Skip to content

A Collaborative Palliative and Oncology Care Model for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Randomized Trial of a Collaborative Palliative and Oncology Care Model for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02975869
Enrollment
160
Registered
2016-11-29
Start date
2017-01-01
Completion date
2026-01-01
Last updated
2026-03-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Keywords

Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Brief summary

This research study is evaluating the impact a collaborative palliative care and oncology team will have on the quality of life, symptoms, mood, and end of life outcomes of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Palliative care is a medical specialty focused on lessening (or "palliating") symptoms and assisting in coping with serious illness.

Detailed description

The main purpose of this study is to compare two types of care - standard leukemia oncology care and standard leukemia oncology care with collaborative involvement of palliative care clinicians to see which is better for improving the experience of patients and families with AML undergoing treatment. The investigators aim to find out whether introducing patients and families undergoing AML treatment to the palliative care team that specializes in symptom management can improve the physical and psychological symptoms that patients and families experience during their hospitalizations for their leukemia care as well as enhance the quality of patients' end of life care.

Interventions

OTHERPalliative Care

Sponsors

Massachusetts General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER
Duke University
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Hospitalized patients with high-risk AML, defined as: * Newly diagnosed patients with AML ≥ 60 years of age * Newly diagnosed AML with antecedent hematologic disorder * Newly diagnosed therapy-related AML * Relapsed AML * Primary refractory AML

Exclusion criteria

* Patients already receiving palliative care * Major psychiatric illness or comorbid conditions prohibiting compliance with study procedures. * A diagnosis of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APML)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparison of Patients' quality of life as measured by (FACT-Leukemia) Score at Week-2 Between Study Arms2 weeksWe will compare patients' FACT-Leukemia scores at week-2 adjusting for baseline scores. FACT-Leukemia ranges from 0-176 with higher scores indicating better quality of life.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Compare patient quality of life longitudinally using FACT-Leukemia Scores longitudinally Between Study Arms.up to 6 monthsWe will compare FACT-leukemia scores longitudinally between study arm. FACT-Leukemia ranges from 0-176 with higher scores indicating better quality of life.
Compare psychological distress (as measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) between Study Armsup to 6 monthsWe will compare patients' psychological distress using the HADS between study arms at week-2 and longitudinally between study arms. The HADS consistent of two subscales assessing anxiety and depression symptoms with scores ranging from 0-21 with higher scores indicating worse psychological distress.
Compare Symptom Burden (as per ESAS) Between Study Arms.up to 6 monthsWe will compare patients' symptom burden using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) between the two arms at week-2 and longitudinally. The ESAS ranges from 0-100 with higher scores indicating worse symptom burden.
Compare Patient-Reported PTSD (as per PTSD-Checklist) between study armsup to 6 monthsWe will compare PTSD symptoms as measured by the PTSD-Checklist (PCL) between the two groups at week-2 and longitudinally. PCL scores range from 17-85 with higher scores indicating worse PTSD symptoms
Compare Patient-Report Of Discussion EOL Care Preferences Between Study Armsup to 6 monthsWe will compare patient-reported discussing their EOL care preferences between the two groups
Compare Rates Of Chemotherapy Administration Within 30 Days Of Death Between The Two Study Armsup to 6 monthsto compare rates of chemotherapy administration near the end of life between the two arms
Compare Rates Of Hospitalizations Within 7 Days Of Death Between The Study Armsup to 6 monthsto compare rates of hospitalizations within the last week of life between the study arms
Compare Rates Of Hospice Utilization And Length-Of-Stay In Hospice At The EOL Between The Study Arms.up to 6 monthsto compare rates of hospice utilization and length-of-stay in hospice at the end of life between the two study arms

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORAreej El-Jawahri, MD

Massachusetts General Hospital

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 4, 2026