Skip to content

Dose Ranging Study of ALX-0171 in Infants Hospitalized for Respiratory Syncytial Virus Lower Respiratory Tract Infection

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Dose Ranging Study of ALX-0171 in Infants and Young Children Hospitalized for Respiratory Syncytial Virus Lower Respiratory Tract Infection

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02979431
Acronym
Respire
Enrollment
180
Registered
2016-12-01
Start date
2017-01-11
Completion date
2018-05-25
Last updated
2019-10-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Respiratory Syncytial Virus Lower Respiratory Tract Infection

Keywords

RSV, Lower Respiratory Tract Infection, pediattric patients

Brief summary

The primary objective is to evaluate the anti-viral effect and safety of different doses of inhaled ALX-0171 in subjects hospitalized for Respiratory Syncytial Virus Lower Respiratory Tract Infection (RSV LRTI). The secondary objective is to evaluate the clinical activity, pharmacokinetic (PK) properties, pharmacodynamic (PD) effect and immunogenicity of different doses of inhaled ALX-0171.

Detailed description

This was a Phase 2b, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, international, multicenter dose-ranging study in infants and toddlers hospitalized for RSV LRTI. The study evaluated 3 dose levels of ALX-0171 in a sequential part (safety Cohorts 1-3) followed by a parallel part (Cohort 4). An Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) was assigned to review study data and provide recommendations on proceeding to the next safety cohort and on which dose levels could be taken forward in the parallel part. Three dose levels of ALX-0171 were evaluated: * Dose 1: target dose of 3.0 mg/kg * Dose 2: target dose of 6.0 mg/kg * Dose 3: target dose of 9.0 mg/kg The study drug was administered by inhalation once daily for 3 consecutive days along with standard of care treatment, which was determined by the Investigator (or his/her designee) according to institutional practice.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALALX-0171 3.0 mg/kg
BIOLOGICALALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg
BIOLOGICALALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg
OTHERPlacebo

Sponsors

Ablynx, a Sanofi company
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
28 Days to 2 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Male or female infant or young child aged 28 days to \< 2 years with gestational age ≥ 33 weeks at screening. 2. Subject weighed between ≥ 3.0 kg and \< 15.0 kg at screening. 3. Subject is otherwise healthy but was hospitalized for and clinically diagnosed with RSV LRTI (bronchiolitis or broncho-pneumonia), i.e., showing typical clinical signs and symptoms such as tachypnea, wheezing, cough, crackles, use of accessory muscles and/or nasal flaring. 4. Subject had a positive RSV diagnostic test at screening. 5. Subject was expected to have to stay in the hospital for at least 24 hours (according to the Investigator's judgment at screening). 6. Symptoms were likely related to RSV infection (i.e., the symptoms present needed to be probably linked to the current RSV infection according to Investigator's judgment) had appeared within 4 days of screening and were not yet improving at screening and randomization. 7. Subject fulfilled at least 2 of the following RSV disease severity criteria at screening and randomization: * Inadequate oral feeding that required feeding support (i.e., nasogastric tube or intravenous \[i.v.\] line) * Inadequate oxygen saturation defined as: * Oxygen saturation (peripheral capillary oxygen saturation \[SpO2\]) ≤ 92% on room air or * Requiring oxygen supplementation to maintain oxygen saturation \> 90% with documented pre-supplementation value ≤ 92% * Signs of respiratory distress defined as: * Respiratory rate ≥ 50 per minute in infants up to 12 months of age, and ≥ 40 per minute in children above 12 months and/or * Moderate or marked respiratory muscle retractions 8. Normal psychomotor development.

