Skip to content

The Comparison of Core Stabilization Exercise With Scientific Exercise Approach to Scoliosis in Idiopathic Scoliosis

Core Stabilization Exercise Versus Scientific Exercises Approach to Scoliosis in the Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Randomized Single Blind Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02978820
Enrollment
30
Registered
2016-12-01
Start date
2015-11-30
Completion date
2016-11-30
Last updated
2016-12-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis, Scoliosis

Keywords

scientific exercise approach to scoliosis, core stabilization training, bracing, adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Brief summary

Scoliosis specific exercises have been shown to improve curve progression but there have been few studies that compare the different exercise approaches in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). The objective of this study was to compare the effects of Core stabilization (CS) exercises with Scientific Exercises Approach to Scoliosis (SEAS exercises) in addition to brace wearing in patients with AIS. It is important to compare different exercise methods on different aspects of scoliotic deformity, such as curve progression, angle of trunk rotation, body symmetry, cosmetic trunk deformity, satisfaction with treatment and quality of life.

Detailed description

The aim of this study was to investigate whether adolescent with idiopathic scoliosis receiving scoliosis specific exercise approach, such as SEAS exercises, in accordance with the bracing approach for moderate curves would have greater improvement in curve progression, trunk deformity, body symmetry and quality of life than adolescent receiving exercise therapy based on the general core stabilization approach with similar intensity. Thirty female patients with AIS aged 12 to16 years, who have moderate curves (20 to 45 degree) randomly divided into two groups. One group received CS exercise, while other received SEAS exercise for forty-min once weekly for four months. Both groups underwent full-time bracing (23 hours per day) intervention. Outcome was based on Cobb angle, angle of trunk rotation, body symmetry (Posterior Trunk Symmetry Index), cosmetic trunk deformity (Walter Reed Visual Assessment Scale) and quality of life (Scoliosis Research Society - 22 Questionnaire) measured at baseline and after intervention period. Results were analyzed using the paired sample t-test to compare repeated measurements and independent sample t-test to compare the groups.

Interventions

OTHERSEAS exercise

Patient were referred by medical doctor with a prescription of brace and exercise training for their moderate scoliotic curves. Patients were randomly divided into two groups. The SEAS group received SEAS exercises one times in a week for four months. In addition patients in SEAS groups were wearing spinal brace for their scoliosis in this period

OTHERCS exercise

Patient were referred by medical doctor with a prescription of brace and exercise training for their moderate scoliotic curves. Patients were randomly divided into two groups. The CS group received core stabilization exercise training one times in a week for four months. In addition patients in SEAS groups were wearing spinal brace for their scoliosis in this period

Sponsors

Hacettepe University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
12 Years to 16 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* The patients included in the current study were consecutive adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis seen in our department who were referred to receive both brace and exercise treatment conservatively. Additional inclusion criteria included the following: female gender; at least age 12 years; primary curve magnitude between 20 and 45 degrees of Cobb angle; double curve (right thoracic-left lumbar) or single thoracolumbar curve having an apex in the main thoracic region; Risser 2-3 and no previous treatment.

Exclusion criteria

*

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Cobb angleChange from baseline Cobb angle at 4 monthsCobb angle is considered a gold standard to determine the magnitude of spinal curve on frontal plan radiograph

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Chance in Posterior trunk symmetry indexChange from baseline trunk symmetry at 4 monthsPosterior trunk symmetry index includes the sensitive assessment of the frontal plane asymmetry of trunk deformity as a two-dimensional surface topographic method in scoliosis. The index based on assessing trunk asymmetry with regard to C7 plumb line, shoulder and hip asymmetry based on back surface photograph of patient.
Change in Walter reed visual assessment scaleChange from baseline cosmetic trunk deformity at 4 monthsWalter reed visual assessment scale assesses patient's cosmetic trunk deformity with set of figures representing seven visible aspects of spinal deformity: Item 1, spinal deformity; item 2, rib prominence; item 3, lumbar prominence; item 4, thoracic deformity; item 5, trunk imbalance; item 6, shoulder asymmetry; and item 7, scapular asymmetry
Change in Scoliosis Research Society 22 QuestionnaireChange from baseline quality of life at 4 monthsScoliosis Research Society 22 Questionnaire is widely used to evaluate the efficacy of several treatment regimens for idiopathic scoliosis from the patient's perception of his or her condition. The questionnaire consists of 22 items exploring 5 domains related to psychophysical wellbeing: function/activity level, pain, mental health, self-image and treatment satisfaction.
Change in Angle of trunk rotationChange from baseline angle of trunk rotation at 4 monthsAngle of Trunk rotation is assessed with scoliometer in forward bending test

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026