Skip to content

Evaluation of a New Sequencing Strategy in Autoinflammatory Siseases (BIOSAID)

Evaluation of a New Sequencing Strategy in Autoinflammatory Diseases Diagnostic Value and Therapeutic Orientation

Status
Terminated
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02976948
Acronym
BIOSAID
Enrollment
299
Registered
2016-11-30
Start date
2015-07-31
Completion date
2020-03-31
Last updated
2021-12-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Systemic Autoinflammatory Diseases (SAID)

Brief summary

Main objective: To compare the efficacy of a new strategy of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) versus a classical Sanger strategy, for the diagnosis of patients referred to the laboratory for suspected systemic autoinflammatory diseases (SAID). Secondary objectives: * Compare after 6 months the impact of these strategies on the establishment of an effective treatment SAID following genetic result. * Compare the distribution of different forms of SAID found with each genetic diagnostic strategies (NGS vs classic method).

Detailed description

Systemic autoinflammatory diseases (SAID) include a broad spectrum of pathologies of innate immunity. In recent years, numerous publications have shown the involvement of new genes in these diseases, highlighting new pathophysiological pathways (inflammasome, NFkB: nuclear factor-kappa B, interferon) and new targeted therapies (biotherapy advantageously replacing non-specific anti-inflammatory drugs). Current laboratory diagnostic strategy is based on the Sanger method, the gold standard to date, allowing the sequential analysis of some genes (usually between 1 and 4). The nonspecific nature of the clinical presentation of these diseases, the increasing number of genes involved and the low diagnostic yield obtained, make it essential to develop a new strategy, more efficient, so that the patient can benefit as soon as possible treatment suited to his pathology as soon as the gene involved is identified. The investigator had developed and validated in our genetic laboratories a new method based on the Next Generation Sequencing (NGS). A panel of 32 known or candidate SAID genes, which can be simultaneously analyzed within a time compatible with the diagnosis. The investigator wishes to highlight the benefits of this new strategy.

Interventions

OTHERNo intervention

Sponsors

University Hospital, Montpellier
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
3 Months to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patients with prerequisites established jointly by the reference centers: * At least 3 unexplained inflammatory access * Elevated C Reactive Protein * Age of symtoms less than 30 years and validated by a physician CeréMAI (Centre de référence des maladies autoinflamatoires)

Exclusion criteria

* Other inflammatory disease: * intercurrent infection * cancer * autoimmune disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Number of genetically ascertained patients using Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) vs SangerAt time of report issue up to two years

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Date of introduction of relevant treatment6 months after report issue

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026