Skip to content

HFNC Alone or Associated With NIV for Immunocompromised Patients Admitted to ICU for Acute Respiratory Failure

High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy (HFNC) Alone or Associated With Noninvasive Ventilation (NIV) for Immunocompromised Patients Admitted to Intensive Care Unit for Acute Respiratory Failure : FLORALI-Immunodéprimés

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02978300
Acronym
FLORALI-IM
Enrollment
300
Registered
2016-11-30
Start date
2017-01-21
Completion date
2019-08-30
Last updated
2019-09-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Respiratory Failure, Immunosuppression

Brief summary

Acute respiratory failure is the leading cause of ICU admission of immunocompromized patients. In this subgroup of patients, the need for intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation occurs in about 50% of cases and is associated with very a high mortality rate, reaching 70% of cases. Therefore, noninvasive oxygenation strategies have been developed to avoid intubation. More than 15 years ago, 2 trials have suggested that NIV could decrease intubation and mortality rates of immunocompromized patients as compared to standard oxygen through a mask. However these results have not been confirmed in a recent large trial. HFNC is a recent and well-tolerated oxygenation technique. In a recent trial, HFNC alone could decrease mortality and intubation rates in patients with ARF as compared to NIV. Similar findings have been reported in a post-hoc analysis on immunocompromized patients excluding those with profound neutropenia. Likewise in a retrospective monocentric cohort of immunocompromized patients, we reported better outcomes with HFNC than with NIV.

Interventions

DEVICENIV/HFNC

Pressure support level to achieve an expired tidal volume between 6 and 8 ml/kg of predicted body weight Positive end expiratory pressure from 5 to 10 cm H2O, aiming a PEEP level ≥ 8 cm H2O FiO2 set to achieve SpO2 ≥ 92%

DEVICEHFNC

Gas flow of 60 l/min and FiO2 set to achieve SpO2 ≥ 92%

Sponsors

Poitiers University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥ 18 * Admission to ICU for acute respiratory failure defined by all of the following criteria: * Dyspnea at rest with RR ≥ 25 breaths/min * PaCO2 ≤ 50 mm Hg * PaO2/FiO2 ≤ 300 mm Hg under oxygen ≥ 10 l/min through a mask or HFNC or NIV (for patients under oxygen FiO2 will be calculated using the following formula: oxygen flow in liters per minute x 3 + 21) * Immunosuppresion defined by 1 of the following criteria: * Hematological malignancy (active or remitting \< 5 years) * Allogenic stem cell transplantation \< 5 years * Solid cancer (active) * Leucopenia \< 1 G/l or neutropenia ≤ 0.5 G/l after chemotherapy * Solid organ transplantation * AIDS (not only HIV) * Treatment with immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory drugs * Systemic steroids ≥ 0.5 mg/kg/d of prednisone-equivalent for ≥ 3 weeks * Non opposition to participate obtained from the patient or their legally acceptable representative.

Exclusion criteria

* Contraindication of NIV (patient refusal, cardiac arrest, coma, not drained pneumothorax, unresolving vomiting, upper airways obstruction, hematemesis, severe facial trauma) * Chronic respiratory failure with altered pulmonary function tests * Overt cardiogenic pulmonary edema * Urgent need for intubation * Severe shock (vasopressors \> 0.3 µg/kg/min to maintain SAP \> 90 mm Hg) * Impaired consciousness (Glasgow coma scale score ≤ 12) or agitation * Surgery under general anesthesia \< 7 days * Previously included in the trial * Do-not-intubate order * Pregnancy or breastfeeding * Persons benefiting from enhanced protection, namely minors, persons deprived of their liberty by a judicial or administrative decision, persons staying in a health or social institution, adults under legal protection

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
mortality ratesday 28Mortality rates at day 28 after randomization will be compared between the 2 groups

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 20, 2026