Skip to content

Effects of Prolonged Roll-tilt in Healthy Human Subjects

Erticality Perception - Effects of Prolonged Roll-tilt in Healthy Human Subjects

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02980419
Enrollment
20
Registered
2016-12-02
Start date
2016-06-30
Completion date
2020-05-31
Last updated
2020-01-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Adaptation Reaction

Brief summary

The long-term goal of this research is to advance the investigators knowledge of how the brain combines the information of multiple sensory systems coding for spatial oriention and how adaptation to vestibular imbalance influences spatial orientation. In healthy human subjects verticality perception is accurate while upright. After prolonged roll-tilt, humans show a systematic bias in perceived direction towards the previous roll-tilted position (so-called post-tilt bias). This effect could either be related to adaptation to the roll-tilted position (shifting the null position) or it could be related to changes in torsional eye position due to prolonged static roll-tilt (ocular counter-roll). While in the first case a post-tilt bias is predicted independently of the experimental paradigm used, the second hypothesis predicts a post-tilt bias only if retinal cues are integrated. In order to evaluate these hypotheses, the investigators will assess perceived vertical using both vision-dependent and vision-independent paradigms.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALpresentation of visual and vestibular stimuli

In each participant the investigators will assess verticality perception in whole-body upright position by use of the SVV, the SPV and the SHV after static roll-tilt at ±90deg over 5min. Measurements will be obtained on a motor-driven turntable and two different roll-tilt positions will be applied (±90°). A visual line (SVV), a rod (SHV) or the turntable itself will be adjusted to indicate perceived direction of vertical. A total of three measuring sessions, each lasting about 60 minutes are scheduled.

Sponsors

University of Zurich
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* ages 18-65 years * informed consent * absence of

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
adjustment errors of the subjective visual/haptic/postural vertical in upright position after prolonged whole-body roll-tilt positions.10 minutes (i.e. short-term adaptation)the accuracy and precision of visual vertical adjustments after prolonged roll tilt are quantified.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
changes in adjustment errors of the subjective visual vertical when providing an additional optokinetic stimulus10 minutes (i.e. short-term adaptation)This is the same as in outcome 1, but an additional visual (optokinetic) stimulus is added
changes in adjustment errors of the subjective haptic vertical when providing an additional optokinetic stimulus10 minutes (i.e. short-term adaptation)This is the same as in outcome 1, but an additional visual (optokinetic) stimulus is added
changes in adjustment errors of the subjective postural vertical when providing an additional optokinetic stimulus10 minutes (i.e. short-term adaptation)This is the same as in outcome 1, but an additional visual (optokinetic) stimulus is added

Countries

Switzerland

Contacts

Primary ContactDominik Straumann, MD
dominik.straumann@usz.ch+41442551111
Backup ContactAlexander A Tarnutzer, MD
alexander.tarnutzer@usz.ch+41442551111

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026