Exclusion criteria

1. Subject was known to have significant comorbidities including: * Genetic disorders (e.g., trisomy 21, cystic fibrosis), * Hemodynamically significant congenital heart disease (e.g., needing corrective therapy or inotropic support), * Bronchopulmonary dysplasia, * Any hereditary or acquired metabolic (bone) diseases, * Hematologic or other malignancy. 2. Subject was known to be human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive. If the subject was \< 6 months of age, a known HIV-positivity of the mother was also exclusionary. 3. Subject was known to be immunocompromised. 4. Subject had or was suspected to have an active, clinically relevant concurrent infection (e.g., bacterial pneumonia, urinary tract infection). Concurrent acute otitis media was not exclusionary. 5. Subject had significant oral and/or maxillofacial malformations that would prevent proper positioning of the face mask. 6. Subject received invasive mechanical ventilation or non-invasive respiratory support (i.e., continuous or bilevel positive airway pressure) in the 4 weeks prior to screening. 7. During the admission, the subject was initially hospitalized in an intensive care unit (ICU) setting and/or had received invasive mechanical ventilation or non-invasive respiratory support (i.e., continuous or bilevel positive airway pressure). 8. Subject was critically ill and/or was expected to require invasive mechanical ventilation, non invasive respiratory support (i.e., continuous or bilevel positive airway pressure), or High Flow oxygen therapy (HFOT) at levels not enabling nebulization therapy according to the Investigator's judgment. High Flow oxygen, with a maximum flow of 2 L/kg/min, was permitted under the following conditions: * used as Standard of Care outside ICU setting * could be removed for study drug administration (Note: oxygen flow at 2 L/min could be provided)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time for Viral Load to Drop Below Assay Quantification Limit (BQL) (Plaque Assay Analysis)Overall Study Period (i.e., approximately 28 days)The primary endpoint for this trial was the time needed for the viral load to drop below the quantification limit (time-to-BQL) of the plaque assay in nasal mid-turbinate swab specimens. Time-to-BQL was defined as the time from the first study drug administration to the first occurrence of a value below the quantification limit (BQL), provided the next measured value was also below the limit of quantification. The time to BQL for subjects with missing data and/or who did not reach BQL during the trial were censored at the last non-missing viral load assessment. The primary endpoint was analysed using logrank test to compare time-to-BQL between each of the ALX-0171 treatment groups and the combined placebo group. The tests were performed in a sequential way to preserve the family-wise error rate at 0.05. The comparisons were performed in the following order: ALX-0171 9 mg/kg vs Placebo, followed by ALX-0171 6mg/kg vs Placebo, ALX-0171 3mg/kg vs Placebo.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Global Severity Score on Day 2 (5 Hours Post-dose)from Baseline untill Day 2 (5 hours post-dose)A formal comparison for change from Baseline in GSS to Day 2, 5 hours post-dose was performed using a contrast analysis on a longitudinal mixed model with random factor subject and fixed effects baseline value, treatment group and timepoint, including the treatment-by-timepoint interaction term. All data up to and including Day 3 were used in the longitudinal mixed model. The Kenward-Roger approximation of degrees of freedom was used. The model was fitted using an unstructured variance-covariance matrix. The individual pair-wise comparisons were reported (comparison in least square \[LS\] means for 9.0 mg/kg versus placebo; 6.0mg/kg versus placebo; 3.0 mg/kg versus placebo). Evolution over time in Global Severity Score. The maximum total score is 20 (minimum:0 to manimum:20); higher score indicates more severe disease.
Time-to-Clinical ResponseOverall Study Period (i.e., approximately 28 days)The time-to-clinical response was defined as the time between the first study drug administration and the time of achieving adequate oxygen saturation (defined as SpO2 \> 92% over a period of at least 4 hours) and adequate oral feeding (which is sufficient to maintain sufficient hydration, in the judgment of the Investigator).
Time-to-BQL (RT-qPCR)Overall Study Period (i.e., approximately 28 days)As secondary endpoint, the time-to-BQL using RT-qPCR was summarized using Kaplan Meier (KM) estimates. No p-values were calculated. For RSV load by RT-qPCR, the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) was 2.4 log10 copies/mL. The upper limit confidence interval (CI) could not be calculated; Values of the 25 percentile are reported here.
Time-to-undetectable Viral Load (Plaque Assay Analysis)Overall Study Period (i.e., approximately 28 days)The time-to-undetectability (hours), defined as the time from the first study drug administration to the first occurrence of viral titer below the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ), and target not detected provided the next measured value was also below the quantification limit and undetected, were summarized using KM estimates, based on the plaque assay. The time-to-event for subjects with missing data and/or subjects who did not reach undetectability during the trial were censored at the last non-missing viral load assessment. For RSV load by plaque assay the LLOQ was 1.7 log10 pfu/mL.
Viral Load Changes From Baseline (Plaque Assay Analysis)From Baseline until Day 14 (Follow-up) (Baseline; Day 1, 5 hours post-dose; Day 3, 2 hours post-dose; and Follow-up reported)Change from Baseline in RSV Load measured by Plaque Assay (RSV Infected Population)
Viral Load Changes From Baseline (RT-qPCR Analysis)From Baseline until Day 14 (Follow-up) (Baseline; Day 1, 5 hours post-dose; Day 3, 2 hours post-dose; and Follow-up reported)Change from Baseline in RSV Load measured by RT-qPCR (RSV Infected Population)
Viral Load Time-weighted Average Changes From Baseline (Plaque Assay Analysis)From Baseline until Day 14 (Follow-up) (Baseline, Day 3, and Follow-up reported)The time-weighted average change from baseline to Day x was defined as (AUCx - x\* viral load at baseline) /x, where AUCx denotes the AUC between baseline and Day x. For subjects who only had data up to Day t (t\<x), the endpoint was defined as (AUCt - t\*viral load at baseline) / t.
Viral Load Time-weighted Average Changes From Baseline (RT-qPCR Analysis)From Baseline until Day 14 (Follow-up) (Baseline, Day 3, and Follow-up reported)The time-weighted average change from baseline to Day x was defined as (AUCx - x\* viral load at baseline) /x, where AUCx denotes the AUC between baseline and Day x. For subjects who only had data up to Day t (t\<x), the endpoint was defined as (AUCt - t\*viral load at baseline) / t.
Immunogenicity; Number of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Anti-drug AntibodiesOverall Study Period (i.e., approximately 28 days)The number of subjects with treatment-emergent (TE) anti-drug antibodies (ADA; TE ADA) based on ADA assay by treatment group for the Safety Population. Blood samples for immunogenicity assessments were collected at Baseline and on Day 14. Immunogenicity data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
Immunogenicity; Number of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Neutralizing AntibodiesOverall Study Period (i.e., approximately 28 days)Number of subjects with treatment-emergent neutralizing antibodies (TE NAb) as detected with the competitive ligand binding NAb assay. Blood samples for immunogenicity assessments were collected at Baseline and on Day 14. Immunogenicity data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.

