Skip to content

Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients

Effect of a Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program on Skeletal Muscle Mass, Pulmonary Function, Inflammatory Response and Overall Survival on Patients Diagnosed With Non-small-cell Advanced Cancer

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02978521
Enrollment
94
Registered
2016-12-01
Start date
2016-08-05
Completion date
2027-12-12
Last updated
2026-04-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pulmonary Rehabilitation, Quality of Life, Sarcopenia

Brief summary

Lung cancer (LC) is usually diagnosed in advanced stages and continues to be the leading cause of cancer related deaths worldwide. Cancer cachexia are frequent among patients with LC affecting up to 80% of patients with advanced stage disease, and it has been related with higher risk of complications, length of hospital stay, and worst overall survival. During cancer cachexia, both muscle and fat mass can be wasted, however, the loss of muscle mass has been associated to higher treatment related toxicity, loss of functional status, shorter progression free survival and overall survival in different types of cancer under various treatments. Hence, preservation of muscle mass and function should be an important focus of the multidisciplinary treatment of patients with LC. Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) has been known to improve pulmonary function, reduce fatigue and improve exercise tolerance in patients with LC undergoing curative surgery. However, few studies have focused on the efficacy of PR on patients with advanced cancer undergoing palliative care with chemotherapy or targeted therapies.

Detailed description

The main objective of this study is to determine the effects of a pulmonary rehabilitation program on the pulmonary function and muscle mass. Moreover, the effects on exercise tolerance, inflammatory response, quality of live and overall survival will be explored. Patients will be randomized into intervention group (IG) or control group (CG). Patients in the IG will be scheduled to receive 12 sessions of PR over a period of 4-6 weeks (2-3 session/week). CG will receive information and recommendations on physical activity. Both groups will receive nutritional assessment and intervention as needed.

Interventions

OTHERPulmonary rehabilitation

Session 1: ventilatory pattern training Session 2,3: ventilatory pattern + respiratory training with incentive spirometer Session 4-6: Sessions 1-3 training continues + training with Positive expiratory pressure device (Threshold PEP) and breathing trainer Threshold IMT) Sessions 7-9: Continue respiratory training + resistance training with RECK MOTOmed2 ergometer at a 30% intensity until 60% is achieved Session 10-12: Continue with previous training + treadmill training

Sponsors

Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia de Mexico
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Confirmed diagnosis of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer * Good performance status (ECOG 0-1) * Life expectancy \>12 weeks * Eligible to receive treatment with chemotherapy or tyrosinkinase inhibitors * Recent electrocardiogram without evidence of arrythmia

Exclusion criteria

* Symptomatic brain metastasis * Uncontrolled pain (Visual Analog Scale \>5) * Uncontrolled hypertension (\>140/100mmHg) * Practice of regular moderate to intense physical activity at least 3 day/week * Not residents of Mexico City or unable to attend to therapy sessions

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pulmonary functionAfter 12 sessions (6 weeks)Pulmonary function Maximal expiratory and inspiratory pressure units: cm H2O (measured with Jaeger spirometer)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Muscle massAfter 12 sessions (6 weeks)Muscle mass measured by body composition analysis of CT images using lumbar vertebra 3 (L3)
Inflammatory responseAfter 12 sessions (6 weeks)Quantification of: Interleukin (IL)-8, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) (Human Inflammatory Cytokine Kit Becton, Dickinson and Company (BD)™ Cytometric Bead Array) Units: pg/ml
Exercise toleranceAfter 12 sessions (6 weeks)6 minute walk test
Quality of Life in lung cancerthe European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire is applied before and after a follow-up after 12 sessions (6 weeks).To determine the Quality of Life (QoL) of patients with lung cancer and its association with rehabilitation. Application of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire, the EORTC QLQ-C30. It is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These include five functional scales, three symptom scales, a global health status / QoL scale, and six single items. Each of the multi-item scales includes a different set of items - no item occurs in more than one scale. It ranges in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level.
Lung Cancer Quality of LifeAfter 12 sessions (6 weeks)Application of the "european organization for research and treatment of cancer quality of life questionnaire (QLQ)LC-13"
Anxiety and DepressionAfter 12 sessions (6 weeks)Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS

Countries

Mexico

Contacts

CONTACTOscar Arrieta
01 55 56280400
CONTACTDiana Flores
01 55 56280400
STUDY_DIRECTOROscar Arrieta

Head of Thoracic Oncology Unit

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 9, 2026