Skip to content

The Use of Integra in Coverage of Radial Forearm Free Flap Donor Site Defect

The Use of Integra in Coverage of Radial Forearm Free Flap Donor Site Defect

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02980601
Enrollment
10
Registered
2016-12-02
Start date
2015-11-30
Completion date
2018-08-06
Last updated
2019-05-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Head and Neck Cancer

Keywords

Traumatic Defect, Chronic Wounds

Brief summary

The purpose of this research study is to compare the forearm free flap of patients with a traditional split thickness skin graft and those repaired with Integra (a skin substitute that helps to provide wound closure) and a split thickness skin graft. The study team will be looking at the subject's satisfaction with how the skin graft site looks and how well the skin graft site is functioning.

Detailed description

The radial forearm fasciocutaneous free flap (hereafter referred to as RFFF) was described more than 30 years ago as a fasciocutaneous flap for microsurgical transfer. It was soon after established as a safe and reliable flap for transfer of fascia and cutaneous tissue. Currently, it is used to repair any defect in which a relatively thin island of skin is needed with a fascial strength layer . While the flap itself is very reliable, it leaves a donor site that can be very unsightly and has multiple known complications including loss of pronation, pain, paresthesias, cold intolerance, and skin graft necrosis. The donor site is typically covered with a split thickness skin graft (hereafter referred to as STSG). In an effort to minimize these complications, several groups have described a technique of placing Integra© dermal substitute (hereafter referred to as Integra) underneath the STSG to provide a thicker support and decrease overall morbidity associated with the defect. These studies have shown success in decreasing overall morbidity including increasing range of motion and improving aesthetic quality of the donor site. However, the largest study to date has included only 29 subjects. Furthermore, these studies do not provide a comparative cohort of subjects repaired with a classic STSG to show effectiveness of this technique when compared to a classic repair. Our goal is to perform a prospective study comparing subjects repaired with a classic STSG and those repaired with one step Integra and STSG applied at the same time. These subjects will be evaluated for overall donor site aesthetic quality and functional outcome as described below.

Interventions

DEVICEIntegra plus STSG

A sheet of Integra directly on the wound bed with subsequent removal of the overlying silicone sheet and immediate application of a 0.008mm STSG

PROCEDURESTSG

0.012mm STSG

Sponsors

Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All subjects who receive a radial forearm free flaps in the included time period, including subjects with head and neck cancer, traumatic defects, chronic wounds, or any other problems that require a radical forearm free flap for reconstruction. * Have had a distal, anterograde fasciocutaneous flap * Age ≥ 18 years * Ability to understand and the willingness to sign an IRB-approved informed consent document. * Smokers and tobacco users will be included in this study

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects who have had an osteocutaneous or musculocutaneous flap. * Subjects who have a radial forearm flap with a proximal skin flap or subjects that receive a reverse radial forearm flap * Pregnant women will be excluded due to the lack of clinical studies evaluating INTEGRA template in pregnant women.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Skin Pliability1 yearSkin pliability will be measuredusing a Cutometer MPA 580. We plan to measure Pliability (Ua), Elasticity (Ue), Retraction (Ur). Viscoelasticity (Uv), and Extension (Uf).
Wrist Range of Motion- Flexionpre-opFunctional outcomes will be measured by using electric goniometers so as to standardize the measurements. Wrist flexion and wrist extension
Number of Participants With Skin Graft Necrosis.1 yearNumber of participants with skin graft necrosis.
Vancouver Scar Scale1 YearThe Vancouver Scar Scale will measure donor site aesethetic quality and it encompasses 4 separate outcomes to be objectively assessed. Each has been separately reported in the literature for each group in different papers as previously mentioned. We will compare the final score as well as scores within each outcome.On a scale of 1-13; with higher score denoting worse outcome.
Vancouver Scar Scale - Pigmentation1 yearPigmentation will be measured on the Vancouver Scar Scale. On a scale of 0-2; higher score denoting worse outcome.
Vancouver Scar Scale - Vascularity1 yearVascularity will be measured on the Vancouver Scar Scale. On a scale of 0-3; higher score denoting worse outcome.
Vancouver Scar Scale - Pliability1 yearPliability will be measured on the Vancouver Scar Scale. On a scale of 1-5; higher score denoting worse outcome.
Vancouver Scar Scale - Height1 yearHeight will be measured on the Vancouver Scar Scale. On a scale of 0-3; higher score denoting worse outcome.
Hand Strength -Lateral PinchPre-opFunctional outcomes will be measured by using strength dynamometers.
Hand Strength - Grippre-opFunctional outcomes will be measured by using strength dynamometers.
Hand Strength- Pincerpre-opFunctional outcomes will be measured by using strength dynamometers
Wrist Range of Motion- Extensionpre-opFunctional outcomes will be measured by using electric goniometers so as to standardize the measurements. Wrist flexion and wrist extension
Number of Participant With Tendon Exposure6 monthTendon exposure identified clinically.
Rate of Tendon Exposure1 yearTendon exposure identified clinically.
Patient Scar Assessment- Paresthesia3 monthPresence of paresthesia on a 1-10 scale , higher score denote worse outcomes
The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) Questionnaire)pre-opFunctional outcome as measured by pre and post operative assessment on the QuickDASH scale. On a scale of 0-100; with higher score denotes worse outcome measure
Percent of Wound Contracture3 monthPlanimetry Software will be used to measure and determine percentage of wound contracture