Countries

Belgium, Bulgaria, Chile, Colombia, Croatia, Czechia, Estonia, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Latvia, Malaysia, Philippines, Poland, Slovakia, Spain, Thailand

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

A total of 301 subjects were screened.180 subjects were randomized to receive ALX-0171 3.0 mg/kg, ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg, ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg or placebo, yielding an overall allocation ratio of 3:1 active to placebo.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Inhalation of Placebo once daily for 3 consecutive days
42
ALX-0171 3.0 mg/kg
Inhalation of ALX-0171 3.0 mg/kg once daily for 3 consecutive days
45
ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg
Inhalation of ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg once daily for 3 consecutive days
43
ALX-0171 9.0mg/kg
Inhalation of ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg once daily for 3 consecutive days
45
Total175

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdverse Event0010
Overall StudyParent/guardian withdrew consent2111
Overall StudyRandomized but received no study drug1100
Overall StudySubject left country after Day141000

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicALX-0171 3.0 mg/kgALX-0171 9.0mg/kgTotalALX-0171 6.0 mg/kgPlacebo
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
45 Participants45 Participants175 Participants43 Participants42 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Continuous6.933 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.8827
7.022 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.6884
6.896 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.9234
6.657 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.2605
6.964 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.0668
Age, Customized
Age categories
≥ 12 months
9 Participants8 Participants36 Participants9 Participants10 Participants
Age, Customized
Age categories
< 6 months
23 Participants25 Participants99 Participants27 Participants24 Participants
Age, Customized
Age categories
≥ 6 months and < 12 months
13 Participants12 Participants40 Participants7 Participants8 Participants
Age, Customized
Gestational Age
38.6 Weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.99
38.3 Weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.54
38.5 Weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.73
38.6 Weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.62
38.5 Weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.78
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
4 Participants5 Participants18 Participants5 Participants4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
41 Participants40 Participants157 Participants38 Participants38 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Global Severity Score (GSS)9.2 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2
9.4 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.41
9.2 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.23
9.3 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.09
9.1 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.44
Height65.71 centimetres
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.21
66.55 centimetres
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.58
65.85 centimetres
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.915
65.25 centimetres
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.19
65.84 centimetres
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.997
Number of days between symtpom onset and the first dose of study drug3.34 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.144
3.25 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.149
3.25 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.088
3.23 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.845
3.16 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.207
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Asian
7 Participants10 Participants27 Participants3 Participants7 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Multiple
0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Other
0 Participants3 Participants4 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
White
38 Participants32 Participants141 Participants36 Participants35 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
3 Participants1 Participants9 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Bulgaria
8 Participants11 Participants32 Participants6 Participants7 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Chile
0 Participants4 Participants4 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Colombia
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Croatia
6 Participants3 Participants23 Participants8 Participants6 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
0 Participants2 Participants6 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Hungary
6 Participants4 Participants25 Participants8 Participants7 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Israel
2 Participants1 Participants4 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Latvia
1 Participants5 Participants10 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Malaysia
4 Participants3 Participants14 Participants3 Participants4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Philippines
1 Participants3 Participants5 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
5 Participants0 Participants13 Participants3 Participants5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Slovakia
0 Participants2 Participants4 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
7 Participants1 Participants15 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Thailand
2 Participants5 Participants10 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Respiratory Distress Instrument (RDAI)8.41 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.07
8.11 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.8
8.44 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.693
8.74 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.19
8.5 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.74
Sex: Female, Male
Female
15 Participants17 Participants75 Participants19 Participants24 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
30 Participants28 Participants100 Participants24 Participants18 Participants
Weight7.188 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.2278
7.020 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.2474
7.066 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.3059
6.988 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.4084
7.065 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.4193
Weight category
≥ 10.0 kg and < 12.0 kg
4 Participants1 Participants18 Participants7 Participants6 Participants
Weight category
≥ 12.0 kg and < 15.0 kg
1 Participants2 Participants4 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Weight category
≥ 3.0 kg and < 4.0 kg
2 Participants2 Participants5 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Weight category
≥ 4.0 kg and < 5.0 kg
6 Participants7 Participants34 Participants13 Participants8 Participants
Weight category
≥ 5.0 kg and < 7.0 kg
15 Participants14 Participants55 Participants11 Participants15 Participants
Weight category
≥ 7.0 kg and < 10.0 kg
17 Participants19 Participants59 Participants12 Participants11 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 400 / 450 / 440 / 46
other
Total, other adverse events
17 / 4016 / 4516 / 4410 / 46
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 404 / 453 / 443 / 46

Outcome results

Primary

Time for Viral Load to Drop Below Assay Quantification Limit (BQL) (Plaque Assay Analysis)

