Skip to content

Positive End-expiratory Pressure-induced Increase in Central Venous Pressure as a Predictor of Fluid Responsiveness in Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Surgery

Comparison of Positive End-expiratory Pressure-induced Increase in Central Venous Pressure and Stroke Volume Variation to Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Surgery: A Prospective Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02977143
Enrollment
50
Registered
2016-11-30
Start date
2016-11-30
Completion date
2017-03-31
Last updated
2018-04-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prostatic Neoplasm, Urinary Bladder Neoplasm

Keywords

fluid responsiveness, central venous pressure, positive end-expiratory pressure, robot surgery

Brief summary

In urologic robotic surgery with steep Trendelenburg position, maintenance of cardiac preload and cardiac output is important for clinical prognosis. Previous studies reported the positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP)-induced increase in central venous pressure (CVP) could be a accurate predictor of fluid responsiveness in cardiac surgical patients. The authors attempt to evaluate the predictability of PEEP-induced increase in CVP as well as stroke volume variation in urologic robotic surgery with Steep Trendelenburg position.

Detailed description

In urologic robotic surgery with steep Trendelenburg position, maintenance of cardiac preload and cardiac output is important for clinical prognosis. As a preload index, the predictability of central venous pressure, pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variations may be impaired due to the impaired hemodynamics that result from the effect of increased abdominal pressure and decreased venous return. Previous studies reported the positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP)-induced increase in central venous pressure (CVP) could be a accurate predictor of fluid responsiveness in cardiac surgical patients. Therefore, the authors attempt to evaluate the predictability of PEEP-induced increase in CVP as well as stroke volume variation in urologic robotic surgery with Steep Trendelenburg position.

Interventions

PROCEDUREFluid loading of volulyte 300 ml

Administration of volulyte 300 ml and measurement of increase in cardiac index

Sponsors

Seoul National University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patient undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy or cystectomy. * American Society of Anesthesiologist Physical Status Classification of 1, 2 or 3.

Exclusion criteria

* Medical history of arrhythmia or new-onset arrhythmia after anesthesia induction. * Valvular or ischemic heart disease or left ventricular ejection fraction less than 40%. * Any significant pulmonary disease or history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease * End-stage renal disease or preoperative creatinine \> 1.4 mg/dl

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
fluid responsiveness5 minutes after administration of 300 ml volulytefluid responsiveness is determined when increase in cardiac index is more than 10%

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
cardiac indexone hour after the initiation of pneumoperitoneumT1: baseline measurement of cardiac index with positive end-expiratory pressure of zero
stroke volume variationone hour after the initiation of pneumoperitoneumT1: baseline measurement of stroke volume variation with positive end-expiratory pressure of zero
central venous pressureone hour after the initiation of pneumoperitoneumT1: baseline measurement of central venous pressure with positive end-expiratory pressure of zero
arterial oxygen partial pressure (mmHg)5 minutes after anesthesia inductionarterial blood gas analysis
arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure (mmHg)5 minutes after anesthesia inductionarterial blood gas analysis
abdominal pressureone hour after the initiation of pneumoperitoneumT1: baseline measurement of abdominal pressure with positive end-expiratory pressure of zero

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026