Skip to content

To Assess the Safety, Efficacy and Tolerability of CKD-519, Administered With HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitors

Multicenter, Parallel-group, Double-blind, Randomized, Active-controlled, Dose-ranging Study to Assess the Safety, Efficacy, and Tolerability of CKD-519, Administered With HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitors, in Subjects With Dyslipidemia

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02977065
Enrollment
62
Registered
2016-11-30
Start date
2017-03-23
Completion date
2018-01-30
Last updated
2018-11-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dyslipidemias

Keywords

Dyslipidemia, CETP Inhibitors, Hyperlipidemia

Brief summary

A multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group, active-controlled, dose-ranging study to assess the safety and efficacy of the novel cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitor CKD-519 in combination with atorvastatin or rosuvastatin in subjects with dyslipidemia.

Detailed description

The purpose of this study is to assess the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of CKD-519, administered with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors in subjects with dyslipidemia

Interventions

DRUGAtorvastatin 20mg

PO daily for 4weeks

DRUGAtorvastatin 20 mg + CKD-519 50 mg

PO daily for 4weeks

DRUGAtorvastatin 20 mg + CKD-519 100 mg

PO daily for 4weeks

DRUGAtorvastatin 20 mg + CKD-519 200 mg

PO daily for 4weeks

PO daily for 4weeks

DRUGRosuvastatin 10 mg + CKD-519 100 mg

PO daily for 4weeks

Sponsors

Chong Kun Dang Pharmaceutical
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age 18 to 80 years. 2. Dyslipidemia with LDL-C * At screening if untreated: 100 to 190 mg/dL * At screening if treated with statins or other lipid-lowering drugs: 100 to 170 mg/dL * At start of double-blind treatment: 100 to 190 mg/dL. 3. HDL-C \<45 mg/dL (males) or \<50 mg/dL (females). 4. Fasting TG \<400 mg/dL. 5. Presence of the following conditions is permitted but not mandatory, at the discretion of the investigator: * Treated and stable coronary heart disease without acute events in the past 3 months and stable, state-of-the-art medication. * Treated and stable carotid artery disease or peripheral arterial disease on stable, standard medication for the past 3 months * Treated and stable Type 2 diabetes mellitus with glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) ≤9.5%. 6. Willing and able to sign the informed consent form (ICF).

Exclusion criteria

1. Chronic heart failure as defined by New York Heart Association classes III and IV. 2. Uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmias. 3. Myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass graft, or unstable angina in past 3 months before Visit 1. 4. Stroke or transient ischemic attack within 3 months before Visit 1. 5. Uncontrolled hypertension. 6. Clinically significant laboratory abnormalities * Aspartate aminotransferase or alanine aminotransferase \>2 times upper limit of normal range * Bilirubin \>1.5 times upper limit of normal range * Creatine kinase \>2 times upper limit of normal range. 7. Any active nephropathy or estimated glomerular filtration rate \<60 mL/min/1.73m2 or on kidney dialysis. 8. Poorly controlled (thyroid-stimulating hormone \[TSH\] \>2 times upper limit of normal) hyperthyroidism. 9. Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. 10. Intolerance or hypersensitivity to atorvastatin or rosuvastatin. 11. Prior treatment with any CETP inhibitor. 12. Positive for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive, hepatitis B or hepatitis C.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Percentage change from baseline (Visit 3) in LDL-Cat Week 4

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Percentage change from baseline in concentration of HDL particles (HDL-P)at Weeks 2 and 4
Change from baseline in size of HDL particles (HDL-P)at Weeks 2 and 4
Percentage change from baseline in LDL-Cat Week 2
Change in concentration from baseline in LDL-Cat Weeks 2 and 4
Change in concentration from baseline in HDL-Cat Weeks 2 and 4
Percentage change from baseline in total cholesterol, TG, and non-HDL-Cat Weeks 2 and 4
Percentage change from baseline in HDL-Cat Weeks 2 and Week 4
Percentage change from baseline in apolipoprotein B (Apo B), apolipoprotein A1 (Apo A1), and apolipoprotein E (Apo E)at Weeks 2 and 4
Change in concentration from baseline in Apo B, Apo A1, and Apo Eat Weeks 2 and 4
Percentage change from baseline in lipoprotein(a) (Lp-a)at Weeks 2 and 4
Change in concentration from baseline in Lp-aat Weeks 2 and 4
Change in concentration from baseline in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein atat Weeks 2 and 4
Change in concentration from baseline in total cholesterol, TG, and non-HDL-Cat Weeks 2 and 4

Countries

Australia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026