The primary endpoint for this trial was the time needed for the viral load to drop below the quantification limit (time-to-BQL) of the plaque assay in nasal mid-turbinate swab specimens. Time-to-BQL was defined as the time from the first study drug administration to the first occurrence of a value below the quantification limit (BQL), provided the next measured value was also below the limit of quantification. The time to BQL for subjects with missing data and/or who did not reach BQL during the trial were censored at the last non-missing viral load assessment. The primary endpoint was analysed using logrank test to compare time-to-BQL between each of the ALX-0171 treatment groups and the combined placebo group. The tests were performed in a sequential way to preserve the family-wise error rate at 0.05. The comparisons were performed in the following order: ALX-0171 9 mg/kg vs Placebo, followed by ALX-0171 6mg/kg vs Placebo, ALX-0171 3mg/kg vs Placebo.

Time frame: Overall Study Period (i.e., approximately 28 days)

Population: modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboTime for Viral Load to Drop Below Assay Quantification Limit (BQL) (Plaque Assay Analysis)46.1 hours
ALX-0171 3.0 mg/kgTime for Viral Load to Drop Below Assay Quantification Limit (BQL) (Plaque Assay Analysis)14.2 hours
ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kgTime for Viral Load to Drop Below Assay Quantification Limit (BQL) (Plaque Assay Analysis)5.1 hours
ALX-0171 9.0mg/kgTime for Viral Load to Drop Below Assay Quantification Limit (BQL) (Plaque Assay Analysis)5.1 hours
Comparison: The primary endpoint was analysed using log-rank test to compare time-to-BQL between each of the ALX-0171 treatment groups and the combined placebo group. The tests were performed in a sequential way to preserve the family-wise error rate at 0.05.p-value: <0.001Log Rank
Comparison: The primary endpoint was analysed using log-rank test to compare time-to-BQL between each of the ALX-0171 treatment groups and the combined placebo group. The tests were performed in a sequential way to preserve the family-wise error rate at 0.05.p-value: =0.001Log Rank
Comparison: The primary endpoint was analysed using log-rank test to compare time-to-BQL between each of the ALX-0171 treatment groups and the combined placebo group. The tests were performed in a sequential way to preserve the family-wise error rate at 0.05.p-value: <0.001Log Rank
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Global Severity Score on Day 2 (5 Hours Post-dose)

A formal comparison for change from Baseline in GSS to Day 2, 5 hours post-dose was performed using a contrast analysis on a longitudinal mixed model with random factor subject and fixed effects baseline value, treatment group and timepoint, including the treatment-by-timepoint interaction term. All data up to and including Day 3 were used in the longitudinal mixed model. The Kenward-Roger approximation of degrees of freedom was used. The model was fitted using an unstructured variance-covariance matrix. The individual pair-wise comparisons were reported (comparison in least square \[LS\] means for 9.0 mg/kg versus placebo; 6.0mg/kg versus placebo; 3.0 mg/kg versus placebo). Evolution over time in Global Severity Score. The maximum total score is 20 (minimum:0 to manimum:20); higher score indicates more severe disease.

Time frame: from Baseline untill Day 2 (5 hours post-dose)

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Global Severity Score on Day 2 (5 Hours Post-dose)-3.6392 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.416
ALX-0171 3.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Global Severity Score on Day 2 (5 Hours Post-dose)-3.8548 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.4103
ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kgChange From Baseline in Global Severity Score on Day 2 (5 Hours Post-dose)-4.1296 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.4129
ALX-0171 9.0mg/kgChange From Baseline in Global Severity Score on Day 2 (5 Hours Post-dose)-4.2844 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.4099
Comparison: A comparison for change from Baseline in GSS to Day 2, 5 hours post-dose was performed using a contrast analysis on a longitudinal mixed model with random factor subject and fixed effects baseline value, treatment group and timepoint, including the treatment-by-timepoint interaction term. All data up to + including Day 3 were used in the longitudinal mixed model. The Kenward-Roger approximation of degrees of freedom was used.The model was fitted using an unstructured variance-covariance matrix.p-value: =0.271Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: =0.404Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: =0.713Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Immunogenicity; Number of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Anti-drug Antibodies

The number of subjects with treatment-emergent (TE) anti-drug antibodies (ADA; TE ADA) based on ADA assay by treatment group for the Safety Population. Blood samples for immunogenicity assessments were collected at Baseline and on Day 14. Immunogenicity data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.