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient Scar Assessment3 monthTotal score (20-200). Higher scores denote worse outcomes.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Integra and a Split Thickness Skin Graft (STSG)
A sheet of Integra directly on the wound bed with subsequent removal of the overlying silicone sheet and immediate application of a 0.008mm STSG. Integra plus STSG: A sheet of Integra directly on the wound bed with subsequent removal of the overlying silicone sheet and immediate application of a 0.008mm STSG STSG: 0.012mm STSG
6
Split Thickness Skin Graft (STSG)
reconstruction as dictated by the protocol. They will either receive 1) a 0 STSG: 0.012mm STSG
4
Total10

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath01
Overall StudyFailed to sign consent20
Overall StudyGraft loss10
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up22

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicIntegra and a Split Thickness Skin Graft (STSG)Split Thickness Skin Graft (STSG)Total
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
4 Participants4 Participants8 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
5 Participants4 Participants9 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
6 Participants4 Participants10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants3 Participants8 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 61 / 4
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 60 / 4
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 61 / 4

Outcome results

Primary

Hand Strength - Grip

Functional outcomes will be measured by using strength dynamometers.

Time frame: 3 month

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Integra and a Split Thickness Skin Graft (STSG)Hand Strength - Grip58.14285714 LbsStandard Deviation 22.94358654
Split Thickness Skin Graft (STSG)Hand Strength - Grip66.4 LbsStandard Deviation 21.81375713
Primary

Hand Strength - Grip

Functional outcomes will be measured by using strength dynamometers.

Time frame: pre-op

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Integra and a Split Thickness Skin Graft (STSG)Hand Strength - Grip72.4 LbsStandard Deviation 19.82523644
Split Thickness Skin Graft (STSG)Hand Strength - Grip79.25 LbsStandard Deviation 16.02146997
Primary

Hand Strength - Grip

Functional outcomes will be measured by using strength dynamometers.

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Data not collected

Primary

Hand Strength - Grip

Functional outcomes will be measured by using strength dynamometers.

Time frame: 6 month

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Integra and a Split Thickness Skin Graft (STSG)Hand Strength - Grip66.4 LbsStandard Deviation 25.49195952
Split Thickness Skin Graft (STSG)Hand Strength - Grip81.66666667 LbsStandard Deviation 16.49915823
Primary

Hand Strength -Lateral Pinch

Functional outcomes will be measured by using strength dynamometers.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Integra and a Split Thickness Skin Graft (STSG)Hand Strength -Lateral Pinch15.8 LbsStandard Deviation 4.833218389
Split Thickness Skin Graft (STSG)Hand Strength -Lateral Pinch19.33333333 LbsStandard Deviation 2.494438258
Primary

Hand Strength -Lateral Pinch

Functional outcomes will be measured by using strength dynamometers.

Time frame: Pre-op

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Integra and a Split Thickness Skin Graft (STSG)Hand Strength -Lateral Pinch19.4 LbsStandard Deviation 4.176123
Split Thickness Skin Graft (STSG)Hand Strength -Lateral Pinch21.25 LbsStandard Deviation 2.165064
Primary

Hand Strength -Lateral Pinch

Functional outcomes will be measured by using strength dynamometers.

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Data not recorded.

Primary

Hand Strength -Lateral Pinch

Functional outcomes will be measured by using strength dynamometers.

