/quality of life (2 items) with scores ranging from 1 (Very Poor) to 7 (Excellent). 2. Functional scales (15 total items addressing either physical, role, emotional, cognitive, or social functioning), each item scores ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much) 3. Symptom scales (13 total items addressing either fatigue, nausea/vomiting, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, or financial impact), each item scores ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much). Raw scores are linearly converted to a 0-100 scale with higher scores reflecting higher levels of function/QOL or higher levels of symptom burden. No participants were enrolled to stage 2; however, results for stage 2 outcomes are reported from the data collected for participants enrolled to stage 1.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 Months

Population: All randomized participants with baseline \& post baseline value for the EORTC QLQ-C30 specified item.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
200mg AbemaciclibStage 2: Change From Baseline in Symptom Burden on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)Functional Scale: Social Functioning-21.12 units on a scaleStandard Error 4.9
200mg AbemaciclibStage 2: Change From Baseline in Symptom Burden on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)Functional Scales: Role Functioning-17.09 units on a scaleStandard Error 6.17
200mg AbemaciclibStage 2: Change From Baseline in Symptom Burden on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)Symptom Scale: Insomnia-5.19 units on a scaleStandard Error 5.17
200mg AbemaciclibStage 2: Change From Baseline in Symptom Burden on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)Symptom Scales: Fatigue14.13 units on a scaleStandard Error 4.92
200mg AbemaciclibStage 2: Change From Baseline in Symptom Burden on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)Functional Scales: Physical Functioning-14.44 units on a scaleStandard Error 4.4
200mg AbemaciclibStage 2: Change From Baseline in Symptom Burden on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)Symptom Scale: Dysopnea0.35 units on a scaleStandard Error 5.48
200mg AbemaciclibStage 2: Change From Baseline in Symptom Burden on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)Symptom Scales: Nausea and Vomiting7.98 units on a scaleStandard Error 5.57
200mg AbemaciclibStage 2: Change From Baseline in Symptom Burden on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)Symptom Scale: Constipation2.96 units on a scaleStandard Error 5.95
200mg AbemaciclibStage 2: Change From Baseline in Symptom Burden on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)Symptom Scales: Pain9.79 units on a scaleStandard Error 5.63
200mg AbemaciclibStage 2: Change From Baseline in Symptom Burden on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)Functional Scales: Emotional Functioning-4.89 units on a scaleStandard Error 4.49
200mg AbemaciclibStage 2: Change From Baseline in Symptom Burden on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)Symptom Scale: Financial difficulties3.96 units on a scaleStandard Error 4.82
200mg AbemaciclibStage 2: Change From Baseline in Symptom Burden on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)Global Health Status-6.21 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.87
200mg AbemaciclibStage 2: Change From Baseline in Symptom Burden on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)Functional Scales: Cognitive Functioning-10.43 units on a scaleStandard Error 4.1
200mg AbemaciclibStage 2: Change From Baseline in Symptom Burden on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)Symptom Scale: Diarrhoea15.71 units on a scaleStandard Error 6.76
200mg AbemaciclibStage 2: Change From Baseline in Symptom Burden on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)Symptom Scale: Appetite Loss12.54 units on a scaleStandard Error 5.79
150mg Abemaciclib + 150mg LY3023414Stage 2: Change From Baseline in Symptom Burden on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)Symptom Scale: Appetite Loss15.32 units on a scaleStandard Error 6.77
150mg Abemaciclib + 150mg LY3023414Stage 2: Change From Baseline in Symptom Burden on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)Global Health Status-4.82 units on a scaleStandard Error 4.5
150mg Abemaciclib + 150mg LY3023414Stage 2: Change From Baseline in Symptom Burden on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)Functional Scales: Physical Functioning-11.65 units on a scaleStandard Error 5.12
150mg Abemaciclib + 150mg LY3023414Stage 2: Change From Baseline in Symptom Burden on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)Functional Scales: Role Functioning-18.05 units on a scaleStandard Error 7.32
150mg Abemaciclib + 150mg LY3023414Stage 2: Change From Baseline in Symptom Burden on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)Functional Scales: Emotional Functioning-0.63 units on a scaleStandard Error 5.22
150mg Abemaciclib + 150mg LY3023414Stage 2: Change From Baseline in Symptom Burden on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)Functional Scales: Cognitive Functioning-8.39 units on a scaleStandard Error 4.77
150mg Abemaciclib + 150mg LY3023414Stage 2: Change From Baseline in Symptom Burden on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)Functional Scale: Social Functioning-17.09 units on a scaleStandard Error 5.72
150mg Abemaciclib + 150mg LY3023414Stage 2: Change From Baseline in Symptom Burden on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)Symptom Scales: Fatigue14.90 units on a scaleStandard Error 5.73
150mg Abemaciclib + 150mg LY3023414Stage 2: Change From Baseline in Symptom Burden on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)Symptom Scales: Nausea and Vomiting9.42 units on a scaleStandard Error 6.47
150mg Abemaciclib + 150mg LY3023414Stage 2: Change From Baseline in Symptom Burden on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)Symptom Scales: Pain2.68 units on a scaleStandard Error 6.61
150mg Abemaciclib + 150mg LY3023414Stage 2: Change From Baseline in Symptom Burden on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)Symptom Scale: Dysopnea11.19 units on a scaleStandard Error 6.38
150mg Abemaciclib + 150mg LY3023414Stage 2: Change From Baseline in Symptom Burden on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)Symptom Scale: Insomnia1.83 units on a scaleStandard Error 6.01
150mg Abemaciclib + 150mg LY3023414Stage 2: Change From Baseline in Symptom Burden on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)Symptom Scale: Constipation-6.51 units on a scaleStandard Error 6.96
150mg Abemaciclib + 150mg LY3023414Stage 2: Change From Baseline in Symptom Burden on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)Symptom Scale: Diarrhoea26.28 units on a scaleStandard Error 7.83