Time frame: Overall Study Period (i.e., approximately 28 days)

Population: The Safety Population consisted of all subjects who received at least 1 administration of study drug. When using this population, the subjects were classified as treated (i.e., using the treatment that the subject actually received). Number of subjects with non-missing ADA results were: placebo:39; ALX-0171 3.0mg/kg:45; 6.0mg/kg:44; 9.0mg/kg:46.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboImmunogenicity; Number of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Anti-drug AntibodiesTotal TE ADA Positive10 Participants
PlaceboImmunogenicity; Number of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Anti-drug AntibodiesTotal TE ADA Negative16 Participants
PlaceboImmunogenicity; Number of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Anti-drug AntibodiesTE ADA Equivocal12 Participants
PlaceboImmunogenicity; Number of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Anti-drug AntibodiesTE ADA Inconclusive1 Participants
ALX-0171 3.0 mg/kgImmunogenicity; Number of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Anti-drug AntibodiesTotal TE ADA Negative17 Participants
ALX-0171 3.0 mg/kgImmunogenicity; Number of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Anti-drug AntibodiesTE ADA Equivocal12 Participants
ALX-0171 3.0 mg/kgImmunogenicity; Number of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Anti-drug AntibodiesTE ADA Inconclusive1 Participants
ALX-0171 3.0 mg/kgImmunogenicity; Number of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Anti-drug AntibodiesTotal TE ADA Positive15 Participants
ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kgImmunogenicity; Number of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Anti-drug AntibodiesTE ADA Equivocal13 Participants
ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kgImmunogenicity; Number of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Anti-drug AntibodiesTotal TE ADA Negative14 Participants
ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kgImmunogenicity; Number of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Anti-drug AntibodiesTE ADA Inconclusive1 Participants
ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kgImmunogenicity; Number of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Anti-drug AntibodiesTotal TE ADA Positive16 Participants
ALX-0171 9.0mg/kgImmunogenicity; Number of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Anti-drug AntibodiesTE ADA Inconclusive4 Participants
ALX-0171 9.0mg/kgImmunogenicity; Number of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Anti-drug AntibodiesTotal TE ADA Negative13 Participants
ALX-0171 9.0mg/kgImmunogenicity; Number of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Anti-drug AntibodiesTotal TE ADA Positive15 Participants
ALX-0171 9.0mg/kgImmunogenicity; Number of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Anti-drug AntibodiesTE ADA Equivocal14 Participants
Secondary

Immunogenicity; Number of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Neutralizing Antibodies

Number of subjects with treatment-emergent neutralizing antibodies (TE NAb) as detected with the competitive ligand binding NAb assay. Blood samples for immunogenicity assessments were collected at Baseline and on Day 14. Immunogenicity data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.

Time frame: Overall Study Period (i.e., approximately 28 days)

Population: The Safety Population consisted of all subjects who received at least 1 administration of study drug. When using this population, the subjects were classified as treated (i.e., using the treatment that the subject actually received).Number of subjects with non-missing NAb results were: placebo:39; ALX-0171 3.0mg/kg:45; 6.0mg/kg:44; 9.0mg/kg:46.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboImmunogenicity; Number of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Neutralizing AntibodiesPost-dose Positive2 Participants
PlaceboImmunogenicity; Number of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Neutralizing AntibodiesPost-dose Missing1 Participants
PlaceboImmunogenicity; Number of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Neutralizing AntibodiesPost-dose Negative36 Participants
ALX-0171 3.0 mg/kgImmunogenicity; Number of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Neutralizing AntibodiesPost-dose Positive11 Participants
ALX-0171 3.0 mg/kgImmunogenicity; Number of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Neutralizing AntibodiesPost-dose Missing1 Participants
ALX-0171 3.0 mg/kgImmunogenicity; Number of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Neutralizing AntibodiesPost-dose Negative33 Participants
ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kgImmunogenicity; Number of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Neutralizing AntibodiesPost-dose Negative26 Participants
ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kgImmunogenicity; Number of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Neutralizing AntibodiesPost-dose Positive18 Participants
ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kgImmunogenicity; Number of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Neutralizing AntibodiesPost-dose Missing0 Participants
ALX-0171 9.0mg/kgImmunogenicity; Number of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Neutralizing AntibodiesPost-dose Positive12 Participants
ALX-0171 9.0mg/kgImmunogenicity; Number of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Neutralizing AntibodiesPost-dose Missing3 Participants
ALX-0171 9.0mg/kgImmunogenicity; Number of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Neutralizing AntibodiesPost-dose Negative31 Participants
Secondary

Time-to-BQL (RT-qPCR)

As secondary endpoint, the time-to-BQL using RT-qPCR was summarized using Kaplan Meier (KM) estimates. No p-values were calculated. For RSV load by RT-qPCR, the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) was 2.4 log10 copies/mL. The upper limit confidence interval (CI) could not be calculated; Values of the 25 percentile are reported here.

Time frame: Overall Study Period (i.e., approximately 28 days)

Population: The modified ITT (mITT) population consisted of all randomized subjects who received at least 1 administration of study drug. When using this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e., using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboTime-to-BQL (RT-qPCR)26.7 hours
ALX-0171 3.0 mg/kgTime-to-BQL (RT-qPCR)26.8 hours
ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kgTime-to-BQL (RT-qPCR)28.9 hours
ALX-0171 9.0mg/kgTime-to-BQL (RT-qPCR)6.3 hours
Secondary

Time-to-Clinical Response

The time-to-clinical response was defined as the time between the first study drug administration and the time of achieving adequate oxygen saturation (defined as SpO2 \> 92% over a period of at least 4 hours) and adequate oral feeding (which is sufficient to maintain sufficient hydration, in the judgment of the Investigator).