Time frame: 3 month

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Integra and a Split Thickness Skin Graft (STSG)Hand Strength -Lateral Pinch14.57142857 LbsStandard Deviation 4.655477353
Split Thickness Skin Graft (STSG)Hand Strength -Lateral Pinch16.8 LbsStandard Deviation 3.059411708
Primary

Hand Strength- Pincer

Functional outcomes will be measured by using strength dynamometers

Time frame: 6 month

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Integra and a Split Thickness Skin Graft (STSG)Hand Strength- Pincer13.4 LbsStandard Deviation 4.079215611
Split Thickness Skin Graft (STSG)Hand Strength- Pincer16 LbsStandard Deviation 3.265986324
Primary

Hand Strength- Pincer

Functional outcomes will be measured by using strength dynamometers

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Data not collected

Primary

Hand Strength- Pincer

Functional outcomes will be measured by using strength dynamometers

Time frame: pre-op

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Integra and a Split Thickness Skin Graft (STSG)Hand Strength- Pincer13.4 LbsStandard Deviation 4.176122604
Split Thickness Skin Graft (STSG)Hand Strength- Pincer14.75 LbsStandard Deviation 3.561951712
Primary

Hand Strength- Pincer

Functional outcomes will be measured by using strength dynamometers

Time frame: 3 month

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Integra and a Split Thickness Skin Graft (STSG)Hand Strength- Pincer11 LbsStandard Deviation 5.318431563
Split Thickness Skin Graft (STSG)Hand Strength- Pincer12.2 LbsStandard Deviation 5.306599665
Primary

Number of Participants With Skin Graft Necrosis.

Number of participants with skin graft necrosis.

Time frame: 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Integra and a Split Thickness Skin Graft (STSG)Number of Participants With Skin Graft Necrosis.2 participants
Split Thickness Skin Graft (STSG)Number of Participants With Skin Graft Necrosis.1 participants
Primary

Number of Participant With Tendon Exposure

Tendon exposure identified clinically.

Time frame: 6 month

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Integra and a Split Thickness Skin Graft (STSG)Number of Participant With Tendon Exposure2 participants
Split Thickness Skin Graft (STSG)Number of Participant With Tendon Exposure1 participants
Primary

Patient Scar Assessment- Paresthesia

Presence of paresthesia on a 1-10 scale , higher score denote worse outcomes

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Data not collected

Primary

Patient Scar Assessment- Paresthesia

Presence of paresthesia on a 1-10 scale , higher score denote worse outcomes

Time frame: 6 month

Population: Data not collected

Primary

Patient Scar Assessment- Paresthesia

Presence of paresthesia on a 1-10 scale , higher score denote worse outcomes

Time frame: 3 month

Population: Data not collected

Primary

Percent of Wound Contracture

Planimetry Software will be used to measure and determine percentage of wound contracture

Time frame: 3 month

Population: data not recorded

Primary

Percent of Wound Contracture

Planimetry Software will be used to measure and determine percentage of wound contracture

Time frame: 1 year

Population: data not recorded

Primary

Percent of Wound Contracture

Planimetry Software will be used to measure and determine percentage of wound contracture

Time frame: 6 month

Population: data not recorded

Primary

Rate of Tendon Exposure

Tendon exposure identified clinically.

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Data not collected

Primary

Skin Pliability

Skin pliability will be measuredusing a Cutometer MPA 580. We plan to measure Pliability (Ua), Elasticity (Ue), Retraction (Ur). Viscoelasticity (Uv), and Extension (Uf).

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Data not collected

Primary

The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) Questionnaire)

Functional outcome as measured by pre and post operative assessment on the QuickDASH scale. On a scale of 0-100; with higher score denotes worse outcome measure

Time frame: pre-op

Population: Data not collected

Primary

The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) Questionnaire)

Functional outcome as measured by pre and post operative assessment on the QuickDASH scale. On a scale of 0-100; with higher score denotes worse outcome measure

Time frame: 3 month

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Integra and a Split Thickness Skin Graft (STSG)The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) Questionnaire)27.43333333 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.01894065
Split Thickness Skin Graft (STSG)The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) Questionnaire)29.525 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.13118836
Primary

The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) Questionnaire)

Functional outcome as measured by pre and post operative assessment on the QuickDASH scale. On a scale of 0-100; with higher score denotes worse outcome measure

Time frame: 6 month

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Integra and a Split Thickness Skin Graft (STSG)The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) Questionnaire)-3.636363636 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.31264662
Split Thickness Skin Graft (STSG)The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) Questionnaire)-9.090909091 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.62356686
Primary

The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) Questionnaire)

Functional outcome as measured by pre and post operative assessment on the QuickDASH scale. On a scale of 0-100; with higher score denotes worse outcome measure

Time frame: 1 year

Population: data not recorded for all subjects

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Integra and a Split Thickness Skin Graft (STSG)The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) Questionnaire)5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.056672193748
Primary

Vancouver Scar Scale

The Vancouver Scar Scale will measure donor site aesethetic quality and it encompasses 4 separate outcomes to be objectively assessed. Each has been separately reported in the literature for each group in different papers as previously mentioned. We will compare the final score as well as scores within each outcome.On a scale of 1-13; with higher score denoting worse outcome.

Time frame: 1 Year

Population: Data not collected

Primary

Vancouver Scar Scale - Height

Height will be measured on the Vancouver Scar Scale. On a scale of 0-3; higher score denoting worse outcome.