150mg Abemaciclib + 150mg LY3023414Stage 2: Change From Baseline in Symptom Burden on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)Symptom Scale: Financial difficulties2.45 units on a scaleStandard Error 5.68
Gemcitabine or CapecitabineStage 2: Change From Baseline in Symptom Burden on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)Functional Scale: Social Functioning-2.00 units on a scaleStandard Error 5.95
Gemcitabine or CapecitabineStage 2: Change From Baseline in Symptom Burden on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)Symptom Scale: Diarrhoea20.51 units on a scaleStandard Error 7.98
Gemcitabine or CapecitabineStage 2: Change From Baseline in Symptom Burden on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)Symptom Scale: Insomnia-6.71 units on a scaleStandard Error 6.05
Gemcitabine or CapecitabineStage 2: Change From Baseline in Symptom Burden on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)Functional Scales: Cognitive Functioning-5.18 units on a scaleStandard Error 4.95
Gemcitabine or CapecitabineStage 2: Change From Baseline in Symptom Burden on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)Functional Scales: Emotional Functioning2.06 units on a scaleStandard Error 5.41
Gemcitabine or CapecitabineStage 2: Change From Baseline in Symptom Burden on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)Symptom Scale: Appetite Loss9.51 units on a scaleStandard Error 7.3
Gemcitabine or CapecitabineStage 2: Change From Baseline in Symptom Burden on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)Functional Scales: Role Functioning-17.10 units on a scaleStandard Error 7.36
Gemcitabine or CapecitabineStage 2: Change From Baseline in Symptom Burden on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)Global Health Status-2.40 units on a scaleStandard Error 4.64
Gemcitabine or CapecitabineStage 2: Change From Baseline in Symptom Burden on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)Symptom Scale: Constipation12.93 units on a scaleStandard Error 7.15
Gemcitabine or CapecitabineStage 2: Change From Baseline in Symptom Burden on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)Symptom Scales: Nausea and Vomiting11.88 units on a scaleStandard Error 6.5
Gemcitabine or CapecitabineStage 2: Change From Baseline in Symptom Burden on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)Functional Scales: Physical Functioning-5.42 units on a scaleStandard Error 5.12
Gemcitabine or CapecitabineStage 2: Change From Baseline in Symptom Burden on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)Symptom Scales: Pain5.43 units on a scaleStandard Error 6.62
Gemcitabine or CapecitabineStage 2: Change From Baseline in Symptom Burden on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)Symptom Scales: Fatigue5.64 units on a scaleStandard Error 5.71
Gemcitabine or CapecitabineStage 2: Change From Baseline in Symptom Burden on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)Symptom Scale: Financial difficulties-3.30 units on a scaleStandard Error 5.87
Gemcitabine or CapecitabineStage 2: Change From Baseline in Symptom Burden on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)Symptom Scale: Dysopnea-4.51 units on a scaleStandard Error 6.36
Comparison: Global health statusp-value: 0.81895% CI: [-13.46, 10.68]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Global health statusp-value: 0.53395% CI: [-16.03, 8.42]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Functional Scales: Physical functioningp-value: 0.68195% CI: [-16.4, 10.82]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Functional Scales: Physical functioningp-value: 0.18995% CI: [-22.63, 4.59]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Functional Scales: Role functioningp-value: 0.92195% CI: [-18.29, 20.21]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Functional Scales: Role functioning.p-value: 0.99995% CI: [-19.4, 19.42]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Functional Scales: Emotional functioningp-value: 0.54195% CI: [-18.2, 9.68]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Functional Scales: Emotional functioningp-value: 0.3395% CI: [-21.17, 7.27]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Functional Scales: Cognitive Functioningp-value: 0.74795% CI: [-14.74, 10.66]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Functional Scales: Cognitive functioningp-value: 0.41995% CI: [-18.22, 7.73]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Functional Scales: Social functioningp-value: 0.59695% CI: [-19.23, 11.19]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Functional Scales: Social functioningp-value: 0.01795% CI: [-34.68, -3.55]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Symptoms Scales: Fatiguep-value: 0.91995% CI: [-16.03, 14.49]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Symptom Scales: Fatiguep-value: 0.26795% CI: [-6.72, 23.69]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Symptom Scales: Nausea and Vomitingp-value: 0.86695% CI: [-18.66, 15.77]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Symptom Scales: Nausea and Vomitingp-value: 0.65295% CI: [-21.23, 13.43]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Symptom Scales: Painp-value: 0.41795% CI: [-10.39, 24.6]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Symptom Scales: Painp-value: 0.61895% CI: [-13.16, 21.89]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Symptom Scales: Dyspnoeap-value: 0.20695% CI: [-27.85, 6.18]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Symptom Scales: Dyspnoeap-value: 0.56695% CI: [-12.08, 21.8]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Symptom Scales: Insomniap-value: 0.3895% CI: [-23.01, 8.96]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Symptom Scales: Insomniap-value: 0.8595% CI: [-14.6, 17.64]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Symptom Scales: Appetite lossp-value: 0.75695% CI: [-20.78, 15.21]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Symptom Scales: Appetite lossp-value: 0.74795% CI: [-15.77, 21.82]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Symptom Scales: Constipationp-value: 0.31195% CI: [-9.16, 28.09]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Symptom Scales: Constipationp-value: 0.2995% CI: [-28.75, 8.8]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Symptom Scales: Diarrhoeap-value: 0.32395% CI: [-31.93, 10.78]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Symptom Scales: Diarrhoeap-value: 0.65195% CI: [-26.08, 16.48]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Symptom Scales: Financial Difficultiesp-value: 0.84195% CI: [-13.57, 16.59]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Symptom Scales: Financial Difficultiesp-value: 0.34495% CI: [-8.03, 22.54]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Stage 2: Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR): Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response of CR, PR, or SD With Duration of SD for at Least 6 Months