Time frame: Overall Study Period (i.e., approximately 28 days)

Population: modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboTime-to-Clinical ResponseTime-to-Clinical Response47.9 hours
PlaceboTime-to-Clinical ResponseTime-to-adequate oxygen saturation53.4 hours
PlaceboTime-to-Clinical ResponseTime-to-adequate oral feeding43.7 hours
ALX-0171 3.0 mg/kgTime-to-Clinical ResponseTime-to-Clinical Response44.1 hours
ALX-0171 3.0 mg/kgTime-to-Clinical ResponseTime-to-adequate oxygen saturation38.5 hours
ALX-0171 3.0 mg/kgTime-to-Clinical ResponseTime-to-adequate oral feeding44.0 hours
ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kgTime-to-Clinical ResponseTime-to-adequate oral feeding17.6 hours
ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kgTime-to-Clinical ResponseTime-to-Clinical Response27.9 hours
ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kgTime-to-Clinical ResponseTime-to-adequate oxygen saturation29.5 hours
ALX-0171 9.0mg/kgTime-to-Clinical ResponseTime-to-Clinical Response46.3 hours
ALX-0171 9.0mg/kgTime-to-Clinical ResponseTime-to-adequate oxygen saturation46.5 hours
ALX-0171 9.0mg/kgTime-to-Clinical ResponseTime-to-adequate oral feeding23.8 hours
Secondary

Time-to-undetectable Viral Load (Plaque Assay Analysis)

The time-to-undetectability (hours), defined as the time from the first study drug administration to the first occurrence of viral titer below the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ), and target not detected provided the next measured value was also below the quantification limit and undetected, were summarized using KM estimates, based on the plaque assay. The time-to-event for subjects with missing data and/or subjects who did not reach undetectability during the trial were censored at the last non-missing viral load assessment. For RSV load by plaque assay the LLOQ was 1.7 log10 pfu/mL.

Time frame: Overall Study Period (i.e., approximately 28 days)

Population: RSV-Infected Population: A central RSV test was used for defining the RSV-Infected population. The RSV-Infected population consisted of all randomized subjects with RSV infection, as confirmed by RT-qPCR (hVIVO quantitative PCR assay) on Day 1 (pre- or post-dose), who received at least 1 administration of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboTime-to-undetectable Viral Load (Plaque Assay Analysis)95.9 hours
ALX-0171 3.0 mg/kgTime-to-undetectable Viral Load (Plaque Assay Analysis)26.3 hours
ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kgTime-to-undetectable Viral Load (Plaque Assay Analysis)21.0 hours
ALX-0171 9.0mg/kgTime-to-undetectable Viral Load (Plaque Assay Analysis)5.1 hours
Secondary

Viral Load Changes From Baseline (Plaque Assay Analysis)

Change from Baseline in RSV Load measured by Plaque Assay (RSV Infected Population)

Time frame: From Baseline until Day 14 (Follow-up) (Baseline; Day 1, 5 hours post-dose; Day 3, 2 hours post-dose; and Follow-up reported)

Population: RSV-Infected Population: A central RSV test was used for defining the RSV-Infected population. The RSV-Infected population consisted of all randomized subjects with RSV infection, as confirmed by RT-qPCR (hVIVO quantitative PCR assay) on Day 1 (pre- or post-dose), who received at least 1 administration of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboViral Load Changes From Baseline (Plaque Assay Analysis)Baseline3.494 log10 pfu/mLStandard Error 0.2396
PlaceboViral Load Changes From Baseline (Plaque Assay Analysis)Day 1, 5 hours post-dose-0.270 log10 pfu/mLStandard Error 0.1607
PlaceboViral Load Changes From Baseline (Plaque Assay Analysis)Day 3, 2 hours post-dose-1.936 log10 pfu/mLStandard Error 0.2317
PlaceboViral Load Changes From Baseline (Plaque Assay Analysis)Follow-up-2.368 log10 pfu/mLStandard Error 0.2946
ALX-0171 3.0 mg/kgViral Load Changes From Baseline (Plaque Assay Analysis)Day 1, 5 hours post-dose-2.173 log10 pfu/mLStandard Error 0.2123
ALX-0171 3.0 mg/kgViral Load Changes From Baseline (Plaque Assay Analysis)Day 3, 2 hours post-dose-2.396 log10 pfu/mLStandard Error 0.2234
ALX-0171 3.0 mg/kgViral Load Changes From Baseline (Plaque Assay Analysis)Follow-up-2.431 log10 pfu/mLStandard Error 0.2202
ALX-0171 3.0 mg/kgViral Load Changes From Baseline (Plaque Assay Analysis)Baseline3.312 log10 pfu/mLStandard Error 0.2165
ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kgViral Load Changes From Baseline (Plaque Assay Analysis)Day 3, 2 hours post-dose-2.134 log10 pfu/mLStandard Error 0.2525
ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kgViral Load Changes From Baseline (Plaque Assay Analysis)Day 1, 5 hours post-dose-2.189 log10 pfu/mLStandard Error 0.2676
ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kgViral Load Changes From Baseline (Plaque Assay Analysis)Follow-up-2.279 log10 pfu/mLStandard Error 0.2576
ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kgViral Load Changes From Baseline (Plaque Assay Analysis)Baseline3.135 log10 pfu/mLStandard Error 0.243
ALX-0171 9.0mg/kgViral Load Changes From Baseline (Plaque Assay Analysis)Follow-up-1.416 log10 pfu/mLStandard Error 0.2821
ALX-0171 9.0mg/kgViral Load Changes From Baseline (Plaque Assay Analysis)Day 1, 5 hours post-dose-1.535 log10 pfu/mLStandard Error 0.2526
ALX-0171 9.0mg/kgViral Load Changes From Baseline (Plaque Assay Analysis)Baseline2.385 log10 pfu/mLStandard Error 0.2526
ALX-0171 9.0mg/kgViral Load Changes From Baseline (Plaque Assay Analysis)Day 3, 2 hours post-dose-1.516 log10 pfu/mLStandard Error 0.2558
Secondary