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Data not collected

Primary

Vancouver Scar Scale - Pigmentation

Pigmentation will be measured on the Vancouver Scar Scale. On a scale of 0-2; higher score denoting worse outcome.

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Data not collected

Primary

Vancouver Scar Scale - Pliability

Pliability will be measured on the Vancouver Scar Scale. On a scale of 1-5; higher score denoting worse outcome.

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Data not collected

Primary

Vancouver Scar Scale - Vascularity

Vascularity will be measured on the Vancouver Scar Scale. On a scale of 0-3; higher score denoting worse outcome.

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Data not collected

Primary

Wrist Range of Motion- Extension

Functional outcomes will be measured by using electric goniometers so as to standardize the measurements. Wrist flexion and wrist extension

Time frame: 6 month

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Integra and a Split Thickness Skin Graft (STSG)Wrist Range of Motion- Extension59.4 degreesStandard Deviation 21.10544953
Split Thickness Skin Graft (STSG)Wrist Range of Motion- Extension70 degreesStandard Deviation 8.498365856
Primary

Wrist Range of Motion- Extension

Functional outcomes will be measured by using electric goniometers so as to standardize the measurements. Wrist flexion and wrist extension

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Data not collected

Primary

Wrist Range of Motion- Extension

Functional outcomes will be measured by using electric goniometers so as to standardize the measurements. Wrist flexion and wrist extension

Time frame: pre-op

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Integra and a Split Thickness Skin Graft (STSG)Wrist Range of Motion- Extension57.33333333 degreesStandard Deviation 9.689627902
Split Thickness Skin Graft (STSG)Wrist Range of Motion- Extension49.66666667 degreesStandard Deviation 7.758060325
Primary

Wrist Range of Motion- Extension

Functional outcomes will be measured by using electric goniometers so as to standardize the measurements. Wrist flexion and wrist extension

Time frame: 3 month

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Integra and a Split Thickness Skin Graft (STSG)Wrist Range of Motion- Extension45 degreesStandard Deviation 15.58387445
Split Thickness Skin Graft (STSG)Wrist Range of Motion- Extension47.5 degreesStandard Deviation 13.78404875
Primary

Wrist Range of Motion- Flexion

Functional outcomes will be measured by using electric goniometers so as to standardize the measurements. Wrist flexion and wrist extension

Time frame: 6 month

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Integra and a Split Thickness Skin Graft (STSG)Wrist Range of Motion- Flexion59.8 degreesStandard Deviation 11.66876172
Split Thickness Skin Graft (STSG)Wrist Range of Motion- Flexion68.333333 degreesStandard Deviation 6.236095645
Primary

Wrist Range of Motion- Flexion

Functional outcomes will be measured by using electric goniometers so as to standardize the measurements. Wrist flexion and wrist extension

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Data not collected

Primary

Wrist Range of Motion- Flexion

Functional outcomes will be measured by using electric goniometers so as to standardize the measurements. Wrist flexion and wrist extension

Time frame: 3 month

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Integra and a Split Thickness Skin Graft (STSG)Wrist Range of Motion- Flexion66.42857143 degreesStandard Deviation 13.55261854
Split Thickness Skin Graft (STSG)Wrist Range of Motion- Flexion69 degreesStandard Deviation 12
Primary

Wrist Range of Motion- Flexion

Functional outcomes will be measured by using electric goniometers so as to standardize the measurements. Wrist flexion and wrist extension

Time frame: pre-op

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Integra and a Split Thickness Skin Graft (STSG)Wrist Range of Motion- Flexion72.83333333 degreesStandard Deviation 15.44254585
Split Thickness Skin Graft (STSG)Wrist Range of Motion- Flexion68 degreesStandard Deviation 16.02146997
Other Pre-specified

Patient Scar Assessment

Total score (20-200). Higher scores denote worse outcomes.

Time frame: 3 month

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Integra and a Split Thickness Skin Graft (STSG)Patient Scar Assessment86.14285714 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.03529786
Split Thickness Skin Graft (STSG)Patient Scar Assessment82.25 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.72521416
Other Pre-specified

Patient Scar Assessment

Total score (20-200). Higher scores denote worse outcomes.

Time frame: 6 month

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Integra and a Split Thickness Skin Graft (STSG)Patient Scar Assessment89.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 78.170071
Split Thickness Skin Graft (STSG)Patient Scar Assessment65.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.5
Other Pre-specified

Patient Scar Assessment

Total score (20-200). Higher scores denote worse outcomes.

Time frame: 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Integra and a Split Thickness Skin Graft (STSG)Patient Scar Assessment24.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.5
Split Thickness Skin Graft (STSG)Patient Scar Assessment28 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026