Clinical benefit rate (CBR) is the percentage of participants with a BOR of CR or PR, or SD ≥6 months. CR is defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions & no appearance of new lesions. PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the LD of target lesions (taking as reference the baseline sum LD), no progression of non-target lesions, and no appearance of new lesions. SD is neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD for target lesions, no progression of non-target lesions, and no appearance of new lesions. PD is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, with reference being the smallest sum on study and an absolute increase of at least 5 mm, or unequivocal progression of non-target lesions, or 1 or more new lesions. No participants were enrolled to stage 2; however, results for stage 2 outcomes are reported from the data collected for participants enrolled to stage 1.

Time frame: Baseline to Disease Progression or Start of New Anticancer Therapy (Up to 6 Months)

Population: All randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
200mg AbemaciclibStage 2: Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR): Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response of CR, PR, or SD With Duration of SD for at Least 6 Months3 percentage of participants
150mg Abemaciclib + 150mg LY3023414Stage 2: Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR): Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response of CR, PR, or SD With Duration of SD for at Least 6 Months0 percentage of participants
Gemcitabine or CapecitabineStage 2: Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR): Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response of CR, PR, or SD With Duration of SD for at Least 6 Months3 percentage of participants
p-value: 1Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.3017Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Stage 2: Disease Control Rate (DCR): Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response of CR, PR, and SD

Time frame: Baseline to Measured Progressive Disease or Start of New Anticancer Therapy (Up to 6 Months)

Population: Data not reported, no patients were enrolled to stage 2.

Secondary

Stage 2: Duration of Response (DoR)

Time frame: Date of CR or PR to Date of Disease Progression or Death Due to Any Cause (Up to 6 Months)

Population: The population for analyzing DoR is the number of participants with response of CR or PR. There was only one participant in 200 mg Abemaciclib arm and one participant in Gemcitabine/Capecitabine arm. Due to small number of participants, the data is not analyzable using the planned time to event analysis.

Secondary

Stage 2: Overall Survival (OS)

OS duration is measured from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. for participants who is not known to have died as of the data-inclusion cutoff date, OS was censored at the last known alive date. No participants were enrolled to stage 2; however, results for stage 2 outcomes are reported from the data collected for participants enrolled to stage 1.

Time frame: Baseline to Death from Any Cause (Up to 10 Months)

Population: All randomized participants. Censored participants: Abemaciclib 200mg: 11, Abemaciclib 150mg + LY3023414 150mg: 12, Gemcitabine + Capecitabine: 21;

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
200mg AbemaciclibStage 2: Overall Survival (OS)2.71 Months
150mg Abemaciclib + 150mg LY3023414Stage 2: Overall Survival (OS)3.29 Months
Gemcitabine or CapecitabineStage 2: Overall Survival (OS)NA Months
p-value: 0.193895% CI: [0.782, 3.272]Log Rank
p-value: 0.247795% CI: [0.746, 3.15]Log Rank

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 26, 2026