Viral Load Changes From Baseline (RT-qPCR Analysis)

Change from Baseline in RSV Load measured by RT-qPCR (RSV Infected Population)

Time frame: From Baseline until Day 14 (Follow-up) (Baseline; Day 1, 5 hours post-dose; Day 3, 2 hours post-dose; and Follow-up reported)

Population: RSV-Infected Population: A central RSV test was used for defining the RSV-Infected population. The RSV-Infected population consisted of all randomized subjects with RSV infection, as confirmed by RT-qPCR (hVIVO quantitative PCR assay) on Day 1 (pre- or post-dose), who received at least 1 administration of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboViral Load Changes From Baseline (RT-qPCR Analysis)Baseline5.236 log10 copies/mLStandard Error 0.2827
PlaceboViral Load Changes From Baseline (RT-qPCR Analysis)Day 1, 5 hours post-dose-0.221 log10 copies/mLStandard Error 0.1601
PlaceboViral Load Changes From Baseline (RT-qPCR Analysis)Day 3, 2 hours post-dose-2.156 log10 copies/mLStandard Error 0.2454
PlaceboViral Load Changes From Baseline (RT-qPCR Analysis)Follow-up-3.413 log10 copies/mLStandard Error 0.3715
ALX-0171 3.0 mg/kgViral Load Changes From Baseline (RT-qPCR Analysis)Day 1, 5 hours post-dose-0.544 log10 copies/mLStandard Error 0.1286
ALX-0171 3.0 mg/kgViral Load Changes From Baseline (RT-qPCR Analysis)Day 3, 2 hours post-dose-2.589 log10 copies/mLStandard Error 0.2138
ALX-0171 3.0 mg/kgViral Load Changes From Baseline (RT-qPCR Analysis)Follow-up-3.665 log10 copies/mLStandard Error 0.2203
ALX-0171 3.0 mg/kgViral Load Changes From Baseline (RT-qPCR Analysis)Baseline4.966 log10 copies/mLStandard Error 0.2095
ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kgViral Load Changes From Baseline (RT-qPCR Analysis)Day 3, 2 hours post-dose-2.310 log10 copies/mLStandard Error 0.2797
ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kgViral Load Changes From Baseline (RT-qPCR Analysis)Day 1, 5 hours post-dose-0.241 log10 copies/mLStandard Error 0.2031
ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kgViral Load Changes From Baseline (RT-qPCR Analysis)Follow-up-3.972 log10 copies/mLStandard Error 0.2032
ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kgViral Load Changes From Baseline (RT-qPCR Analysis)Baseline5.232 log10 copies/mLStandard Error 0.1899
ALX-0171 9.0mg/kgViral Load Changes From Baseline (RT-qPCR Analysis)Follow-up-3.033 log10 copies/mLStandard Error 0.3252
ALX-0171 9.0mg/kgViral Load Changes From Baseline (RT-qPCR Analysis)Day 1, 5 hours post-dose-0.449 log10 copies/mLStandard Error 0.1883
ALX-0171 9.0mg/kgViral Load Changes From Baseline (RT-qPCR Analysis)Baseline4.525 log10 copies/mLStandard Error 0.2937
ALX-0171 9.0mg/kgViral Load Changes From Baseline (RT-qPCR Analysis)Day 3, 2 hours post-dose-2.025 log10 copies/mLStandard Error 0.284
Secondary

Viral Load Time-weighted Average Changes From Baseline (Plaque Assay Analysis)

The time-weighted average change from baseline to Day x was defined as (AUCx - x\* viral load at baseline) /x, where AUCx denotes the AUC between baseline and Day x. For subjects who only had data up to Day t (t\<x), the endpoint was defined as (AUCt - t\*viral load at baseline) / t.

