Skip to content

Does Olfactory Training Improve Olfaction in a Population With Normal Sense of Smell?

Does Olfactory Training Improve Olfaction in a Population With Normosmia and How is Their Self Assessment of Sense of Smell?

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02980718
Enrollment
200
Registered
2016-12-02
Start date
2016-12-31
Completion date
2019-12-01
Last updated
2020-05-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

People With Normal Sense of Smell

Keywords

Olfaction training, Smell

Brief summary

Awareness of the sense of smell in the western population has been low. Most people do not think about the consequences of absence of smell (anosmia). Reduction in sense of smell (hyposmia) can influence everyday life. In situations of stress anosmia can be life threatening for example when there is a fire. Cooks may lose their job. Not being able to enjoy food and drink interferes with quality of life. The causes of olfactory dysfunction (OD) vary. Most often OD is associated with upper respiratory tract infections, disease of the nose and sinuses or head injuries. OD may be congenital, age related or associated with neurological disorders. Hyposmia occurs in up to 85% of cases of Parkinson's and may be the first symptom of both Parkinson's and Alzheimer's disease several years before the mental changes occur. Knowledge and focus on OD has until recently been low among most physicians and treatment options have often not been available. Different approaches to improve OD have been tried with variable effect depending on the cause of OD. There are studies on corticosteroids, zinc gluconate and vitamin A. In recent years, olfactory training has been launched as a promising treatment option. Most studies with olfactory training are done with patients with OD. A recently published review describes 10 studies with olfactory training among 639 patients and concludes that daily stimulation with odorants (odor concentrate) over a limited period time is a promising treatment. The suggested duration of olfactory training varies from 3 to 14 months. Different intensities of olfactory training were compared in patients with post-viral OD. Olfaction was more improved by the high concentration of odorant than by the low concentration. A small number of studies have shown that the olfactory nerve to some extent can be trained in persons with normal sense of smell, but we need more experience and structured studies to be able to conclude with greater certainty about the effect of olfactory training in this population. This study examines whether intensive olfactory training improves the sense of smell more than ordinary olfactory training in subjects with normal olfaction (normosmia) and examines self-evaluation of olfactory function.

Detailed description

Sub-study: Part of the participants (45/200) will be included in a pilot study which will be an analytical observational study to compare olfactory bulb volume measured on MRI three times during a year, while at the same time resting state fMRI will be measured before and after olfactory training. There is not sufficient data in the literature for power calculations and this sub-study is therefore a pilot study.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALintensive olfactory training
BEHAVIORALordinary olfactory training

Sponsors

Norwegian University of Science and Technology
CollaboratorOTHER
St. Olavs Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* TDI score \> 30.5 measured by Sniffin'Sticks

Exclusion criteria

* Not able to follow the olfactory training or follow-up (language, practical implementation, mental condition) * Disease affecting olfaction (sinusitis, pronounced allergies, recent nasal surgery, Alzheimer's, Parkinson, MS, COPD)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
olfaction assessed by TDI-score according to extended Sniffin'Sticks4 months (immediately after completion of the training period)
olfaction self-evaluated and reported in a questionnaire4 months (immediately after completion of the training period)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
olfaction assessed byTDI-score according to extended Sniffin'Sticks1 year (6-7 months after completion of the training period)
olfaction self-evaluated and reported in a questionnaire1 year (6-7 months after completion of the training period)

Countries

Norway

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026