Time frame: From Baseline until Day 14 (Follow-up) (Baseline, Day 3, and Follow-up reported)

Population: RSV-Infected Population: A central RSV test was used for defining the RSV-Infected population. The RSV-Infected population consisted of all randomized subjects with RSV infection, as confirmed by RT-qPCR (hVIVO quantitative PCR assay) on Day 1 (pre- or post-dose), who received at least 1 administration of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboViral Load Time-weighted Average Changes From Baseline (Plaque Assay Analysis)Baseline3.494 log10 pfu/mLStandard Error 0.2396
PlaceboViral Load Time-weighted Average Changes From Baseline (Plaque Assay Analysis)Follow-Up-2.096 log10 pfu/mLStandard Error 0.2443
PlaceboViral Load Time-weighted Average Changes From Baseline (Plaque Assay Analysis)Day 3-1.014 log10 pfu/mLStandard Error 0.154
ALX-0171 3.0 mg/kgViral Load Time-weighted Average Changes From Baseline (Plaque Assay Analysis)Baseline3.312 log10 pfu/mLStandard Error 0.2165
ALX-0171 3.0 mg/kgViral Load Time-weighted Average Changes From Baseline (Plaque Assay Analysis)Follow-Up-2.295 log10 pfu/mLStandard Error 0.2116
ALX-0171 3.0 mg/kgViral Load Time-weighted Average Changes From Baseline (Plaque Assay Analysis)Day 3-1.924 log10 pfu/mLStandard Error 0.1659
ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kgViral Load Time-weighted Average Changes From Baseline (Plaque Assay Analysis)Day 3-1.804 log10 pfu/mLStandard Error 0.2098
ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kgViral Load Time-weighted Average Changes From Baseline (Plaque Assay Analysis)Baseline3.135 log10 pfu/mLStandard Error 0.243
ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kgViral Load Time-weighted Average Changes From Baseline (Plaque Assay Analysis)Follow-Up-2.028 log10 pfu/mLStandard Error 0.2217
ALX-0171 9.0mg/kgViral Load Time-weighted Average Changes From Baseline (Plaque Assay Analysis)Baseline2.385 log10 pfu/mLStandard Error 0.2526
ALX-0171 9.0mg/kgViral Load Time-weighted Average Changes From Baseline (Plaque Assay Analysis)Follow-Up-1.419 log10 pfu/mLStandard Error 0.2488
ALX-0171 9.0mg/kgViral Load Time-weighted Average Changes From Baseline (Plaque Assay Analysis)Day 3-1.330 log10 pfu/mLStandard Error 0.2434
Secondary

Viral Load Time-weighted Average Changes From Baseline (RT-qPCR Analysis)

The time-weighted average change from baseline to Day x was defined as (AUCx - x\* viral load at baseline) /x, where AUCx denotes the AUC between baseline and Day x. For subjects who only had data up to Day t (t\<x), the endpoint was defined as (AUCt - t\*viral load at baseline) / t.

Time frame: From Baseline until Day 14 (Follow-up) (Baseline, Day 3, and Follow-up reported)

Population: RSV-Infected Population: A central RSV test was used for defining the RSV-Infected population. The RSV-Infected population consisted of all randomized subjects with RSV infection, as confirmed by RT-qPCR (hVIVO quantitative PCR assay) on Day 1 (pre- or post-dose), who received at least 1 administration of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboViral Load Time-weighted Average Changes From Baseline (RT-qPCR Analysis)Baseline5.236 log10 copies/mLStandard Error 0.2827
PlaceboViral Load Time-weighted Average Changes From Baseline (RT-qPCR Analysis)Follow-up-2.684 log10 copies/mLStandard Error 0.2263
PlaceboViral Load Time-weighted Average Changes From Baseline (RT-qPCR Analysis)Day 3-0.933 log10 copies/mLStandard Error 0.1421
ALX-0171 3.0 mg/kgViral Load Time-weighted Average Changes From Baseline (RT-qPCR Analysis)Baseline4.966 log10 copies/mLStandard Error 0.2095
ALX-0171 3.0 mg/kgViral Load Time-weighted Average Changes From Baseline (RT-qPCR Analysis)Follow-up-2.828 log10 copies/mLStandard Error 0.2099
ALX-0171 3.0 mg/kgViral Load Time-weighted Average Changes From Baseline (RT-qPCR Analysis)Day 3-1.209 log10 copies/mLStandard Error 0.1301
ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kgViral Load Time-weighted Average Changes From Baseline (RT-qPCR Analysis)Day 3-1.113 log10 copies/mLStandard Error 0.1932
ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kgViral Load Time-weighted Average Changes From Baseline (RT-qPCR Analysis)Baseline5.232 log10 copies/mLStandard Error 0.1899
ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kgViral Load Time-weighted Average Changes From Baseline (RT-qPCR Analysis)Follow-up-2.756 log10 copies/mLStandard Error 0.1831
ALX-0171 9.0mg/kgViral Load Time-weighted Average Changes From Baseline (RT-qPCR Analysis)Baseline4.525 log10 copies/mLStandard Error 0.2937
ALX-0171 9.0mg/kgViral Load Time-weighted Average Changes From Baseline (RT-qPCR Analysis)Follow-up-2.292 log10 copies/mLStandard Error 0.2581
ALX-0171 9.0mg/kgViral Load Time-weighted Average Changes From Baseline (RT-qPCR Analysis)Day 3-0.842 log10 copies/mLStandard Error 0.1842

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026